Reply to topic  [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ... 52  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Still, I am curious to see where Sylvain Laforest goes with his analysis of the Hess flight to England. What conclusion has his research and reasoning led him to?
Because Hess landed on a remote farm in Scotland, the USA quickly realized that their first major proxy army, the Nazis, wasn’t working for them anymore and that if they hoped to lead the New World Order someday, they had to enter the war and get it themselves, fast.

Sylvain LaForest thinks the U.S. money men funded Hitler to bring about the demise of the Rothschild-controlled City of London so that the American empire could replace the British empire.

Oy vey, has he got it wrong!

LaForest completely ignores the elephant in the room — the Jewish juggernaut. Both Churchill and Roosevelt were controlled by the Jewish cabal. Stalin was part of the Jewish cabal. Only Hitler was the odd-man out, the only one acting independently of the Jews and actively removing their power and control from the German nation. It is absurd to imagine that Jewish-controlled America was trying to undermine Jewish-controlled Britain by manipulating non-Jewish-controlled Germany!
:face:
No, Jewish sociopaths and their minions were running the show, and they were surely united in their efforts to annihilate their greatest enemy in modern history, Hitler and the Nazi party. The Jewish declaration of economic war on Germany in 1933 was the precursor to the behind-the-scenes intrigue that led to England declaring war on Germany in September of 1939. So LaForest's speculation, and all we get from him is speculation, just isn't on solid ground. That's too bad, as I was hoping for some new, relevant information about the Hess mystery. It still looks most probable that Hess was on a secret peace-seeking mission for Hitler that Churchill was determined to cover up, just like he covered up all of Hitler's peace proposals, and just like he covered up the chemical weapons he and Roosevelt sent to Bari, Italy for use against German civilians ( 1 2 3 ). Churchill was a monster, while Hitler was not, and that truth can never be allowed to leak out to the public, as it would undermine the whole false history of WW2 that we are force-fed even to this day.



Image



Please remember that for the Germans, propaganda was accurate information intended to enlighten and inform. For the Jews, propaganda is false information designed to deceive and manipulate. It is important to understand this difference of definition, and to understand the underlying psychology from which it springs. The Jewish leaders were sociopaths, while the German leaders were not. Their respective use of propaganda reflects their underlying psychology. What the western world calls Nazi propaganda was far more truthful than anything the Allied forces put out as "fact". The Katyn massacre is a typical example. The Nazis reported this atrocity to the world, but the Allies completely dismissed it publicly as "Nazi propaganda", when in fact the Nazis were being totally honest with their information. Russia denied its responsibility for the war crime, and the Allies even accused the Nazis of being responsible! It wasn't until 1989 that Gorbachev admitted Stalin had ordered the killings.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Aug 26, 2018 12:37 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
“I don't see much future for the Americans... It's a decayed country. And they have their racial problem, and the problem of social inequalities... My feelings against Americanism are feelings of hatred and deep repugnance... Everything about the behavior of American society reveals that it's half Judaized, and the other half negrified. How can one expect a State like that to hold together?” -- Hitler's Table Talks


Image
-- source



Did Hitler really say that? I tend to doubt it.

The quote comes from Hitler's Table Talks, also published as Hitler's Secret Conversations. We have already seen how unreliable quotes attributed to Hitler are. They are often outright fabrications.

Quote:
I did not rely on hearsay accounts because those who admired or hated him had reason to embellish their own beliefs onto him. The best way to evaluate a person involves examining the words and actions of the person directly rather than indirectly from editors and hearsay accounts. -- source

Quotes allegedly by Hitler sourced back to these books would be in the latter category.

Quote:
LORD DACRE of Glanton, the historian who as Hugh Trevor-Roper wrongly authenticated the “Hitler Diaries”, has died aged 89 at a hospice in Oxford. He had cancer.

His reputation as an expert on modern history was damaged after the diaries affair in 1983. The Sunday Times and the German magazine Stern published extracts from what were said to be 60 volumes of Hitler’s personal diaries that had been found in East Germany. They turned out to be a hoax.

He was a prolific historian who wrote several books on the Third Reich, including The Last Days of Hitler and Hitler’s Table Talk. -- source

There is so much deceit involved with understanding the real Hitler that you have to wonder why. It looks to me like it is due to the false portrait of Hitler we are expected to believe, which is built upon Allied wartime propaganda.

Quote:
After the war, these notes were acquired by a French con-man, Genoud, who, other than this, fabricated Hitler saying things that were easily shown to be categorically false, and admitted as much when confronted.

When Trevor-Roper went to translate these he signed a contract which allowed only access to the French versions of the pages as translated by the con-man Genoud. Trevor-Roper kept this agreement secret and claimed they were from the German versions. But, translations errors and the contracts (found after he died) reveal this to be completely false, and he agreed to something that a serious scholar should never have ever agreed to.

Trevor-Roper claimed in his foreword that he used the German Bormann-Vermerke. This is a lie. A lie he would have known was a lie because it was in his contract that he was to use the French version and the translators were never given access the original German pages in Genoud's possession.

In the time since, the German versions have been released in German and a quick translation and comparison finds that a lot of the quotes that certain people harp on are completely fictitious. Most of the glaring problems come between the German -> French translations by the con-man. The French versions say the same thing, whereas the German versions say something different. -- source

Who can you believe? Where is the truth? Why is it so hard to find?

Are we being lied to about Hitler? As we have seen over and over again, almost everything we have been taught to believe about Hitler is indeed a lie.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Aug 26, 2018 2:08 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
I want war. To me all means will be right. My motto is not 'Don't, whatever you do, annoy the enemy'. My motto is 'Destroy him by all and any means.' I am the one who will wage the war! -- allegedly Adolf Hitler

This is the quote beneath Adolf Hitler's picture on Wikiquote. I just came across it today, and as soon as I read it, I thought, "I would bet money that quote is fraudulent."

According to Wikiquote, this quote is from Hitler and Nazism (1961) by Louis Leo Snyder, p. 66.

So who is Louis Leo Snyder, and where did he get this quote?

Quote:
A retired University Professor of History at the City College of New York, Professor Snyder was the author most recently of "Hitler's Elite" (1989). It dealt with such high-ranking Nazis as Field Marshal Hermann Goring, S.S. leader Heinrich Himmler, Julius Streicher and Col. Otto Skorzeny, the daredevil pilot who plucked Benito Mussolini from a mountain prison fortress before the Partisans caught and killed him.

"From its beginnings the Nazi movement attracted more than its share of unprincipled hangers-on," the author concluded. He called Goring a "deadly Falstaff," Himmler a mass murderer, and Streicher, the publisher of a virulent Nazi paper, a "pornographer and sadist." -- source

Hmm, Snyder sounds like a purveyor of Jewish propaganda against Hitler and the Nazis. It says he is "an authority on the rise and fall of Nazi Germany and the author of more than 60 books..." That's quite the book mill. It sounds like someone was cashing in on the public's fascination with Hitler and the Nazis. Could he be Jewish?

Quote:
He earned his doctorate at the University of Frankfurt-am-Main in 1931. Following post-doctoral work at Columbia University, he started tutoring at City College in 1933. -- source

So he's a student in Germany in 1931, and two years later, the same year Hitler becomes Fuhrer, Snyder is living in New York City, a stronghold of American Jews! But is he Jewish or a Jewish apologist?

Interestingly, there is nothing I can find about this prolific author's religious background or religious persuasion. And the quote from his book? Is it fraudulent? That I could find!

Quote:
The US government propaganda film, "Why We Fight," quotes Hitler as having said: "My motto is 'Destroy by all and any means. National Socialism will reshape the world'." This is a version of a remark attributed to Hitler by Hermann Rauschning in his influential book. The "original" text, as presented by Rauschning, is: "I want war. To me all means will be right ... My motto is not 'Don't, whatever you do, annoy the enemy!' My motto is 'Destroy him by all and any means.' I am the one who will wage the war!" Another version of this invented remark appears in the book Hitler and Nazism (1961), by historian Louis Leo Snyder, who was a professor at City College of New York. -- source
Quote:
Hermann Rauschning's The Voice of Destruction, later republished as Conversations with Hitler, seems to be the source for the first half of this quote. (Rauschning is not a trustworthy source. If you find that the source for a quote attributed to Hitler is Rauschning, that already invalidates it, but what we get in Capra's film (Why We Fight) is even worse than that.)

Wait a minute! Haven't I already posted about Rauschning before? Why, yes! ( 1 2 )

So a respected historical scholar and prolific WW2 author named Louis Leo Snyder is just parroting wartime propaganda that is completely false? Who knew?

Quote:
Fraudulent quotations attributed to Hitler and other Third Reich leaders have been widely circulated for years. Such quotes are often used by polemicists -- of both the left and the right -- to discredit their ideological adversaries by showing that Nazis held similar views. This tactic works because people have been educated to believe that anything Hitler and other Nazi leaders thought or said was malevolent, wrong-headed or evil, and that no reasonable or ethical person could hold similar views. -- source

Another fraudulent Hitler quote uncovered, one that is prominently displayed at Wikiquote as the truth! For shame...



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Aug 26, 2018 4:09 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
It is startling when I see people waking up to the truth, as well as seeing the push-back from the Jewish-controlled media which opposes such lucidity.

Quote:
The Nordic Resistance Movement (NRM) held a rally in Stockholm on Saturday, facing off counter-protesters, who decried its members as neo-Nazis.

Members of the NRM do not like being described as neo-Nazis, branding those who call them so “brainwashed,” but at the same time do not hide their fondness for the policies of National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP), better known as the Nazi Party of Adolf Hitler. But Lindberg went even further, and didn’t shy away from praising Hitler personally and on camera.

Calling the Nazi leader “a very very good person for German people,” he claimed that Hitler “freed Germany from the globalists and the bankers, that have a grip over Sweden today.”

“He did what was necessary to secure his people’s freedom,” Lindberg went on. “We’re National Socialists, as Hitler was and we do whatever it takes to take our nation back.”

Germany’s infamous Fuhrer is surrounded with “a million lies,” which many “not so [well-thinking]” people do believe, Lindberg claimed. Other extremely controversial statements of the NRM leader included branding the Holocaust “probably the biggest lie in history,” as well as a bizarre claim that “Jews declared war on Germany.” -- source

:shock: Bizarre claim?

These Nordic people are spot-on in their understanding of history. There are indeed "a million lies" that we have been taught as "fact" concerning Hitler, and I have been exposing those lies in this thread for nearly five years now. And now I learn there is a new political party in Sweden that is on-board with my investigations.

The truth is leaking out.

I know that my investigations had nothing to do with these Swedes waking up, because almost no one reads my posts, so I take no credit for their awakening. I am happy to see it nonetheless. Everyone should know the truth, because the truth will indeed set us free, just like the lies keep us enslaved.



Image
-- source

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Aug 28, 2018 3:55 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
They lied to us about Hitler and the Nazis.

Once you realize that, you have to investigate who lied, and why they lied.

It was the Jewish sociopathic leaders and their puppets (like Churchill and Roosevelt). They lied to hide their crimes and their prior lies.

They lied to hide the truth.



Image
-- source

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:06 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
What happened the day after the city of Dresden was bombed and burned into ruins, in one of the worst war crimes of World War II?

The Americans returned to murder the survivors and rescue workers helping them.

Quote:
“[P]anic broke out,” said fifteen-year-old Gerhard Kuhnemund. “Women and children were massacred with cannon and bombs. It was mass murder…. While we literally clawed ourselves into the grass, I personally saw at least five American fighter-bombers, which from an altitude of approximately 120–150 metres opened fire with their cannon on the masses of civilians. My companion . . . was killed beside me in this attack. There was a hole in his back the size of a palm.”

Near the park, zoo-keeper Otto Sailer-Jackson watched in stunned disbelief as one American pilot mowed down people running in the street. “He attacked several times, flying very low, firing from cannon and machine-guns into the refugees. Then he flew low over the Zoo and made several firing runs at anything he could see that was still alive. In this way our last giraffe met her death. Many stags and other animals which we had managed to save, became the victims of this hero.”

Although the raid lasted only ten minutes, the Americans returned the next day, and the next, and the next, seemingly determined that not a single living thing should survive in Dresden. “There seemed to be no end to the horror,” said Eva Beyer. -- source

Is it any wonder that Hitler and the Nazis had to be vilified and demonized, so that Allied war crimes could be completely overlooked and ignored?



Image
A charred body of a woman in the air-raid shelter – Dresden, February 1945. -- source

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Aug 29, 2018 9:05 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
As news from Dresden spread slowly throughout the rest of the Reich, there was shock and horror, but mostly their was anguish. “Dresden was a glorious city … ,” wrote Ruth Andreas-Friedrich in her diary. “It’s a little hard getting used to the idea that Dresden, too, no longer exists. I almost feel like crying.” And Rudolf Semmler, aide to the propaganda minister, also took note that public facades of strength and courage could easily crumble in private: “For the first time I saw Goebbels lose control of himself when two days ago, he was given the stark reports of the disaster in Dresden. The tears came into his eyes with grief and rage and shock. Twenty minutes later I saw him again. He was still crying and looked a broken man.” -- source

Hitler's men were not sociopaths. They were feeling, empathetic, compassionate Germans who mourned all the victims of the war. They didn't want war. It was forced upon them by their heartless enemy, the Jewish cabal and their diseased leaders, who were indeed sociopaths. Goebbels was a man of honor, much like his Fuhrer, and Goebbels too had to be vilified and demonized by the Allied propaganda machine, the Allied media, and later by the Allied history books. ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 )

No, Hitler's men were not sociopaths. But the enemy forces that sought to destroy them at any cost, including global war, were directed by sociopaths, and Jewish sociopaths at that. When former Waffen SS General Leon DeGrelle stated with conviction that the real winners of the war were the Jews, he wasn't joking.

"I am convinced — it's obvious, without a doubt in the universe — that those who won the war were the Jews." -- Leon Degrelle @ 1:30 in this video

The losers of the war were the ordinary German civilians in the crowded cities that the Allies fire-bombed into oblivion without any warning, like the hundreds of thousands of Dresden victims. The villainy is unprecedented.

Quote:
As more facts and information from neutral Swiss and Swedish sources began to arrive, however, many throughout the world were horrified. For the first time in the war, those in England, America and elsewhere learned what Germans had known for three years—the Allies were engaged in “deliberate terror-bombing.”

Most outrage, high and low, was directed at Arthur Harris, Chief of Bomber Command.

“[W]e were told at the briefing that there were many thousands of Panzer troops in the streets [of Dresden], either going to or coming back from the Russian Front,” one angry RAF crewman later explained. “My personal feeling is, that if we’d been told the truth at the briefing, some of us wouldn’t have gone.”

Once known affectionately by many of his men as “Bomber” Harris, after Dresden the air marshal earned a new nickname—“Butcher.” “Butcher Harris didn’t give a damn how many men he lost as long as he was pounding the shit out of German civilians,” growled one British airman.

Meanwhile, the man directly responsible for the Dresden massacre began to publicly distance himself from both Harris and terror bombing. Winston Churchill:

"It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts, should be reviewed. The destruction of Dresden remains a serious query against the conduct of Allied bombing. . . . I feel the need for more precise concentration upon military objectives … rather than on mere acts of terror and wanton destruction." -- source

Churchill backtracks like the hypocritical sociopath he is, throwing Butcher Harris under the bus to save his own fat ass. How typical of the monster known as Winston Churchill, the real butcher of Dresden. Hitler is an innocent choir boy next to the vile Churchill.



Image
Fake hero (smiling) versus real hero (serious).
-- source

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:41 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Lost almost entirely in the furor over Dresden was the February 23 leveling of Pforzheim in western Germany. Although much smaller than Dresden, in nineteen minutes the city was utterly destroyed with nearly 20,000 dead. A short time later, the “hospital city” of Wurzburg was likewise incinerated. Additionally, in what appeared an attempt to broaden the war, American planes struck neutral Switzerland, raiding Schaffhausen in late February and striking Basel and Zurich on March 4. -- source

The horror of Dresden was repeated on many German cities. Repeated war crimes is what finally won the war for the Allies and their Jewish controllers. This is the way sociopaths "win the game", using any underhanded way imaginable — rules, ethics, and morals be damned!

If only there were justice in the world. Churchill would have been assassinated, and Hitler's peace offers would have been accepted by England and France. Stalin would have been overthrown by the German military, Russia would have been freed from Jewish control, and Jews would have been relegated to Israel, where Palestinians would police them and keep them in check. Roosevelt's foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor would have been revealed and he would have been quickly impeached. All of his Jewish advisers would have been exposed and prosecuted. America would never have dropped atomic bombs on Japan and would have been forced to negotiate a proper peace with Japan to avoid prosecution for crimes against humanity (including crimes against its own people). Sociopaths would not dominate our world with Jews properly corralled and Germany setting the example for other nations to follow.

If only there were justice in this world, Dresden and many other German cities would never have been destroyed, and millions of German civilians would not have died so horribly. The Eisenhower death camps for surrendering German soldiers would never have operated, saving over a million lives. The gulags in Russia would have never existed, saving millions more. The Holocaust Lie would have never survived, and the real history of WW2 would be in the history books today. All the wars pursued by the USA since 1945 would likely never have happened, saving millions more.

Everything would be different, and surely much better for the bulk of humanity.



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Aug 30, 2018 8:08 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Here is an example of how the propaganda about the Dresden death toll can convince people to dismiss the truth. This is a comment from a reviewer of the book Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi German, 1944-1947 by Thomas Goodrich.
Martin Lawford wrote:
This book compares unfavorably with most other accounts of the events it describes. To take one example, Goodrich reports a death toll of 200,000 in the bombing of Dresden and cites as his source Dresden's Chief of Police. Unfortunately, the Nazi government is the worst possible source for historical accuracy. In 2010, long after all the real Nazis were dead or in nursing homes, the Dresden City Council commissioned a study which reported a maximum death toll from the bombing of 25,000. That's ghastly enough but an eight-fold exaggeration from a highly dubious source shows more interest in sensational claims than historical accuracy. -- source

The reviewer is inclined to dismiss the historical accuracy of the book based on a comparison to "most other accounts of the events it describes". In other words, one person recounting a truthful description of events cannot be believed if ten other people parrot the official propaganda line. This leads the reviewer to wrongly state that "the Nazi government is the worst possible source for historical accuracy". Author David Irving would disagree, as his widely acclaimed book on Dresden, Apocalypse 1945: The Destruction of Dresden, is based on the opposite perspective that the German people, including the Nazi government, who actually experienced the Dresden apocalypse would be the best possible source for historical accuracy! Irving also recognizes the German habit of documenting everything with efficient accuracy, given the enormous quantity of Nazi war records and documents he has studied as the basis for all of his books. But for the reviewer, Dresden's Chief of Police who actually participated in Dresden's recovery and burial of the bodies in 1945 becomes a highly dubious source, while the Dresden Historical Committee study some 65 years later, mired in the powerful political pressures of the false Jewish narrative of the Holocaust, is granted the title of best possible source for historical accuracy!

The insanity of our world is truly remarkable.



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Aug 31, 2018 5:35 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Pforzheim was another terror-bombing, holocaust attack on German civilians 10 days after the similar Dresden attack.

Quote:
During the latter stages of World War II, Pforzheim, a town in southwestern Germany, was bombed a number of times. The largest raid, and one of the most devastating area bombardments of the war was carried out by the Royal Air Force (RAF) on the evening of February 23, 1945. About one fifth of the town‘s population, over 17,000 people, were killed in the air raid, and about 83% of the town‘s buildings were destroyed. -- source

Quote:
In an area about 3 kilometers long and 1.5 kilometers wide, all buildings were reduced to rubble. 17,600 citizens, or one out of three Pforzheimers, were officially counted as dead and thousands were injured. Some died instantly from the impact of explosions, many from burns due to the hellish burning phosphorus that seeped into the cellars of houses where they hid, and others suffocated from lack of oxygen and poisonous gases or were crushed to death by collapsing walls. -- source

Quote:
During the latter stages of World War II, Pforzheim, a town in southwestern Germany, was bombed a number of times. The largest raid, and one of the most devastating area bombardments of the war was carried out by the Royal Air Force (RAF) on the evening of February 23, 1945. As many as 17,600 people, representing 31.4% of the town's population, were killed in the air raid. About 83% of the town's buildings were destroyed, two-thirds of the complete area of Pforzheim and between 80% and 100% of the inner city. -- source

There's a whole lot of parroting going on, it would seem.

The point here is that the official "old" propaganda concedes that over 31% of the city's population likely died in the bombing attack on Pforzheim, while the "new" propaganda places Dresden deaths at only 4% (25,000 deaths out of a normal population of 600,000) at most! This clearly exposes the desire of the WW2 victors (the Jews, according to Leon Degrelle) to further rewrite history in order to distort the true magnitude of the evil they visited upon the world.

In examining the photos of the destruction of Dresden, I still find it highly feasible that 1 in 2 people failed to survive the series of bombings the city suffered. Half the people in the city could easily have died, especially given the use of phosphorus incendiary bombs (now illegal due to their inhumane effects) to burn the combustibles that the explosive bombs had rendered accessible in the old and compact city during the first of the attacks on the night of February 13, 1945. The follow-up attack the next day targeting the rescue workers and dazed survivors in the streets just ensures a high kill percentage of the city's population. The 4% figure implied from the 2010 Dresden Historical Commission report is totally ludicrous.

This is how they fool us. This is how they mind control us. And this is who they are.



Image
Terror-Bombing of Pforzheim: Phosphorus Incendiary Bombs against Civilians
-- source

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:02 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 ... 52  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.