united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
The Holocaust Lie https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=71&t=1085 |
Page 11 of 47 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Oct 19, 2015 10:06 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The Holocaust Lie | |||||||||
Wait, I was taught at a young age that the bulk of the German Jews were exterminated in gas chambers by evil Nazis! You mean I was fooled?! |
Author: | UncleZook [ Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:14 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The Holocaust Lie | ||||||||||||||||||
Israel is a sociopathic state, from its tribal conception, to its manufactured inception, through its history of deceptions, and its ongoing acts and behaviors. So ... who were the founders of this sociopathic state. The sociopathic Zionists are the obvious founders. But are they the sole founding fathers? The Ha'avara agreement, which was absolutely crucial to the founding of the neoBiblical apparition and renegade nation, Israel ... for a peoples without a land on a land without a peoples (here, the label 'peoples' does not extend to the populating Arab goyim, who were considered as animals in order to maintain the false integrity of the highlighted catchphrase) ... had an important and necessary cosigner, Adolf Hitler. But can a nonsociopath cosign an agreement to found a sociopathic state? If not, then we have more evidence that Hitler was, indeed, a sociopath. Certainly, he lacked empathy for the Arab goyim who were nothing more than innocent bystanders and nothing less than humans. Of course, we have already established that Hitler was a sociopath using threshold definitions such as megalomania and, too, his willingness to appropriate other peoples' lands without conscience or apology (e.g. Lebensraum and expansion into Russian territories). The big cats in the putative jungle also act without conscience or apology. That said, the putative jungle is not the standard of civilization in the 20th century. The actual standard creates both the meme of society and its contraindicator, sociopathy. If we are to measure Hitler, then we must measure him in the 20th century. And in the 20th century, Hitler is inescapably a sociopath (using a broad collection of threshold measures). Those who claim that Hitler was something other than a sociopath are ignoring the evidence field, and nibbling on crumbs of unlikely possibility. Such is the plight of cupids ... and the sleight of the pentaColumnists. Pax |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Oct 21, 2015 2:52 am ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The Holocaust Lie | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oh, Zook, you are so funny. Using your ridiculous "guilt by association" logic, you surely proved Hitler was a sociopath! I'm so glad you've come back to set the record straight! Bravo! Hitler wanted the Jews out of Germany because he and other National Socialists understood the ruin the Jews had brought to Germany with the first World War and the Treaty of Versailles. That ruin was recognized by many in Germany, like Julius Streicher, which is why Hitler had such massive support among his countrymen. That was his purpose in signing the Haavara Agreement, to clean his nation of the real enemy.
Oversimplifying, as usual, Zook. If only you could be taught... With regards to megalomania, I see you didn't do the necessary research into Hitler's behavior and psychology before he became famous. He had plenty of opportunities to express megalomania in his younger days, and instead did very much the opposite. "His willingness to appropriate other peoples' lands" is how war is typically waged, whether one wanted war or not. Hitler didn't want war with England, or France, or Russia, or the United States. That was all orchestrated against Hitler from the outside, apparently coming mostly from the Zionist Jews. Hitler often expressed his willingness to stop the war, with a number of peace proposals that Churchill wouldn't even consider, megalomaniac and sociopath that Churchill was. Could the reason Hess was imprisoned in solitary until he died be because he was a peace emissary sent by Hitler? That would certainly blow a hole in your "Hitler was a sociopath" accusation. "Without conscience or apology" is also a devious deception and manipulation on your part. You have no idea what was troubling Hitler's conscience, nor do you truly know if Hitler had anything to apologize for, or if he would apologize if he did. You have only a boat-load of Allied propaganda about Hitler that you have been fed since birth, just as was done to me. Yet unlike me, you still parrot that misleading propaganda with absolute certainty. Have you no shame? That's a rhetorical question, of course, since we already know the answer to that one...
Always good to see the ad hominem slurs. It just confirms how strong your arguments really are. And I'm not backing off my theory that Hitler was not a sociopath. Suppose Hitler did quietly escape to Argentina and live out his days in anonymity and obscurity. Does that sound like the expected behavior of a megalomaniac sociopath to you? So if you want to maintain that Hitler was a megalomaniac sociopath, you had better be upholding with maniacal certainty the Allied propaganda that Hitler committed suicide in his bunker. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Oct 21, 2015 6:16 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The Holocaust Lie | ||||||||||||||||||
It's not Jewish emigration in Nazi Germany that's problematic, it's Jewish twisting of history as parroted by Wikipedia that is problematic. We've seen that the Haavara Agreement, signed in August of 1933, was being successfully implemented, with an estimated two thirds of German Jews emigrating without significant problem by 1940. It continued to function until at least 1942. So how is it that by 1938, according to Wikipedia, Jews were having trouble emigrating? Where are the footnote references for this Wikipedia claim? And what's this 90% "tax" nonsense? It wasn't a "tax", nor was it pegged at 90%.
Now you can see why the Haavara Agreement was also called the Transfer Agreement. It was a fair and efficient way to allow Jewish emigrants to transfer their wealth out of Germany and into Palestine. Next comes the dubious claim that "mass deportation schemes" proved impossible for the Nazis to carry out. Was not the Haavara Agreement a "mass deportation scheme" that was highly successful, if an estimated "two thirds of the Jewish population of the Greater Reich had departed the country by 1940"? Then comes the bigger lie, again with no confirming references, that "sometime around December 1941, Hitler resolved that the Jews of Europe were to be exterminated." We know that no documents have ever been found supporting this wild fantasy, and German officials are well-known for fastidious record-keeping. Most of those records were seized by the Allies when Berlin fell, and if they could have found any record of such a "resolve", you can be sure the Allies would have paraded it up and down the aisles of Nuremberg! But they didn't, because they never found any such documentary evidence. And all of that is followed by the biggest lie of all -- "The total number of Jews murdered during the resulting Holocaust is estimated at 5.5 to 6 million people..." Well yeah, it's sort of true, with Zionist conspiracy specialists making outrageous claims on the number of Jews murdered in concentration camp gas chambers, when all the real evidence that is aggressively censored suggests NO Jews were ever gassed in any concentration camps. Not only no Jews, but no people. None. Even the alleged "extermination gas chambers" tested negative multiple times ( 1 2 3 ) for ferrocyanide, while the small delousing chambers (about 10 cubic meters in size, enough to hold a big rack of clothes), where Zyklon B was regularly used to fumigate camp clothes and mattresses, where visible ferrocyanide staining has penetrated completely through the walls, tested very high in ferrocyanide. The delousing chamber in use at Dachau. Bet you'll never see this picture in the mainstream media. I'll further bet the video it appears in will be censored and never seen again. Guess who will do it? So Wikipedia parrots the official "Holocaust conspiracy theory" without any supporting evidence whatsoever. I know from personal experience that Wikipedia will refuse any information that is not referenced to "reliable sources". Evidently, the whole Holocaust fib gets a free pass. Now why would that be? Are Jews behind Wikipedia? ( 1 2 3 4 ) Google is going down the same path, where it will determine what information is valid, and any information it considers "wrong" will not show up in your search results. Google can't be a Jewish front, can it? ( 1 2 3 4 ) Is this why the Nazis in Germany passed the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service in April of 1933, to prevent Jews from monopolizing media, education, and government where only their version of anything is allowed? Ugh, this is depressing. I can't believe what I am uncovering. History is repeating. What Germany went through is proceeding nicely step by step in my own country, the United States of America. Only this time, the Zionist sociopaths leading the Jews may not have a challenger like Hitler to rally the country's people to stop them. And I think that's exactly the plan. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri Oct 23, 2015 7:34 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The Holocaust Lie | |||||||||
That wasn't a Nazi speaking. That was a Zionist. What Herzl is saying can be clarified with proper wording. Anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely understandable response by non-sociopaths to Jewish behavior and attitudes. You see, Jewish behavior and attitudes are far too often sociopathic, because that behavior and those attitudes are a policy determined by their leaders, who are sociopaths. It's why Jews are a repeatedly persecuted people -- they always end up stabbing their accommodating hosts in the back. Betraying your host is inevitable when you consider yourself God's chosen people and consider non-Jews as goyim who are only fit to serve you. If you behave like a sociopath in a world where the vast majority consider such behavior as repulsive and immoral, you will be persecuted. Criminals are persecuted because of their wrong behavior. So of course Herzl is correct when he states that anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely understandable response by normal people. But we have been brainwashed our entire lives to believe that anti-Semitism is a horrible thing. See how the sociopathic mind works? Deception and manipulation. Power and control over others. Domination. And you really think the Holocaust happened the way we've been told? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:17 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The Holocaust Lie | ||||||||||||||||||
So Jews made up less than 2% of the Russian population, but made up 52% of the Soviet communist party, and made anti-Semitism punishable by death? There's something very wrong with that picture. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:23 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The Holocaust Lie | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's fascinating to observe the "infowars" taking place regarding the Holocaust Lie. Jews claim 6 million Jews were exterminated. But then again, they were claiming 6 million Jews for one thing or another before, during, and after World War One. The Auschwitz museum claimed for 50 years that 4 million Jews were killed there, then had to reduce it to 1.5 million. Later, it is reduced again to 1.1 million.
We now know that the "confessions" of Rudolf Höss were extracted under torture, and that Höss signed whatever documents the torturers placed before him. And were those documents prepared by the Jews orchestrating the rigged Nuremberg Trials? In any event, the 6 million figure can now be reduced to 3.1 million, right? Wrong. That hasn't happened. There is documentation that comes out from the International Red Cross about the number of deaths they recorded in all German concentration camps, which is less than 300,000. And that includes all deaths, Jews and non-Jews. So I pop over to Wikipedia to hear the Jewish rebuttal.
Hey, I recognize that tactic -- accusing your opponents of your own malfeasance! That's what sociopaths do. In fact, the methodologies of Holocaust supporters are based on a predetermined conclusion that ignores extensive scientific evidence to the contrary. The "6 million Jews" murdered didn't change even though Auschwitz dropped its number by almost 3 million. Talk about a predetermined conclusion!
Documents reporting camp deaths made by fastidious record-keeping Germans certainly do bear a relation to the total death tolls! How can Wikipedia say they don't, and then in the same breath say "Nazis destroyed much documentation"? Where's the proof of the record destruction when they are holding German records in their hands? Maybe they don't like what those records indicate? And is the ITS such a poor source of information?
The ITS has 30 million documents on file? About incarceration in concentration camps, ghettos and Gestapo prisons, about forced labour and displaced persons? Well yes, I guess the ITS could be a poor source of information after all. You are not going to find anything in 30 million documents. If you spent just one minute on each document, working 8 hour days every day for 60 years, you could only get through about one third of the 30 million documents. Obviously, those records are good for nothing. Thanks for keeping us fooled, Wikipedia! |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 5:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Holocaust Lie |
The admirable Anthony Lawson elaborates on the alleged confession of Rudolf Höss, the alleged gassing of 6 million Jews, the alleged Holocaust, and the all too real suppression of inquiry into one of the most monstrous lies ever perpetrated against humanity. What kind of psychology would see a benefit from one of the most monstrous lies ever perpetrated against humanity? Only one that I know of -- sociopaths. Anthony Lawson reminds me of an English-speaking version of Frenchman Vincent Reynouard. Both are direct, succinct, thorough, reasonable, and practically indisputable. And they have empathy, lots of empathy. Holocaust, Hate Speech & Were the Germans so Stupid? (Anthony Lawson) |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:27 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The Holocaust Lie | |||||||||
A global compulsory new religion? I have to admit, that's exactly what the Holocaust Lie appears to be. It makes you wonder if Christianity also got its start in a similar way and is also based on propaganda supported by a kind of mass hysteria. Perhaps Judaism too. I wonder how many other beliefs we are certain about were created in the same way. 9/11? Hitler as the epitome of evil? The War for Southern Independence (a.k.a. the Civil War)? The "founding fathers" story about the birth of the United States? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:58 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: The Holocaust Lie | ||||||||||||||||||
You remember Judea declaring economic war on Germany in 1933?
Bite the hand that feeds you, and you get chased out. |
Page 11 of 47 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |