Cannabis oil strikes again! That's why marijuana was made illegal -- it puts the expensive medications from the pharmaceutical industry to shame.

Given all the legitimate cancer cures that have been shut down and suppressed, including Dr. Royal Rife's work, you can bet that this simple and natural cure for cancer is soon to disappear.

I predicted the same thing would happen to the scientist that independently rediscovered Rife's technique.

How long before the video below is censored? Better watch it while you can. Found in northern Australia's blushwood tree berries, EBC-46 is a molecule that triggers an immune response in the body when injected into a cancer tumor that melts tumors away in just seven days. I thought I had better note the cure here in writing, for "safekeeping".

I see this news was reported two years ago already.

Snopes claims "the drug will never be a 'cure for cancer'" and that it "the main stakeholder behind the research is a pharmaceutical company that owns the patent to the chemical." You can count on Snopes ( 1 2 3 4 ) to downplay any cure for cancer.




7 News - Scientists find Australian berry to cure cancer

Got cancer? Change lifestyle.

Air, water, and food. All are being poisoned, and deliberately. The insanity of the situation is beyond belief, and sociopaths, the morally insane, are at the root of it all.

Similar to Doctor Royal Rife's use of specific frequencies to target pathogens (rediscovered recently), here is another TED talk about using focused sound as a noninvasive surgical tool.





Curing With Sound | Dr. Neal Kassell | TEDxCharlottesville
(duration 18:33)

I too was taught to throw away the big avocado seed! I didn't ever hear you could eat it and it would help prevent cancer.




Looks pretty tasty as a roasted powder!

Will fenbendazole, a dog de-worming medicine, cure cancer?


Yes, it would be foolish to let dozens of success stories sway you away from the "classical treatments" that basically send you home with the message that you have three months to live.

Wait, could there be a conflict of interest present in those skeptical doctors?

Yes, the medical system is terrible. Money makes all the decisions, not the desire to improve health and eliminate disease. So it's not a health care system. It is a health scam business.

And why would that be? Because sociopaths run the world.


Why do you think the ruling sociopaths are pushing GMO food? Because they want to sabotage our healthy foods just like they have sabotaged our so-called health care system.

Monsanto. Glyphosate. Money. Deception. Disease.

There is a direct path from Monsanto to Disease. But Monsanto is not the starting point. Sociopaths are.

Watch this video called Secret Ingredients. Although the video is being used to attract buyers to make money, it contains a lot of astounding information about the Monsanto to Disease pathway.

Not so coincidentally, Monsanto is starting to feel the pain of its Roundup-induced diseases inflicted upon the general public, which probably includes you and me.


Liar, liar, pants on fire, Monsanto! I hope you are driven out of business by your evil, sociopathic ways!

Could it be that some Americans are mad as hell and they're not going to take it any more?


OK, petitioning the FDA, an agency controlled by sociopaths, is not likely to accomplish anything. Sociopaths will say things to placate the petitioners, and maybe pretend to initiate some actions for change, but they will not actually do anything that will produce the results the petitioners desire. In other words, our food supply will continue to be poisoned by glyphosate, just as the sociopaths have planned. They want us ignorant, misinformed, disoriented, distracted, divided, weakened, and sick. When we are like that, they own us. That's their plan and they will stick to it.

You can't ask sociopaths to stop enslaving you and expect results. You have to force them to stop.

Yes, You Are Definitely Ingesting Pesticides. Here's Why It's Not A Problem

Yes, ingesting pesticides in not a problem! Brought to you by Forbes magazine, propaganda mouthpiece for the ruling sociopaths!

Yes, that Forbes:






The deception in the pesticide article is beyond belief. It is here to convince you that it is OK to eat pesticides because the level of exposure is too small to be toxic, i.e. to cause a relatively quick death. But that's not the issue. The issue is: does ingesting pesticide cause harm?


"No link between pesticide residues on food and disease"? Does causing harm qualify as a "disease"? Is autism a disease? How about cancer? Multiple sclerosis? How about chronic pain, or chronic discomfort? Leaky gut syndrome? Crohn's disease?

This line of reasoning being pushed by Forbes sounds like something Bill Clinton would come up with: "That depends on what the definition of the word disease is."

Or perhaps the critical word is "on", meaning that there is no link between pesticide residues on food and disease. Pesticide in the food that someone actually consumes could be another matter entirely. So sociopaths have two double-speak ways to claim their argument is valid if challenged.

And the third way is the word "link". What qualifies as a link? Is statistical correlation a link? How about personal experience? Circumstantial evidence? How long did the cigarette industry claim there was no link between smoking and cancer?

Anyway, here are a few links that suggest our glyphosate advocate is conning us: 1 2 3 4


I know, these people must be desperate to present such an argument! The effects of eating salt are well known and thoroughly studied, while glyphosate in the food supply is a new phenomenon not seen in the last 4000 or more years. Its effects are neither well known nor thoroughly studied. This kind of straw man argument is typical of scheming sociopaths looking to con their gullible victims!


How about harmful doses? Looking at LD50 levels (the dose where 50% of subjects quickly die from ingestion / exposure) is not germane to this question.


Humans aren't mice either, yet we use mice to assess the harmfulness of many chemicals and poisons.


But do they cause harm, or chronic health debilitations, or "disease"?


I bet there are no links supporting this claim, and "exact same rates" is the tip-off that this "fact" is being invented. Plus, the previous video suggests glyphosate is so prevalent in our food supply today that it is very possible that it is affecting everyone in a statistically equivalent bell curve distribution. No weed killer has ever achieved such ubiquitous distribution in the human food supply. This is truly the first time it has ever happened, and we are being told, "Don't worry. Be happy!"


But not so great for the consumers who are eating this BT insecticide, which has effects within the body. I've talked about BT corn before ( 1 2 3 ). Even worse, there is evidence that genetic modifications in GMO foods can be incorporated into the micro-organisms that live in our bodies and expose us to a continually refreshed supply of the foreign chemicals these genetic modifications code for, like the BT insecticide!


Right, "trust us". Trust in our system. Trust in our business model. Trust that Big Brother is looking after you, because to do otherwise "is bad for business". Of course, if you can't definitively prove a link between our product and your new disease, that's good for business! Win - Lose! Hey, works for us!

And note that this is the usual sociopath ploy of accusing their opponents of their own malfeasance. "Big Organic" is just conning you to make greater profits! They don't care about your health, they just want to make lots of money!

Yeah. This is sociopaths conning us. It's obvious. Insecticides and pesticides will never hurt you, so eat up! Sociopaths have lots of expensive prescription drugs for you when you are suffering from un-diagnosable diseases with no proven links to their chemical poisons. What a scam.