Reply to topic  [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 57  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10871
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain's most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:

"He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but 'where there is planing, there are shavings flying'. He compared the British Empire with the catholic Church - saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany's position on the Continent. The return of Germany's colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere.." (p 200).

According to Liddell Hart, "At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the 'Battle over Britain' had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia." (p140). -- source

We have all been fed a load of BS with regards to Hitler, all intended to paint him as the epitome of evil, when in fact he was just the opposite.

Who would do this? Cui bono?

Answer: The Jews. The Zionists. The ruling sociopaths. These are not separate groups in most cases. They are all descriptions of the same people.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:02 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10871
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Interviewer: You say that the Syrian Army protects civilians, yet there are all sorts of reports about war crimes committed by Assad’s forces, such as the bombardments with barrel bombs.

Father Daniel: “Do you not know that the media coverage on Syria is the biggest media lie of our time? They have sold pure nonsense about Assad. It was actually the rebels who plundered and killed. Do you think that the Syrian people are stupid? Do you think those people were forced to cheer for Assad and Putin? It is the Americans who have a hand in all of this, for pipelines and natural resources in this region and to thwart Putin.” -- source

They used the same strategy with Hitler as they do with Assad. The lies are pervasive, the media is complicit, and the public is gullible. Assad is painted as the bad guy, just like Hitler was. Israel and the Jews are working behind the scenes to destroy Syria, just like the Jews were united in conspiracy to destroy Germany. Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it. And we don't know the true history, as it is twisted completely out of shape by the sociopaths that lead us. Their deceptions and manipulations are permanently recorded in the history books they publish for us to learn from. We are brought up completely brainwashed, completely programmed, completely mind-controlled. And that is their plan.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Feb 11, 2017 1:53 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10871
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
In the case of "the Jewish persecution" in Germany I found that impartial presentation of the facts gradually gave way to so partisan a depictment that the truth was lost. This transformation was effected in three subtle stages. First the persecution of "political opponents and Jews" was reported; then this was imperceptibly amended to "Jews and political opponents"; and at the end the press in general spoke only of "the persecution of Jews". By this means a false image was projected on to the public mind and the plight of the overwhelming majority of the victims, by this fixing of the spotlight on one group, was lost to sight. The result showed in 1945, when, on the one hand, the persecution of Jews was made the subject of a formal indictment at Nuremberg, and on the other hand half of Europe and all the people in it were abandoned to the selfsame persecution, in which the Jews had shared in their small proportion to populations everywhere.

At that period I, typical of Englishmen of my generation, had never thought of Jews as different from myself, nor could I have said what might make a Jew, in his opinion, different from me. If I later became aware of any differentiation, or of the desire of a powerful group to assert one, this was not the result of Hitler's deeds but of the new impediment to impartial reporting which I then began to observe. When the general persecution began I reported it as I saw it. If I learned of a concentration camp containing a thousand captives I reported this; if I learned that the thousand included thirty or fifty Jews I reported that. I saw the first terror, spoke with many of the victims, examined their injuries, and was warned that I incurred Gestapo hostility thereby. The victims were in the great majority, certainly much over ninety percent, Germans, and a few were Jews. This reflected the population-ratio, in Germany and later in the countries overrun by Hitler. But the manner of reporting in the world's press in time blocked-out the great suffering mass, leaving only the case of the Jews.

I illustrate this by episodes and passages from my own experience and reporting. Rabbi Stephen Wise, writing in 1949, gave the following version of events personally reported by me in 1933, and undoubtedly purveyed the same version in the presidential circle of which he was a familiar during those years: "The measures against the Jews continued to outstrip in systematic cruelty and planned destruction the terror against other groups. On January 29, 1933 Hitler was summoned to be chancellor . . . at once the reign of terror began with beatings and imprisonment of Jews. . . We planned a protest march in New York on May 10, the day of the ordered burning of Jewish books in Germany . . . the brunt of the attack was borne by Jews. . . concentration camps were established and filled with Jews".

All these statements are false. The measures against the Jews did not outstrip the terror against other groups; the Jews were involved in a much larger number of others [Note: that means there were only a few jews involved; most of any other victims involved, the majority, by an overwhelming percentage, were not jew]. The reign of terror did not begin on January 29, 1933, but in the night of the Reichstag fire, February 27. No "burning of Jewish books" was ordered; I attended and reported that bonfire and have looked up my report published in The Times, to verify my recollection. A mass of "Marxist" books was burned, including the works of many German, English and other non-Jewish writers (my books, had they then been published, would undoubtedly have been among them); the bonfire included some Jewish books. [However,] the "brunt" of the terror was not borne by Jews, nor were the concentration camps "filled with Jews". The number of Jewish victims was in proportion to their ratio of the population.

(The Controversy of Zion, by Douglas Reed, 1956, pp 309-310)
-- source (comment by "headless blogger")

Keep in mind that Jews made up less that 1% of the German population before the Haavara agreement of 1933. By the time the war started in 1939, it is estimated that two-thirds ( 1 2 3 ) of the Jews had already left Germany. At that time, Jews would make up only 0.2% of the German population.

Remember that Jews world-wide also declared economic war on Germany in the form of a boycott in 1933, the very same year they signed the Haavara agreement.

Quote:
Rasner, one of the Polish delegates to the World Jewish Congress in Geneva in September 1933, declared, “The six million Jews in the world have already declared a boycott, instinctively and spontaneously.” -- source

So at that time, in 1933, Jews were claiming they numbered 6 million in the world! By the time the war was over, they were claiming 6 million Jews had been gassed in the concentration camps. The lie was totally absurd, yet the world accepted it without question. Even more incredible is that no Jews were gassed in the concentration camps, yet the world still believed the Big Lie of 6 million Jews gassed.

The Jewish leaders had pulled an incredible con over on the entire world. It wouldn't be the first time, or the last.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Feb 11, 2017 9:25 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10871
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
So at that time, in 1933, Jews were claiming they numbered 6 million in the world! By the time the war was over, they were claiming 6 million Jews had been gassed in the concentration camps. The lie was totally absurd, yet the world accepted it without question.

There is a third related issue, which is how many surviving Jews received Holocaust-related reparations? That number is claimed to be more than 4.4 million! If that is true, it would appear that the Holocaust is big business, and quite the on-going gravy train ( 1 2 ) for Jews.

Quote:
By the end of 1980, a German government agency reported, the number of successful claims was 4,344,378, with payments reaching 50.18 billion German marks. About 40 percent of the claimants lived in Israel, some 20 percent were living in West Germany, and 40 percent elsewhere. The Focus On article cited above noted that between October 1953 and the end of December 1983, the Federal German government paid out 56.3 billion marks on a total of 4,390,049 claims from individuals under the BEG legislation. -- source

Jews claim there are six million Jews in the world before the war, then claim six million Jews are gassed to death by the evil Nazis, then 4.4 million Jews line up after the war to be paid reparations by defeated Germany! Does that make any sense at all?

So the three critical questions are:

  1. How many Jews were in Nazi controlled territories during World War II?
  2. How many Jews were deliberately executed by the Nazis unjustifiably?
  3. How many surviving Jews received Holocaust-related reparations?

1. In 1933, there were 9.5 million Jews in all of Europe. Nazis only controlled a small portion of Europe during the war, and most of those 9.5 million Jews were not found in that portion. Germany itself only had about 523,000 Jews in 1933, and some 300,000 had left before the war actually started in 1939.

2. Detailed German concentration camp records captured and held by the Soviets indicate less than 200 Jews were executed (and never by gas) during the war years. There were no gas chambers used for killing people during World War II. There was only propaganda of such activities (deliberately spread by Allied intelligence).

3. Total Jewish reparation applications for any war-related claims could easily number 6 million, given that Germany alone processed nearly 4.4 million. Other countries like Poland and France have also been "shaken down" by the Jews for compensation.

Here is the Jewish definition of a Holocaust survivor:

Quote:
A "Holocaust survivor" is defined as a *Jew* (=person born of a Jewish mother?) who lived in a country under National Socialist ("Nazi") regime (such as Germany from February, 1933), or in a district that was under Nazi occupation (such as some parts of the Soviet Union, 1941 to 1944), or in a country under regime of Nazi collaborators (such as Finland, 1941 to 1944), and who did not die before May, 1945. -- source

That is not a Holocaust survivor. That is a Jew that survived the war. Just being a Jew in an area under Nazi administration does not mean said Jew was subject to any holocaust! Keep in mind that numerous Jews were in German uniform during the war, serving the Führer and Germany! Maybe not 6 million, but perhaps thousands.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Feb 12, 2017 8:32 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10871
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Here's a good one. Because Hitler was falsely painted by the Allies as the epitome of evil, we are supposed to find it shocking that he would try to comfort anyone! Even to this day, over 70 years later, the public brainwashing is continually reinforced with BS like this. Why? Because sociopaths are still in power and running the show, and anyone who has so openly opposed them in the past must be vilified.

Quote:
Rare Photos That’ll Leave You Breathless
Adolf Hitler comforting someone


Image

Adolf Hitler has been regarded as the worst dictator of all times, moreover in this image he is seen comforting a woman at her husband’s funeral. He was not kind so it is rare to see him actually comforting another human being. -- source

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:08 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10871
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
OK, I'm loving this one, as it's all about censoring flattering information about Hitler.

In November 1938, about nine months before England declared war on Germany, an article on Hitler's mountain home appeared in "Homes & Gardens" magazine. Here's the first website I looked at about it. I was intrigued and wanted to see more. Unfortunately, every linked site I went to initially had been scrubbed of the magazine article.

Now why would that be? :shock:

I kept digging, and eventually found a website that still hasn't been censored yet. See it here.

Clearly, the magazine article portrays Hitler in an unbiased manner, as just an ordinary man, which can't be allowed in light of the ongoing propaganda campaign to paint Hitler as the epitome of evil. Evidently, in November of 1938, the propaganda had not yet begun. Hitler was just a good man who could welcome you into his home for a friendly tour.

Quote:
It is over twelve years since Herr Hitler fixed on the site of his one and only home. It had to be close to the Austrian border, hardly ten miles from Mozart's own mediæval Salzburg. At first no more than a hunter's shack, "Haus Wachenfeld" has grown, until it is today quite a handsome Bavarian chalet, 2,000 feet up on the Obersalzberg amid pinewoods and cherry orchards. Here, in the early days, Hitler's widowed sister, Frau Angela Raubal, kept house for him on a "peasant" scale. Then, as his famous book, Mein Kampf ("My Struggle") became a best-seller of astonishing power (4,500,000 copies of it have been sold), Hitler began to think of replacing that humble shack by a house and garden of suitable scope. In this matter he has throughout been his own architect.

There is nothing pretentious about the Führer's little estate. It is one that any merchant of Munich or Nuremberg might possess in these lovely hills.

"This place is mine," he says simply. "I built it with money that I earned." Then he takes you into his library, where you note that quite half the books are on history, painting, architecture, and music. -- source

I know there is a determined effort by Jews to continually revise history to support their Holocaust Lie, and this information about Hitler will likely disappear in the near future, as it has on so many websites already. I am keeping copies for you to download here ( 1 2 3 4 5 ) in the event the sociopaths succeed in scrubbing the more visited websites.

Isn't it sickening that we have to put up with censorship like this? And you know why, right? Because sociopaths rule over us.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:34 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10871
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
You think you know the history of World War II, but everything you were taught was twisted around nearly 180 degrees! The deception and manipulation the general public suffered, and continues to suffer right up to today, is so pervasive that almost no one can even think to question it! And in many countries, there are laws that will punish you if you do!

The following interview of Mike King, author of The Bad War: The Truth NEVER Taught About World War II, makes the true history of Hitler "the peacemaker" accessible for those in the dark. Jews everywhere will condemn Mike King as an anti-Semite and a purveyor of hate speech, but that too is part of the well orchestrated lie. If you have any respect for the truth, you owe it to yourself to investigate! Question what you hear, but also question what you have been taught as "fact", and find out where the truth really lies.




Dr. David Duke & Mike King Expose the Jews Role in the Catastrophic 2nd World War: Feb 27 & 28, 2017

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:03 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10871
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
This is the man who has legitimately studied the most primary sources regarding Adolf Hitler for decades! There may be no better expert to refute the insultingly fake history that has grown up around Hitler, thanks to the extensive Jewish con that began in 1933 when world Jewry declared global economic war on Germany. This expert is David Irving, a Holocaust denier reviled by the Jewish community. He calls himself a "historical non-conformist", which is a more accurate and less biased term than the pejorative Jewish insult of "Holocaust denier". His credibility and expertise is light years beyond anything the lying Zionist sociopaths can invent, but they are relying on us not to notice, which usually works quite well for them.

There are many revelations in this lecture, but I want to mention two. One occurs at about 37:00, when Irving talks about his meetings with many of the Germans who were part of Hitler's immediate staff. "Like all Germans, even now, you find that they had two faces, or two opinions. There was the opinion they were prepared to show to strangers, and the private opinion they would disclose to you once you had won their trust. All of these people on Adolf Hitler's private staff, they stunned me by showing great admiration for him and speaking of him in only the most glowing and positive terms." In other words, all of Hitler's immediate staff spoke very well of him off the record!

Then, around the 38:00 mark, we learn that Irving's extensive index card file on Hitler, the result of 5 or 6 years of unrepeatable research, was seized and largely destroyed "by accident" by the British government! That card file resource often allowed Irving to identify other secondary documents as fraudulent, so of course it had to be eliminated if Jewish interests hoped to maintain their con!

This stuff is shocking, as it illustrates the magnitude of the deception and manipulation that must be employed to keep us all fooled about the true nature of Adolf Hitler, who is painted as an evil monster, when the truth is that he was just the opposite.




David Irving - The Faking of Adolf Hitler for History.


As a minor aside, UncleZook will not be pleased by all this. No doubt David Irving will go straight to the top of UncleZook's long list of gatekeepers. Too bad we don't get to see Zook's histrionics recorded on this forum any more, as he has disappeared into silence after the spanking he got on the Inphinet forum. Alas, Zook, I knew you well. You always said the UP forum archives held the evidence, which you were never able to legitimately produce. Let me count the ways...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 :shock:

But I sure did love you, Zook, as you were so effective at demonstrating the behavior sociopaths employ to great effect. I thanked you many times for that, and that thanks was sincere.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:41 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 12:04 am
Posts: 157
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Saw this article today and thought you might enjoy it, Chico.

JFK's diary reveals fascination with Hitler, compared to 'legend'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03 ... egend.html


Attachments:
jfk.jpg
jfk.jpg [ 58.7 KiB | Viewed 1945 times ]
Wed Mar 22, 2017 11:54 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10871
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Rose wrote:
Saw this article today and thought you might enjoy it, Chico.

Thank you! I really appreciate you helping me learn new things.

From the article you posted:

Quote:
Kennedy predicted in his diary that Hitler would “emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived.” -- source

I agree with JFK. This is exactly what will happen if the truth can ever be uncovered from the mountain of lies we have been programmed to believe about Hitler.

And I love this part:

Quote:
“When JFK said that Hitler ‘had in him the stuff of which legends are made,’ he was speaking to the mystery surrounding him, not the evil he demonstrated to the world,” she says. “Nowhere in this diary, or in any of his writings, is there any indication of sympathy for Nazi crimes or cause.”

“It’s the mystery surrounding Hitler – why did he do what he did? I don’t think anyone will ever know,” she said. “But JFK was analyzing it and saying Hitler was a legend – and Hitler is a legend. But he’s not a good legend. You can’t translate that as meaning he had admiration for him.” -- source

Deirdre Henderson, JFK’s former research assistant, already feels the pressure to commence "damage control" and separate Kennedy's reputation from Hitler's! This is an indication of her brainwashing as well as everyone else's. It is all about "public relations", which is literally the deception and manipulation from the ruling sociopaths that have shaped us all since birth, and continues to this day in Deirdre Henderson's excuses and whitewashing. Yes, the ruling sociopaths have us so mind controlled that we police ourselves to ensure that our programming is never seriously challenged!

I am reminded of questions put to me at Inphinet about why anyone should bother looking into Hitler and the events of World War II. "It's ancient history, it doesn't matter now, there's no question Hitler was a monster, he caused WWII, he killed millions of Jews..." and so on.
And for the brainwashed, this is all quite obvious, and so they police themselves and never question the veracity of what they have been taught by the people they trusted. But it is also quite wrong, an enormous error, a huge injustice, and a crime against humanity perpetrated by very sly con-artists / sociopaths. They have succeeded (so far) in rewriting history for their own selfish benefit and at our great expense. We, meaning most of humanity, have been denied the truth and tricked into believing falsehoods.

The horror...

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:29 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 568 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 57  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.