Reply to topic  [ 465 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 47  Next
The Holocaust Lie 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Holocaust Lie
Vincent Reynouard, historical revisionist who doggedly tracks down the truth concerning the Holocaust Lie, has again been fired from his teaching job without cause.

Quote:
Good day Sir,
With this letter I am informing you that we are ending our collaboration. This takes effect immediately, please end all contact with our students. Please send a final invoice settling all accounts with us. -- translation @ 0:35




Je perds mon travail (I lose my job)


This is the fourth time Vincent has had his job terminated without cause. Revealing the truth behind the Holocaust scam, a scam perpetrated against nearly the entire human race, evidently makes one a marked man. Who benefits from persecuting Vincent no matter where he goes? He has been driven from his jobs, his wife and children, and even his country. He has been imprisoned for two years in his own country for speaking truth to conventional "wisdom", and he faces more prison time for the same reason. His crime is nothing more than freedom of speech. What kind of human beings would hound this man simply because he searches for the truth so that we might all know it?

Criminals. Sociopaths. Jews.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Mar 21, 2016 2:19 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Holocaust Lie
Vincent Reynouard gets an explanation for being fired, from the very person who hired him -- "When you exclaim such insanities (on the Internet about the Holocaust), it is incompatible with any sort of teaching."

But those "insanities" were never part of his teaching, and no one ever complained of his performance, aptitude, or capabilities.

And so the intolerance of those who claim the high ground of being tolerant is clearly revealed for what it is -- hypocrisy. And who claims the high ground? God's Chosen People, of course. Speak in any kind of opposition to them and you will be crushed. They have no tolerance for opposition or diverging opinions.





L'intolérance des "tolérants"

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Mar 25, 2016 7:54 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Holocaust Lie
Well, I learned something interesting while reading about Paul von Hindenburg, who was president of Germany, defeating Hitler in the 1932 election. But back up to 1918, when Hindenburg was one of Germany's biggest war heroes.

Quote:
Hindenburg was also an advocate of the so-called Polish Border Strip plan, which postulated mass expulsion of Poles and Jews from territories that would be annexed by the German Empire, a foreshadow of the ethnic cleansing carried out decades later. - source

This was in 1918! World War I was still raging. Yet even then, 14 years before Hitler would run for president of Germany and lose, official German policy was oriented towards expelling the Jews. So it wasn't Hitler who came up with the idea. It was obviously a long-running problem for the Germans. And this was even before the Paris Peace Conference and the Treaty of Versailles, when Germans first learned of the betrayal of Germany by German Jews. Those German Jews had secretly negotiated with England to refuse the official German peace offer to end World War I early. The German Jews promised to bring the United States into the war as an ally of England, guaranteeing English victory, and in return, they wanted land in Palestine for a Jewish nation (the Zionist agenda). The Balfour Declaration ( 1 2 3 4 5 ) later confirmed this agreement in writing. Learning about this treasonous betrayal caused Germans to resent the Jews even more than they already had.

The Jews lay all the blame on Hitler, and pretend they played no part in it. That is typical sociopathic behavior.

Also note that the quote is from Wikipedia, a Jewish-controlled on-line encyclopedia that can't refrain from adding that the 1918 Polish Border Strip Plan was "a foreshadow of the ethnic cleansing carried out decades later." By Hitler, of course. But as we've seen in this thread, the Holocaust referred to by this quote is an outrageous Jewish lie.

And that's how they fool us. Very devious...

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:30 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Holocaust Lie
According to a number of accounts, all of which are suppressed from history, Hitler made numerous appeals to the Allies for peace during World War II, all of which were ignored by England's leader at that time, Winston Churchill. In May of 1941, Hitler even sent Rudolf Hess, the number two man in the Reich, to present peace proposals to other English leaders in an attempt to bypass the unyielding Churchill. Churchill got wind of the attempt and intercepted Hess, imprisoned him, and kept him quiet until Hess died 46 years later.

So why would Churchill sabotage every peace-keeping effort that Hitler made? Hitler clearly did not want war with England. Remember too that Hitler allowed the English troops to escape at Dunkirk to avoid utter defeat (May 1940), another strange act for a supposed psychopathic madman bent on world domination.

Quote:
Thus it was that, in the years leading up to the 1917 revolutions, Jews were working internally and externally to overthrow the Czar. Stein quotes a Zionist memo of 1914, promoting “relations with the Jews in Eastern Europe and in America, so as to contribute to the overthrow of Czarist Russia and to secure the national autonomy of the Jews.” Temperley noted that, “by 1917, [Russian Jews] had done much in preparation for that general disintegration of Russian national life, later recognized as the revolution.” Ziff stated the common view of the time that “Jewish influence in Russia was supposed to be considerable. Jews were playing a prominent part in the revolution…”

Surprisingly, even Winston Churchill acknowledged this fact. In 1920 he wrote an infamous essay explaining the difference between the “good” (Zionist) Jews and the “bad” Bolsheviks. This dichotomy, which was nothing less than a “struggle for the soul of the Jewish people,” made it appear almost “as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people” (1920/2002: 24). The Zionists were “national” Jews who sought only a homeland for their beleaguered people. The evil “international Jews,” the Bolsheviks, sought revolution, chaos, and even world domination. It was, said Churchill, a “sinister conspiracy.” He continued:

Winston Churchill wrote:
This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. … It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

“There is no need to exaggerate” the Jewish role in the Russian revolution; “It is certainly a very great one. … [T]he majority of the leading figures are Jews.” In the Soviet institutions, “the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing.” But perhaps the worst aspect was the dominant role of Judeo-terrorism. Churchill was clear and explicit:

Winston Churchill wrote:
[T]he prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. … [T]he part played by the [Jews] in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

By this time (1920), Churchill had been working on behalf of Zionist Jews for some 15 years. He had long counted on Jewish political support, and was rumored to be in the pay of wealthy Zionists. -- source

So Churchill was bought and paid for by the Jews long before even World War I! World War II was just an excuse to annihilate Germany and genocide the German people. An excuse for who? For the Jews. No wonder they instructed Churchill to forget about making peace with Hitler.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:10 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Holocaust Lie
Just in case you can't believe Churchill was in the back pocket of the ruling Jewish sociopaths, let's see what he had to say about the Balfour Declaration, which we just talked about two posts earlier:

Quote:
Speaking after the war, on 4 July 1922, Churchill argued for full implementation of the famous Declaration:

Winston Churchill wrote:
Pledges and promises were made during the War… They were made because it was considered they would be of value to us in our struggle to win the War. It was considered that the support which the Jews could give us all over the world, and particularly in the United States, and also in Russia, would be a definite palpable advantage. (in Gilbert 2007: 78-79)
-- source

So Churchill does seem to be representing his Jewish masters long before World War II. And here is additional evidence that the Balfour Declaration resulted from the Jewish deal to bring the United States into World War I in exchange for land in Palestine:

Quote:
In his monumental six-volume study of the 1919 Paris Peace Conference, British historian Howard Temperley (1924) made this observation:

Howard Temperley wrote:
It was believed that if Great Britain declared for the fulfillment of Zionist aspirations in Palestine under her own pledge, one effect would be to bring Russian Jewry to the cause of the Entente [Allies]. It was believed, also, that such a declaration would have a potent influence upon world Jewry in the same way, and secure for the Entente the aid of Jewish financial interests. It was believed, further, that it would greatly influence American opinion in favour of the Allies. Such were the chief considerations which, during the later part of 1916 and the next ten months of 1917, impelled the British Government towards making a contract with Jewry. (1924, vol. 6: 173)

We must bear in mind that the Declaration was issued seven months after US entry into the war. But Temperley is unequivocal: the deal was concluded “during the later part of 1916,” well before Wilson’s decision to go to war. Apparently the deal was this: bring the US into the war, and we will promise you your Jewish homeland. Such was the “contract with Jewry.”

Sensing the importance, Temperley reiterates the point, to drive it home: “That it is in purpose a definite contract with Jewry is beyond question. … In spirit it is a pledge that, in return for services to be rendered by Jewry, the British Government would ‘use their best endeavours’ to secure… Palestine.” And in fact, it was a good deal all around. “The Declaration certainly rallied world Jewry, as a whole, to the side of the Entente (Allies)… [T]he services of Jewry were not expected in vain, and were…well worth the price which had to be paid” (p. 174). Britain’s price was low: a spit of land far from the home country. True, there would be Arab resistance, but the Brits were used to that. A much higher price would be paid by Germany and the Central Powers, and by America—who would expend hundreds of millions of dollars, and suffer 116,000 war dead. -- source

Who would trade the lives of unknown strangers by the tens of thousands for selfish benefits? Who else but sociopaths -- in this case, Jews.

That is evil.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Apr 01, 2016 1:53 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Holocaust Lie
Wait! It gets better! Here's Churchill again representing Jewish interests, this time about to ensure the second global war against the Germans, against whom the Jews have already declared and are waging economic war:

Quote:
Two years after this report, in 1939, the British contemplated starting a war with Germany. Churchill wrote a memo for his War Cabinet, reminding them that

"it was not for light or sentimental reasons that Lord Balfour and the Government of 1917 made the promises to the Zionists which have been the cause of so much subsequent discussion. The influence of American Jewry was rated then as a factor of the highest importance, and we did not feel ourselves in such a strong position as to be able to treat it with indifference." (in Gilbert 2007: 165)

The implication, of course, was that the British might once again need Jewish help to defeat the Germans. Having been goaded into war in 1939 by Roosevelt and his Jewish advisors, the British were becoming desperate once again to draw in the Americans. As David Irving reports, it was in late 1941 that Weizmann and his fellow British Zionists began “promising to use their influence in Washington to bring the United States into the war” (2001: 73). Irving quotes from an amazingly blunt letter from Weizmann to Churchill, promising to do again in this war what they did in the last:

"There is only one big ethnic group [in America] which is willing to stand, to a man, for Great Britain, and a policy of ‘all-out aid’ for her: the five million Jews. From [Treasury] Secretary Morgenthau [Henry, Jr.], Governor [Herbert] Lehman, Justice Frankfurter, down to the simplest Jewish workman or trader… It has been repeatedly acknowledged by British Statesmen that it was the Jews who, in the last war, effectively helped to tip the scales in America in favour of Great Britain. They are keen to do it—and may do it—again." (p. 77)

So here we have Weizmann explicitly naming the influential Jews with the power to bring Roosevelt and the United States into a war in which it, once again, had no compelling interest. The letter was dated September 10, 1941. Churchill did not have to wait long. Within 90 days, America would be at war. -- source

The Jews controlled Churchill and Roosevelt, wanted Germany crushed, had already orchestrated one world war to do it, and now orchestrate another. Diabolical!

Would these people be capable of creating a psy-op as massive and monstrous as the Holocaust hoax?

Yep.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:22 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Holocaust Lie
Quote:
32. Churchill’s close connection to British Jews dated back at least to 1904. Gilbert (2007: 9) explains that “this was the first but not the last time that Churchill was to be accused by his political opponents…of being in the pocket, and even in the pay, of wealthy Jews.” Makovsky (2007) describes Churchill’s father’s longtime association with “Jewish financial titans,” and notes that Churchill himself “came to count many of [his father’s] wealthy Jewish friends as his own” (p. 46).

Oh, now I see the footnote reference concerning Churchill being in the pocket of Jews for at least 15 years prior to 1920 (from this post).

And they had us calling him one of the leaders of the free world! :face:

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Apr 01, 2016 4:40 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Holocaust Lie
The Holocaust Lie and all the disdain and revulsion dumped on the Nazis via obscene wartime propaganda was all designed to cover up the far more outrageous war crimes of the Allies (English, French, Americans, and Russians). Vincent Reynouard continues his valiant work by providing undeniable evidence of these war crimes which have been forgotten in the deliberate redirection of our focus and attention. "Never forget" the millions of Jews claimed to have been gassed by the Nazis, a crime of enormous evil which never happened, yet be sure to forget the indiscriminate bombing of the Allies on European cities that killed so many innocent victims and which really did happen!

April 4, 1943 is "a day that will live in infamy!" But unlike December 7, 1941, when Pearl Harbor was deliberately sacrificed to the Japanese so that the U.S. government had the excuse it needed to enter the war, no one remembers April 4, 1943. That was the day the English and Americans dropped bombs on Paris. Hundreds of civilians were killed in the terror attacks, including women and children who had nothing to do with the war. Newspaper articles in Paris decried the injustice of it all, the brutality, the criminality, the moral indignity and the outrage, yet there are no markers or memorials in remembrance of these heinous crimes that truly do deserve a "Never forget" reminder.

How I wish Vincent's work could reach the American public, but the language barrier is formidable (the video is entirely in French). At least Vincent reaches this American, and sharing my education in even the smallest way is better than doing nothing.



Notre mémoire nationale confisquée
(Translation: Our national memory confiscated)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Apr 04, 2016 10:46 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Holocaust Lie
I just ran across another article discussing the postwar propaganda myth of German "looted art".

Quote:
A talented painter himself, Adolf Hitler has a great appreciation for art and culture. He sees Churchill and FDR as uncultured barbarians with merciless disregard for innocent life, architecture, and works of art. As the Germans under Kaiser Wilhelm II had done during World War I, Hitler too orders the protection of artworks throughout the combat theatres of Western and Eastern Europe. -- source

Like the story of the Holocaust, the story of Germans looting art is bogus. In both world wars, the cultured Germans made determined efforts to protect art from the ravages of war. You can read the story at the link given after the quote.

I talked about this earlier in this post. Once you realize how this vilification of the enemy works, and how the facts are twisted around to support the new false narrative, you begin to see it in many places, and the mechanism used to construct the Holocaust Lie becomes more visible. Protected art becomes looted art, and people in camps who died from epidemics become gassed Jews. It's devious, and it is rooted in evil intent.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:51 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The Holocaust Lie
The following six paragraphs are from Barbarians Inside the Gates, pages 244 to 246. They describe the evolution of mind control, which was rapidly refined thanks to the first global war. After the lessons learned from the "Great War" and the years that followed it, selling the Holocaust Lie to the world during and after World War II was a well understood and simple exercise for the propaganda masters.

Quote:
There are two books still available which were published in the 1920s, but whose subject matter is more than pertinent currently. They deal with mass manipulation, and were written by erudite and scholarly experts in their fields. Both evolved from the wellspring of Babylonian Talmudism and the covenants contained therein.

Walter Lippmann’s book Public Opinion, published in 1922, detailed the study in which he and Edward Bernays were involved while in London during the First World War. It had to do with creating pictures inside people’s heads, which were cunningly and deliberately designed by expert craftsmen to mislead not only individuals but entire societies. Lippmann describes the basics as “PUBLIC OPINION with capital letters.” He wrote that “Public opinion deals with indirect, unseen and puzzling facts, and there is nothing obvious about them.” He also stressed that: “The picture inside the head often misleads men in their dealings with the world outside of their heads.”14

His colleague of those stimulating days in London, Edward Bernays (whose relative by marriage, Murray Bernays, prepared the scenario for the fraudulent Nuremberg Trials), also produced a book, Crystallizing Public Opinion, and in 1928 published another dealing with a continuation of the subject, appropriately titled Propaganda. His helpmate in this endeavor was the master manipulator and historian, H. G. Wells. It was the latter’s contention that nations could be defeated, not by overt warfare, but by the thought processes, e.g. propaganda and public opinion formation, i.e., the manipulation of minds on a mass scale.15

Both Bernays and Wells believed in regimenting human thought to the degree that an “invisible government” could take over an increasingly complex civilization. Bernays revealed in Propaganda that the conscious and intelligent manipulation of organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important technique in a democratic society.

“Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government, which is the true ruling power in our country,” Bernays wrote in 1928. “It remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons (who) pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world.…”16

For his epic work, Bernays was handed CBS by his controllers, most of them centered in the newly-formed Council of Foreign Relations, an offshoot of the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) which sprang from the fertile loins of the Round Table in Britain. Bernays was replaced by his understudy, William Paley, who has carried that media firm to new heights of popular-opinion formulation. -- Barbarians Inside the Gates, pages 244 to 246

Can you see how the Holocaust Lie is simply "creating pictures inside people’s heads, which were cunningly and deliberately designed by expert craftsmen to mislead not only individuals but entire societies"? The propaganda masters showed us dead bodies of many people reduced to skin and bones in the German concentration camps, they showed us shrunken heads and lampshades, showed us piles of human hair and clothing, showed us many empty cans of Zyklon B, and then they told us that evil Nazis had gassed 6 million Jews to death. And we believed them! And why wouldn't we, because we trusted them, and no one told us differently.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Apr 14, 2016 6:44 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 465 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 47  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.