Reply to topic  [ 182 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 19  Next
Censorship 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9503
Reply with quote
Post Re: Censorship
Censorship is the big red flag that indicates the truth is being suppressed. I've been censored many times on many forums. At Avalon, I was censored for pointing out the censorship occurring there. At Atticus1, I was censored for pointing out the psychopathology of the cult leader running the forum. At Nexus, I was once again censored for pointing out the underhanded censorship occurring there by the administrator (the use of the Miserable User module). In every case, censorship was used to hide the ugly truth that directly contradicted the public proclamations of the primary forum authorities, who were in fact lying.

Analogous to censoring a forum poster is censoring a book. Many books are banned without actually banning them. Andrew M. Lobaczewski tells how he could not find a publisher in the United States for his book "Political Ponerology" thanks to the influence of Zbigniew Brzezinski, who used his substantial political clout to blacklist the very book that could expose him for the sociopath he is. If no one will publish your book, your book is effectively censored. And it happens all the time, but the public is typically completely unaware of it, since the book never comes into any kind of public existence. It's like so many posts at Avalon that are censored so quickly that few forum readers are even aware that they ever existed.

The idea of resurrecting "dangerous" books that have been effectively suppressed is a step in the right direction of undoing the evil that censorship represents. That's why I like the idea behind the "Forbidden Bookshelf" series. It's too bad the equivalent doesn't exist on the forums! But the idea is a powerful one. Books that have been suppressed have a story to tell that is greater than their contents. They also tell a story of what the Powers-That-Be fear most -- that we might learn the truth about the Matrix of lies that they impose on us.



These 5 Censored Books Tell a History the Establishment Wants Hidden

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:44 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9503
Reply with quote
Post Re: Censorship
Want to know what the most all-encompassing form of censorship is?

It's already in place, waiting to be used against all of us.

Quote:
On Monday the Supreme Court declined to hear a petition from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) that sought to force the Department of Homeland Security to release details of a secret “killswitch” protocol to shut down cellphone and Internet service during emergencies. -- source

The government can cut off our communications essentially whenever it wants to, because a continuous but fake state of emergency has been in effect in the USA ever since 1979. Currently, there are more than two dozen of them in effect.

Quote:
With the Supreme Court’s refusal to address EPIC’s petition, the issue seems to have reached a dead-end. The American people are (once again) left in the dark regarding the inner-workings of another dangerous and intrusive government program. It is only through the hard work of activists and groups like EPIC that we are at least aware of the existence of this program — but knowing bits and pieces about the protocol is not enough. In order to combat such heavy-handed measures, we need to have access to the government’s own documents. Hopefully, there is already a whistleblower preparing to release these details. -- source

So the Supreme Court is in on the deal, which is why they cooperate with the government to maintain the secrecy. They are traitors, too, subverting the Constitution and its legal requirements for freedom of speech.

And whistle-blowers are not likely to save us. Bradley/Chelsea Manning would tell you as much, if only he/she could, in all liberty.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:10 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9503
Reply with quote
Post Re: Censorship
John W. Whitehead wrote:
The U.S. government has become particularly intolerant of speech that challenges the government’s power, reveals the government’s corruption, exposes the government’s lies, and encourages the citizenry to push back against the government’s many injustices.

What we’re dealing with today is a government that wants to suppress dangerous words—words about its warring empire, words about its land grabs, words about its militarized police, words about its killing, its poisoning and its corruption—in order to keep its lies going. -- source

The media is not going to spend much time on the government murder of LaVoy Finicum. If it spends any time at all, it will be to paint Lavoy as a criminal, not a law-abiding patriot.

What's wrong with that picture?

Deliberately lying is censorship of the truth. The truth is that if the U.S. government wants you dead, there is no law that will keep them from murdering you.

That is also the definition of tyranny.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:29 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9503
Reply with quote
Post Re: Censorship
Censorship -- it's here!

Stephen Lendman wrote:
On October 17, WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange tweeted his “internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.” -- source

So Julian Assange's Internet has been cut. Evidently, the truth about presidential shoe-in Hillary Clinton, just weeks before the American election, cannot be tolerated. Americans must not be allowed to "wake up" to the evil that is planned to lead them into the next global war.

And as if on cue, the pesky news network Russia Today, spreading intolerable truths around the world with disrespectful abandon, has its British bank accounts seized!

Stephen Lendman wrote:
The second Monday shoe to drop targeted RT International, its editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan tweeting “(o)ur (bank) accounts in Britain have been closed. All of them. ‘Decisions not to be discussed.’ Long live freedom of speech.”

NatWest Bank is part of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, largely owned by Britain’s government. It’s responsible for targeting RT, suggesting high-level official involvement in what happened.

NatWest ignored RT’s request to explain its action, saying only “(w)e have recently undertaken a review of your banking arrangements with us and reached the conclusion that we will no longer provide these facilities.”

The Royal Bank of Scotland and its affiliate banks decline to service RT’s account. The decision is final, NatWest saying it’s “not prepared to enter into any discussion in relation to it.”

An RT press office statement called the decision “incomprehensible, (made) without warning, (yet) not at odds with” countless other attacks on RT in Britain and other European countries “to ostracize, shout down, or downright impede” its truth-telling mission on vital issues. -- source

Oh, Abby Martin of Russia Today is highlighting "The Untold History of Palestine & Israel". Now do you see why British banks are tightening down the screws? Israel and Jews are taking flak again! Damage control, damage control!

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Oct 18, 2016 6:28 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9503
Reply with quote
Post Re: Censorship
The mainstream media sites are now telling us which news websites we can dismiss as fake.

But, they do not include themselves on the list.

I am so reminded of Bill Ryan, who was often telling his Project Avalon forum members which whistle-blowers to dismiss as fake. "Don't even bother to listen to them," he would say. "I've done all the hard work for you and determined they are liars. Trust me." And this is how sociopaths lie, just like Bill Ryan, and just like the mainstream media.

"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!"



Pay No Attention To That Man Behind The Curtain...

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:40 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9503
Reply with quote
Post Re: Censorship
Quote:
By Julia Fioretti

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Web giants YouTube , Facebook , Twitter and Microsoft will step up efforts to remove extremist content from their websites by creating a common database.

The companies will share 'hashes' - unique digital fingerprints they automatically assign to videos or photos - of extremist content they have removed from their websites to enable their peers to identify the same content on their platforms.

"We hope this collaboration will lead to greater efficiency as we continue to enforce our policies to help curb the pressing global issue of terrorist content online," the companies said in a statement on Tuesday. -- source

What constitutes "extremist content"? How does that get equated to "terrorist content"? I used to practice extreme sports. Was I a terrorist?

I am reminded of a quote I just posted here, which deals with the definition of truth. Does the definition of non-extreme content originate from the same kind of perspective?

Censoring information by classifying it as extremist or some kind of terrorism is a very dangerous game, one ripe for corruption and misuse. I would suggest that the corruption and misuse have already begun.

Quote:
Twitter suspended 235,000 accounts between February and August this year and has expanded the teams reviewing reports of extremist content. -- source

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Dec 08, 2016 2:23 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9503
Reply with quote
Post Re: Censorship
The ruling sociopaths rely on controlling the flow of information to achieve the deception and manipulation necessary to increase their power and control over the bulk of humanity. Censorship is a fundamental part of that process.




We Are Watching The Long Game to Total Censorship Play Out



You can bet your booties that this forum will be targeted for censorship if this program gains traction. What I have to say will be suppressed. You may think that is all right, because it is not you. But one day, it may very well be you.

First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a communist;

Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a socialist;

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a trade unionist;

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Jew;

Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak out for me.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:54 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9503
Reply with quote
Post Re: Censorship
"Ghost banning" = having your information suppressed without you being aware of it.

Almost no one reads the information on this forum. There are lots of users reported reading the forum, but they are all "bots", meaning computer programs. Some are not identified as bots, but their IPs stay consistent, typically from Shanghai China, so it becomes fairly clear by their behavior that they are just a new kind of clandestine bot. Real humans are nowhere to be seen on this forum.

Now this could be because this forum sucks, or that no one is interested to hear what I have to say.

But I doubt it.

More likely, I'm being ghost banned.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Dec 18, 2016 10:36 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9503
Reply with quote
Post Re: Censorship
Ah, here's a critical component to ghost banning:

Quote:
Wikipedia wrote:
The Overton window, also known as the window of discourse, is the range of ideas the public will accept. It is used by media pundits. The term is derived from its originator, Joseph P. Overton (1960–2003), a former vice president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, who in his description of his window claimed that an idea’s political viability depends mainly on whether it falls within the window, rather than on politicians’ individual preferences. According to Overton’s description, his window includes a range of policies considered politically acceptable in the current climate of public opinion, which a politician can recommend without being considered too extreme to gain or keep public office.

Because the public perceives that it has been offered multiple choices, individual members of the public take stake in whichever view – confined within that acceptable window – best fits theirs. But they lack perception of the shifts in direction that window has taken; they have forgotten all previous attitudes – or regard them as taboo or ridiculous.

Right now, the biggest shift in the Overton window is happening on social media. Facebook and Google are leading the charge, hiring new hit teams to flag and censor news.

Because it all works on algorithms, the “window” effect becomes literal, rather than just figurative. News and information that falls outside of the acceptable range of view is simply not seen by the public – it is hidden from view, and omitted from search results. -- source

So if you fall outside of the Overton window, you are essentially ghost banned automatically.

You can see how the ruling sociopaths have made a science out of this.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Dec 31, 2016 3:02 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9503
Reply with quote
Post Re: Censorship
Judge Andrew Napolitano, the only voice anywhere near reasonable on Fox News, has been censored! :o

Stephen Lendman wrote:
Former law professor, New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Napolitano was legal analyst for Fox News until silenced over allegations of Obama using Britain’s GCHQ spy agency (its NSA equivalent) to monitor Trump - meaning his phone and online communications.

GCHQ called his claim “nonsense, utterly ridiculous and should be ignored.” Fox News disavowed his accusation, indefinitely suspending him.
-- source

Of course, I don't watch Fox News, or even television for that matter, but I have seen Napolitano deliberately choose to stand on the side of truth in Fox clips posted to the Internet. Some I have even posted on this forum, as have others ( 1 2 3 ).

Note that Janet Napolitano, head of Homeland Security under traitor Obama, is not cut from the same tree as Andrew Napolitano.

Note also that being censored is inevitable if you choose to stand on the side of truth when being hosted by scammers, whether they be Fox News or the Project Avalon forum. Or the Nexus forum. Or the Atticus1 forum. Or the Quark forum. Don't worry, Judge Napolitano. You'll get used to it. I speak from long experience. :lol:

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Mar 23, 2017 4:03 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 182 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 19  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.