united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Nexus - censoring history https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=970 |
Page 5 of 7 |
Author: | UncleZook [ Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:54 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Nexus - censoring history | ||||||||||||||||||
You assume too much, Chucklesdoodoo ... and continue to get things wrong time and again. I'm an epsilonMod <------------- if you took mathematics beyond grade school, you will note that the Greek letter epsilon is associated with the incremental, the infinitesimal, the small number. I specifically asked to be an epsilon moderator when Universal was created because I enjoy being the low man on the totem pole. I'm not and have never been interested in power, over anything or anyone, as a rule. The lone exception being power over myself, in which case I want to retain absolute power. Bozo. You're projecting your own psychopathy yet again. Universal was created to cultivate the privilege of free speech, not the right. It had been determined by the founding brothers and sisters at Universal, that the privilege of free speech delivers more signal than the right of free speech. So we at Universal had decided to support free speech using the privilege plinths. So far this has worked beautifully and has delivered the signal as promised. I can understand why a drama queen like yourself would get all perturbed about that. But Universal was not designed for drama queens, nor will it accommodate any of their requests. Your request has been denied. Please wait twelve months and apply again . Pax |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:34 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Nexus - censoring history | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reduced to mincing words, are you? So you're an "epsilon" moderator, "low man on the totem pole". What a contrast from your usual grandiose self-assessment. It is, however, the usual hypocrisy, custom selected to fit the argument of the moment.
Still mincing words, thinking that you're onto a winning strategy? The hypocrisy is still overwhelming. Earlier, you turned to the founding fathers for support, and now you dismiss them. They didn't recognize free speech as a mere privilege. It takes a "low man on the totem pole" to do that.
From whose perspective? From Heebert's, who was silenced without justification? From Noxon's, whose entire thread was deleted, also without justification? Or from the perspective of the power pyramid at Universal Spectrum, which rules just like the sociopaths that dominate us with equal impunity.
I see you've remounted your high horse. Allow me to respond as you would expect -- "Yes, your Majesty." Now, allow me to respond as you deserve -- "Why you narcissistic, sociopathic hypocrite!" |
Author: | UncleZook [ Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:42 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Nexus - censoring history | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visit Universal and have a look at my avatar, Chico. It says epsilonMod. You believed your own vacuous, voluble innuendo against me ... and that has led you astray again. I was always more modest than you have the ability to comprehend, because you've never seen such levels of modesty in yourself. Not your fault. But there it is. We all too often subconsciously project ourselves onto others. Your own lack of modesty is projecting in the way you view me, for example.
Actually, if you could understand English as well as you can process Andy's gibberish with glowing admiration ... then you would understand that the founding fathers viewed free speech as an inalienable right. Meaning that it cannot be separated from the individual. They did not then say that an individual cannot be separated from a group; indeed, they elucidated the right of free association precisely to allow groups to form without interference from the government. To illustrate the point on full brake at a zillion miles per hour, you, Chico, have the unabridged inalienable right to speech on the internet, and United People has guaranteed that right. Universal, by contrast, has used its right of free association to deny you membership - or would likely deny you membership if you did try to apply as Chico - because of your track record of destroying forums with obfuscation, mind games, innuendo, orthogonal pursuits, prima donna theatrics, etc. Which is why you had resorted to sockpuppetry and Heebert - now banned - who had your fingerprints all over him, not to mention a whole hand up his sock puppet ass. United is a private club which guarantees you inalienable right of free speech. Universal is a private club which denies you membership, but in doing so, does not impact your inalienable right of free speech. The founding fathers recognized both the rights of free speech and free association, the latter being foundational to the establishment of private clubs. In private clubs, the membership ultimately decides who gets in, who stays in, and who doesn't. Those who are not allowed in at one private club may go elsewhere to exercise their right of free speech because that right remains inalienable to the individual, but the individual does not remain inalienable to the group.
There you go again with your own sockpuppet, Heebie, playing silly mindgames with brains as big as yours, but not as prodigal. Heebie was tossed because he broke the fine china at Universal. The privacy of the club is all the justification that is needed. Anymore would have overdetermined things and undermined the privacy of the club. The great thing about Universal is that it's an all-inclusive private club ... which means anyone can apply. Those that create mischief or have a track record of mischief, will naturally be shown the tree bucket and a free launch to the vacation spot of their choosing. To compare power pyramid sociopaths with people desiring a genuine round table for ideas ... is to confuse the apple with the orange ... and making orange pies. Pax |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:53 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Nexus - censoring history | ||||||||||||||||||
I know what it says, dufus. That wasn't the issue. The issue was the false modesty that you assign to it. You are so dense.
At last, we get an answer as to why Heebert was banned at Universal Spectrum! He "broke the fine china". What the hell is that supposed to mean, UncleObfuscation? You are such a weasel. No mention of the erasure of Noxon's entire thread. Want to take a stab at explaining that? Wait, let me guess -- Noxon tarnished the silverware. |
Author: | andywight [ Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:58 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Nexus - censoring history | ||||||||||||||||||
Process this UncleZook!
This entire thread of over 200 posts has now quietly disappeared from Nexus2012 aka Nexusnow, which is sadly ironic as a very similar thread also containing Noxon's posts has "quietly disappeared" from Universal Spectrum as well! Fortunately I have screen shots of all these threads/posts which I will be posting here as time permits, possibly in an attached folder as their are several threads containing hundreds of posts. Care to comment on this now UncleZook, or are you still too CHICKENSHIT!!! |
Author: | andywight [ Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:02 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Nexus - censoring history | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Process this UncleZook!
This entire thread at Nexus2012 aka Nexusnow has vanished into thin air! Care to comment on this now UncleZook, or are you still too CHICKENSHIT!!! |
Author: | magamud [ Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nexus - censoring history |
This is a very good movie chronicling a pathological liar who would impersonate missing children to be in a family. Check it out if you can. This is the essence of a Con man, sociopath and pathology itself. The imposter Movie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGTAJKC4Joc |
Author: | magamud [ Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nexus - censoring history |
I wonder if Richard, Celine, Mods, or any other people would come forward and corroborate Zook as a Con artist in light of this new evidence. This might give the Nexus or the Avalon scandal a new perspective. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:32 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Nexus - censoring history | |||||||||
Hmmm, that gives one pause for thought. Do con-artists rat on each other? It seems to me that they don't, as it's bad for business. |
Author: | magamud [ Tue Mar 12, 2013 5:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nexus - censoring history |
Well I was thinking maybe Richard would see how flucked up zook is and realize he got duped by him. Exposing zook and bringing this Charlatan down would allow opportunities for people to heal and find some credibility. Probably not, but its worth a try. |
Page 5 of 7 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |