Reply to topic  [ 520 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 52  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm
Posts: 1400
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Hitler was an artist. But was he a good one? An exceptional one? And if he was an exceptional talent, why was he rejected by The Vienna Academy of Art school?

Let's look at "View over Neuschwanstein Castle" ... to get some idea about Hitler's apparent talents as an artist ... and to a lesser extent, whether art attributed to Hitler is really his.

Attachment:
hitlersample01.jpg
hitlersample01.jpg [ 26.26 KiB | Viewed 2341 times ]


Attachment:
hitlersample02.jpg
hitlersample02.jpg [ 77.6 KiB | Viewed 2341 times ]



The first image is an actual photo of the castle taken long after Hitler had left the scene.

The second image is purported to be an authentic Hitler painting (authenticated by Peter Jahn).
http://www.germaniainternational.com/wa ... itler.html

But here's the rub, the third image is also purported to be a Hitler authentic.

By comparing the two puported Hitler paintings of the castle, we see two different styles. Which one is authentic? Are they both authentic? Both not authentic?

The second image has too much architectural detail ... so it was probably initially sketched over a draftboard ... maybe even traced first over an actual photograph. Because the lines are too perfect and the proportions are also near perfect. Peter Jahn may have authenticated it, but what exactly did he authenticate ... a painting by an artistic genius? Or a draftboard derivative by an above-average talent but nowhere near the point of genius?

The third image has a lot of imperfections, which makes it plausible as a Hitler authentic ... or an original from a gifted talent (far short of genius). But then if you look at the left part of the castle, there appears to an additional wing added on. This wing is observable in the actual photo of the castle. But was it present during Jahn's authentication of the second image? So many questions.

The fog about Hitler's art remains thick.

Yet Chico is quick to dismiss the Vienna Academy of Art's evaluation of Hitler as a modest art talent (which is documented) ... and quick to accept Jahn's authentication of Hitler's purported paintings ... paintings that appear to be the work of an art genius (if they were indeed sketched and painted freehand as opposed to being aided by drafting tools). Anyone with a drafting board can get impressive results if they put their time into it.

Me? I prefer to remain in the fog that is real (e.g. lack of credible authentication) ... than in the fog that is contrived. Jahn is not so credible because he met and interviewed Hitler when Hitler was the Fuhrer ... now, who's gonna refuse the Fuhrer anything, especially affirmation of greatness?

But it gets better ... or stranger in the narrative of Hitler as "not a sociopath" (Chico's narrative) ... for Hitler is so obsessed with himself (e.g. extreme sociopathic narcissism) that he makes the following order:

http://www.fpp.co.uk/Hitler/artist/Pric ... 0402b.html

beginExcerpt
IN 1935, Hitler ordered the Nazi Party to find and obtain as many of his paintings as possible. Many were purchased from German citizens for prices of about two years' average salary for a German worker. The assembled pictures were stored in underground bunkers.
end


Say what??

What kind of empathic nature spends state resources on finding and retrieving all his artwork? What was Hitler afraid of? Was he that insecure about his own artwork? We should ask Chico why this peculiar Fuhrer order
is not symptomatic of a greater mental illness?



Pax

ps: IMO, Hitler was a gifted draftsman and an above-average artist. Genius? Only in the standards of wishful thinkers.

ps2: Hitler's art is a small part of his influence on history. So we should not spend too much time in the trivial pursuit. As for the large part, there is no credible evidence that a creator cannot also be a destroyer, which is what Chico was trying to intimate in one of his earlier posts on the topic. If anything, everyone of us has the ability to create, sustain, and destroy ... in varying degrees. The empaths create and sustain goodness, and destroy badness. The sociopaths have the reverse orientation. Hitler created and sustained "badness" (e.g. primitive memes of racial superiority and inferiority, robotic efficiency, conformity, sterile environments, etc.); and he destroyed goodness (e.g. individuality, compassion for the weak, diversity, etc.). But most damning of all, he collaborated with the evil bankstering class to drive people from their homes and nations, both in Germany and in Palestine.

_________________
Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.


Fri Jan 08, 2016 12:02 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9932
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Still avoiding placing examples of young Hitler's sociopathy on the table? As I predicted... No surprise there.

Great article on Hitler's art, Zook! I love it, because once again it argues against all you ascribe to it. I still can't believe you read it, and if you did, there was certainly no comprehension, because it demolishes all the arguments you think it makes!

Once you understand that there was no Holocaust, that it is just a massive deception designed to benefit the agenda of the sociopathic Zionist leadership, that Hitler was not the monster they deliberately painted him as, THEN you can see the effects of the enormous fraud perpetrated on the public:

Quote:
The writer found that many of the scholars had gotten

"too close to the Fuehrer, so close that the magnitude of his evil became a distorting lens that makes any human perspective impossible. So close that the temptation, the inevitable tendency, is to begin looking at all history in terms of how it led to Hitler and the death camps. And a concomitant temptation . . . to view all evil in relation to Hitler's evil. A process that can end up turning Hitler into a kind of graven image -- a defining, if not ruling, principle of all being." -- source

Exactly. Unlike you, I am looking at all this free of the distorting lens. If there was no Holocaust, then Hitler was not evil. If he's not evil, it changes your perspective on all the arguments heaped against him! It becomes so obvious. But you, Zook, like the brainwashed public at large, are completely fooled. Hitler remains the "graven image" to both the public and you.


P.S. Like I said earlier, I can't tell you which artwork attributed to Hitler is genuine or counterfeit. The field has been thoroughly and deliberately muddied to support the Zionist psy-op. If you think you are the expert on Hitler's art, then Happy Gatekeeping! Personally, I think David Price, the author of the book "Adolf Hitler: The Unknown Artist", clearly has it over you, given the suppression he suffered and the efforts he made to avoid bias, all explained in that wonderful article you have offered us. Gracias, Zook!

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:16 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9932
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
UncleZook wrote:
The second image has too much architectural detail ... so it was probably initially sketched over a draftboard ... maybe even traced first over an actual photograph. Because the lines are too perfect and the proportions are also near perfect.

Your inexperience is showing, Zook. You obviously aren't familiar with Hitler's other pieces. Hitler was known for his detailed architectural eye and solid lines and proportions.


Image

Image

Image


UncleZook wrote:
The third image has a lot of imperfections, which makes it plausible as a Hitler authentic ...

No, it makes it plausible as a counterfeit. It doesn't look at all like Hitler's works. Compare it with the three images above.


UncleZook wrote:
But then if you look at the left part of the castle, there appears to an additional wing added on. This wing is observable in the actual photo of the castle. But was it present during Jahn's authentication of the second image? So many questions.

Wrong question. The right question is: was the additional wing there when Hitler allegedly painted the castle without it? A counterfeiter wishing to discredit Hitler as an artist might easily work from a recent photograph, ignorant of the fact that the castled had changed since Hitler painted it in the early 1900s.

Check out the Hitler paintings looted by the U.S. government, which refuses to return them, because they make Hitler look too good as an artist. One of them is among the three I selected above. Billy Price sued the U.S. government to have them returned, won the case, and the government refused to comply, basically resorting to having the decision overturned on appeal for the flimsiest of technicalities! The U.S. government doesn't want the Zionist psy-op demonizing Hitler to be questioned for any reason, artwork included.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:33 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9932
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
We have been lied to. It was done with devious propaganda, and we believed it. We have been taught it since birth, by parents and teachers who wrongly believed it as well. It is in our history books, as if it actually happened. Our existence for at least the last 100 years has been a psy-op. We've been living in a dream world, a Matrix of deception and manipulation, a deliberate agenda directed by the worst sociopaths humanity can produce. All the evil heaped upon Hitler is nothing but organized Zionist sociopaths accusing their opponent of their own malfeasance. For Hitler to have been the target of such monumental evil can only mean that Hitler was a great man. Sacrilege, you say! That is how deep your brainwashing goes. It will not let you consider the truth, which is that good has been redefined as evil, and evil has been redefined as good. Lies have been redefined as truth and truth has been redefined as lies. Fantasy has been redefined as reality and reality redefined as fantasy. Only highly organized and highly skilled sociopaths are capable of doing this to humanity. And they have.

This has got to change.

There is only one power that sociopaths fear. There is only one power that can trump their mighty skills of deception and manipulation. There is only one power that can undermine their destructive pursuit of power and control over others.



That power is the power of T R U T H.


  1. Search for it.
  2. Find it.
  3. Understand it.





Hitler Uncensored



Hitler Uncensored 2

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:29 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9932
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Why did Hitler invade Poland? What he "invaded" was actually Germany, meaning land that had been stolen from the German people only 20 years earlier by the Zionist directed Treaty of Versailles. Germans living there on their own traditional lands (at that moment said to be part of Poland) were being abused and murdered by gangs of Zionist directed thugs.

Quote:
As the Polish government "looked the other way", Germans suffered extreme abuse at the hands of Bolshevik terror gangs. The September 3rd massacre at Bromberg, which propaganda historians have tried to mitigate, but cannot deny, gives a clear indication of the malevolent and envious hatred directed towards innocent Germans. At Bromberg, as many as 3000 Germans, including women and children were tied up, tortured, bludgeoned, mutilated, butchered or shot - and it wasn't the first time that such events took place in the Corridor. -- source

The sociopathic Zionist-controlled media is not going to tell you the truth about Hitler. The only way you will get the truth is to uncover it yourself. Fortunately, it's not that hard to do. While the lies are all readily available and pushed to the forefront by the benefiting parties, the truth is still there hidden in the shadows.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:14 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9932
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
I talked with a woman today who was living in Garmisch, Germany during World War II (she was born there in 1934). She remembers, at the age of 9 years old, lying on a hospital operating table, being prepped for minor surgery. At that moment, Allied bombs were dropped on Garmisch. She said they missed the intended target, the train station, and fell into an open field. The force of the explosions blew out all the windows in the hospital. She still remembers the broken glass lying everywhere, even though she was only 9.

She lived on a farm with her family. They had Jewish neighbors that were being unneighborly. The young men were stealing their fuel wood and digging up their potatoes in the fields under cover of darkness. Her father warned the neighbors to keep their sons off his land, or someone would be shot. The thieving continued, so the father lay in wait one night in the potato field with a steel crow bar. Two young men showed up, dug up the potatoes, and were about to run off with them when the father jumped up and struck at them with the crow bar. Neither thief survived the encounter. The father dumped their bodies in the ditch by the side of the road. No one claimed the bodies, no one complained of any crime, and the thieving stopped.

Another man she knew well lived right beside an alleged extermination camp. He told her there was never any indication whatsoever of any exterminations taking place. There was no smell of burning flesh, no smoke from crematoriums, no mass graves being dug, and no bodies being disposed of. There were covered trucks going in and out of the camps, but nothing that would indicate any mass genocide of human beings. She knew from this trusted friend that the story of that camp being used for exterminations was a lie. But she also knew she shouldn't talk about it.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:56 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9932
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Hitler speaks for the first time to 7 men in September 1919, then to 11, to 25, to 111 in December, to 270 in January 1920, and soon to 400. On 14 November 1920, he spoke to 1700 in the first true mass meeting. Adolf Hitler organized the young party’s propaganda, which after one year of activity had had 64 members. One year later — 1920 — it has already grown to 3,000. Hitler increases the number of meetings in Munich to the point that he is speaking to three mass meetings every week, and holds a discussion and training evening each Monday. His main theme was always

the insanity of (the Treaty of) Versailles,

refuting strongly claims by the Marxists, the Center Party, etc., that its terms could be fulfilled. He also attacked the slogan these parties used that if Germany “disarmed, so would the others.” He predicted that after Germany disarmed, the others would begin arming in earnest, using not their own money, but billions extorted from the now defenseless German people. He argued against the propaganda of the SPD and Center party, who claimed that the treaty had to be signed or the Ruhr would be occupied, by prophesying that the Ruhr would be occupied in any case, regardless of what we signed. -- source

Hitler was fighting for justice for the German people, just like he did for four long years in the trenches of World War I. It was always about his people, consistently, all the way up to April 1945 when he supposedly committed suicide (which he did not). His people also included all Jews who were working for Germany, and not against it. Hitler made the distinction not based on religion, but on intentions. Jewish Zionist sociopaths had no intention of working for Germany. Their intention was to destroy Germany and annihilate all her non-Jewish people.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:24 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9932
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
"A truth that's told with bad intent / Beats all the lies you can invent." -- William Blake (as told in Barbarians Inside the Gates, page 181)

That is exactly how sociopaths use the truth -- with bad intent. Shezbeth did it with his "Everyone lies" diatribe to excuse his own duplicity. Charles / Atticus / Stephen / Houdini did it (mixed in with many lies) as naturally as a duck sheds water off its back. Bill Ryan at Project Avalon is a prime example of telling truths with bad intent. And of course, UncleZook. His use of the Norman Dodd account of the Carnegie 1909 minutes to bolster his deception is one of many examples. His use of 9/11 beliefs to dismiss others is another example.

Uncovering truth is not enough. You must also uncover the intent behind it. That's why seeking the truth is a lot harder than we imagine. With sociopaths controlling our information, truth-seeking becomes difficult beyond belief. This is by deliberate design. This is exactly how sociopaths want it. If they control our information, they control our minds. And this is how they have operated for millennia.

When searching for the truth behind Hitler, beware of bad intent. Thanks to the Jewish sociopaths, bad intent concerning Hitler is everywhere.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:01 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9932
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Mein Kampf is a tough read. It is written by an intellectual, not a simpleton. The ideas are complex and interconnected. Those wishing to discredit Hitler often pull short quotes out of context from this book to paint a false picture, which they then emphasize with their own invented interpretations. It is dishonest to do this. Indeed, it is deceptive and manipulative, which is precisely the playground of sociopaths and their minions.

Much better than to trust the interpretations of sociopaths is to read the book. You can download it in PDF form here or here.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9932
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
I'm not the only one that says Hitler was NOT a sociopath. I actually thought I was, but I just decided to investigate, and I already found someone who agrees with me. There are not many who take that position, but that's because the propaganda and brainwashing regarding Hitler are pervasive, extensive, and unrelenting. Few people actually investigate the issue with any seriousness or expertise. When you've been taught that Hitler was the epitome of evil, responsible for starting World War II (false) and for gassing 6 million defenseless Jews (another completely orchestrated lie), who would even think of questioning what everyone is taught to accept without question?

Quote:
Surprisingly, Hitler does not rank as a psychopath. Fallon says that Hitler and Nazi leaders were simply doing their job, citing Hannah Arendt who famously called it “the banality of evil.” -- source

And here too, Hannah Arendt is under the spell of the propaganda and the brainwashing, not to mention being firmly entrenched in the Zionist camp herself. The Nazi leaders were "doing their job" like George Washington and his ragtag army were "doing their job" at Valley Forge. Both were fighting for their freedom and their survival! The story often depends on how the storyteller wants to spin it.

But this particular assessment by Fallon is interesting in itself:

Quote:
James Fallon should know. He himself is a psychopath. As a neurobiologist at UC Irvine, Fallon has made a name for himself decoding the psychopathic brain. -- source

A psychopath who studies the psychopathic brain says Hitler was not a psychopath! I have a feeling he's telling the truth, because when psychopaths lie, they don't choose a lie that almost no one will believe. That is just not effective for purposes of manipulation.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Apr 04, 2016 5:26 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 520 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 52  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.