Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Hero or Traitor? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9935
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hero or Traitor?
Quote:
We know from other sources that Winston Churchill was under considerable pressure to finish off the peace talks that had been started by Neville Chamberlain. This is why George VI wanted Lord Halifax as prime minister instead of Churchill. There is an intriguing entry into the diary of John Colville, Churchill’s private secretary, on 10th May (1940). In discussing Churchill’s talks with the king about becoming prime minister Colville writes: “Nothing can stop him (Churchill) having his way – because of his powers of blackmail”. -- source

Powers of blackmail?! That is one of the primary characteristics of high-level sociopaths! Add that to his war-mongering attitude, his parasitic life of luxury on Jewish money, his running for the country estate whenever London was at risk of being bombed, his scheming to force Hitler to bomb London, his refusal to even look at peace proposals from Germany, his lack of empathy for the suffering of the British population, his desire to use illegal chemical and biological weapons on the German population, his stubborn focus on "winning the game", his unrelenting deception and manipulation of others... and you have a rabid sociopath similar to Stalin and Roosevelt, his reluctant war-time allies bound together only by converging interests and evil intent.

Quote:
Churchill was a sociopath. This fact is shown by himself in his own writings. He writes that while a young man in the British Army he was part of putting down an Arab uprising. He writes how bored he felt mowing down hundreds of people with a machine gun. Well, a normal person would not feel bored with machine gunning other human beings. Only a sociopath would. -- source



Image
Young Churchill in 1904.
Look into the eyes of a sociopath...

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:44 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9935
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hero or Traitor?
Eustace Mullins talks about Winston Churchill starting at 32:10 in the video below, confirming what David Irving has uncovered from original sources.




Eustace Mullins - The New World Order (Full Length)
(duration 58:20)


By the way, I wanted to find more information on Bobby Lee, the interviewer of Eustace Mullins in the video, so I naturally turned to Google. There's Bobby Lee the oriental stand-up comedian all over Google, but nothing on the interviewer I was interested in. I'm sure there is an interesting back story to that phenomenon. Bread and circuses perhaps?

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:05 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9935
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hero or Traitor?
During World War II, Churchill declared himself in favor of “terror bombing.” He wrote that he wanted “absolutely devastating, exterminating attacks by very heavy bombers.” Horrors such as the firebombing of Dresden were the result.

In the fight for Irish independence, Churchill, in his capacity as secretary of state for war and air, was one of the few British officials in favor of bombing Irish protesters, suggesting in 1920 that airplanes should use “machine-gun fire or bombs” to scatter them.

Dealing with unrest in Mesopotamia in 1921, as secretary of state for the colonies, Churchill acted as a war criminal: “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against the uncivilised tribes; it would spread a lively terror.” He ordered large-scale bombing of Mesopotamia, with an entire village wiped out in 45 minutes.

In Afghanistan, Churchill declared that the Pashtuns “needed to recognise the superiority of [the British] race” and that “all who resist will be killed without quarter.” He wrote: “We proceeded systematically, village by village, and we destroyed the houses, filled up the wells, blew down the towers, cut down the great shady trees, burned the crops and broke the reservoirs in punitive devastation. … Every tribesman caught was speared or cut down at once.”

In Kenya, Churchill either directed or was complicit in policies involving the forced relocation of local people from the fertile highlands to make way for white colonial settlers and the forcing of more than 150,000 people into concentration camps. Rape, castration, lit cigarettes on tender spots, and electric shocks were all used by the British authorities to torture Kenyans under Churchill’s rule.

But the principal victims of Winston Churchill were the Indians — “a beastly people with a beastly religion,” as he charmingly called them. He wanted to use chemical weapons in India but was shot down by his cabinet colleagues, whom he criticized for their “squeamishness,” declaring that “the objections of the India Office to the use of gas against natives are unreasonable.”

How ironic that Churchill has Hollywood movies portraying him as a great hero, while Hitler is portrayed in every Hollywood movie as a cruel villain. The reality is just the opposite. Hitler gassed to death no more Jews than Churchill did (unless some of the Italians in Bari, Italy were Jews).

This makes perfect sense when you remember that Jews run Hollywood.

You see, Churchill was the sociopath, not Hitler. Jewish sociopaths, using their near-monopoly media ownership, make sure we believe the opposite. Why? Because they accuse their opponents of their own malfeasance, as sociopaths always do.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:43 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9935
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hero or Traitor?
Quote:
That is the Winston Churchill who was on the scene and was instrumental in the lighting of the match that ignited both World War I and World War II, as revealed by Nick Kollerstrom in his short, incisive book, How Britain Initiated Both World Wars. We are also talking about the admittedly war-loving Churchill who had already made his reputation fighting in and writing reports from British colonial wars in India, the Sudan, and South Africa. At the dawn of World War I, the aristocratic Churchill had risen to the position of First Lord of the Admiralty, which placed him in charge of the British Navy. -- source

It's misleading to say Britain initiated both world wars, when it was really Churchill and cooperating sociopaths. It's not nations that start wars, it's sociopaths.

That's an important distinction we need to get straight. It's not nations that start wars, it's sociopaths.

Sociopaths.

Churchill was a sociopath. Stalin was a sociopath. Roosevelt was a sociopath. But surprise, surprise... Hitler was not a sociopath. But he was falsely painted as one by the real sociopaths. And most people still believe to this day that Hitler was the sociopath, and Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin were the good guys.
:face:

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Apr 21, 2018 5:23 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9935
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hero or Traitor?
Quote:
For example, in recent history the UK Prime Minister during the Second World War, Winston Churchill, did nothing to stop the city of Coventry to be bombed by the German air force despite having warning from decrypted radio transmissions. He knew that if he had done something, the Germans would have realised that their codes had been broken and the allies would have lost the advantage they had gained. -- source

Wrong. That's not why Churchill didn't do anything about the bombing. That is just the "plausible deniability" excuse Churchill knew he could rely on to dupe people of empathy. Churchill absolutely needed the bombings on England (see David Irving's story about Churchill shaking his fists at the empty skies and saying "Why won't you come?!") to successfully deceive and manipulate the British public into granting him the power and control he desired to be England's supreme leader. It was all a game that Churchill won and that the British public didn't even know was being played. It really was a con-game. This is what sociopaths excel in doing.

If you simply think about it, you will realize that the defense of Coventry could have been augmented without revealing that the German code had been broken. Churchill's plausible deniability excuse is lame, yet it works because the majority of humanity, the Followers, never think to challenge the excuse, because they lack critical thinking skills. To choose to keep a secret instead of saving people's lives is the kind of choice sociopaths would make.

Another similar example of a lame plausible deniability excuse is the one given for the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of WW2. "It saved millions of American lives who would have died in the invasion of Japan." BS. There was never going to be an invasion of Japan, as the Japanese were already looking for a way to surrender without being humiliated. But sociopaths were running the American war effort, and they wanted the Japanese to be humiliated, which is why they were demanding "unconditional surrender". In other words, no compromise and no understanding.

Quote:
It is worth reminding ourselves how emotionally convenient the traditional explanation of Hiroshima is — both for Japan and the United States. Ideas can have persistence because they are true, but unfortunately, they can also persist because they are emotionally satisfying: They fill an important psychic need. For example, at the end of the war the traditional interpretation of Hiroshima helped Japan’s leaders achieve a number of important political aims, both domestic and international.

Put yourself in the shoes of the emperor. You’ve just led your country through a disastrous war. The economy is shattered. Eighty percent of your cities have been bombed and burned. The Army has been pummeled in a string of defeats. The Navy has been decimated and confined to port. Starvation is looming. The war, in short, has been a catastrophe and, worst of all, you’ve been lying to your people about how bad the situation really is. They will be shocked by news of surrender. So which would you rather do? Admit that you failed badly? Issue a statement that says that you miscalculated spectacularly, made repeated mistakes, and did enormous damage to the nation? Or would you rather blame the loss on an amazing scientific breakthrough that no one could have predicted? At a single stroke, blaming the loss of the war on the atomic bomb swept all the mistakes and misjudgments of the war under the rug. The Bomb was the perfect excuse for having lost the war. No need to apportion blame; no court of inquiry need be held. Japan’s leaders were able to claim they had done their best. So, at the most general level the Bomb served to deflect blame from Japan’s leaders. -- source



Image
How sociopaths see things.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Apr 22, 2018 12:53 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9935
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hero or Traitor?
Senator John McCain has often been the subject in this thread. Now we hear a Lutheran pastor's point of view concerning McCain's status as hero or traitor.

Quote:
Senator, a good Lutheran pastor preaches Law and Gospel. Here’s your situation in terms of your earthly performance under God’s Law: In life, you killed and wounded scores of your shipmates on the USS Forrestal ‘Wet Starting’ your A-4 aircraft in a deliberate attempt at grandstanding. Your Admiral father covered that up, as he did Israel’s deliberate attack on the USS Liberty which killed and wounded scores of Americans.

You betrayed your POW colleagues in Hanoi, not under torture as is indicated by Empire Media, but for a guest room and morning coffee according to cell mates. I have interviewed several of them personally. Your real performance then would earn you the name Songbird. It is a name that has remained etched in the vivid memories of your comrades all these decades later. As in the USS Forrestal tragedy, you would evade a military tribunal and an inevitable court martial and dishonorable discharge due to your father’s power and influence in the inner sanctums of the US Navy elite and the covert assistance of the President of the United States.

You divorced your first wife when she was ill, to marry a rich woman who financed your political career. She obtained her money from her father, Jim Hensley, a bag man for the Meyer Lansky Israeli Crime Syndicate.

You have been a willing and deliberate liar and warmonger for the Zionist State of Israel, the banks, and the Military Industrial Complex. Among the countless number of deaths you have been a conscious and consenting party over many years, you have even stooped in recent years to photo opportunities with Sunni Wahhabic extremists from ISIS and the al-Qaeda fronts in your Israeli sponsored activities in Syria.

In short, Senator, as I explain the gravity and seriousness of your eternal position, you are nearing entrance into the grasping Jaws of Hell. You are like Belshazzar. The Israeli American Empire is like his Babylonian Empire. Both have ‘been weighed and found wanting in the balance.’ (Daniel, Chapter Five)

And so, I present you with your one route of escape. Confess your sins in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Rest in the mercy of the Holy Trinity.

While your mind is still clear, read and consider the Gospel as found in I John, Chapter One. It is your only hope.
The Empire, the Empire Media, and the Synagogue of Satan you have served cannot save you. I cannot save you. You cannot save yourself.

Only Christ can, in your case, just before the stroke of Midnight.

Senator, concern yourself not with whether or not Donald Trump attends your funeral. Concern yourself with Eternity in either the Kingdom of God, or in Hell. -- source

John McCain, hero or traitor? Yes, it's a tough question, as sociopaths are so good at fooling people. Looks like the pastor is not fooled.



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu May 10, 2018 6:45 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9935
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hero or Traitor?
Quote:
Never let it be said that "the powers-that-be" (cough cough) do not reward their loyal goy agents generously. Here we are, more than a half-century after Winston Churchill, that vile, bumbling, drunken, cigar-chomping, lying, scheming, plagiarizing, sodomizing, warmongering, genocidal blob of human feces departed for hell -- and he is still being glorified on the big screen for the next degeneration of boobs to worship. -- source

The story of Winston Churchill fed to the gullible public, just like the story of Adolf Hitler, is nothing but propaganda that is far removed from the truth. It is Hollywood's job to reinforce our brainwashing and keep us believing the lies that have been so carefully placed into our consciousness by parrots parroting other parrots, who stretch backward into time in a long line until the original lying Jewish sociopaths are reached. Hollywood is controlled by the Jews, as even they like to boast. The myth of Churchill supports the myth of the evil Nazis, which supports the myth of the madman Hitler, which supports the myth of the Holocaust. The Holocaust is the Big Lie, the one that must never be exposed. Exposure would mean the end of the most heinous con-game in history, one of deliberately fabricating a shockingly false history that traumatizes nearly every mind on the planet in brutal and nefarious ways.

"I think a curse should rest on me — because I love this war. I know it's smashing and shattering the lives of thousands every moment — and yet — I can't help it — I enjoy every second of it." -- 1916 (writing of WW 1)

Spoken like a true sociopath, Winston.

Hitler would never have said anything like that. He hated war, having spent four years fighting as an ordinary soldier in World War I. Many of Hitler's attempts to negotiate a peaceful end to WW2 were deliberately sabotaged by the warmonger Churchill.



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:52 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9935
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hero or Traitor?
Quote:
Undoubtedly Churchill was a flawed character, but not a genocidal leader. Confronted by “the abyss of a new dark age”, Churchill’s oratory inspired resistance and formed a great alliance that defeated the far greater evils of Nazism and Japanese imperial expansion. He deserves a Nobel for that. -- source

B.S.

Churchill deserves a Nobel Peace Prize like Barack Obama deserved one ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 ).

I was investigating the arguments that Churchill did not bear any responsibility for the Bengal famine in India which killed millions from starvation during WW2. The International Churchill Society defends Churchill, as one would expect, but I see duped people defending their "hero". Churchill was a genocidal leader. Sociopaths in leadership positions almost always are. While normal people are always trying to dream up reasons for the strange behaviors of their sociopathic leaders, it is a futile exercise. Sociopaths have entirely different reasons for their actions that are markedly devoid of empathy, compassion, sympathy, responsibility, and integrity. They act just like like sociopaths and use deception to hide their true motivations.




Image
Churchill's written history of WW2 is demonstrably full of lies to make him look good.
Yep, sociopaths do that.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Aug 27, 2018 11:02 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9935
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hero or Traitor?
Synchronicity!

I love it when it happens!

And it just happened while listening to David Irving at about 1:45:00 in this video:



David Irving - The Biggest Lie
(duration 1:53:51)


A question is asked of David Irving about new information revealing that Churchill's mother was Jewish. Irving says Churchill probably wasn't cognizant of it because he never mentioned it! That is just David Irving failing to understand how secretive sociopaths are about their private histories! I'm sure Churchill never mentioned it because he knew he had to hide it, given the extent to which he was financially indebted to the Jewish cabal. Jews completely owned Churchill, and this was a big secret that the deceived and manipulated (hoodwinked) public could never know. So somehow David Irving brushes off Churchill's Jewish mother as not particularly interesting. But...

Quote:
"What is interesting are his (Winston Churchill's) links with the Jewish community, which I'll go into in a little bit of detail here, because they've not been gone into by any of the other Churchill biographers, for obvious reason, in particular the main authorized Churchill biographer Martin Gilbert, hasn't gone into it for the simple reason that he is one himself." -- David Irving

So the "authorized" Churchill biographer Martin Gilbert is a Jew! But then why should that be interesting when Churchill's Jewish mother is not? Irving goes on to explain how Churchill's stately lifestyle, which he could not afford, was paid for by wealthy Jews for the 10 years preceding the start of WW2. Suddenly, his mother being Jewish is not to be dismissed, as it appears the Jewish cabal has had its claws into Churchill since he was born.

But the sychronicity comes from my prior post, where I mention Churchill being defended by the International Churchill Society. And who do they get to defend their man Churchill? Martin Gilbert! The very same Martin Gilbert who Irving identifies as the authorized Churchill biographer who doesn't want the goyim to know he's a Jew, defending Churchill, a puppet of the Jewish cabal, who happens to have a Jewish mother!

What authority "authorized" Martin Gilbert as the official Churchill biographer? Well, who owns the publishing houses that authors rely on? The Jews. God's Chosen People. The Authorities. Our Masters.

Quote:
“Churchill was not responsible for the Bengal Famine,” Sir Martin replied. “I have been searching for evidence for years: none has turned up."

Oh yes, you can trust Sir Martin Gilbert and his searching. No conflict of interest there! No bias either!

Jews stick to their lies with the boldness and audacity of a sociopath. Coincidence? I think not.




Image
Another revered Martin, but not a Jew, and not so biased. He saw sociopaths.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:10 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9935
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hero or Traitor?
Quote:
McCain was an unapologetic imperial spear carrier, a thuggish scoundrel supporting all US wars of aggression against nations threatening no one.

He was uncaring about the horrific human cost, dismissive about millions of civilians perishing post-9/11 alone, countless millions more harmed by US-led aggression he cheerled. -- source

Sounds like a classic sociopath to me!

It makes me wonder why it is so hard for most Americans to see the true nature of the men that lead them.

But I don't wonder for long. When 80% of the population are Followers, it is pretty self-explanatory.




Image
John McCain is not pictured, but might as well be.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Sep 02, 2018 1:49 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.