Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Will the real history please stand up? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10042
Reply with quote
Post Re: Will the real history please stand up?
Quote:
Following the Iran-Iraq War, Saddam had depleted too much of his country’s wealth, and to be sure, he was interested in the wealth production of Kuwait, but he also knew that his military was not designed to invade and annex countries, and he was aware that the superpowers would protect their interests in Kuwait.

Saddam had a real dilemma, he had upwards of a million soldiers that were without jobs after the Iran-Iraq War and there was no place within Iraq’s broader economy to absorb these men. The Military Force was aware of Saddam’s dilemma, and, through a consistent disinformation campaign by the Military Force, Saddam was led to believe that he would be allowed to invade Kuwait without superpower retaliation. -- source, page 139

We have already seen ( 1 2 ) that we were not given the real history of the cause of first Gulf War. Saddam was apparently deceived and manipulated by the leaders (i.e. organized sociopaths) of the major powers into believing that he had the green light to invade Kuwait. When he did so, those same leaders feigned surprise and outrage, and they mounted an international cooperative effort to wage war on Saddam. In other words, they betrayed him, like the hard-core sociopaths they were.

The veracity of the source of that quote can easily be questioned, but the scenario described is indeed the standard operating procedure of the ruling sociopaths. Demanding reliable sources is potentially less important than demanding reliable information. Any source can be discredited. Discrediting the truth is a more difficult matter (though certainly doable).

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:27 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10042
Reply with quote
Post Re: Will the real history please stand up?
The history we are taught is as accurate as the mainstream media's news reports. In other words, it's hokum.

Genuine evidence that disturbs the desired portrait of history is discredited and dismissed, often with shameful hypocrisy.

Artifacts connecting the North American natives with ancient Mediterranean peoples like the Minoans and Phoenicians is routinely denied despite the fact that chemically distinctive Michigan copper is found all over the ancient world.

Why is historical truth as elusive as contemporary truth?

Control.




Out of Place Artifacts, The Michigan Tablets



While researching a bit about the mysterious and oversized Adena people, I came across the Serpent Mound in Ohio. In examining the shape of the figure, it is clear to me that it is not a serpent at all. It's a sperm cell.

Quote:
How could they have known about ova and spermatozoa in an age before microscopes?

February 1, 2013 at 11:00 AM -- PluribusOne Says:

They could have known in a number of ways: (1) by directly receiving the knowledge as “gifts of the Spirit” via inner-visions, (2) through heightened perception achieved during religious ceremonial ingestion of hallucinogenic plants, (3) through comparative study of larger scale natural processes and logical extrapolation, or (4) through oral transmission of knowledge preserved from an earlier and more-advanced lost civilization.

Native American knowledge of some things may have been theoretical, just as most of today’s “knowledge” is theoretical. Consider that the inability to see atoms—invisible building blocks theorized by Greek philosophers more than 2,000 years ago—did not prevent 20th century scientists from splitting them.

Note that the Temple of Luxor, in Egypt embodies in its overall design an abstract blueprint reflecting ancient Egyptian initiates’ understanding of the human body, including the reproduction system down to the microscopic level. A wall inscription in the Luxor temple portrays a phallus and seminal fluid together with a sperm cell. Is this a product of synchronicity? -- source

The Piri Reis map shows an accurate depiction of the coast of Antarctica buried beneath its thick ice sheet, something the modern world could not verify until recently using satellite radar scanning.

Quote:
Geological evidence confirms that the latest date Queen Maud Land could have been charted in an ice-free state is 4000 BC. -- source

Clearly, explanation (4) given above cannot be discounted. And yet it usually is, because humans are 99.9% ignorant of true history, but they always think they know the answers.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Feb 06, 2017 7:10 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10042
Reply with quote
Post Re: Will the real history please stand up?
In the 1970s President Nixon was driven from office, because he thought he was in charge of foreign policy. Like Kennedy, Nixon was a threat to the national security state. Nixon pushed through SALT 1 and the anti-ABM Treaty, and he opened to China, defusing those tensions as well. The military/security complex saw its budget dwindling as the threat dwindled. Nixon also determined to withdraw from Vietnam, but was constrained by the national security state. Nixon, the most knowledgeable president about foreign affairs, was forced from office, because his efforts in behalf of peace constituted a threat to the power and profit of the military/security complex.

Oh, oh. This is feeling eerily similar to the busting of my brainwashing about other "evil" men, like Hitler, Ahmadinejad, Chavez, and Correa. It's true the mainstream media played a critical role in bringing down Nixon, and you know that they are the masters of fake news and owned by the ruling sociopaths.

And I thought I knew the truth about Nixon, but in retrospect, it was all based on what the mainstream media told me.

Now I'm hoping that the real history will please stand up. Was Nixon a crook? Or was he telling the truth when he said, "I'm not a crook."



Richard Nixon - "I'm not a crook"

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun May 21, 2017 2:47 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10042
Reply with quote
Post Re: Will the real history please stand up?
Quote:
When he was shot down over Korea and captured in 1952, Colonel Frank Schwable was the highest ranking military officer to meet that fate, and by February 1953, he and other prisoners of war had falsely confessed to using germ warfare against the Koreans, dropping everything from anthrax to the plague on unsuspecting civilians. The American public was shocked, and grew even more so when 5,000 of the 7,200 POWs either petitioned the U.S. government to end the war, or signed confessions of their alleged crimes. The final blow came when 21 American soldiers refused repatriation.

Suddenly the threat of brainwashing was very real, and it was everywhere. The U.S. military denied the charges made in the soldiers’ “confessions,” but couldn’t explain how they’d been coerced to make them. What could explain the behavior of the soldiers besides brainwashing? -- source

Well, the answer is obvious. The U.S. really was using germ warfare against the Koreans ( 1 2 3 ).

In 1957, the U.S. secretly exposed U.S. citizens in Punta Gorda, Florida, to germ warfare! If the U.S. government would do it to their own citizens in time of peace, you can be sure they were doing it to the Koreans during the Korean War (1950 - 1953).

It's beyond belief how vile and evil the leaders of the United States were, and still are to this day.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu May 25, 2017 1:39 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10042
Reply with quote
Post Re: Will the real history please stand up?
The little known story is that sociopath Franklin D. Roosevelt used Amelia Earhart in 1937 as bait to better the chances of the U.S. breaking the Japanese naval code. In 1941, Roosevelt knew all about the coming attack on Pearl Harbor, because the Japanese naval code was indeed broken by then, and the U.S. intelligence services monitored and understood all Japanese naval messages. Earhart and Noonan were sacrificed so that Roosevelt and his Jewish handlers could trick Americans into actively participating in WW2, even though public sentiment had been against doing so right up until the Pearl Harbor attacks.

And of course, the public was lied to about what really happened.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Jul 06, 2017 4:58 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10042
Reply with quote
Post Re: Will the real history please stand up?
To the American public, the disappearance of Amelia Earhart was a huge mystery. But it wasn't to the American government! They knew the truth, but they withheld it from the public for 80 years at last count.

You know why they hide it? Criminals always hide their crimes. Their chances of getting away with a crime improve dramatically when no one knows a crime was committed.





Jeff & Dick Allgire, Yoichi Shimatsu - What Really Happened To Amelia Earhart!

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:07 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10042
Reply with quote
Post Re: Will the real history please stand up?
Quote:
During the Nazi-Soviet Pact that lasted from August of 1939 to June of 1941, the Communists proclaimed liberals and democratic socialists to be “social fascists,” opposed any preparations for a possible war against the Nazis, and mainly attacked Britain and the U.S. for trying to foment war. When Hitler broke the Pact and invaded Russia, overnight the Communists became anti-fascists and interventionists. -- source

How do you like your history? Twisted, warped, or simply false?

Hitler invaded Russia because Russia was massing its forces on the border to invade Germany. When Stalin signed the non-aggression pact with Germany, he did so knowing it was just a stalling tactic to allow Russia time to prepare for war on Germany. Yes, the pact was a deception, and Stalin was a classic sociopath who naturally operated using deception. So the propaganda we have always been fed is that Hitler broke the pact by invading Russia, when in fact Stalin was never sincere about the agreement and planned to be the one breaking it in a massive betrayal.

So many arguments and explanations rely on false history to prove their point. Everything derived from lies has little chance of ever being the truth.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Jul 11, 2017 6:35 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10042
Reply with quote
Post Re: Will the real history please stand up?
Back to the Amelia Earhart "mystery":

DC Dave wrote:
A major reason why our ruling establishment cannot admit the truth in the Earhart case is what it would do to the reputation of President Roosevelt. According to the dominant myth, he was the great, wise man who led us on to victory in the Good War, a war that was forced upon him by the unanticipated Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor. -- source

Roosevelt was actually a sociopath, criminal, and a traitor. The public has been made to believe the exact opposite.

DC Dave wrote:
Around no war has so much propaganda been generated than World War II, and the official, media-supported story of Amelia Earhart’s disappearance is very much a part of it. -- source

Bingo. Almost everything we know about Hitler is propaganda. Almost everything we know about the Holocaust is propaganda. Almost everything we know about the Nazis is propaganda. Almost everything we know about Pearl Harbor is propaganda. Almost everything we know about Roosevelt is propaganda. Almost everything we know about Churchill is propaganda. And on and on and on...


This article is a good analysis of how the truth about Earhart is twisted. You might especially enjoy how the Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression are applied by the Ministry of Truth to keep us deaf, dumb, and blind.

DC Dave is one capable engine.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Jul 18, 2017 3:35 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10042
Reply with quote
Post Re: Will the real history please stand up?
Quote:
Each of the World Wars was intentionally staged and planned well before their actual occurrence. Both wars were in actuality major moves within the context of the Great Game. The global geopolitical chessboard was profoundly rearranged at the end of each world war. For example, both World War I and II were quite instrumental in paving the way for the illegal establishment of the Modern State of Israel. -- source

The Zionist sociopaths play us like a fiddle. For the most part, we have no clue we are being fooled.

So is it any wonder that "Around no war has so much propaganda been generated than World War II" (see prior post)?

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Jul 18, 2017 3:58 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10042
Reply with quote
Post Re: Will the real history please stand up?
Quote:
I was impelled to write this book to present to thinking peo­ple the verity of modem history's most all-encompassing con­spiracy of silence, and to straighten out some of the lingering distortions that have developed from the massive outpouring of slanted communiques and press releases from governments and private interests over the past three decades, until caring people everywhere are hard put to tell truth from fiction, with too much fiction passing for history. -- PAUL MANNING, New York (source)

This story about Martin Bormann is another example of how history is shaped to benefit those in power. Much was done to suppress the real history and reinforce the false history regarding the fate of the man who secretly moved Hitler to safety in South America, according to Harry Cooper. Once you understand how Martin Bormann orchestrated the movement of Nazi assets and wealth to safety in South America, including Hitler and himself in that movement is only natural and to be expected.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Nov 14, 2017 8:27 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.