united-people.tk
https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/

Uncle Zook -- busted!
https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=898		 Page 3 of 9
Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Uncle Zook -- busted!
Exhibit L. A variation of Exhibit D and Exhibit K, UncleZook fails to properly read "debunking" articles that he quickly uses as "proof" to support his faulty arguments. As a variation of two other exhibits, this shows how Zook uses the same kind of gatekeeping tactics repetitively.
Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Uncle Zook -- busted!
Exhibit M. UncleZook does not hesitate to employ the distasteful techniques of the troll and the flamer (among others), and he does it often.
Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Uncle Zook -- busted!
Quote:
One of the traits of psychopathology is this narcissistic cockiness. They all believe they're God inside on some level. The more power they get, the more infallible they get. They eventually will demolish themselves through this hubris.

-- Thomas Sheridan, source (at about 41:38)

That quote had the alarm bells screaming for me. Where have I seen this kind of behavior before? Of course, now I remember -- in UncleZook! And I'm not saying this to bash UncleZook, but rather to seek truth and understand reality.

The fascinating conversation on sociopaths between John Lash and Thomas Sheridan which produced the above quote is further highlighted on the forum here.
Author:  magamud [ Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Uncle Zook -- busted!
Quote:
No crime exists where neither moral nor rational (nor codified jurisdictional) law is broken. Hyperbole is what it is, an opportunity to stir up emotions. OTOH, high standards do exist when neither moral nor rational (nor codified jurisdictional) law is broken. Which necessarily means that the man who sees crime where none exists
sees pigs with wings ... and compares them to pigs without. E.g. imagines things in the moment and realizes them in the next second.

The accommodation of pigs with wings would explain your penchant for innuendo, however ... because innuendo abides a low standard of investigation.


Zookie busted :jest:
Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Uncle Zook -- busted!
Mags, you lost me on that one. My eyes glaze over sometimes reading certain Zook rhetoric, and that paragraph you quoted almost renders me unconscious from severe obfuscation.
Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Fri Feb 22, 2013 4:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Uncle Zook -- busted!
Exhibit N. UncleZook is quick to condemn anyone posting "private" chat room conversations, yet when he sees a personal benefit, he won't hesitate to post a private PM (Private Message) without permission!

Hypocrisy? Why, yes...
Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Fri Feb 22, 2013 4:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Uncle Zook -- busted!
Exhibit O. UncleZook fails to do his "homework" and continues to put his foot in his mouth as a result. This is a repetitive shortcoming (UncleZook fails to watch the whole video, fails to check the links, fails to read and comprehend the linked articles, fails to check the integrity of his sources, etc.) and is evidently a very difficult habit to break. Or it could also be deliberate gatekeeping, where those kinds of skills are unnecessary time wasters and are intentionally avoided.
Author:  magamud [ Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Uncle Zook -- busted!
Zook has Zero credibility. He is a pyramid example himself, modeling contemporary political discourse to redirect truth seeking, with himself being the all seeing eye on top. Douchebag!
Is it any wonder why he was a Moderator for a Pyramid hierarchy in disguise as a hollow planar model of Liberty? Pathetic....
Author:  UncleZook [ Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Uncle Zook -- busted!
Chicodoodoo wrote:
Exhibit N. UncleZook is quick to condemn anyone posting "private" chat room conversations, yet when he sees a personal benefit, he won't hesitate to post a private PM (Private Message) without permission!

Hypocrisy? Why, yes...


More prevarication and context-stripped bullshit.

Let me get this straight ... is Chico claiming that a toxic PM enjoys the same privacy protections and courtesy considerations as correspondence?

So if someone sends you a blackmail letter ... or a threatening letter ... or an abusive letter ... that all these forms of private intrusion should be categorized as private correspondence (and afforded the same considerations of courtesy and privacy)?

Yes, I guess that's what he's claiming.

Pax
Author:  magamud [ Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Uncle Zook -- busted!
Zook please do not post any of my personal information on the boards. No class...
Page 3 of 9 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/