You miss the points of moralism because you are angry. Anger stampedes the individual, therefore missing the points of moralism. Reducing your speed will help you become aware of your surroundings. This points to trauma based MK, shock and awe type stuff. This is why the bankers stampede the public. Dummkopf! Dramatist! Sadist!
Masochist...
_________________ Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
Zuckerman never had a grip on Facebook that was greater than was allocated to him by the intelligence agencies.
That's right, as Rappoport indicated, Facebook is an intelligence operation. It has twists and turns and illusions designed to give the desired appearance to the outside observer, including Zuckerman's "loss" of control. Zuckerman is just a patsy. So you are not contradicting Rappoport when you say Facebook is a CIA operation, as if you thought of it first, when he clearly indicates as much in his article.
Quote:
The differences in your perspective and mine are subtle, Chico but important all the same.
The difference is that you claim to have complete comprehension, and then fail to demonstrate it. I make no such claim, and merely point out your bumbling.
Quote:
Type "Criticism of Obama" in the google galloper and see how many mainstream articles come up. For me, 115,000,000 results come up with those keywords.
What the heck is that supposed to prove? Type in "Obama" and you get 732,000,000 results. So?
Quote:
If Obama's approval rating is 52% today ... then what about the 48% that disapprove of him? Are they being stifled?
Are you for real? Obama's approval rating isn't 52%. That's mainstream media propaganda. We don't know what people really think of Obama, because it is being whitewashed. Plus people are being fooled, lied to, manipulated, and mind controlled, so an accurate polling would only indicate the success of the brainwashing.
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
ps2: As I already stated, I address Banana Boy - a proven discord dweller - at my leisure and pleasure. He's a child by any standard of intellectual pursuit ... and you can go fcuk yourself if you pose here otherwise, e.g. against the voluminous evidence exposing the sundry games played by the yellow weeble of the clan of Wights, not least, the occasional toxic PM sent in an infantile attempt to stir discord in the membership.
First I would like to thank you for demonstrating for everyone here your present level of intellectual maturity, although I must say I'm a little disappointed in the weak and disingenuous reasons you gave for not wanting to engage me, which without doubt has been one of your smarter moves.
I do hope though that you find a more fulfilling intellectual pursuit in that tiny controlled spectrum of ever diminishing space where you can censor and ban members to your heart's content!
_________________ Think twice before you speak, especially if you intend to say what you think.
That same night and wanting to achieve some measure of privacy, Lorie and I decided to take the conversation off of Facebook to the phone. This is where our evening became very weird. Lorie and I were talking about the possibility of discussing these censorship events on my show and our call was immediately terminated (I was on a land line) and we could not re-establish a connection.
And to all of us, we have bigger fish to fry than Facebook. Venting our indignation against such a tool of censorship and oppression is a waste of time. We need to keep directing our attention on the gardeners, not their tools. For it is the gardeners who are trying to erase most of humanity from the planet.
Just so that things are clear, "gardeners" is what I call "sociopaths". If we don't call a spade a spade, we won't be able to fight our way out of a wet paper bag.
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
Zuckerman never had a grip on Facebook that was greater than was allocated to him by the intelligence agencies.
That's right, as Rappoport indicated, Facebook is an intelligence operation.
No. He has indicated that Facebook has become an intelligence operation. He still abides the narrative of whiz kids finding a diamond in the grass, and then forced to sell low so that others can buy low and sell high. That is a false narrative.
Quote:
It has twists and turns and illusions designed to give the desired appearance to the outside observer, including Zuckerman's "loss" of control. Zuckerman is just a patsy. So you are not contradicting Rappoport when you say Facebook is a CIA operation, as if you thought of it first, when he clearly indicates as much in his article.
The problem with you Chico is that you read what you want to read ... and not what is necessarily written.
Quote:
Quote:
The differences in your perspective and mine are subtle, Chico but important all the same.
The difference is that you claim to have complete comprehension, and then fail to demonstrate it. I make no such claim, and merely point out your bumbling.
Never claimed complete comprehension, Chico ... sufficiency and preponderance are not absolute evidence, but evidence to make a determination with a high degree of confidence. But I understand your tactic of pushing things to the extreme to make a point. A binary thinker often projects his behavior on others. Just like a sociopath often projects his behavior on others. You are both a sociopath and a binary thinker ... and that explains quite a bit.
Quote:
Quote:
Type "Criticism of Obama" in the google galloper and see how many mainstream articles come up. For me, 115,000,000 results come up with those keywords.
What the heck is that supposed to prove? Type in "Obama" and you get 732,000,000 results. So?
It shows that dissent against Obama is not being stifled, as you claim ... but is being archived rather prodigiously at Le Goog. Indeed, the power pyramid wants an even mix of Obama supporters and dissenters ... that way, the riff raff gets entrenched in trivial pursuits (e.g. like a stuffed rabbit POTUS hopping beyond the reach of greyhounds around the running track) while the significant operators push levers behind the scenes.
Quote:
Quote:
If Obama's approval rating is 52% today ... then what about the 48% that disapprove of him? Are they being stifled?
Are you for real? Obama's approval rating isn't 52%. That's mainstream media propaganda. We don't know what people really think of Obama, because it is being whitewashed. Plus people are being fooled, lied to, manipulated, and mind controlled, so an accurate polling would only indicate the success of the brainwashing.
The American dumbed-down class is large enough to hold 52% approval numbers.
Pax
_________________ Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.
It shows that dissent against Obama is not being stifled, as you claim ... but is being archived rather prodigiously at Le Goog.
It shows no such thing! It doesn't show whether Obama is receiving criticism, or dishing it out (the "of" is ignored by Google). It doesn't show if people are critical of his haircut or his policies, or if Obama is critical of his own children or his perks. It doesn't show squat. If anything, it shows Google, another CIA operation, can find millions of examples where "criticism" and "Obama" show up on some website or webpage. The number of results is just a number being manipulated for purposes of statistical legerdemain by UncleZook. Watch him pull a rabbit out of his hat!
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
It shows that dissent against Obama is not being stifled, as you claim ... but is being archived rather prodigiously at Le Goog.
It shows no such thing!
Even after putting "criticism of Obama" (within quotes), there are still 2,800,000 results. Without quotes, 134,000,000 results.
It shows that the internet is rife with criticism of Obama, contrary to the protestations of surface thinkers, one of whom squawked the following in a prior post: "What planet are you living on, Zook? Here on Earth, Obama criticism is not plastered all over the Internet. Look at Yahoo News, or Google news, both echoing the mainstream media which treats Obama as a good and respectable man. And the well-controlled mainstream media (TV, newspapers, magazines, and books) is still the major media currently, not the Internet."
You made a half-assed statement ... 134,000,000 results (and here, we can assume a good chunk of those are extremely animus towards the suited stooge-on-a-leash Soetoro) has found the lost half and stapled it back on ... but you seem smitten with partial rump dynamics. So be it.
Quote:
It doesn't show whether Obama is receiving criticism, or dishing it out (the "of" is ignored by Google). It doesn't show if people are critical of his haircut or his policies, or if Obama is critical of his own children or his perks. It doesn't show squat. If anything, it shows Google, another CIA operation, can find millions of examples where "criticism" and "Obama" show up on some website or webpage. The number of results is just a number being manipulated for purposes of statistical legerdemain by UncleZook. Watch him pull a rabbit out of his hat!
TUGPOOT strikes again!
Pax
ps: Obama is half Uncle Tom and half Golda Meir. <------------- there, I just criticized Obama! They're gonna close your site down now, Chico! Well, perhaps not ... after all, you've enlisted in their cause.
_________________ Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.
It shows that the internet is rife with criticism of Obama
If that's what the number of Google "hits" causes you to believe, then you have a very bright future in front of you as a genuine truth-seeker!
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:38 am
Chicodoodoo
Site Admin
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm Posts: 11864
Re: Censorship
I sent out a message on Facebook about the censoring of all of Jon Rappoport's writings, with two relevant links, and Facebook censored one of them! So I had to get creative and reword my message:
Quote:
Facebook is censoring people that raise real criticisms about Obama. Info here:
Dang, Facebook censored that, too! I'll give you the link in English:
I sent out a message on Facebook about the censoring of all of Jon Rappoport's writings, with two relevant links, and Facebook censored one of them! So I had to get creative and reword my message:
Quote:
Facebook is censoring people that raise real criticisms about Obama. Info here:
Dang, Facebook censored that, too! I'll give you the link in English:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum