It looks like the unordinary man is seeing through Obama as well. Are the dominoes starting to fall?
Quote:
I forced myself to watch the State of the Union speech last night, which annual affair is not required by the Constitution. The Constitution says that the President shall occasionally inform people of the state of the nation. The annual clapping and standing, is silly. I watched it, just to see what Obama could possibly say to mitigate the sorry state our nation is in, after five years of his socialism. He is a marvelous reader of the teleprompters though, I will grant him that. His speech consisted of virtually nothing, other than a rehash of former nonsense, other than his promise to use the executive order to get his way. For years, I have been writing about executive orders, reminding everyone that they are not in the Constitution. The Constitution tells government what it can do, and the Bill of Rights tells it what it cannot do, is the way I have always looked at it. Obama has brought this home in a big way. The President is not allowed by the Constitution to legislate. For that matter, neither is the Supreme Court, which seems to have a habit of doing, unfortunately. The whole speech and gathering, was a show of what America ought not to be. The glorifying of the deformed soldier, which got an endless standing ovation, was silly, as there are thousands of them, not just one, and there should be none, if we stayed at home, were neutral, and minded out own business. My wife wondered why I would watch it, and after I did, I wonder myself. -- source
Author:
magamud [ Thu Feb 20, 2014 1:30 pm ]
Post subject:
Re: Change we better believe in, or else
We are being so played its ridiculous. Mr. Bush was confronted on his families legacy of Nazi support he states,
"Well, until I see evidence of any kind of allegation to that a (pause) assertion, then can I address it, but it's really a shame." (Interview then cut by Bush's PR man)
The honest response of the Powers-That-Be to the public would be:
We easily control every election we desire, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it, because you are far too stupid. We got you to elect George H. W. Bush, who robbed you blind both before and after his election, and we even got you to later elect his bumbling son, George Junior. Look what we just accomplished, putting a foreign national, Muslim, gay black man into the highest office of your land for two consecutive terms! We can do anything. Down here, we make the rules. Down here, we're God.
Matrix Revolutions -- the Trainman, "Down here, I'm God."
current school safety expert: trained key personnel at over 4,000 US school districts, and over 3,500 school safety officers.
His conclusion after ten months of motivated investigation:
“In my professional opinion, [Sandy Hook was] a scripted event… in planning for maybe two, two and a half years.”
Author:
magamud [ Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:37 pm ]
Post subject:
Re: Change we better believe in, or else
We are in such big trouble I don't know how much more to explain it. The greatest Tyranny of all time is rolling down the hill with at least a few hundred years of momentum. The sociopathy infection is so intertwined into our species its incredible. Its in the most mundane actions hidden in repetitious behaviors indoctrinated from the beginning of time apparently.
Its in the most mundane actions hidden in repetitious behaviors indoctrinated from the beginning of time apparently.
I agree with everything you just said, Mags. Your last sentence really sums it up. The sociopaths have so successfully molded humanity in their own image that the effect is nearly self-sustaining. It's the only thing we know, this control grid of money, religion, mass media, political theater, entertainment, energy scarcity, food devitalization, air and water poisoning, and reprogramming through education.
Has there ever been a time when sociopaths did not rule with sufficient control? And how would we even know, given the inaccuracy of our re-spun history?
Author:
Chicodoodoo [ Tue Feb 25, 2014 10:40 pm ]
Post subject:
Re: Change we better believe in, or else
Looking up the death records of the victims of Sandy Hook...
What do you mean, they aren't there?!
You mean Sandy Hook was a scripted event, like the Boston Marathon bombing, 9/11, the Iraq wars, presidential elections, and the evening news?
NOOOOooooo...... It can't be true! We must listen to our president -- "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories."
All together now -- reject, dismiss, deride, discredit, denigrate, and ridicule!
It must be pointed out that Executive Orders from any US President have no validity outside the United States on the citizens of any other nation.
In fact since Congress is in session Executive Orders have no validity at all even inside the US, because these Executive Orders are nothing but ‘wishful thinking’ that have zero standing in any law anywhere because only the Congress has the right to legislate US official positions in law: Especially in any case involving the citizens or executives of any other countries—who are not bound by whatever bizarre writings this imposter might wish to commit into meaningless Executive Orders, for his own private political ends.
Obama is not an idiot -- he's just a puppet. He's a complete fake, an imposter, a dummy that a hidden hand controls. That controlling hand belongs to the ruling sociopaths who are the most dangerous and destructive criminals on the planet. Obama is just as guilty as they are, as he is an essential accessory to so many of their crimes.
Obama needs to be arrested, jailed, and tried for his crimes. The fact that no one dares to move against him shows the extent of the corruption and lawlessness that grips not only Washington D.C., but the entire nation.
Who speaks for liberty and justice for all, besides Lyndon LaRouche?
It must be pointed out that Executive Orders from any US President have no validity outside the United States on the citizens of any other nation.
In fact since Congress is in session Executive Orders have no validity at all even inside the US, because these Executive Orders are nothing but ‘wishful thinking’ that have zero standing in any law anywhere because only the Congress has the right to legislate US official positions in law: Especially in any case involving the citizens or executives of any other countries—who are not bound by whatever bizarre writings this imposter might wish to commit into meaningless Executive Orders, for his own private political ends.
Obama is not an idiot -- he's just a puppet. He's a complete fake, an imposter, a dummy that a hidden hand controls. That controlling hand belongs to the ruling sociopaths who are the most dangerous and destructive criminals on the planet. Obama is just as guilty as they are, as he is an essential accessory to so many of their crimes.
Accessory.
Quote:
Obama needs to be arrested, jailed, and tried for his crimes. The fact that no one dares to move against him shows the extent of the corruption and lawlessness that grips not only Washington D.C., but the entire nation.
Obama needs to be arrested, jailed, and made to reveal the bigger players in the Crime Syndicate ... and those players need to be the primary focus of The Law. For patsies and puppets are expendable from the perspective of the Syndicate. In short, the focus should be on the Syndicate (its organization, its secrecy, its fiat money, etc.).
There are many Obamas currently doing the puppet theatre out there .. David Cameron; Angela Merkel, Francois Hollande, Mark Rutte, Stephen Harper, Tony Abbott, Vladimir Putin, Manmohan Singh, Li Keqiang, etc.
The evidence is overwhelming ... and outrageously easy to collect. The Law should have no problem arresting the low-rung puppets, then dusting the higher rungs in a comprehensive judicial sweep. That it doesn't do so, simply means that The Law is merely a modern organic version of the system of reverent bishops, noble knights and castle guards plugged into the power machinery of historical monarchies ... and the bankster chiefs, a modern incarnation of kings and queens.
Here's the naked proof of global banskter governance over local peoples:
Quote:
Who speaks for liberty and justice for all, besides Lyndon LaRouche?
Larouche understands that 9/11/2001 was an inside job ... but he attempts to lay the blame at the foot of British and Saudi Arabian interests, cleverly omitting the prime suspect, Israel ... based on the actual evidence. http://larouchepac.com/bae911
beginExcerpt 2013 · Fact Sheet: The Obama/al-Qaeda Alliance
While claiming credit for the killing of Osama bin Laden, President Obama was forging an alliance with al-Qaeda. First, to overthrow the government of Libya, and now, the government of Syria. a. This reckless and lawless policy of allying with the perpetrators of 9/11, 2001, and, now, 9/11, 2012, to conduct war without the consent of Congress, in violation of the U.S. Constitution, runs the immediate danger of leading to world war, which can only mean thermonuclear war. end Here's a video that exposes Larouche as a deeply-embedded intelligence asset for the bankster empire. Again, Larouche's website endorses Steinberg's propaganda. Steinberg is stooging for the Zionists by trying to shift blame away from Israel, the real architects. Watch the nonYoutube video ... and be charmed by the deception. http://larouchepac.com/node/11005
Tarpley, to his credit, has long ago distanced himself from Larouche. Here's the proof of Tarpley's fallout with Larouche: http://www.rense.com/general78/kenn.htm
beginExcerpt Activists of the 9/11 truth movement will recall Berlet as the gutter thug brought in by the foundation-backed Amy Goodman on her deeply compromised Democracy Now program to harass David Ray Griffin a couple of years ago. Berlet worked for the National Student Association, which was exposed as a CIA front. His true expertise is in narcotics, which he acquired during a stint as Washington DC bureau chief for High Times Magazine. More recently, Berlet appeared on the History Channel's 9/11 Conspiracies broadcast to slander of the entire 9/11 truth movement as mentally unbalanced individuals who have a pathological need to believe in conspiracies. Berlet has been slandering 9/11 truth activists for many years. After these interventions, Berlet's status as a raving enemy of 9/11 truth is beyond dispute. His credentials as a sincere antiwar activist are equally lacking. Notice below that Berlet, in all his inveighing against Kennebunkport, never mentions the main themes, which are a new false flag terror op coming out of Cheney's faction, a nuclear attack on Iran, and a new world war. These are issues Berlet does not want to publicize.
Instead, Berlet suggests that I am a sock-puppet for LaRouche. LaRouche drove me out of his organization in 1997, more than ten years ago. I have nothing in common with LaRouche, whose supporters have repeatedly slandered me, albeit in terms slightly different from those used by Berlet. LaRouche is a border guard for the sinister Hillary Clinton-Rahm Emanuel neocon warmonger machine in the Democratic Party. He is currently trying to combine that with the notion that Bush is a force for peace with Putin's Russia a manifest absurdity, since Bush is promoting aggression against Russia in the form of a nuclear first-strike capability. Contrary to what Berlet writes, LaRouche has no commitment to 9/11 truth and has contributed nothing to the 9/11 truth movement. LaRouche has rather sponsored a personality cult complete with a youth movement which is a parody of Chairman Mao's Red Guards of the mid-1960s. end
Pax
Author:
Chicodoodoo [ Wed Mar 19, 2014 9:43 pm ]
Post subject:
Re: Change we better believe in, or else
I'm not passing judgement on Lyndon Larouche (or Webster Tarpley) but simply noting his critique of Obama, which has obvious merit, in my opinion. The complexities of the Matrix we live in are far too massive for me to state in a binary fashion with arrogant certainty that Larouche is a witting bankster stooge. I see, as usual, that you swallowed the opportunity to do that hook, line, and sinker with your usual relish. Would it surprise you to know that I expected that? It's not why I mentioned Larouche, but before I submitted that post I commented to myself that Zook will probably respond with strong accusations of "gatekeeper" against Larouche, as you have done so often in the past against a long list of dissenting voices. You did not disappoint, which I find to be a shame. Your behavior is very much in keeping with that of a gatekeeper. You would have no doubt prospered greatly during the Inquisition hurling accusations of "witch" against all who questioned your discernment.
