united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
What's your gas mileage? https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=609 |
Page 3 of 4 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Aug 26, 2014 6:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: What's your gas mileage? |
Even better than running a car on gasoline is running it on water. Gasoline costs 500 times more than water, so of course the massively profitable oil industry is not too keen to see cars running on water, which would pretty much put them out of business. They will easily kill to destroy the competition, which is what they did to Stanley Meyer (1 2 3 4). So what happened to these two guys, who had a hulking pickup truck running on water four years ago? |
Author: | magamud [ Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: What's your gas mileage? |
Thanks for the posts chic. Showing ideas, experiments as qualified results in this area will help people objectify the matrix. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:45 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: What's your gas mileage? | |||||||||
I still remember when I was a highly "educated" man, completely brainwashed, and stories like vehicles running on water rolled off my mind like water off a duck's back. They simply didn't fit the Matrix that had been overlaid on my mind, so they were quickly dismissed. That is why I say one must not only question everything, one must also dismiss nothing. The consequence of this is that there is no certainty. There are only probabilities based on available knowledge, with available knowledge being sparse and of dubious value. It's not a very pretty picture, but if that's what people want, there are sociopaths that will paint them a pretty picture with great enthusiasm! Like Obama:
Even George H. W. Bush still springs to mind:
But I hope you are right, and that some people will take in this information and allow it to expand their minds. The brainwashing coming from the sociopaths is designed to confine our minds into tight, well-defined boxes full of certainty. Nothing could be more crippling while at the same time feeling so reassuring. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Nov 25, 2014 7:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: What's your gas mileage? |
The technology we have been denied for 100 years is starting to slip out. Here (1 2 3 4) is a car called the Quant that produces 920 HP, accelerates from 0 to 60 mph in 2.8 seconds, and can run at over 200 mph. As you can imagine, like most exotic cars, gas mileage is not its strong point. But that's because it doesn't run on gasoline. It runs on salt water. How did this one get past the oil company thugs? Now all we need to do is scale it down to 100 HP, 0 to 60 mph in 10 seconds (1 2 3), and a top speed of 100 mph. And price it at under $20,000. I would buy one immediately. The world would thrive like we can't even imagine. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:15 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: What's your gas mileage? | |||||||||
I just learned of another "successful" inventor of more efficient automobile transportation. His name was Tom Ogle, and he was a 20-year old mechanic in Texas. He also used the very simple idea of changing liquid gasoline to gaseous gasoline before injecting the gases into an internal combustion engine. His 4000 pound test vehicle, a modified 1970 Ford Galaxie, got something over 100 mpg in 1977! ( 1 2 3 ) And yeah, they killed him (poisoned). He was in his grave at age 24. His simple idea was dismissed and buried.
It sounds like Tom Ogle became a target. How surprising. Funny how you never hear about Tom Ogle, or Stanley Meyer, or Royal Rife. Our education system is obviously not about education at all. It's about brainwashing. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:50 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: What's your gas mileage? | |||||||||
Update on the Quant car that runs on salt water. It's been almost two years since my last post about this car, and you still can't buy one, or even drive one. No surprise there. You can video game with one, however. I guess we should be grateful for that. Thank you, ruling sociopaths!
Whoa! They were granted permission to test one on the road! Since when does anyone need permission to test a car on the road? After testing, they might "consider" making more of these cars. "Consider"? Why not actually do it? Isn't that the whole idea, to sell people a car that runs on water, thereby abandoning the gigantic fossil fuel industry and freeing humanity from oil dependency and oil-based pollution? Oh, right... that's why they killed Stan Meyer after he refused a billion dollar bribe to turn his technology over to the oil companies. I predict that if you want to drive a Quant, the video game is going to be the closest you'll ever get. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:43 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: What's your gas mileage? | ||||||||||||||||||
Running a gasoline engine on water alone, as Stanley Meyer did, is a huge economic threat to the existing energy companies. That, and their sociopathic mindset, is why they murdered him. "It's just business", as the sociopaths see it. Can you see that sociopaths are indeed the source of human evil? Even mixing gasoline and water successfully in an engine will get you targeted. water and gasoline mixture used in a car engine
Yes, the inventor of the process has to go into hiding and stop talking about his work. He is effectively censored. Nevertheless, what he was able to say is quite interesting. I have selected some excerpts from the comments section of the video:
His earliest posts (bottom of quote) were from 2008, and by 2013, he was "off the radar". This is the state of scientific endeavor now, where sociopaths strictly control things for their benefit, not the benefit of all humanity. Actually, Tesla faced the same thing over 100 years ago. Humanity has been subtly enslaved, and we don't even know it. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:50 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: What's your gas mileage? | ||||||||||||||||||
Cars that run on water just keep getting re-invented. I just found two more examples ( 1 2 ). But there is always the know-it-all who will tell you it is too good to be true.
"It's a fake! It's just first semester high school chemistry, you fools!" Sorry, but what they taught us in first semester high school chemistry is not quite the way it is. I too was taught that the energy required to break a chemical bond is exactly equal to the energy released to reform it. I believed what I was told, as nearly all of us do, only it turns out that it wasn't exactly true. Under certain conditions, like resonance, chemical bonds can be broken with very little energy. And that changes the equation in a big way. The inventors: Daniel Dingel died in 2010, and his work "disappeared". Alaeddin Qassemi hit the scene in 2016. His current status is unknown. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:27 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: What's your gas mileage? | ||||||||||||||||||
Here is the classic dismissal again for any kind of over-unity energy production, from our good friends at Popular Mechanics:
Yeah, period, you dolts! Wait, aren't these the same "authorities" who defended the official 9/11 story?
I used to be a big fan of Popular Mechanics. Not any more. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:01 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: What's your gas mileage? | |||||||||
I watched a video about making a hydrogen mini-torch and looked up the temperature of such a flame (maximum about 2800 degrees C, or 5100 degrees F). While I was reading the Wikipedia page on oxyhydrogen, guess what popped up there?
It's our good friend Popular Mechanics, teaming up with Wikipedia! Why am I not surprised! Surely the crooked Snopes ( 1 2 3 ) has got to be involved with the dismissal of water-powered cars too! But alas, it seems Snopes is confining its dismissal to the message boards ( 1 2 ). Somehow, it hardly seems fair that they had to poison Stanley Meyer when he wouldn't take a billion dollars to walk away from his technology. Why not just laugh at him and allow him to make a total fool of himself? Killing him, like offering him a billion dollars, seems totally unnecessary, assuming his technology was indeed a hoax. But if it wasn't a hoax, then the threats, the bribes, the murder, the theft, the cover-up, and all the cooperating media whores make perfect sense. |
Page 3 of 4 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |