Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Sunstein, Wikileaks, Assange ... three clay pigeons ... 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm
Posts: 1400
Reply with quote
Post Sunstein, Wikileaks, Assange ... three clay pigeons ...
... for sharpshooter Tarpley.

Release!! *Tup* *Tup* *Tup*

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php ... t=next#new

beginExcerpt

No Equal Time for CIA Covert Operations

Assange also provides a splendid pretext for draconian censorship and limitations on the freedom of the internet. The totalitarian liberal Senator Feinstein wants to bring back Woodrow Wilson’s infamous Espionage Act of 1917 in honor of Assange. Assange must be seen not as an activist, not as a journalist, and not as an entertainer, but rather as a spook. John Young of Cryptome, according to some reports, has denounced Wikileaks, to which he formerly belonged, as a CIA front. In a December 29 RT interview, Young described the internet as “a very large-scale spying machine.”1 The internet is indeed a vast battlefield, where the intelligence agencies of the US-UK, China, Israel, Russia, and many others clash every hour of the day, with commercial spies, hackers, anarchists, cultists, mercenary trolls, and psychotics all getting into the act as well. Intelligence agencies deliberately feed real and doctored material to various websites, sometimes using their own disgruntled employees as cutouts, conduits, and go-betweens. This means among other things that Bradley Manning cannot be taken at face value, although it is also clear that he like anyone else should not be tortured.

Assange is now famous, it might be argued. But the Wall Street controlled media can make anyone famous, from Lady Gaga to Justin Bieber to Snooki, and this is what they have done with Assange. It is wrong to capitulate to the demagogic power of these media by making it appear that there might be some legitimate value to Assange. Up to now, the CIA has been organizing color revolutions using Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, and so forth as vehicles. Now they think they have a cult figure whom they can sell to the youth bulge in the Arab world and other developing countries, where most of the population is under 30. This is an operation which must be exposed.

Most recently, Wikileaks has played a role in the CIA’s new “Jasmine Revolution” in Tunisia by publishing some State Department cables about the sybaritic luxury and lavish lifestyle of the Ben Ali clan, leading to the downfall of that regime. The CIA is now gloating that with the help of Wikileaks it can now topple all the Arab regimes at will, from Mubarak to Qaddafi to Bouteflika, and replace them with new and more pliable puppets eager to clash with Iran, Russia, and China

If Assange ever launches his much-touted doomsday machine against the Bank of America or some other financial institutions, we will be justified in asking that the Securities and Exchange Commission make public the extent of short interest in those stocks by certain hedge funds, especially those controlled by George Soros. And as far as Assange’s attacks on the Vatican are concerned, they fit neatly into four centuries of British intelligence warfare against the Holy See, going back to Guy Fawkes and Lord Robert Cecil’s Gunpowder Plot of 1605 and beyond. Not much new or radical here.

Wikileaks: No Serious Derogatory Information about US, UK, Israel

It is illuminating that none of Assange’s document dumps have revealed any notable scandals involving Great Britain or Israel. No US public figures have had to resign because of anything Wikileaks has done. No major ongoing covert operation or highly placed agent of influence has been blown. After all these months, there are still no US indictments against Assange, even though we know that a US grand jury will readily indict a ham sandwich if the US Attorney demands it. If the CIA had wanted to silence Assange, they could have subjected him to the classic kidnapping aka rendition, meaning that he would have been beaten, drugged, and carted off to wake up in a black site prison in Egypt, Poland, or Guantanamo Bay. Otherwise, the CIA could have had recourse to the usual extralegal wetwork. We must also assume that the new US Cybercommand with its vast resources would have little trouble shutting down the Wikileaks mirror sites, no matter how numerous they might be. The same goes for Anonymous and other flanking organizations of Wikileaks. But these considerations are purely fantastic. Assange emerges today as the pampered darling and golden boy of The New York Times, Der Spiegel. The Guardian, El Pais — in short, of the entire Anglo-American official media Wurlitzer. He reclines today in baronial splendor in the country house of a well-connected retired British officer who should be quizzed by the media about his ties to British intelligence. The radical-chic world, from Bianca Jagger to Michael Moore, is at Assange’s feet.

Cass Sunstein Present at the Creation of Wikileaks

Wikileaks was apparently founded in 2006. Originally, the group was programmed to attack China, and its board was heavily larded with fishy Chinese dissidents and “democracy” activists from the orbit of the Soros foundations. Interestingly, the first big publicity breakthrough for Wikileaks in the mainstream US media was provided by an infamous totalitarian liberal today ensconced in the Obama White House – none other than Cass Sunstein. In Sunstein’s op-ed published in the Washington Post of February 24, 2007 under the title “Brave new Wikiworld,” we read: “Wikileaks.org, founded by dissidents in China and other nations, plans to post secret government documents and to protect them from censorship with coded software.” How interesting that Sunstein was present at the creation of the new Wikileaks psywar operation!

This is the same Sunstein who today heads Obama’s White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. In his January 2008 Harvard Law School Working Paper entitled “Conspiracy Theories,” Sunstein infamously demanded that the United States government deploy groups of covert operatives and pseudo-independent agents of influence for the “cognitively infiltration of extremist groups” – meaning organizations, activists and Internet websites who espouse beliefs which Sunstein chooses to classify as “false conspiracy theories.”

Wikileaks = Cass Sunstein’s Program for Cognitive Infiltration In Action

It should be clear that Assange and Wikileaks are precisely the practical realization of Sunstein’s program for “cognitive infiltration” shock troops to counteract and overwhelm any real mass understanding of oligarchical domination in the modern world, and any discussion of what kind of economic policies are needed to secure a recovery from the present world depression.

In line with Sunstein’s recipe, Assange is a self-declared enemy of 9/11 truth. As Assange told Belfast Telegraph reporter Matthew Bell last July, “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.” In other words, Assange argues that the truth about 9/11 truth is not nearly as radical as the various scandals which Wikileaks claims to expose. But the scandals Assange is offering target mostly the adversaries of the CIA.

Assange must also be seen as a deeply troubled individual and a possible psychopath. He has the ravaged emotional complexion that we might expect from an alumnus of one of the many MK-Ultra operations. He reportedly spent several years in the menticidal Anne Hamilton-Byrne cult (also known as The Family and Santiniketan) near Melbourne, Australia. Here little children were separated from their parents and made to ingest LSD, Anatensol, Diazepam, Haloperidol, Largactil, Mogadon, Serepax, Stelazine, Tegretol, Tofranil, and other potent psychopharmaca. Dozens of children were told that Hamilton-Byrne was their real mother, and had their hair dyed blond. Anne Hamilton-Byrne reportedly regarded blond hair as a sign of racial superiority. Careful observers will have noted that Assange’s hair is sometimes blond, sometimes more brownish, raising the question of whether his grooming practices are a residue of his time with Hamilton-Byrne, whom he says he does not remember. When other kids were getting cookies and milk, was Assange being lobotomized by LSD and other potent psychopharmaca dished up by Hamilton-Byrne? There is evidence pointing in that direction.

With Assange, we thus have the tragic spectacle of the emotionally mutilated product of a CIA (or MI-6) covert operation of 40 years ago, who has now been given a prominent role in a key counter-insurgency ploy of the present time. Will the youth of the world, already burned by their recent fatuous obsession with Obama, be duped again by such an impaired individual?

The Precedent: Pentagon Papers Whitewashed CIA, Blamed Army, Demonized Kennedy


Assange’s revelations mainly involve communications labeled Confidential or Secret, and which in reality would be over-classified if marked Official Use Only. In other words, Assange is in reality a purveyor of low level cable traffic, not of earth-shattering secrets. This reminds us of an earlier CIA limited hangout operation, the one known as the Pentagon Papers. This was a carefully screened selection of historical documents, supplemented by outright forgeries, relating to the Vietnam War and compiled by Morton Halperin and Leslie Gelb, both of whom have gone on to glittering careers in the imperialist foreign policy establishment – Gelb became president of the Council on Foreign Relations, while Halperin serves today as chief political officer of the Soros wolfpack of foundations. The papers were leaked by former RAND Corporation official Daniel Ellsberg, who had been a very bellicose hawk in Vietnam before a suspicious Damascus Road conversion to pacifism, and then published in the US establishment press – similarly to Assange today. There was nothing in the Pentagon papers which a casual reader of LeMonde or Corriere della Sera did not already know. But, as Mort Sahl later said, left liberals have generally had very few heroes, so they battened on to Ellsberg and lionized him – led by Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, and some others. (This is a syndrome which we see again today: at the moment when Obama’s treacherous sellout on the Bush tax cuts was providing a final disillusionment for many gullible left libs, Assange arrived on the scene as their new Savior. Not by chance, Ellsberg has now designated Assange as his own reincarnation, and thus surely the new Messiah.)

The Pentagon papers had been carefully selected by the CIA itself to cover up CIA war crimes in Vietnam, blaming these on the US Army wherever possible, while also obscuring the CIA’s massive program of drug production and narcotics smuggling. The Pentagon Papers systematically hid the salient political fact of the entire Vietnam era, which is that President John F. Kennedy before he was assassinated was preparing to end the de facto US combat role in that country. Instead, Kennedy was systematically demonized and smeared, emerging as the villain of the piece. Needless to say, the Pentagon papers throw no light whatsoever on the CIA role in the Kennedy assassination – in the same way that Assange’s various document dumps tell us nothing of importance about 9/11, the Rabin assassination, Iran-contra, the 1999 bombing of Serbia, the Kursk incident, the various CIA color revolutions, or many of the other truly big covert operations of the past decades.

The limited hangout is not new; it was described in a secret memorandum by Venetian intelligence chief Paolo Sarpi to the Venetian Senate in 1620 as the art of “saying something good about somebody while pretending to be saying something bad.” That is the common denominator of the CIA’s limited hangout operations from Ellsberg to Philip Agee to Assange, with so many other “former” CIA operatives turned “whistleblowers” along the way.
___________________________
1John Young of Cryptome, “‘Internet a very large-scale spying machine’ – info leaking site co-founder,” RT, 29 December, 2010, at http://rt.com/news/cryptome-classified- ... wikileaks/

end



The Pentagon Papers deception was the precedent to the Wikileaks deception. Ellesberg was the point man, the witting stooge, and a co-accomplice in that deception. Assange is the point man, the witting stooge, and a co-accomplice in the Wikileaks deception.

History repeats itself if we don't - or if we choose not to - learn from it.

Moreover, the paths to the learning are littered with obstacles in the duty of the ruling empire. These obstacles work in concert to suppress thought, and to subvert the ability to discern. The empire, of course, employs and promotes quills to write a profitable story. So we must look to those that write the other story for discernment and guidance.

Pax Discerni

_________________
Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.


Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:17 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10876
Reply with quote
Post Re: Sunstein, Wikileaks, Assange ... three clay pigeons ...
UncleZook wrote:
The Pentagon Papers deception was the precedent to the Wikileaks deception.

Oh, please... Not the gatekeeper UncleZook again! Can't you get it through your thick skull that you're busted?

So the Pentagon Papers were supposedly a psyop, and so Wikileaks must be, too. And your Webster Tarpley article on Alex Jones' Infowars website is not!? You're either a gullible retard or a paid gatekeeper (maybe even both).

Let's take a closer look at the "evidence" from the article:

Quote:
Assange started his intensive deployment phase this year with video of a Class A US war crime in Iraq, which was very graphic but which dealt with an incident which was already widely known.

I'm going to go out on a limb here (sarcasm) and suggest this event was NOT well known AT ALL until Wikileaks released it, after which it spread like wildfire! This was indeed a "Class A US war crime", for which no one has yet been charged, and no one will be charged due to the criminal nature of our entire government and justice system. Wikileaks did right to expose this crime and the nature of our ruling sociopaths, and they did so with undeniable graphic proof! I don't see Tarpley doing as much.

Quote:
...along with jabs at supposed US allies who need to be kept off-balance and dependent, including the Saudi Arabian royal family, French President Sarkozy, and others. Wikileaks thus directs the vast majority of its fire against figures who are part of the CIA’s enemies list.

I'm going to go out on a limb here (sarcasm) and suggest that Sarkozy and the Saudi Arabian royal family are regular bedfellows with the CIA. It wouldn't surprise me that the other listed "enemies" of the CIA are actually partners-in-crime with the CIA, and the CIA is just running another psyop to shut Wikileaks down since the U.S. "legal" pursuit has failed.

Quote:
Assange also provides a splendid pretext for draconian censorship and limitations on the freedom of the internet.

And why is that? Because he has provided a brilliant demonstration of the "dangers" of free speech and transparency to the criminal cartel that runs the CIA, the mainstream media, and the major governments of the world! So this idiotic argument is -- if only Assange had kept his mouth shut, we wouldn't have to censor him and everyone else. Duh. If only we didn't have criminals running the show, we wouldn't have to fight them!

I can give you a lot more from the same article, UncleKook, but I think my point is clear. Your certainty is the dead giveaway that you are a gatekeeper, Busted Boy.

UncleZook wrote:
The empire, of course, employs and promotes quills to write a profitable story.

Can you tell us (from personal experience) how much they pay?

UncleZook wrote:
So we must look to those that write the other story for discernment and guidance.

Dummkopf! We look to those that write the other story for contrast and comparison. Then we attempt to use discernment to weigh the evidence, knowing that the evidence is incomplete and thoroughly tampered with such that no certain conclusions can be legitimately reached. But one thing we don't do is latch onto one side of the story as the unvarnished truth, and label everyone that fails to do so as "gatekeepers". Only gatekeepers do that. Sound familiar?

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:28 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10876
Reply with quote
Post Re: Sunstein, Wikileaks, Assange ... three clay pigeons ...
By the way, Zook, did you just do a big "cut and paste", one that is worse than the one Andy did (because it's a repeat from here), for which you jumped all over Andy, even asking me to take "appropriate steps to remove such behavior"?

Can you say "hypocrite"?

I say "busted again!"

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:44 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 5:40 pm
Posts: 2156
Reply with quote
Post Re: Sunstein, Wikileaks, Assange ... three clay pigeons ...
UncleZook wrote:

If you want to keep this as a discussion forum and not a link dump, please take the appropriate steps to remove such behavior. Thank you. Hopefully, it's not me thanking just the wind again.

Pax Administratum


:lol: Thanks for the link Chico :lol:

_________________
Think twice before you speak, especially if you intend to say what you think.

QRK: QifUSqn6ygXK61pEkm2g4iBY9ZcLw4g4su
FCK: FettxKyQVhsSURZt1XQxUTypwxEeBbTgUQ

Please visit http://forum.qrk.cc/ for all things Crypto!


Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:36 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm
Posts: 1400
Reply with quote
Post Re: Sunstein, Wikileaks, Assange ... three clay pigeons ...
Mags, can you please apprise the twindependent titwits in question, the difference between my large excerpt with my significant commentary at the end ... and Andy's link dump without commentary?

It seems they have lost their purpose the last few days during which I've been pointedly silent towards them. It's done me good just to focus on the truths and not engage with their taunts and disruptive behavior any longer. I figure that with myself and yourself, and a few others, we can still make United People a place to share ideas ... even as the founder does his very best to focus on personal attacks and what not - in an attempt to fulfill his own hidden gatekeeping charter for the forum. Chico's behavior the last few days also pronounces what most of us had already discovered about him, namely, that he is one deeply disturbed sociopathic (and psychopathic) radiator. Then again, there has to be some degree of sociopathy/psychopathy in anyone that enjoins with Sunstein's Ministry of Propaganda.

For the genuine truthseekers of United People - a select club within the club - what does Sunstein's announcement of Wikileaks.org back in February of 2007 portend for Soros-funded Wikileaks?

Pax Veritas

ps I will continue to ignore the twindependent ester states of Chico (bananacrackers) and Chiquita (bananas) ... and if you clowns continue to follow me about, then I must assume that you both simply can't adjust to life without the avuncular guy. Nothing to be ashamed about fellas, I can't adjust to life without me either.
:jest:

_________________
Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.


Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:23 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 10:33 pm
Posts: 4156
Reply with quote
Post Re: Sunstein, Wikileaks, Assange ... three clay pigeons ...
Zook,
I dont think I can do anything of the sort, while there is a blood feud going on.
They both acknowledge that Wiki could be psyop, but then there is Assange defending truth within the Ministry of truth environment.

Double agent stuff within two contexts of truth.

Is it any wonder why people fall for contrived revolutions?

I think part of the confusion is that the social engineers force you into their paradigm. They dont have to fool you much, they just control your hierarchy of needs.

_________________
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.


Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:54 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm
Posts: 1400
Reply with quote
Post Re: Sunstein, Wikileaks, Assange ... three clay pigeons ...
magamud wrote:
Zook,
I dont think I can do anything of the sort, while there is a blood feud going on.


Blood feud?? Perhaps between a truthseeker and some gatekeepers ... but that's usually known as dragonslaying, pest control, or weed control.

In any event, truthseeking is a lone journey for the most part; so I do recognize your right not to intercede in another's weed control efforts. As it is, it was mostly a rhetorical question anyways, as I often find that I speak to the wind and the wall, which are more receptive to my wisdom than the wobbles of warpainted weebles. Such is the plight of the few who advance into the dragon's breath with or without company.

Quote:
They both acknowledge that Wiki could be psyop, but then there is Assange defending truth within the Ministry of truth environment.

Double agent stuff within two contexts of truth.


I beg to disagree. Tepid conclusions about Wikileaks and Assange - on the available hard evidence - are the bane of the brave and the boon of those bewared or bought off.

In the multiplicative universe, we have four outcomes:
Those who advance the truths and advance the lies, e.g. double agents ... are liars.
Those who advance the truths and retreat the lies, e.g. single agents ... are truthseekers.
Those who retreat the truths and advance the lies, e.g. single agents ... are liars.
Those who retreat the truths and retreat the lies, e.g. double agents ... are liars.

Where you see double agency within two contexts of truths ... I see liars.

Quote:
Is it any wonder why people fall for contrived revolutions?

I think part of the confusion is that the social engineers force you into their paradigm. They dont have to fool you much, they just control your hierarchy of needs.


Discernment is the arrow into the Achilles Heel of social engineering.

Pax Discerni

ps: I grant that it may be the case that very few of us can see through multiple layers of deception. And if that is the case, then I'm better off on a mountain with a guitar and the acrophilic goats than in the company of my fellow human beings.

ps2: Stay clean, Mags ... I'd hate to see you succumb to the prevaricational bullshit that frequently fertilizes this forum.

_________________
Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.


Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:15 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10876
Reply with quote
Post Re: Sunstein, Wikileaks, Assange ... three clay pigeons ...
UncleZook wrote:
Mags, can you please apprise the twindependent titwits in question...

Zook: Help, Mags! Help, me! I'm being exposed in front of everyone! I'm melting! Melting... My beautiful wickedness...




UncleZook wrote:
It's done me good just to focus on the truths and not engage with their taunts and disruptive behavior any longer. ... even as the founder does his very best to focus on personal attacks and what not...

Chico's behavior the last few days also pronounces what most of us had already discovered about him, namely, that he is one deeply disturbed sociopathic (and psychopathic) radiator.

:lol: Short focus there, Zook.

UncleZook wrote:
ps I will continue to ignore the twindependent ester states of Chico (bananacrackers) and Chiquita (bananas) ...

I still think your best strategy is to bring down the forum by removing the only thing that helps us prosper and flourish -- your life-supporting presence. Think of how quickly this forum would fold without the fancy new clothes of the Emperor Zook!

"But Mommy, he has no clothes."

"Quiet, you twindependent titwit!"

UncleZook wrote:
and if you clowns continue to follow me about, then I must assume that you both simply can't adjust to life without the avuncular guy. Nothing to be ashamed about fellas, I can't adjust to life without me either.

He's as bad as a teenage girl primping and posing in front of a mirror! Narcissist, perhaps? Or maybe narcissistic sociopath!

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:27 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 10:33 pm
Posts: 4156
Reply with quote
Post Re: Sunstein, Wikileaks, Assange ... three clay pigeons ...
Quote:
Perhaps between a truthseeker and some gatekeepers ... but that's usually known as dragonslaying, pest control, or weed control.

I agree with this statement.

Quote:
Tepid conclusions

Your right Zook. The baseline should be emphasized that we are in total lockdown arguing a sic fi prison. A true matrix. Then this would already presume what is given is already co opted. We would not even have to get into time travel. Im willing to discuss the co opting of supposed random organic spontaneity, but im sure the twins think that is ridiculous and not even know how to extrapolate that info.

The preponderance of evidence demands one prior his posture with this knowledge.

Reason takes dialogue, and when a defense system knows not itself?

Quote:
In the multiplicative universe, we have four outcomes:

Thats pretty good stuff Zook.

Your right again. We must push a new paradigm and not fall to the grey area of rebellion tyranny recycling as we continue to do. Probably why bureaucracy is such a wonderful commodity, like fractals. Its deconstruction. You need supercomputers to manage the detail.

Quote:
Where you see double agency within two contexts of truths ... I see liars.

Yes in your context I agree and I have a lot of animals and live near the mountains....

_________________
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.


Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:57 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 10876
Reply with quote
Post Re: Sunstein, Wikileaks, Assange ... three clay pigeons ...
magamud wrote:
UncleZook wrote:
In the multiplicative universe, we have four outcomes:

Thats pretty good stuff Zook. Your right again.

Are you serious, Mags? It's deceptive claptrap, and Zook is wrong again. Do I have to deconstruct it for you? OK, that's obviously a rhetorical question.

Your first clue should be his claim that there are only four possible outcomes in a "multiplicative universe". That's completely absurd. The universe is a big place, and I'm pretty sure there are more than these four outcomes happening. Remember Zook's penchant for oversimplification that I pointed out so many times? Yep, he's still doing it, only this time on a universal scale.

Continuing on, let's just look at his first of four outcomes, "Those who advance the truths and advance the lies, e.g. double agents ... are liars." This is not necessarily true at all. The sheeple do this all the time, not because they are double agents or liars, but because they are deceived and manipulated. So already there is untruth in two out of two Zook statements.

If you insist, I will deconstruct the next three "outcomes", but it should already be clear that Zook is doing his usual gatekeeping BS. If you think he is not, please explain why you think that.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Dec 05, 2012 12:23 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.