
Re: Atheistic freedom zone
I have long considered this "obvious" argument, and I am convinced that it is an illusion. The inherent flaws in human thinking (yes, we have them) take us down false paths that lead to faulty conclusions. Entire books have been written about this, including many by Richard Dawkins like "The Blind Watchmaker" and "Climbing Mount Improbable".
No, that's not what I did. I essentially said that we are equally capable of discerning reality, yet we come to dissimilar conclusions regarding religion. That is a clue suggesting those inherent flaws in human thinking.
In searching for the correct explanation when faced with the unknown, imagination does have an important role to play. But it does not necessarily lead you to the truth. Consider an optical illusion that is placed in front of you for the first time. How obvious is it what is really occurring there, right in front of your nose?
Everything can be construed as a belief system, so your statement says nothing. Atheist conclusions could indeed be wrong, and if they are, it should be demonstrated why they are wrong. I understand a
banana is useful for this.
The burden of proof is on the seeker of truth. Those who do not seek truth have no burden, because ignorance is bliss.