united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Uncle Zook -- busted! https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=898 |
Page 2 of 9 |
Author: | UncleZook [ Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:37 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Uncle Zook -- busted! | |||||||||
Weak again. Again, you're letting your penchant for innuendo lead you by the nose, Chico. Pax Chico |
Author: | UncleZook [ Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:55 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Uncle Zook -- busted! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feathers don't make the paddle grade, Chico. They tickle, yes. I'm tickled.
Weak. The assumption Chico makes is that Gordon Duff is required to expose Assange or Wikileaks. On the contrary, the scam artist and the scam were both exposed long ago by yours truly, on Avalon and at Nexus, supported in large part by the research of Webster Tarpley. Now go dig up some dirt on Tarpley, for innuendo and dirt is your forte ... and attacking messengers while decrying said practice, is your trademark. In any event, the links you provide say that Duff spreads disinformation 40% of the time. Being a graduate of grade school mathematics, you shouldn't need a calculator to figure out the percentage of time he is putting out information. Since his expose on Assange corroborates with others' findings, we can assume that Duff on Assange ... is of the 60% informational variety. Give it up, Chico. Pax Chico, Man Of La Mancha ... Whoa, Rocinante!! |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:40 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Uncle Zook -- busted! | |||||||||
If it's so WEAK, perhaps you would like to link to this page over at Nexus and United Spectrum. That would be impressive. We can let the public judge how weak my arguments are and see if you will be exonerated. Like that would ever happen... You are simply busted. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Uncle Zook -- busted! |
Hindsight is 20/20. If you look back at Zook's posts, you will be amazed at how many of them match the tell-tale characteristics of the troll, shill, or flamer, as I first pointed out here. The information I linked to in that post is a real eye-opener with respect to Zook's behavior at UP. This checklist may also be very applicable. |
Author: | andywight [ Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:55 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Uncle Zook -- busted! | |||||||||
Just out of curiosity UncleZook, how do your employers pay you for you gatekeeping? My guess is "per word", which would explain your unnecessary longs posts which generally contain nothing of any substance, and are never backed up with any tangible evidence! |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Uncle Zook -- busted! |
Continuing the evidence for UncleZook's gatekeeping: Exhibit G. Zook condemns certain UP members (those critical of his posts) of trivial "crimes", insisting these members be removed from the forum, then, when he thinks everyone has forgotten, he copies the same behavior, only worse, to push forward his gatekeeping agenda. Exhibit H. Zook flatters certain UP members (those NOT critical of his posts), repeatedly, until the suck-up behavior is simply sickening. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Uncle Zook -- busted! |
Exhibit I. Pure gatekeeping posts from UncleZook that contribute nothing to the subject and are focused on character assassination of Zook challengers and dissenters (kill the messenger, ignore the message). |
Author: | UncleZook [ Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:04 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Uncle Zook -- busted! | |||||||||
The absurdity of Chico's comment above is underscored by one inescapable observation, namely, that Chico has created an entire thread for the purposes of character assassination. Attempting to kill the messenger in degrees, post by post in other threads, simply hasn't worked for him. So necessity had become pregnant once more ... and is now the proud mother of punk-purpose thread creation. Pax Absurdi |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:31 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Uncle Zook -- busted! | |||||||||
Exhibit J. UncleZook claims his character is being attacked when his gatekeeping activities are exposed with documented evidence. Isn't that exactly what you would expect from a genuine gatekeeper? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Uncle Zook -- busted! |
Exhibit K. UncleZook often dismisses evidence without even examining it! This includes smearing videos with watching them (the Assange videos), and ridiculing testimony without reading it. An unbiased truth-seeker would not behave this way, but a gatekeeper definitely would. |
Page 2 of 9 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |