Money power is omnipotent and corrosive. Expunging it matters more than anything else. -- Stephen Lendman
For being a Zook-discerned gatekeeper, Lendman sure "gets it". Since I think along the same lines as Lendman, that would make me a Zook-discerned gatekeeper as well. Since I know, as do others, that I am not a gatekeeper by any stretch of the imagination, but work tirelessly to expose the deception and manipulation being heaped upon us by the ruling sociopaths and their gatekeepers, we have an obvious contradiction that points to a serious underlying problem. That problem is that Zook-discernment is massively flawed and at a minimum cannot be trusted, and at a maximum is a deliberate deception in the service of the ruling sociopaths and their gatekeepers.
If you need more rope for a longer swing, just ask ... but we'll need a taller tree.
The assumption that if someone says something worth listening to some of the time, that they are worth listening to all of the time ... is one that you make all too frequently. The trouble is, the disinformation artists are obliged to mix their lies with truths here and there. So even if Lendeman speaks the truth form time to time - and I'm not necessarily saying he is speaking the truth in the article you reference above - that does not protect him from the charge of gatekeeping. A charge which is justified by his comments supporting Assange and Wikileaks; and by his two-faced stance on 9/11/2001 (by telling the truth about it in some - even large - measure but then also supporting disgraced gatekeeper Fetzer's wild theories on 9/11/2001).
You're ongoing shifting of the truth vector away from the significant truth and exposition of the gatekeepers (e.g. Pilger, Fisk, Lendeman, Zinn, etc.), to their less significant contributions on behalf of truth ... is getting to be signature behavior with you.
Suffice to say, we are quickly arriving at the stage when the proverbial duck is flocking, walking and talking like it was meant to do. All the rants against sociopaths - that you've been quacking for the longest little while - now appear as a collective tarp to conceal your true intentions of defending the indefensible in the likes of Chomsky, Zinn, Pilger, Fisk, Lendeman, Assange, etc. ... against exposition by genuine truthseeking efforts.
Your kinship with Esquire Andy ... of the titwit tribe of titular Wights ... is now becoming understandable.
Pax Postcard From India
ps: I could still be wrong about you, Chico ... but that probability is getting less and less with each of your attacks against genuine truthseeking and each of your defenses of demonstrable gatekeeping.
_________________ Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.
Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:39 am
andywight
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 5:40 pm Posts: 2156
Re: The Julian Assange Show
_________________ Think twice before you speak, especially if you intend to say what you think.
Anwar Ibrahim is the classic gatekeeper, slatesweeper, Little-Bo-Peep reaper who breaks briny bread with Pilger, Lendman, Fetzer, Assange, Banana Boy, Mr. UgLY, and everyone else on my scrumptious scroll of Rothschild stooges and cointelpro doofuses. His mere failure to foam at the mouth and rabidly condemn 9/11 as a false-flag legerdemain speaks volumes about the guilt that trails behind him like snail snot, leading like slippery umbilical cords back to his greasy handlers in elevated understated master-related places. Those with ample discernment and sage-like wisdom (like myself) need only lift a little finger (as I do) to ascertain the binary-faced hypocrisy on display in this shameful scene of skullduggery and back-door buggery. Highly decorated frond fruit, ester jester, and drama queen has-been-mean Andypandy quite-so-randy has earned his place in the annals of gatekeeping with his unending support for provable proven fraud mint-Julian and Soros-sustained sicky-Wikileaks. A massive missive of rinky-dink links I quickly collected from bankster-controlled Google deliver irrefutable proof for everything I've ever exquisitely discerned, but my time is too valuable to waste reading the derailing details, which I leave to you, dear reader, that you may struggle mightily to attain the bright enlightenment that my blessed presence anoints you with like aromatic frankincense and myrrh. Wot?
ps1:
ps2: Blah, blah, black sheep, have you any gruel. Yes sir, yes sir, now it's stool. Wot?
ps3: Blah, blah, and more blah blah, repeated ad infinitum, etc. See ps2.
OMG! I've been possessed by a Zook demon! Exorcism, quick!
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:53 am
magamud
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 10:33 pm Posts: 4156
Re: The Julian Assange Show
Both sides have the truth, but none of you can hold on to it for more then a certain amount of time.
That is because its moving. The key to a lie is to mask the truth as best as it can. This makes it interwoven.
Were in the contemporary technocratic age of the Bullshevik Revolution and there is not a damn thing you can do about it.
Keep posting and dissecting the players and witness the spectacle....
_________________ Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.
Venezuela and the sundry latin American dictatorships dressed up as democracies
Interesting statement Mr. UncleZook, if Venezuela is a "dictatorship dressed up as a democracy" but opens it's elections to observers, what does that make your homeland... assuming of course that you live in Novascotia, as claimed!
Quote:
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott made it clear this week he does not want international elections observers anywhere near the polls in his state.
In a letter dated Tuesday to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Abbott threatened to prosecute any of its monitors who step within 100 feet of a Texas polling place on Election Day. The threat came even though U.S. State Department officaials earlier this year had invited the monitors to observe the election.
“If OSCE members want to learn more about our elections processes so they can improve their own democratic systems, we welcome the opportunity to discuss the measures Texas has implemented to protect the integrity of the elections,” Abbott wrote. “However, groups and individuals from outside the United States are not allowed to influence or interfere with the election process in Texas.”
The letter provoked a swift response on Wednesday from Janez Lenarcic, the head of the international group’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, who wrote a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton expressing his concern that the threat of prosecution was contrary to the U.S.’s obligations as an OSCE participant.
“The threat of criminal sanctions against OSCE/ODIHR observers is unacceptable,” Lenarcic said in a news release about the letter. “The United States, like all countries in the OSCE, has an obligation to invite ODIHR observers to observe its elections.” (Source)
_________________ Think twice before you speak, especially if you intend to say what you think.
“The threat of criminal sanctions against OSCE/ODIHR observers is unacceptable,” Lenarcic said in a news release about the letter. “The United States, like all countries in the OSCE, has an obligation to invite ODIHR observers to observe its elections.” (Source)
So, the OSCE is above the law, Texas law that is, when in the state of Texas. Now, where have I heard that attitude before? Oh, now I remember -- the United Nations! So what is the relationship between the UN and OSCE?
Quote:
The OSCE considers itself a regional organization in the sense of Chapter VIII of the United Nations Charter[5] and is an observer in the United Nations General Assembly.[6] The Chairman-in-Office gives routine briefings to the United Nations Security Council. -- source
They seem pretty tight.
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
Fri Oct 26, 2012 6:04 am
UncleZook
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm Posts: 1400
Re: The Julian Assange Show
To the resident moron at United Peeps that frequently attires as a banana and perspires like a skunk in tropical heat, here's a quick primer on Hugo Chavez: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Venezuela
beginExcerpt
Chávez and the Bolivarian Revolution Main article: Presidency of Hugo Chávez
Hugo Chávez, a former paratroop lieutenant-colonel who led an unsuccessful coup d'état in 1992, was elected President in December 1998 on a platform that called for the creation of a "Fifth Republic", a new constitution, a new name ("the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela"), and a new set of social relations between socioeconomic classes. In 1999, voters approved a referendum on a new constitution, and in 2000, re-elected Chávez, also placing many members of his Fifth Republic Movement political party in the National Assembly. Supporters of Chávez call the process symbolised by him the Bolivarian Revolution, and were organised into different government-funded groups, including the Bolivarian Circles.
Chávez' policies have faced strong opposition from a vocal minority. In April 2002, Chávez was briefly ousted from power in the 2002 Venezuelan coup d'état attempt following popular demonstrations by his opposers,[9] but he was returned to power after two days as a result of popular demonstrations by his supporters and actions by the military.[10]
Chávez also remained in power after an all-out national strike that lasted more than two months in December 2002 – February 2003, including a strike/lockout in the state oil company PDVSA, and an August 2004 recall referendum. He was elected for another term in December 2006. In December 2007 in a constitutional referendum, Chavez suffered his first electoral defeat when the voters rejected constitutional changes proposed by the president, some of which would have increased the power of the presidency. The referendum saw a very high level of abstention by the standards of recent polls in Venezuela.[11] However, in February 2009 Chavez called another referendum, proposing the removal of term limits for all elected officials (previously, the constitution limited presidents to two terms, and other officials also had term limits). The referendum took place on 15 February 2009 and was approved.
The 2010 parliamentary elections saw a new opposition electoral coalition, the Coalition for Democratic Unity, win nearly as large a share of the vote as the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV), but only 65 seats compared to PSUV's 98. The election was preceded by an electoral reform that favoured PSUV by giving more weight to the countryside. The Venezuelan presidential election, 2012 takes place in September.
end
Mr. Banana Boy, have you ever encountered - in your drunken staggers across political rooms - the related concepts of coups and military juntas ... and how they promote the apparition of democracy and the common good, e.g. without actual democracy or common good?
If not, then I suggest you keep on staggering to the next political pub, to be tossed out likewise there.
Pax Postcard From India
ps: I can't believe that Chico still has confidence in the stultifying, staggering idiot. Then again, Chico ain't exactly probing deep political thoughts himself. At this point, one really has to wonder when exactly United Peeps started morphing into United GateKeeps, pre-sockPuppets ... or post-screechOwls?
_________________ Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.
To the resident moron at United Peeps that frequently attires as a banana and perspires like a skunk in tropical heat, here's a quick primer on Hugo Chavez: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Venezuela
Mr. Banana Boy, have you ever encountered - in your drunken staggers across political rooms - the related concepts of coups and military juntas ... and how they promote the apparition of democracy and the common good, e.g. without actual democracy or common good?
If not, then I suggest you keep on staggering to the next political pub, to be tossed out likewise there.
Pax Postcard From India
ps: I can't believe that Chico still has confidence in the stultifying, staggering idiot. Then again, Chico ain't exactly probing deep political thoughts himself. At this point, one really has to wonder when exactly United Peeps started morphing into United GateKeeps, pre-sockPuppets ... or post-screechOwls?
You're just too funny Mr. UncleZook
A cut-n-paste from the ruling elite's Wikipedia site is the best you can come up with, or should I say use as a "quick primer"!
We've all been patiently waiting weeks for this damming evidence you claim to have on Chavez, but for some unknown reason have decided not to share.
_________________ Think twice before you speak, especially if you intend to say what you think.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
OMG! I've been possessed by a Zook demon! Exorcism, quick! 
