Reply to topic  [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 52  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Adolf Hitler said the following in his inaugural address as chancellor (his Reichstag Speech of March 23, 1933):

Quote:
"Simultaneously with the political purification of our public life, the government of the Reich will undertake a thorough moral purging of the collective body of the nation. The entire educational system, the theatre, cinema, literature, press and radio -- all these will be used as means to this end..." -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 30

This is why the Jews targeted Hitler, because any moral corrections needed for Germany are going to be at their expense, because they are the immoral elements. To restore the body of a nation to health, parasites must be eliminated, and the parasites will not be pleased. They will call it discrimination, a hate crime, and anti-parasite. They will do and say anything to stop the treatment, because from their perspective, it is their survival that is at stake. The survival of the nation doesn't interest them.

Hitler was doing what any doctor would do for a sick patient -- purification. Elimination of toxins. First you remove the toxic elements from the body politic, so that the body politic can properly direct the rest of the healing process. Then the other most heavily infected areas must be addressed. And where did the Jews exercise disproportionate control in relation to their small numbers? Government, banking, the educational system, theater, cinema, literature, radio, and the press. So Hitler first purged government and banking of the parasites, then turned his efforts to the other areas where parasites thrived.

Was Hitler right or wrong in his diagnosis and treatment? The proof is in the pudding, meaning you can't argue with results. In the next six years, from 1933 to 1939, Germany was pulled from death's door and returned to radiant health, despite the determined efforts of the entire Jewish world to sabotage the process via economic boycott and other means.

By the way, the entire Jewish world today is working hard to make it illegal to boycott Israel in response to its outrageous human rights violations. How's that for deplorable irony? Remember, sociopaths are hypocrites. Sociopaths will savagely condemn others that use the very same tactics that the sociopaths used against them.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:05 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Although I am only 44 pages into the book Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, I am struck by the constant barrage of subtle derogatory barbs the author launches at Hitler. I am thinking of starting over from the beginning and highlighting these put-downs to get a more accurate measure of the extent of his bias, which appears to be debilitating. This programmed bias is the same source of his cognitive dissonance that I commented on earlier ( 1 2 3 ). Interestingly, it looks as if it is not done consciously, but is ingrained into his belief system concerning Hitler. I believe it is the product of his brainwashing from the propaganda we have all been fed since we were born into this world of deception.

The last example that caused me to think of this exercise in highlighting is a picture on page 23. The first time I looked at it and read the caption, I completely missed the subtle derogatory barb, which makes me realize now the extent of my own brainwashing! Here is the photocopied picture and its caption as published in the book:

Image
"Hitler showing his honoured guests his favorite sculpture, Myron's Discus Thrower, at the Munich Glyptotek, July 1938. Among those looking on are Gerdy Troost and Arturo Marpicati, vice-secretary of the Italian Fascist Party. Considering them culturally challenged, Hitler declined to invite any of his own party officials."

I could not find this exact picture with an on-line search, but I found similar ones, like these:


Image
Adolf Hitler, Italian ambassador Dino Alfieri (in white jacket), architect Gerdy Troost, Martin Bormann (behind Troost),
Heinrich Himmler (far right) and others at Munich's Haus der Kunst for the 1939 "Day of German Art." -- source


Image
The Great German Art Exhibition in Munich, 1937 -- source


Note that these two pictures are captioned as being from different years, when closer examination of the clothes suggests they were taken on the same day. Nevertheless, this visit to the Munich art museum was probably an annual affair for Hitler and his guests.

In all photos, there are plenty of Nazi party officials in attendance, which makes author Frederic Spotts an obvious liar when he claims "Considering them culturally challenged, Hitler declined to invite any of his own party officials." I am sure Hitler knew the artistic tastes of his party officials and would certainly know who would appreciate a museum visit and who would not. Yet Spotts feels obliged, as usual, to sully Hitler's character with a false statement.

If a respected author and academic historian like Frederic Spotts is this brainwashed, how bad is it for the rest of us?

So this is a typical example showing how programmed we are with respect to our beliefs about Adolf Hitler.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Jan 15, 2018 8:54 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
In our day and age, perhaps the most common entry-level drug into historic revisionism including holocaust denial is the widely disseminated "documentary" called Adolf Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told, often abbreviated TGSNT. It is a roughly 6.5 hour film made in 2013 by a person known as "Dennis Wise". Indeed, most people who recommend TGSNT to others don't even know who made the film, and those who do know it was Dennis Wise, don't know who he is. Shady, don't you think? -- source

No. What's shady is big-name Jewish Hollywood producers like Billy Wilder being called into the freshly liberated German concentration camps to do war propaganda footage to support the Jewish Holocaust hoax. Whether Dennis Wise is a big name or a credentialed historian is not relevant to determining the truth of his presentation. For that, we need not even consider the man. To immediately focus on Dennis Wise instead of the facts presented in the film is the usual strategy employed by sociopaths, i.e. kill the messenger, ignore the message.

So this claimed debunking of TGSNT is starting out looking exactly like the kind of deception and manipulation that sociopaths are so skilled at employing. It's hardly different from Jewish bigots labeling anyone who dares oppose anything Jewish, including their lies and deceptions, as an anti-Semite. It's just a ploy in a game of discrediting others, rather than trying to expose the truth. Who wouldn't want people to discover the truth?

  • Con-artists
  • Criminals
  • Sociopaths

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:13 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
I bet you've never heard of Paula Hitler, Adolf Hitler's younger sister. I bet you've never read her statement made in 1957, addressed to the parasitic, sociopathic Jews running the German press ever since Germany was conquered in 1945.

I am 62 years old at the moment, and today is the first I ever heard of Paula Hitler.

How the hell does that happen? Why is this information kept quiet? Why is her statement never talked about?

That happens by deliberate design, because Paula Hitler doesn't fit well into the false Holocaust story the Jews used to brainwash the entire world with. The Jewish-run press and media don't want you to hear about it, because it might lead you to question your own brainwashing. The deceivers can't afford to have that happen.

So let's read what Paula Hitler had to say to the Jews running the German press in 1957:

Quote:
Gentlemen,

Never forget this; your names will be forgotten even before your bodies have rotted away in the earth, but the name Adolf Hitler will still be a light in the darkness. You cannot murder him by drowning his memory in your sick-buckets, and you cannot strangle him with your filthy, ink-stained fingers.

His name exists forever in hundreds of thousands of souls. You are far too insignificant to even touch him. He loved Germany. He fretted over Germany, and when he fought for honour and respect, he fought for German honour and respect for Germany. And when there was nothing left, he gave his life for Germany.

What have you given so far? Which one of you would give his life for Germany? The only things you care about are riches, power, and never ending luxurious living. When you think of Germany, you think of indulging your senses, without responsibility or care.

Trust me on this: the Fuhrer's utter unselfishness in word and deed alone guarantees his immortality. The fact that the bitter fight for Germany's greatness wasn't crowned by success like Cromwell's in Britain, for example, has a lot to do with the mentality of the people involved. On the one hand the Englishman's character is essentially unfair, ruled by jealousy, self-importance, and lack of consideration. But he never forgets he is an Englishman, loyal to his crown. On the other hand, you with your need for recognition are never first and foremost a German. Therefore it doesn't matter to you, you insignificant beings, if you destroy the entire nation. Your only guiding thought will always be me first, me second, me third. In your worthlessness you will never think of the welfare of the nation, and with that pitiful philosophy you wish to prevent the immortality of a giant?

Paula Hitler
Berchtesgaden, May 1, 1957
-- source


Whoa, powerful stuff! She hits the nail square on the head! She too recognized how unselfish Hitler was, which was a major part of his greatness. No psychopath is unselfish, so either Hitler wasn't unselfish, or he wasn't a psychopath. Readers of this forum will know that I have made the claim and presented much evidence that Hitler was indeed not a psychopath (or sociopath, same thing in my book). Readers will also know that my detractors, like UncleZook, have tried to leverage that claim as a means to discredit me as a crazy loon who doesn't believe the widely accepted "fact" that Hitler was a psychopath. But the real fact is that nearly all of the German population, nearly 70 million strong, had a quarter century to evaluate the character of Adolf Hitler (1921 to 1945). Those 70 million Germans were solidly behind him. Why? Because Hitler was solidly behind them! He loved German. As Paula Hitler correctly observed, "He loved Germany. He fretted over Germany, and when he fought for honour and respect, he fought for German honour and respect for Germany. And when there was nothing left, he gave his life for Germany."

Paula Hitler knew the truth. She died in 1960, three years after making her statement. Today, in 2018, 58 years later, the Jews are still working frantically to maintain their insidious lies, to keep the people of the world in the dark, and to expand their power and control over the goyim, the name they give to the foolish non-Jews who believe their fantasy tales of the "evil" Hitler gassing 6 million Jews to death, which never even happened!





Paula Hitler: Statement in Support for her Brother
(duration 1:57)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Jan 20, 2018 1:23 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Peter Morley interviewed Paula Hitler, and in this video he recounts what is basically his cognitive dissonance. He can't reconcile this quiet sister who speaks so highly of Adolf Hitler with the brainwashing he had received of Hitler as "the most evil person you could ever imagine". Every effort is made to reinforce that false narrative and denigrate Hitler by twisting the most innocent things around to fit the propaganda. It's incredible stuff. The fact that Peter Morley cannot even suspect that everything he's heard about Hitler is a lie underscores how effective the mind control is.




Paula Hitler
(duration 2:45)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Jan 20, 2018 8:30 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Closing remarks of the Agent.

If further investigations prove that the declarations of Mrs. Paula Wolf are true there can be no doubt in her sincerity, at least as far as she is describing her own life and her relationship to her brother. (1) Unworthy of belief, however, is her declaration that she did never know anything about the innumerable crimes which were committed during the government of her brother and under his immediate responsibility, and that she was never told of these crimes. (2) She also insisted on the fact that she never noticed his threat to destroy the Jews in Europe and to crush all his enemies in his speeches which were transferred by radio over the whole world and also to Vienna! (3) And what a contrast of this Adolf Hitler who according to her own declarations was radiant with kindness with the brutal man he really was! (4) The tactics to have been unaware of all what happened during 12 years of Nazi terror are only too well known and unable to convince even an unprejudiced man. (5) -- source

  1. Time has proved that there is no doubt of her sincerity and honesty.
  2. This is not unworthy of belief, but is to be expected if the claims of Hitler's crimes are false.
  3. Hitler's goal was never to "destroy the Jews", but to purge the country via emigration of anti-German peoples.
  4. All the evidence does point to a Hitler who radiated kindness, while there is no evidence for an "evil" Hitler.
  5. They convinced me, a heavily prejudiced man who grew up steeped in the pervasive propaganda of the Jewish Holocaust directed by the most evil Hitler!

The interrogating agent of Paula Hitler (a.k.a. Paula Wolf) is the one who has been completely duped by the propaganda the Allies permeated the public with during the course of the war. His version of reality is severely corrupted, while Paula Hitler speaks the truth!

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Jan 20, 2018 9:46 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Back to the article "debunking" TGSNT that I posted on earlier.

Quote:
TGSNT is debunked, and people who claim it isn't, are in denial (no pun intended). -- source

That would be me. The attempt to debunk Dennis Wise's documentary "The Greatest Story Never Told" is pathetic at best, and deliberate deceit at worse. I suspect it is the latter, because of the implication that if you don't agree it is debunked, you are clearly:

  • uneducated
  • know nothing about history
  • a white supremicist
  • an anti-Semite

I'm not any of those, but since I don't accept this debunking, I am therefore all of them. Not a very convincing argument. He ("Sir" Aaron Richards) lays out that line of reasoning here:

Quote:
So overall, while Adolf Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told might be gospel/preaching to the choir to the white supremacist and/or antisemite, and perhaps even appear convincing to the average layperson on the street "with an open mind" who only possesses a rudimentary middle school education, people who have studied history even a little bit will immediately be able to spot its many many errors, strawmen, lack of sources and vastly exaggerated claims with which it hopes to concoct a whitewashing of National Socialist Germany and at the same time atrocity propaganda against Allied powers. -- source


Here's an example of the quality of his debunking claims:

Quote:
CLAIM 4: "Jews made up 2% of Germany's population but made up 50% of media, 70% of judges, and nearly 100% of the banking system."

An unsourced claim therefore, as the Hitchens Razor goes: "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." -- source

So the revisionist claim is dismissed. How convenient.

In fact, Jews made up less than 1% of Germany's population in 1933. Jews were without any doubt disproportionately represented in positions of power in media, government, education, and finance. The argument is quite sound, and even if the percentages are not precise (and they never can be), the idea of Jews wielding disproportionate power in Germany and using that power to benefit themselves at the expense of the German population majority is not so easily dismissed. Doing so is highly deceptive, highly manipulative, highly unprincipled, and highly objectionable. The appeal is clearly to the emotions and not to the rational mind.

There are enormous problems with his other 9 claims that clearly speak to Sir Richards' apologist position in favor of the official Allied version of Hitler and the Nazis, all of which is derived from Allied wartime (and post-war) propaganda. I would be happy to explore any of the 9 claims in detail if there is any request, but until then I hardly think it is a productive endeavor, as the quality of Sir Richards' arguments makes them easy to dismantle.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:11 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
General Patton was murdered by elements within his own government.

He was murdered because he was beginning to understand the treachery of the Jewish cabal and the integrity of the Nazis.

Quote:
The murder of General Patton, which touches the hearts of even non Americans 65 years later, also establishes that the Elite and its stooges have absolutely no loyalty to any country and that their ruthlessness, planning, cohesion, penetration, anonymity and cunning makes them the most dangerous and persistent foe of humanity. Betrayal and treachery is not unique to developing societies - US history is replete with the most sordid and supremely concealed betrayals that are never revealed or taught in highly controlled US academic institutions. "Democratic" USA was always an insidiously and increasingly controlled state - it is now, for all practical purposes, a totalitarian state and the fig leaf is gone. -- source

In other words, Patton was beginning to realize that he was helping the bad guys (the organized sociopaths) destroy the good guys (Hitler and crew).

It is the organized sociopaths who "have absolutely no loyalty to any country and that their ruthlessness, planning, cohesion, penetration, anonymity and cunning makes them the most dangerous and persistent foe of humanity." It is the organized sociopaths who practice betrayal and treachery, betrayals that are indeed "sordid and supremely concealed betrayals that are never revealed or taught". And it was precisely the organized sociopaths that Hitler opposed, that he purged from Germany, and that plotted against him, orchestrating the second world war of the 20th century expressly to crush Hitler and the Germans.

Quote:
"If what we are doing [to the Germans] is 'Liberty' then give me death. I can't see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic and I am sure of it." -- General George Patton (source)

Patton was sure it was the Jews directing the destruction and genocide of Germany. It appears he was right, so the Jews (meaning their sociopath leaders) ordered him killed.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Jan 22, 2018 7:57 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Since the only point in being a dictator was to dictate, Hitler took enormous pleasure in pontificating about the arts and in laying down the law about what artists were to produce -- and even what the public was to enjoy. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 36

This is another example of the brainwashing and simple-mindedness that the author Frederic Spotts displays towards Hitler. Dictators are bad. Art critics are good, except when they are dictators. So by denigrating Hitler, Spotts is thus both good and legitimate. How ridiculous!

Dictators are not necessarily bad. God is a dictator. A military general is a dictator. The father in a traditional nuclear family is a dictator. Anyone who makes a choice can be called a dictator. Hitler made a lot of tough choices, always with the best interests of Germany in mind. Was he therefore bad? The vast majority of the German population, a sophisticated and culturally advanced people, judged Hitler as not only good, but exceptionally good. They were in the best position to judge, having more than a dozen years of concrete experience with the man. Doesn't that trump any amount of time believing propaganda?

Of course the counter claim is that the German people were a simple-minded and culturally impoverished people who were completely duped by the Nazi propaganda machine. Hitler was just a con-artist putting on a convincing show. He was a madman, a psychopath, a raging narcissist serving the rich and powerful.

So Germans are just like Americans, and Hitler was just like Trump?

You won't see Trump with a 90% approval rating from the American public.

Quote:
Berlin, Monday, Aug. 20, 1933 -- Eighty-nine and nine-tenths per cent of the German voters endorsed in yesterday's plebiscite Chancellor Hitler's assumption of greater power than has ever been possessed by any other ruler in modern times. Nearly 10 per cent indicated their disapproval. -- New York Times
Quote:
Before Hitler began his war, the equivalent of his approval rating (actual polls were not conducted) was probably in the 90's as he had achieved much up until that point. -- source

Again, even here, the propaganda is present, as World War 2 was not "his war". It was Churchill's war, Stalin's war, and Roosevelt's war far more than it was Hitler's war. Hitler didn't want war, but the three genuine sociopaths did. Hitler made peace proposal after peace proposal before and during the war, over two dozen of them according to some sources. Did you ever hear of Churchill, Stalin, or Roosevelt offering any peace proposals to Germany?




Hitler wanted peace and an alliance with England.
(duration 5:01)
Hitler's own words -- trying to avoid "his" war

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Jan 24, 2018 6:50 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Of note in the extensive research Vincent Reynouard always presents as evidence of his historical findings are these gems:


@ 11:56 -- Votes in support of Hitler in Berlin were at 96.2% in early 1936, nearly the same as in smaller towns where voting occurred under the watchful eye of the Brown Shirts. Even in working class centers that were communist-leaning, votes against Hitler never exceeded 3%. Hitler's massive support within Germany was genuine and exceptional.

@ 15:35 -- The detailed and correct rules and regulations of a Waffen SS soldier listed on the inside cover of each soldier's military ID booklet highlight the strict adherence to the "rules of war" of the 1929 Geneva Convention that was expected of every SS soldier.

@ 19:00 -- German soldiers were executed by the German military during the war for crimes against French civilians in France. Two examples of many documented from the Nuremberg Trials are given. In the first, one of the most heinous, two soldiers were tried for rape, theft, assault, and manslaughter. Both were found guilty and executed. In the second, two soldiers regularly stole bedcovers and clothes from French civilians and sent the stolen goods back home. They too were found guilty and executed!


Even my 93-year old French friend -- who hates Nazis and is so proud to have helped make Molotov cocktails for the resistance fighters to lob at German soldiers in 1944 shortly before Paris was liberated -- frankly admitted to me that during her experience living in occupied Paris at age 15 to 19, that the German soldiers were always well-behaved, well-disciplined, and always acted "correctly".




La « Shoah » expliquée par l'histoire du peuple juif (introduction)
(Vincent Reynouard)
(duration 27:39}

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Jan 25, 2018 8:26 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 52  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.