That makes two of us.


The dude was performing miracles. He alone was all that was needed...


This is also true in reverse.

Yes, but I explain why you are not seeing the point. How about backing up your claims.


God doesn't need to fabricate a Jesus if he wants to show us miracles.


Please explain. I've never heard of a reverse avalanche.

I have been chic, you just dont see it....


He uses his Son to teach us the way of life friend. Its in being human...



An avalanche can create one event.

Cymatics
viewtopic.php?p=4304#p4304

Funny how I just used a similar example here refuting intelligent design. You are playing fast and loose with modal phenomena, Mags. Cymatics is not an avalanche in reverse.

I wonder who is?

This is a simple Gestalt analogy.

Mags, I'm acutely aware of your Gestaltist leanings, but fail to see anything analogous here!

Miracles? Like this?

Ya chic just like that lol...
Great comeback...



Chic presented that Jesus was dependent on his followers for his power I think, analogous to the snowflakes creating the avalanche. I reversed it suggesting that Jesus was not dependent on followers for his power, him being alone was enough, suggesting he was the avalanche creating the snowflakes. This goes deeper into Chic understanding of revolution, more specifically that one man cannot start one.

Make any sense? Not that this would make sense to Chic at all, since this appears a dismissive subject. Again the Bible contains direction on the true nature of our world. The difficulty is in disseminating what is true and what is not. This is in relation to understanding the bible or in other words, understanding reality.

This is also a tell in how the lie, more specifically science, tricks man into being. The pure scientist requires the world to tell him what to do, the occultist creates it.

Then the cymatics reference, was how energy really organizes physicality. Energy being a word or sound. This points to that paradigm i present, which enlightens reasons for our slavery, how the world works etc......

On one level, but this is not analogous.


I disagree, its your nonsensical use of word analogous that is confusing the subject!


"It contains false direction which aids understanding", this is just more nonsense, I was born at night mags but it wasn't last night!


Now that's a better attempt at analogue!


Not in my book, I'm more disposed to believe a pure scientist's role is in essence to simply measure and quantify nature.


I agree, but will add that this was probably plagiarized from something more ancient. possibly even from theistic Vedanta.

Sure....