Reply to topic  [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 52  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9922
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
After the war, Hitler's best friend August Kubizek was arrested and held by the Allies. Kubizek recounts in his book the way the interrogations usually went. What jumps out at me is how brainwashed the Allied interrogators already were against Hitler, believing he was so evil that any sane person would feel obligated to destroy Hitler to best serve humanity! Here is how Kubizek describes it:

Quote:
I was arrested and held for sixteen months in the notorious detention camp of Glasenbach. Naturally, an intensive search was made during my absence for the Hitler papers, but with no success. In the beginning I was often questioned, first in Eferding, then in Gmunden. These interrogations all ran on the same lines; something like:

"You are a friend of Adolf Hitler's?"
"Yes."

"Since when?"
"Since 1904."

"What do you mean by that? At that time he was nobody."
"Nevertheless, I was his friend."
"How could you be his friend when he was still a nobody?"

An American officer of the Central Intelligence Corps asked: "So you are a friend of Adolf Hitler's. What did you get out of it?"
"Nothing."

"But you admit that you were his friend. Did he give you money?"
"No."

"Or food?"
"Neither."

"A car, a house?"
"Not that either."

"Did he introduce you to beautiful women?"
"Nor that."

"Did he receive you again, later on?"
"Yes."

"Did you see him often?"
"Occasionally."

"How did you manage to see him?"
"I just went to him."

"So you were with him. Really? Quite close?"
"Yes, quite close."

"Alone?"
"Alone."

"Without any guard?"
"Without any guard."

"So you could have killed him?"
"Yes, I could have."

"And why didn't you kill him?"
"Because he was my friend."
-- source


We Americans have been taught that the Nazis were all about propaganda, and that was how they could bamboozle the German population into following their evil agenda. In fact, that is just Allied propaganda. In fact, it was the Allies that used pervasive propaganda to bamboozle the American population into following their evil agenda!

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:26 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9922
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Something had to be done! And Hitler did do something – he placed all the Jews in containment camps to allow Germany to breath again. But – this is the key point in this essay/piece. He did it in a way which was ethical. The camps had decent sufficient food (bearing in mind it was war time), they had theaters, swimming pools, football pitches, post offices where inmates could communicate to the outside world, kindergartens, art and music recreation and even prostitutes.

Quality sanitation within the camps was paramount and that is why the inmates clothes were regularly de-loused with Zyklon B gas. There were no human gas chambers……THAT IS A BIG FAT KOSHER LIE; to which the world has had to endure for over half a century. -- source

There were no human gas chambers. That fact changes things dramatically. No six million exterminated Jews. No homicidal maniac named Hitler conspiring to exterminate Jews. And it reveals the most insidious collection of lies propagated by any group of people in the history of the planet! That Jews would invent this horrendous deception and propagate it for over 70 years, benefiting enormously at the expense of all other people, granting themselves privileged and untouchable status while they perpetrate crimes against humanity more evil than the ones they falsely pinned on Hitler, is almost unbelievable. No normal person could imagine such a scheme.

But sociopaths could.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Dec 24, 2017 5:14 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9922
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Hitler was financed by the western banksters.

I used to believe this one, but it turns out it is just part of the incessant propaganda designed to discredit Hitler, who was the real deal! Hitler was the genuine "good guy" of the whole ugly global war, a war conceived, prepared, and steered by genuinely evil sociopaths in positions of great power and control. In fact, Hitler's goodness -- his solid principles, his moral and ethical sense, his unyielding concern for his people and nation, his selflessness, his sense of justice and equality, and his hard-won achievements derived from his genuine goodness -- is the very reason this horrible war was thrust upon the world.

How evil is that?! How evil is it to snuff out 60 million lives and lay devastation to scores of nations in order to crush one good man? And then, to make matters worse, the evil ones fabricate all manner of lies to make everyone believe that this one good man is the epitome of evil!

No, Hitler was not financed by the western banksters. Yes, they continued to invest in Germany even when Hitler was an up-coming politician, even when he became Fuhrer, even when he stopped the criminal Jewish Poles who were murdering German families. That's because businessmen have no ethics. The pursuit of profit is their only concern. They would invest in Germany no matter what its politics, as long as there were profits to be made. Hitler wasn't the reason they sent their money to Germany. Profits were.

Quote:
Claim: Hitler was financed by the same London and NYC-based Masonic Jewish bankers he was railing against.

Rebuttal: Can anyone show us a receipt? Seriously, there is not one shred of evidence that the Rothschilds or their front men “financed” the rise of Hitler’s NSDAP. Hitler’s money came from German businessmen fearful of Communist takeover, Russian emigres / Royalists who fled the Bolsheviks, and regular Party members, disgruntled veterans and NSDAP supporters.

Contrary to the idiotic claims of patriotards and assorted trolls who are known to pose as “anti-Globalists,” Hitler shut down the German, French, and Austrian branches of the House of Rothschild — a very peculiar action for a “Rothschild agent”, eh? -- source



Image
Winston Churchill (left), puppet and obedient minion of the evil ruling sociopaths

"In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies." -- Winston Churchill

This is also how Churchill operated in peacetime. Sociopaths make no distinction. Truth is always the enemy for them.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Dec 25, 2017 2:02 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9922
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Hess's flight to Britain almost exactly 70 years ago has remained one of the great mysteries of World War II to this day. What compelled the Führer's right-hand man to risk his life on a spring day when 500 German bombers were carrying out their heaviest attack yet on London? Why did he offer peace to Great Britain at a time when it was the Wehrmacht's last fighting enemy and Hitler was preparing to attack the Soviet Union?

Until now, historians had assumed that Hitler's deputy was acting on his own. "Hess acted without Hitler's knowledge, but in the deep (if confused) belief that he was carrying out his wishes," British author Ian Kershaw wrote in his 2008 book, "Hitler: A Biography". But now a previously unpublished document is casting Hess's notorious one-way trip in a new light: A 28-page, handwritten report that historian Matthias Uhl of the German Historical Institute Moscow discovered in the State Archive of the Russian Federation.

The document was written in February 1948 by a man who was closely associated with Hess: his adjutant Karlheinz Pintsch, a Soviet war prisoner from 1945 to 1955. Pintsch, a businessman who joined the Nazi Party early on, had accompanied Hess to the airfield. The next day he had Hitler's aides wake up the Führer at his mountain retreat in Obersalzberg to give him a letter. According to eyewitnesses, the letter began with the words: "My Führer, when you receive this letter I shall be in England."

Contrary to the prevailing view, Hitler, according to the Pintsch account, was not furious in the least when he received the news. "Hitler calmly listened to my report and dismissed me without comment," Pintsch writes. The Führer had known about Hess's flight for a while, the adjutant claims in his report, because Berlin had also been negotiating with London for some time. The flight, Pintsch writes, occurred "by prior arrangement with the English." Hess's mission, he adds, was to "use all means at his disposal to achieve, if not a German military alliance with England against Russia, at least the neutralization of England." -- source

Why is it so hard to get to the truth? Because the ruling sociopaths don't want us to know the truth. It would spoil their deceptions and manipulations that are used to control our minds.

As I have long suspected, Hess was sent by Hitler to England to stop the war. Hitler didn't want war. He wanted to be left in peace so he could be free to improve Germany in great leaps and bounds, exactly as he had before the war was declared by England and France.

All the malicious propaganda that Hitler was a homicidal maniac intent on conquering the world is utter nonsense. He was already a disgruntled veteran of the War to End all Wars, a decorated and reluctant war hero, a compassionate and dedicated artist, a national socialist focused on his people, a long-suffering ethical voice speaking for justice and equality for all Germans, a man for all seasons. Listen to Hitler tell it in his own words from 45:25 to 56:20 in "The Ultimate Red Pill".




The Ultimate Red Pill (EstelleNation)

February 14, 2019: This video scrubbed from the Internet. Private copy here.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Dec 25, 2017 3:03 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9922
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Kevin Myers of the Irish Independent declared back in 2012 that “Everything people believed about Hitler’s intentions toward Britain was a myth created by Churchill.” For example, Churchill perpetuated that Hitler desired to invade Britain in 1940, but it was a total fabrication.

On the contrary, Myers declared, Hitler “admired the British Empire,” and that he “offered terms that did not involve German control of Britain. Churchill refused to allow these terms to be read to the cabinet, and they remain prudently concealed under the 100-year rule.” -- source

Why must Churchill command that Hitler's peace terms be concealed for 100 years? Would it be because those peace terms were perfectly reasonable and just? Would it be because they would expose Churchill as the true warmonger, the real face of evil, the hidden psychopath behind the war? To this day, Churchill is painted as a great hero, while Hitler is the dastardly villain. Is this by deliberate design, i.e. propaganda? Who benefits? Perhaps the same people that benefited from the Holocaust Lie? Could it be the people we must never criticize, the Jews? Or can we just call them the organized sociopaths that hide behind a Jewish mask?

The point is that Churchill was an evil man, being controlled by even more evil men, while Hitler was a good man acting independently according to his principles and values to truly serve his people. Although this is totally at odds with what we are taught, the signs of the cover-up are there to be seen, if only we bother to look. Churchill not only hid Hitler's peace terms from the British War Cabinet, he hid them from the entire population for at least one hundred years! Is this the behavior of a hero, or a sociopath? The answer is clear when you understand how a sociopath behaves. Sociopaths deceive and manipulate in the pursuit of power and control over others. And that's exactly what Churchill consistently did.




The Real Winston Churchill by Historian David Irving
(censored by YouTube from the quoted article)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Dec 25, 2017 11:48 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9922
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
UncleZook wrote:
That said, the preponderance of evidence concludes that Hitler was not a self-made defender of the German people. That he was, in fact, financed by his very demonizers is well documented. The demonizers financing the object of their demonization.
UncleZook wrote:
Nazi Germany was a proven Protocols-instructed Zionist-led bankster empire job. They financed Hitler.
UncleZook wrote:
FTR, the Talmudic empire is responsible for the suffering of the so-called Jews under Hitler's tyranny ... for it is they who financed Hitler's rise to power...

I was reminded of Zook's rationalizations concerning who financed Hitler, as if nothing gets started without someone putting up a bundle of money. Financing is often not necessary. I can point to my own business that I started in 1986 for zero dollars. I can point to this forum that I started in 2011 for zero dollars. Neither venture required any financing. Nobody financed Hitler either when he started being politically active after WW1 ended. He was an unknown but focused one-man act in the beginning. He worked hard for 12 grueling years on his vision before he ended up as Fuhrer ("Guide") of his nation. Nobody told him how to steer Germany; he knew from the beginning the direction he wanted.

What triggered the flashback to Zook's cock-sure ravings was this paragraph that I just read:

Quote:
If Hitler and the Nazis were really part of the “New World Order” then why did the entire capitalist and communist world (the USA, Britain, France, USSR, etc) gang up to completely annihilate and destroy Nazi Germany in the Second World War? If Hitler was part of this New World Order system then why was World War Two even necessary? If Adolf Hitler and National Socialism are such a benefit to the “globalists and elites” then why have they been subjected to such ruthless, non-stop vilification and demonization in the news and entertainment media of the West for the last 67 years since the end of World War II? -- source

How is it that know-it-all Zook can get things so wrong? It's because Zook parrots other authoritative voices. And get this -- that's something we all do! And that's how the mind control game is played. You just have to steer the authoritative voices that everyone else will parrot. It's rare that this technique does not work. It didn't work with David Irving or Vincent Reynouard. Real historians tend to ignore the squawking parrots and look for real evidence. This often takes them in a completely different direction from the authoritative voices. This often makes them renegades who are persecuted for their unconformist thinking. Adolf Hitler was one of those renegades, something Zook just can't accept.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Dec 27, 2017 3:20 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9922
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Here's why getting to the truth about Adolf Hitler or the Holocaust is nearly impossible for the average Follower. It's a psychological characteristic of most human beings called confirmation bias:

Quote:
What social scientists call “confirmation bias” and have repeatedly found to be rampant, is causing the public to be easily manipulated, and has thus destroyed democracy by replacing news-reporting, by propaganda — ‘news' that’s false — in a culture where lies which pump the agendas of the powerful (including lies pumped by the billionaire owners of top ‘news’media and of the media they own) are almost never punished (and are often not even denied to be true). Thus, lies by those powerful liars almost always succeed at enslaving the minds of the millions, to believe what the top economic-and-power class want those millions of people to believe — no matter how false it might happen actually to be. -- source

Not only is this going on today, but it was going on 78 years ago during WW2. Our parents and grandparents were fed mountains of propaganda -- fake news -- about Hitler, the Nazis, the concentration camps, the Jews, and just about everything else that was happening in the war. It continued after the war with the circus trials like Nuremberg, the Eichmann trial, and all the "trials" in the press that crucified the opposition at every opportunity. There was simply no way the truth had any chance of being believed.

Quote:
Anyone who blocks out the key relevant facts and persists in believing the lies they were raised with, or became fooled into believing, doesn’t harm only themselves by the lies they believe; they vote on the basis of the lies they believe, and thus these people who refuse to be open-minded destroy democracy, and invite control of the nation by the aristocracy (who sponsor the proponents of those lies). People who refuse to question their own beliefs, become increasingly putrid pools of their own false beliefs, which have been created and nurtured and sustained and become larger and larger pools of lies, by constant repetition from the media and lobbyists of the rich and powerful, so as to enable the exploiters to enslave the masses, via those constantly repeated and embellished lies. -- source

This is indeed why democracy in the U.S. is an illusion, nothing more than the continuing propaganda, i.e. "fake news", that has been our steady diet for over 200 years.

Quote:
An authentic democracy cannot be based upon a “demos” (a public) that is overwhelmingly composed of suckers — manipulated fools. Only by means of the tiny aristocracy plus the huge mass of their suckers, does a democracy degenerate into a fascism. -- source

And that's what we have -- a tiny aristocracy, a huge mass of their suckers, and fascism. And it's all due to the ruling sociopaths using our trusting nature against us to "divide and rule".

So why does the public automatically reject the evidence presented by the "Holocaust deniers", the "neo-Nazis", and the purveyors of "hate crimes"?

Quote:
A well-established central finding of psychological research, concerning “confirmation bias” or “motivated reasoning” (which are two phrases referring to people’s tendency to believe whatever they want to believe, regardless of any contrary facts), is that individuals evaluate whatever they read or hear according to their pre-existing ideas about the given subject. Specifically, psychologists have found that people tend to pay attention to whatever confirms their existing ideas, and tend to ignore whatever contradicts those pre-established beliefs. -- source

The first story, no matter how preposterous, that is planted in the public mind becomes the yardstick against which all other stories must compete. Only for most people, no competition is allowed. Their minds are closed. We saw this with the JFK assassination, 9/11, and a whole host of false-flag attacks during the last century that are still denigrated by the majority as "conspiracy theory". And so Hitler is the epitome of evil, six million Jews were gassed to death in Nazi concentration camps, and the Nuremberg Trials were fair and just.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Dec 29, 2017 4:40 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9922
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
David Irving made extraordinary efforts to interview the people who actually worked with Hitler. This was original research, something professional (i.e. bought and paid for) historians rarely do. So it should come as no surprise that what David Irving learned about Hitler from Hitler's regular associates was not what professional historians preach. The Germans who were in the best position to really know the real Hitler had an entirely different perspective.

Quote:
"They all, in private, spoke glowingly of the chief (Hitler). This was a big shock to me." -- David Irving at 25:12 in the video below

Even David Irving had been brought up to believe that Hitler was the devil incarnate. Everything bad about WW2 was always blamed on Hitler.

Quote:
"Yet all these educated people that I'm now visiting were speaking well of him." -- David Irving at 25:54 in the video below

How could that be? The obvious but uncomfortable answer is that the popular perspective of Hitler is wrong. It is propaganda. It is brainwashing. It is false. It is the Big Lie.




David Irving's Revised Revisionism

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Jan 01, 2018 2:32 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9922
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
When you begin to see the evil that exists in the British royal family, an evil that has existed for a very long time, then you begin to understand how Churchill was able to freely exercise his sociopathy during the 20th century, most notably during WW2.

When you also understand that the American government is just as evil, and has been since before Roosevelt orchestrated America into WW2 with the Pearl Harbor massacre, it is no mystery why transcripts of discussions between Roosevelt and Churchill that reveal the nature of their criminal conspiring have been sealed forever.

When you understand that the Russian government under Stalin was equally as evil as both the British and American governments, even if we only consider the Katyn massacre, then the WW2 side known as the Allies takes on the unmistakable air of the Dark Side.

For these forces of evil to overcome their natural resentment for each other and join together in opposition to a small but unified nation often called Nazi Germany, which they had completely defeated only 20 years earlier, suggests that the forces operating in Nazi Germany were the forces of good. After all, what other force can cause the evil in the world to come together and cooperate in the annihilation of the one force that it cannot tolerate?

Hitler was the Fuhrer (literally, the Guide) who was the engine behind those forces of good that the forces of evil so hated. It is why Hitler has been falsely painted as exactly the opposite of what he truly was. If the forces of evil portray someone as the devil incarnate, what does that tell you? You know they lie, and they lie big. If they tell you that war is peace, shouldn't you be suspicious and perhaps even entertain the notion that war is the opposite of peace?

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Jan 04, 2018 4:50 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9922
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Looking back over his career, he (Hitler) commented in October 1941, "If I were to assess my work, I would first emphasize that in the face of an uncomprehending world I succeeded in making the racial idea the basis of life, and second that I made culture the driving force in German greatness."

No single statement ever summed up so openly and concisely his two supreme goals of racial genocide and the establishment of a state in which the arts were supreme.

-- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, by Frederic Spotts, page 29 - 30

What utter BS from Frederic Spotts, the brainwashed author suffering from cognitive dissonance. The "racial idea" that Hitler was following as the basis of life was "Germany and Germans first", not so different from the campaign Donald Trump used ("America first") to win the presidency of the U.S. against all odds. This "racial" perspective is clearly more about philosophy than race per se. Jumping from that "racial idea" to "racial genocide" is totally unwarranted and just emphasizes the degree of Spotts' brainwashing. Hitler never condoned racial genocide, never practiced it, and never ordered it! The Jewish Holocaust was a massive lie, a frame-up, and a psychological manipulation of the entire world for the benefit of one special interest group ("God's Chosen People"). Racial genocide was never a "supreme goal" of Hitler's. Neither was "the establishment of a state in which the arts were supreme." The arts were to be better supported in Hitler's Germany, yes, but they were not to reign supreme. It was German well-being and quality of life that was to be supreme.

Spotts is a disingenuous researcher, one who has little regard for the truth. I initially wanted to start this post by claiming "Spotts is either an idiot or a Jew", but then I realized he might be both. I don't know what his connection is to the Jewish mindset, but I do know that his biased perspective is idiotic. The real racial genocide of the second World War was the killing of Germans, not Jews. And guess who was the driving force behind that genocide, that organized the major powers of the world into destroying the German people for the second time within 25 years.

It was the Jews.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Jan 07, 2018 6:53 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 52  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.