Then prove it, and please, not with your usual BS or more links to other accusations, but with real evidence!!!
I see you're still unable to point out the alleged evidence that you falsely claim to have posted proving the connection between the "money masters" and the "instigators of Bitcoin".
You are beyond pathetic Chicodoodoo!
I don't "prove" anything. I just provide evidence, which you conveniently and consistently dismiss out of hand. It is your behavior that is beyond pathetic.
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
Then prove it, and please, not with your usual BS or more links to other accusations, but with real evidence!!!
I see you're still unable to point out the alleged evidence that you falsely claim to have posted proving the connection between the "money masters" and the "instigators of Bitcoin".
You are beyond pathetic Chicodoodoo!
I don't "prove" anything. I just provide evidence, which you conveniently and consistently dismiss out of hand. It is your behavior that is beyond pathetic.
More "cut n paste" conjecture and links to nothing!
Please Chico, do yourself and everyone here a favor and dismiss your deluded/sad/strange little self from this forum!
OR actually provide some real evidence!
_________________ Think twice before you speak, especially if you intend to say what you think.
This is the same defense Chicodoodoo is using to defend his credibility!
You're such a fool, Andy. I don't defend my credibility. I don't need to, and this is something you and Zook cannot understand, because you are both sociopaths. The credibility of sociopaths is an illusion, a false facade, a charade employed to deceive and manipulate others. As such, it must be defended whenever it is threatened, lest the con, and the sociopath, be exposed.
My credibility is not an illusion. It is a function of my principles and my actions, both of which come from me. The essence of my existence creates my credibility automatically, and I don't have to pay the slightest attention to what other people believe my credibility to be. As Amanda Bloom says, "An idea does not gain truth as it gains followers." The same is true for credibility, at least for non-sociopaths.
I am what I am, but since I am not a sociopath, I don't have to hide what I am. You do, which is why the perception of credibility is so important to you. It's part of your disguise. But I don't think it's working too well for you anymore in this forum, Andy. You've exposed yourself so thoroughly of late that you are just like the Emperor parading around in his "new clothes".
Quote:
But among the crowds a little child suddenly gasped out, "But he hasn't got anything on." And the people began to whisper to one another what the child had said. "He hasn't got anything on." -- source
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
You're such a fool, Andy. I don't defend my credibility. I don't need to, and this is something you and Zook cannot understand, because you are both sociopaths. The credibility of sociopaths is an illusion, a false facade, a charade employed to deceive and manipulate others. As such, it must be defended whenever it is threatened, lest the con, and the sociopath, be exposed.
My credibility is not an illusion. It is a function of my principles and my actions, both of which come from me. The essence of my existence creates my credibility automatically, and I don't have to pay the slightest attention to what other people believe my credibility to be. As Amanda Bloom says, "An idea does not gain truth as it gains followers." The same is true for credibility, at least for non-sociopaths.
I am what I am, but since I am not a sociopath, I don't have to hide what I am. You do, which is why the perception of credibility is so important to you. It's part of your disguise. But I don't think it's working too well for you anymore in this forum, Andy. You've exposed yourself so thoroughly of late that you are just like the Emperor parading around in his "new clothes".
Now, now, Chico don't get your knickers all in a twist!
As this evidence you linked to isn't your own, but is rather a forum post from Bill Ryan's Avalon (whose links are now mostly dead incidentally), could you please just post what you feel is the strongest piece of evidence it allegedly presented?
_________________ Think twice before you speak, especially if you intend to say what you think.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum