Reply to topic  [ 544 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 55  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10392
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
What does the propaganda maligning Hitler and Nazi Germany look like today? Here is a classic example:




What Happened to The Man Who Refused to Salute Hitler?



Nobody had to salute Hitler. It was a choice. The wonder is not that one man refused to salute, but that everyone else did so of their own volition. Hitler had near-unanimous support among his people because he was genuine, caring, honest, and wise. There was no Gestapo waiting to pounce on anyone that didn't salute Hitler. That simply wasn't a Gestapo function, nor did Hitler need that kind of help.

Even the Jewish stronghold Wikipedia notes that this fantasy story is potentially a fantasy.

Wikipedia wrote:
Whether the depicted man is (August) Landmesser is not known with certainty. Another family claims the person in the photo is a Gustav Wegert.



Image


So, is this the real story of the man with crossed arms? Or was he feeling sick and had the chills, crossing his arms to feel warmer? Or did he just have a stomach ache? Are his crossed arms an act of defiance against Hitler, or is it something entirely more innocent? Can you see how totally convincing propaganda can be conjured up out of nothing to deceive and manipulate a gullible public?

I will bet the rest of the August Landmesser story is twisted truth, just like the "refusing to salute" explanation assigned to this photo. The claim is the the Nazis were the undisputed masters of propaganda, but I think that's just organized sociopaths accusing their opponents of their own malfeasance. The truth is that the Germans were far too honest and down-to-earth to rely on propaganda to effect change, when the truth was what they craved and could do a better job, as Hitler had amply demonstrated to the entire nation from 1933 to 1939.

I think it is becoming clearer and clearer that we won WW2 not because of our unwavering conviction to do what is right and just, but because of our naive gullibility and foolishness to swallow the con-artistry of our own master propagandists. We were duped. We were deceived and manipulated by the skilled sociopaths who ran our country, and it is still going on today.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:45 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10392
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Or do you think this is propaganda?



Adolf Hitler: The Man They Call the Devil
In case of YouTube censorship, another copy is here.


Real film of a real man saying real words (accurately translated) expressing real ideals and real goals in front of a real mass of really appreciative Germans.

Hitler's message was always honest, genuine, compassionate, and selfless. He was his people's tireless advocate. He always placed their best interests first. He transformed Germany from a destitute, broken wasteland into a proud, vigorous, strong, unified nation. That was his crime in the eyes of the ruling sociopaths, who wanted him utterly crushed and discredited, even if they had to orchestrate another global war to accomplish it and sacrifice the innocent lives of 60 million people.

You want your devil? Look to the ones who would do such evil.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:15 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10392
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Why were we never accurately shown what Hitler said to his nation? Why could we not hear his message for ourselves? Why were we simply fed lies that vilified one of the greatest men of the 20th century? Why were we taught to hate this one man and the nation he led? Why has the name Hitler been falsely associated with the word "evil" in the minds of the masses? Why must historical revisionists be imprisoned for overturning the deliberate propaganda that was presented as unquestionable history? Why have laws been passed to criminalize the pursuit of truth? Why the deception? Why the brainwashing? Why is this still going on 72 years after WW2 ended? Why is it so important that we do not know the truth?




Adolf Hitler, the man against time.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:57 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10392
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
To understand why Hitler was vilified with the totally false story of the Holocaust, meaning the gassing of 6 million innocent Jewish civilians, which never happened, you have to know about the real atrocities committed by the Allies during WW2, because this is what the Holocaust was meant to hide. We've already looked at the terror fire-bombing of German cities (like Dresden) full of civilians, the Katyn massacre committed by the Russians, and the deliberate killing of over a million German soldiers who surrendered to the Americans rather than the Russians at the end of the war in the hopes of more humane treatment, which they did not receive. These were all undeniable war crimes, and in fact the Germans were tried and found guilty at Nuremberg for the Katyn massacres, when the real perpetrators were the Russians following Stalin's orders.

Not surprisingly, there are other Allied atrocities that are still suppressed to this day. I didn't even know about this one:

Quote:
What has actually happened on the 15th of May 1945, the day of the surrender? When after the laying down of the weapons Tito's partisans were certain that their victims could no longer defend themselves and that the British did not intend to intervene (the British, namely, threatened that they would bombard the Croatian troops and civilians if the Croats did not immediately lay down their arms), the partisan commissioner Milan Basta, a Serb from Lika, issued his order. What thereupon followed could be described only by those who were present at that apocalyptic massacre. Here is the testimony of one eyewitness. "Men, women and children were falling down in sheaves while the partisans were mowing left and right with their machine guns over the open field. Soon so many people were slaughtered that the partisans ventured to descend among the survivors and with visible pleasure to beat them to death, to kick them with boots, and to stab them with bayonets.“ (Report of the eyewitness Ted Pavić in Nikolaj Tolstoy's book "The Minister and the Massacres", London 1986, p. 104). Another eyewitness Jure Raguz reports, that in his vicinity he saw a desperate Croatian officer shoot his two small children, a boy and a girl, then his wife and in the end himself (quoted on the above indicated page). When the slaughter at Bleiburg was finished on the 16th of May, the remaining mass of disarmed and frightened Croatian prisoners was driven on foot into Yugoslavia, to the blood-fields of Kočevski Rog and others further on, on a death march known as the Way of the Cross.

Although much has been written about Bleiburg and the death marches which followed it, we still do not have a complete picture of what happened there, because the British archives as the most important ones are still not accessible to the public. According the the British legal provisions the strictly confidential military and intelligence documents relating to the Second World War are not available to the public for 75 years. Hence, these documents will be available in 2020 at the earliest. -- source





World War 2 - British Massacre Confessions Of Bleiburg
In case of YouTube censorship, another copy is here.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Dec 07, 2017 3:28 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10392
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
The truth about Hitler is starting to leak out without being censored. The general public is still completely brainwashed to think of Hitler as the most evil man that ever lived, but the truth is almost the polar opposite. So while the bulk of the public cannot willingly change their programmed mindset, the ranks of those who can continues to grow. At some point in time, a tipping point will be reached where the once-dismissed truth will be embraced as obvious, and the "most evil man" propaganda will be ridiculed and universally rejected.

Even the brow-beaten Germans, the most heavily indoctrinated with the "most evil man" belief system, are starting to wake up to the deception, as this video shows.




Adolf Hitler's - Economic Reform of Germany
In case of YouTube censorship, another copy is located here.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Dec 10, 2017 1:52 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10392
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Black St. Louis, MO pastor Ray Hagins pulls no punches when defending Hitler:

Quote:
But there is a man who these people convinced us was a mad man. .....These people that I'm talkin' about told us that this man was a Satanic agent - he was a mass murderer.

These illegitimate people called Jews convinced the world that a man named Adolf Hitler was a mad man. And we all grew up understanding that Hitler was a tyrant, that he was a mad man. But I'm gonna be honest with you. After doing some research on this, I found out that it was these liars, and deceivers that Adolf Hitler was trying to cleanse the world of. -- source


Thai Royal Prince ML Rungguna Kitiyakara posted the following comments on his Facebook page:

Quote:
So why is Hitler considered to be evil? Because he found a way to free the people from being slaves to the Jews? Because he found a way to create a better world, free from Zionists?

As that is what he did.

He was a People’s man. He was the Father of Germany. His people loved him, and he loved his people.

Heil Hitler… Happy Birthday to you!

Hitler was a true genius and a patriot. Everything in Germany became better because of him.

History is written by the victors, by the Allied forces. The Zionists and the Jewish bankers don’t want the truth to come out. They destroyed Hitler and Germany. Hitler has been imputed as the bad guy for the so-called Holocaust, which actually did not occur. It was propaganda to establish sympathy to expel and kill Palestinians from their homeland so the Jews would have their own state. -- source

Not everyone has been fooled by the malicious propaganda about Adolf Hitler, perhaps the greatest leader of the 20th century. Once you discover that no people were gassed in German concentration camps, and you realize who is behind the BIG LIE that six million Jews were gassed to death there, you suddenly understand where the real evil lies -- not in Hitler's actions, but in the actions of his most ardent accusers.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Dec 11, 2017 6:55 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10392
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
"We have invisible aircraft, submarines, colossal tanks and cannon, unbelievably powerful rockets, and a bomb with a working that will astonish the whole world. The enemy knows this, and besieges and attempts to destroy us. But we will answer this destruction with a storm and that without unleashing a bacteriological war, for which we are also prepared…. All my words are the purest truth. That you will see!" -- Adolf Hitler, overheard by Italian officer Luigi Romersa on March 13, 1945, from Das Geheimnis der deutschen Atombombe, by Mayer and Mehner (source)

The Germans were far more advanced technologically than we've ever been told. The rumor is that Hitler had the first atomic bomb long before the United States, but unlike U.S. sociopathic leaders, Hitler refused to use such weapons of mass destruction. In fact, the blitzkreig was a tactic Hitler deliberately selected to minimize death and destruction. Hitler also had horrific biological and chemical weapons that he also refused to employ. Not much of a sociopath, I would say. Yet he is painted by the Jewish sociopaths and their puppets (like Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt) as a psychopathic madman.

I don't think so.

Quote:
From the start of WWII, some in the military were raring to dispatch their nerve weapons “on a very large scale against the enemy hinterland by air strikes,” noted German Colonel Hermann Ochsner in 1939. He said at the time: “There is no doubt that a city like London would be plunged into a state of unbearable turmoil that would bring enormous pressure to bear on the enemy government.” But Hitler demurred, even after Germany’s spectacular defeat at Stalingrad over the winter of 1942–43, which many believe was a turning point in the war. Why did Hitler veto their use?

Some historians point to the fact that Hitler had been a victim of chemical weapons—probably mustard gas—during WWI. As a result of this experience, Hitler believed using poison gas on the battlefield was unethical, an incredibly inconsistent position given his directive to use Zyklon B and other poisonous gases to kill millions of concentration camp prisoners. -- source

Yes, an unbelievably inconsistent position! Unless Hitler never gave a directive to use Zyklon B and other poisonous gases to kill millions of concentration camp prisoners. And he didn't give such a directive, no directive has ever been found, and no poisonous gases were used to kill any concentration camp prisoners. That lie comes from the wily Jews, not from the honest Hitler.

The claims of William Tompkins ( 1 2 ) are not so unbelievable once you consider that Hitler was speaking the truth to his German Ninth Army officers, as quoted above.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:32 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10392
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Speaking of Nazi atomic bombs and Luigi Romersa (mentioned in the prior post):

Quote:
According to other archival documents, the Italian correspondent Luigi Romersa observed on the ground the same explosion. He had been sent by dictator Benito Mussolini to watch the test of a "new weapon" of the Germans. He was ordered to report his impressions back to Mussolini. -- source

What kind of new weapon? An atomic bomb!

Quote:
The statement of the German test pilot Hans Zinsser in the file is considered evidence: the missile expert says he observed in 1944 a mushroom cloud in the sky during a test flight near Ludwigslust.

His log submitted to the Allied investigators reads; "In early October 1944 I flew away 12-15 km from a nuclear test station near Ludwigslust (South of Lübeck)."

"A cloud shaped like a mushroom with turbulent, billowing sections (at about 7000 metres) stood, without any seeming connections over the spot where the explosion took place. Strong electrical disturbances and the impossibility to continue radio communication as by lighting turned up."

He estimated the cloud stretching for nine kilometres and described further "strange colourings" followed by a blast wave which translated into a "strong pull on the stick" - meaning his cockpit controls.

An hour later a pilot in a different machine took off from Ludwigslust and observed the same phenomenon. -- source

Hitler had the weapons, but refused to employ them. He wasn't trying to "conquer the world". He was defending Germany against Britain and France in the beginning, and later defending Germany and all of Europe against the Russian-Jewish Bolsheviks. He said so himself many times. Here is one from 1941:




Adolf Hitler Speech About the History & Defense of Europe - English Subtitles Deutsch

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:23 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10392
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Just so you know what kind of sociopaths Churchill and Roosevelt were:
Quote:
The Bari raid was a disaster on two fronts for the Allies. Firstly, it was dubbed the 'Second Pearl Harbor,' with 17 ships totalling 75,936 tons sunk, and another 7 ships with a total of 27,289 tons, heavily damaged by the German aircraft. This was the only known poison gas incident associated with WWII, rendered far worse by the inherent secrecy involved.

The German scientist Fritz Hahn found plans in an archive in Washington DC showing that USA planned a gas-war against Germany. According to the US-plans they should start a 15-day operation "...using gas bombs after the Axis-Countries have started the bombing." The result of this operation was calculated to result in 5.6 million dead and 12 million very sick Germans - so sick they would need prolonged medical attention. The German cities of Munich, Augsburg, Stuttgart and Karlsruhe were the main targets of the plan with the Americans intending to use 100 airplanes with 500-pound poisonous gas shells over Germany.

This was all first made public in 1984 when the world learnt the truth about English plans regarding using poisonous gas over Germany. The BBC reporter Robert Harris found documents regarding the use of chemical and biological weapons against Germany.

These documents clearly showed Churchill's intentions and the chief of the British high command, General Lionel Hastings quoted Churchill, thus... "I want a cold-blooded war to be started using poisonous gas... We can bomb the cities along the Rhine and many others with gas until most survivors will need medical care for the rest of their lives." -- source

Remember, Hitler vetoed every suggestion that the Germans use chemical or biological weapons against their enemies. Hitler was a moral man. The same cannot be said for Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:49 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10392
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Of special interest to me is Frederic Spotts' efforts in his book Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics to discredit August Kubizek's book Adolf Hitler - mein Jugendfreund (still available to read online free here). Kubizek and Hitler were best friends in their later teenage years growing up in Linz, Austria. Kubizek's book is the only source of information we have describing the young Hitler, which makes it very important. I read Kubizek's book with the express purpose of finding the identifying markers of a sociopath in the young Hitler. If Hitler were truly the psychopathic madman that we are taught, then the traits of a sociopath would have surely been evident in his teenage years. To my surprise, I not only found no evidence of sociopathy in the young Hitler, I found just the opposite -- evidence for above-normal levels of caring, compassion, and empathy ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 ). Kubizek's book was thus pivotal in changing my programmed attitude towards Hitler.

In another recent surprise, I find that Spotts spends several pages in the Preface of his book (section entitled Sources) trying to discredit Kubizek's book. He condemns anyone that puts any faith in Kubizek's work and compares it to other fraudulent books like the Hitler Diaries. His reasons seem shallow and unconvincing, and I wonder why discrediting Kubizek is so important. The answer is that if Kubizek's portrayal of Hitler is accurate, it completely undermines the "world's most evil man" image of Hitler we have all been taught. Spotts ends up admitting in that section that he uses Kubizek as a source, but it's clear he does so only when it fits his purpose. In other words, he cherry-picks from Kubizek only what he agrees with, rather than take an unbiased approach. Once again we see cognitive dissonance behind Spotts' analysis of Hitler. Spotts never knew Hitler, while Kubizek grew up with Hitler. Who do you think is more likely to describe the real Hitler? Who is the more credible author?

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:18 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 544 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 55  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.