united-people.tk
https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/

Notre Dame fire
https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=1244
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:10 am ]
Post subject:  Notre Dame fire

The absence of a major conflagration in its 850-year history despite extensive indoors use of candles and torches by brandy-soaked stumbling monks, including the mad hunchback bell-ringer, shows the improbability of an accidental fire in the cathedral, which gives some credence to the suspicion that the Parisian church was the target of arsonists.

Not just any arsonists. I would place all my chips on Mossad agents. That fire clearly involved the use of accelerants, given how little natural fuel there was in the church to produce such intense flames.

This is the same method of operation the Israeli sociopaths always use, and the designated patsies are always Muslim extremists, when the real perpetrators are Jewish extremists.

This is a false-flag event. This is France's 9/11 event. It is designed to turn French people against the sworn enemy of the Jews — the Muslims. The Jewish sociopaths always trick stronger nations into fighting their battles for them. They did the same thing with 9/11 and the London Tube bombings.

French president Macron benefits too, just like George W. Bush benefited from 9/11. The false-flag becomes a unifying event that pushes the nation to line up behind their fake leader. Macron has faced months of "yellow vest" protests as the French people rebel against their tyrannical bankster government. Will they be tricked into supporting Macron now that their iconic church has been destroyed? The ruling sociopaths must surely think so to have planned this sinister event.




Notre Dame fire: spire collapses as inferno rages below
(duration 1:52)

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Notre Dame fire

Quote:
The knee-jerk downplaying by the neoliberal media allies of Rothschild puppet Macron insists that the cathedral fire was an "accident" despite mounting evidence to the contrary. For instance, CNN's Shep Smith cut off neoconservative French media critic Phillippe Karsenty when he stated the Notre Dame fire might be "a French 911".

Smith responded: "No, sir, we're not doing that, not now on my watch." As pertaining to a military guard: "my watch". -- source

The CNN gatekeepers lay down the law, just as they have been briefed to do, no doubt. There is no free press in America! STFU, you insolent Frenchman!




Soy Boy Shepard Smith Cuts Off French Elected Official For Speculating Notre Dame Fire was an attack
(duration 1:25)

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Thu Apr 18, 2019 2:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Notre Dame fire

A firefighter gives his reasons why the Notre Dame fire was an obvious false-flag:

  1. Premature announcement that the fire was not intentional, before any investigation.
  2. Duration of a proper investigation would take weeks, not hours.
  3. About the same time Notre Dame is torched, a holy Islamic site, the Al-Aqsa mosque in occupied Jerusalem, also burns. The Israelis have been wanting to destroy it for decades so they can erect their prophesized Third Temple.

Quote:
So that's 3 good reasons why the ND fire was arson by the Mossad, most likely, because now we have BS stories coming out that Muslims were dancing and cheering during the fire, just like the BS stories that came out during the Israeli master-minded 9/11 False Flag, that Palestinians were dancing, when in fact, it was Israeli Jews who were arrested for dancing and hi-fiving each other during that attack. -- source

Yeah, it's pretty obvious, but the Jewish-controlled mainstream media will not breathe a word of all this to the American public. Why not? Because that's how Jewish sociopaths always cooperate and succeed with their deceptions and manipulations.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Thu Apr 18, 2019 5:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Notre Dame fire

Former CIA officer Robert Steele has many reasons to believe the Notre Dame fire was a false-flag psy-op.

1. Canadian intelligence officers who went immediately to the site for a first hand look were prevented from getting close.

2. No electricity in the area where the fire is alleged to have started.

3. Two dead within the fire, both evidently murdered (two bullets each)

4. No helicopters brought in to fight the fire

5. Dysfunctional water spraying machine, a mockery of a fire-fighting performance

6. Official narrative pretending it was an accident was immediate and clearly on the shelf and ready to go.

7. Timing impossible to dismiss — intended to prevent announcement of Macron’s loss in the national debate inspired by the Yellow Vests.

Conspiracy theory?

Who is Robert David Steele?

Quote:
According to his Wikipedia page, Robert David Steele is a former CIA clandestine officer, former Presidential Candidate for the now defunct Reform Party, author, and advocate for Open Source Intelligence Gathering. -- source

Hmm, his Wikipedia page is gone. Did it ever exist? Why yes, it certainly did! There are plenty of snapshots of that page on the Wayback Machine in 2017. But in 2019, there are none.

Steele must have really pissed off the Israelis to get his Wikipedia page erased.

That may mean he is a man worth listening to.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Thu Apr 25, 2019 12:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Notre Dame fire

Is the old hardwood in Notre Dame really that flammable? The church roof was burning like a roaring furnace, almost like in a spectacular Hollywood adventure movie, yet there is some question about how readily old hardwood burns.

Webcam video footage ( 1 2 ) shows a person on the roof and a flash of light, both of which are a bit unusual, no?

The mainstream media is probably pointing the public in all the wrong directions ( 1 2 3 ), which of course is not unusual.

They say nothing happens by accident in this world run by sociopaths. I see plenty of evidence for that in all of these false-flag events.

Quote:
Former British Defense Minister Denis Healey, put it this way, “World events do not occur by accident. They are made to happen, whether it is to do with national issues or commerce; and most of them are staged and managed by those who hold the purse strings.” -- source

No, it can't be true! A British Defense Minister said that? Could it be a conspiracy theory, or a false quote?

I'm not finding anything saying it is... How disturbing.



Image

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sat Apr 27, 2019 7:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Notre Dame fire

Quote:
Benjamin Mouton, who served as Chief Architect of Historic Monuments in France and oversaw restoration work of Notre Dame until 2013, says that it is highly unlikely an electrical short circuit took place, and that it would take an extraordinary effort to ignite the ancient oak of the cathedral. -- source

The Notre Dame fire was most likely a high-technology arson employing an accelerant or some kind of flammable fuel. That would likely make it a Mossad or CIA operation.

That fire was simply too intense to have been natural.

Quote:
...but no sign of arson was found. -- at 1:36 in the video below

Of course no sign of arson was found — they weren't looking for any signs of arson! All efforts were on fighting the fire. An investigation into arson takes weeks or months, and if no evidence of arson turns up, that doesn't necessarily rule out arson. A clever arsonist won't leave evidence. And if the intelligence agencies were involved, they never leave evidence implicating themselves. They leave evidence implicating the designated patsy.

Also note that "No sign of arson was found" is the kind of language deception that sociopaths employ.




Fire tore through Notre Dame cathedral in France
(duration 1:46)

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Tue Apr 30, 2019 1:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Notre Dame fire

As in most big false-flag attacks, there are contradictions and things that just don't add up. And the modus operandi (method of operation) follows a familiar pattern. For example, the cause of the fire is quickly announced, even though no one on the outside of the psy-op knows how the fire started. But somehow the media announces the "suspected" cause, which the public then begins to parrot as if it were the real truth instead of irresponsible conjecture.




NEW EVIDENCE! - NOTRE DAME FIRE(!) PLEASE SHARE|”SHOW & TELLS”(!) 4/23/19
(duration 10:46)

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/