No. It's not. It's common stuff. Keep it real.
Certainly not you. For you have no concept of critical reality. Of causality, for example.
The reality was different, of course. Nexus was never a monarchy ... and the proof of that is the mass exodus that left to form Universal when Richard made the last ultimatum - in an exchange of virtual ultimatums (back and forth) prior to that point. It was all about disparate human personalities, disparate human energy negotiation, and the ultimatum axe that chopped the planar aspirations (which was the charter of the original Nexus). At no point were any of the MOD staff subject to Richard's unilateral decisionmaking, at least to the best of my knowledge ... and I was there from the beginning right up to the bifurcation that resulted in Universal. By contrast, Chico entered the Nexus MOD chamber (with my recommendation) much later and left earlier. Conjecture of a putative Nexus monarchy started out as hyperbole and then exploded on the dark sky over United Chico as a fireworks display. As with fireworks, nothing remains of the conjecture that Chico created to disrupt and destroy a competitive truthseeking forum so that his own gatekeeping forum here at
1984AllOverAgain, could hover around and absorb the disenchanted and the disenfranchised.
Yup. Chico is adept at destroying truthseeking forums with his tangential inquiries; wild goose chases; tactic of inflating uncertainty and deflating certainty; messenger focus; Socratic deconstructivism; etc. And this was all before his recent fascination and preoccupation with sociopathy. I'm sure you enjoyed watching Chicodoodoo do it.
Why are you so surprised? Human behavior is what it is. Sociopaths and nonsociopaths are only separated by
their degree of indulgence in bad behavior, e.g. threshold behavior ... not necessarily the behavior itself.
Nonsociopaths manipulate and deceive. Nonsociopaths have ego and are narcissistic. Nonsociopaths are selfish. Nonsociopaths can be cold and heartless at times. Indeed, the criteria that separates so-called sociopaths are merely a matter of threshold intensity. And proving threshold intensity is not an easy task even for professional psychologists. Certainly, those who hurl the term around on these internet forums are amateur psychologists.
You said it, son: human behavior. Studied for millennia by writers great and small; and long before the discipline of psychology was established by the ruling bankster elites in the duty of corralling the mind and taming it. Indeed, follow the money trail in the funding of this discipline over the last century - and study the backgrounds of its sundry luminaries - and be charmed by the connections to the power pyramid. Psychology and psychiatry being promoted by essentially the same collective of social engineers.
And Chico accuses me of a lack of clarity. What truck are you rolling now, son ... turnips or carrots?
FWIW, human behavior at work and play is to be expected when humans come together. Subjectively cordoning one person's human behavior and calling it sociopathy, and leaving another person's human behavior alone ... is pure whimsy ... a con art and not a science. You and Chico both engage selective cordoning and by doing so, can be accurately described as con artists.
Yup. I plead guilty to being a moral man resorting to a moral defense system to defend himself against the pure whimsy of a cold calculating amoralist (Chico) and an excitable Talmud-nurtured immoralist (Mags). I often integrate ethics into my rational observations. The archives hold it.
The Tea Party movement - like all other movements gratuitously reported by mainstream media - has been infiltrated by Judas goats. The fifth column works in tandem with mainstream media to promote infiltrated movements, so it is no big surprise that you, Mags, would promote the Tea Party movement.
An unbiased Chico would declare the attempted reduction of the human species to a wheel of codependency with two participants ... as being binary and oversimplified. But a Chico playing leapfrog with his buddy Mags, will just lay down like a lily pad and wait for his own turn.
The rest of what Mags is attempting to communicate is anybody's guess.
I would add, however, that sociopaths and nonsociopaths both have the potential to exhibit selfless and narcissistic behavior. In fact, all humans are selfless to a degree and narcissistic to a degree. The placement of thresholds to demarcate degree is then mostly arbitrary ... and has emerged only with the modern establishment of the disciplines of psychology and psychiatry. Prior to this establishment, individuals were considered either black sheep based on extreme individual-oriented behavior (e.g. selfish or narcissistic behavior) ... and white sheep based on extreme collective-oriented behavior (e.g. selfless behavior).
There is money to be made in new coinages and new establishments ... and the love of money is a big part of the success of psychology and psychiatry.
As you reflect on this, good folks, imagine a train of wooden elixir wagons being manufactured in a woodworks holding factory; imagine also a thousand head of tamed horses in an adjacent corralled holding pasture; imagine, too, individuals being recruited off the street and trained in the art of sale in an adjoining vocational holding house; and finally, imagine all three holding spaces finding intersection of purpose as each new certified recruit steps out of the arts building ... and is handed the reins to a team of horses coaxed out of the corral and hitched to a brand new elixir wagon rolling out of the woodworks factory.
Careful, Mags ... you are not allowed to speak on matters outside your training. If you do, you set your self at risk of malpractice and/or practicing without a license.
Individuals become aware of the risks in their immediate environment or remain ignorant of them. It doesn't require an individual to be selfless to be unaware or narcissistic to be aware. And individuals make decisions to extend empathy or withhold it.
If you extend empathy across most or all situations, chances are likely that you meet the other threshold criteria for being a selfless nonsociopath or empath. If you withhold empathy across most or all situations, chances are that you meet the other threshold criteria for being a narcissistic sociopath or nonempath.
You see, Mags, one doesn't need to invent new coinages to understand human behavior. Human behavior has been understood since the dawn of human civilization ... using old coinages such as white sheep and black sheep ... good seed and bad seed ... samaritan and nonsamaritan ... etc. etc.
The tendency to exploit others is one of the major vices in the human condition. The first world nonsociopath who exploits third world slave labor (e.g. buying Walmart shoes made in a Bangladesh slum factory) ... does not possess greater virtue than the first world sociopath who exploits the first world nonsociopath.
When and where it becomes a greater virtue, is the time and space whenwhere moral relativism officially swallows basic ethics. To this point,
the secretive, fiat-financed, Talmud-organized bankster empire ... not narcissism ... not selflessness ... is the greedy doctor Frankenstein that had created the twin frankenstates of First and Third Worlds.
Dividing humans into narcissists and altruists ... is a deliberate misdirect away from the root of the global corruptions. It is an unmitigated fraud committed against the unsuspecting.
Again, what truck are you rolling now? Turnip or carrot?
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Number 3. How does one see the micro dynamics of this parasitic dynamic? Look around you with this knowledge in place and observe the give and take of your direct relationships. Are they equal! No of course they are not, but why would a family member, a person I have known for so many years betray me this viscously? Why would my own thinking get me entrapped to this type of death system? It has to do with primitive drives! Biological stability usurps critical thinking. So as long as you are safe, your mind will not think its in trouble. This is a main juncture in the con. As to why Terror and Safety are always pushed through mockingbird newspeak. Stolkhome syndrome?
|
|
|
|
|
Humans have more or less understood the bad apples in their own families, friend circles, neighborhoods, and greater collectives expanding outwards ... since the dawn of human civilization. The indigenous peoples of Canada, for example, used to temporarily excommunicate the bad seeds in their community as punishment for transgressing collective rules of conduct. There is great wisdom in the small-scale council of elders concept. But this conceptual eddy has been swallowed up by a concentrated, centralized, large-scale regional whirlpool that has effectively destroyed the wisdom inherent in the plenitude of independent regional eddies ... and replaced it with the farcical foolhardy fiat decrees of a collective of falsely chosen individuals spinning with great energy but with little wisdom and even less connection to the local scene. Whatever foolhardiness exists in the decrees of the regional whirlpools becomes even more idiotic - and maniacal - as the regional whirlpools connect and receive instructions from an even more centralized, concentrated, detached collective spinning furiously in the waterpit of a grand central global whirlpool. Etc. Etc.
The infusion of psychology is a deliberate attempt to misdirect attention away from the nudity of the emperors in the waterpit. The discipline was established by these drop-robed emperors and their forebears for the explicit purpose of corralling the mind ... for the body can only be truly tamed (e.g. enslaved) once the mind is tamed.
The above is loaded with obfuscating terminology and loose association of said terminilogy ... with no real anchoring in critical observation or thought. I'm sorry. I wish I could be less objective and give you a medal for participation. But I have to call it like it is.
Or one can just step back and look at the facts at how the world became increasingly corrupt over the last 200 plus years. From the Talmud to the push towards totalitarianism. On trial? Secrecy, fiat money, organization.
Already understood since the dawn of human civilization. No warning required, except perhaps to warn against charlatans layering new paints over old glass houses and charging you for the lost view. In the end, tempting apples are what they were. And bad apples be what they be.
The same riff raff that are colluding behind the scenes to arrive Agenda 21, Codex Alimentarius (with terminator seeds), Georgia Guidestones, Protocols, PNAC, the Samson option, FSD, etc. ... are to be considered beacons of knowledge and wisdom that the rest of us should learn from and, if possible, emulate?
Indeed, Mags. Thanks for sharing your theory, belief and nursery rhyme with us ... a belief also shared, no doubt, by the chosen people who densely populate the capstone of the bankster power pyramid and who actually have little or no connection to Judea or to any Covenant (therein).
You must think the rest of the world is a nursery.
Pax