united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Hero or Traitor? https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=1205 |
Page 3 of 5 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:44 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hero or Traitor? | ||||||||||||||||||
Powers of blackmail?! That is one of the primary characteristics of high-level sociopaths! Add that to his war-mongering attitude, his parasitic life of luxury on Jewish money, his running for the country estate whenever London was at risk of being bombed, his scheming to force Hitler to bomb London, his refusal to even look at peace proposals from Germany, his lack of empathy for the suffering of the British population, his desire to use illegal chemical and biological weapons on the German population, his stubborn focus on "winning the game", his unrelenting deception and manipulation of others... and you have a rabid sociopath similar to Stalin and Roosevelt, his reluctant war-time allies bound together only by converging interests and evil intent.
Young Churchill in 1904. Look into the eyes of a sociopath... |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hero or Traitor? |
Eustace Mullins talks about Winston Churchill starting at 32:10 in the video below, confirming what David Irving has uncovered from original sources. Eustace Mullins - The New World Order (Full Length) (duration 58:20) By the way, I wanted to find more information on Bobby Lee, the interviewer of Eustace Mullins in the video, so I naturally turned to Google. There's Bobby Lee the oriental stand-up comedian all over Google, but nothing on the interviewer I was interested in. I'm sure there is an interesting back story to that phenomenon. Bread and circuses perhaps? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:43 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hero or Traitor? | |||||||||
How ironic that Churchill has Hollywood movies portraying him as a great hero, while Hitler is portrayed in every Hollywood movie as a cruel villain. The reality is just the opposite. Hitler gassed to death no more Jews than Churchill did (unless some of the Italians in Bari, Italy were Jews). This makes perfect sense when you remember that Jews run Hollywood. You see, Churchill was the sociopath, not Hitler. Jewish sociopaths, using their near-monopoly media ownership, make sure we believe the opposite. Why? Because they accuse their opponents of their own malfeasance, as sociopaths always do. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sat Apr 21, 2018 5:23 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hero or Traitor? | |||||||||
It's misleading to say Britain initiated both world wars, when it was really Churchill and cooperating sociopaths. It's not nations that start wars, it's sociopaths. That's an important distinction we need to get straight. It's not nations that start wars, it's sociopaths. Sociopaths. Churchill was a sociopath. Stalin was a sociopath. Roosevelt was a sociopath. But surprise, surprise... Hitler was not a sociopath. But he was falsely painted as one by the real sociopaths. And most people still believe to this day that Hitler was the sociopath, and Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin were the good guys. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Apr 22, 2018 12:53 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hero or Traitor? | ||||||||||||||||||
Wrong. That's not why Churchill didn't do anything about the bombing. That is just the "plausible deniability" excuse Churchill knew he could rely on to dupe people of empathy. Churchill absolutely needed the bombings on England (see David Irving's story about Churchill shaking his fists at the empty skies and saying "Why won't you come?!") to successfully deceive and manipulate the British public into granting him the power and control he desired to be England's supreme leader. It was all a game that Churchill won and that the British public didn't even know was being played. It really was a con-game. This is what sociopaths excel in doing. If you simply think about it, you will realize that the defense of Coventry could have been augmented without revealing that the German code had been broken. Churchill's plausible deniability excuse is lame, yet it works because the majority of humanity, the Followers, never think to challenge the excuse, because they lack critical thinking skills. To choose to keep a secret instead of saving people's lives is the kind of choice sociopaths would make. Another similar example of a lame plausible deniability excuse is the one given for the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of WW2. "It saved millions of American lives who would have died in the invasion of Japan." BS. There was never going to be an invasion of Japan, as the Japanese were already looking for a way to surrender without being humiliated. But sociopaths were running the American war effort, and they wanted the Japanese to be humiliated, which is why they were demanding "unconditional surrender". In other words, no compromise and no understanding.
How sociopaths see things. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu May 10, 2018 6:45 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hero or Traitor? | |||||||||
Senator John McCain has often been the subject in this thread. Now we hear a Lutheran pastor's point of view concerning McCain's status as hero or traitor.
John McCain, hero or traitor? Yes, it's a tough question, as sociopaths are so good at fooling people. Looks like the pastor is not fooled. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Aug 20, 2018 2:52 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hero or Traitor? | ||||||||||||||||||
The story of Winston Churchill fed to the gullible public, just like the story of Adolf Hitler, is nothing but propaganda that is far removed from the truth. It is Hollywood's job to reinforce our brainwashing and keep us believing the lies that have been so carefully placed into our consciousness by parrots parroting other parrots, who stretch backward into time in a long line until the original lying Jewish sociopaths are reached. Hollywood is controlled by the Jews, as even they like to boast. The myth of Churchill supports the myth of the evil Nazis, which supports the myth of the madman Hitler, which supports the myth of the Holocaust. The Holocaust is the Big Lie, the one that must never be exposed. Exposure would mean the end of the most heinous con-game in history, one of deliberately fabricating a shockingly false history that traumatizes nearly every mind on the planet in brutal and nefarious ways.
Spoken like a true sociopath, Winston. Hitler would never have said anything like that. He hated war, having spent four years fighting as an ordinary soldier in World War I. Many of Hitler's attempts to negotiate a peaceful end to WW2 were deliberately sabotaged by the warmonger Churchill. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Aug 27, 2018 11:02 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hero or Traitor? | |||||||||
B.S. Churchill deserves a Nobel Peace Prize like Barack Obama deserved one ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 ). I was investigating the arguments that Churchill did not bear any responsibility for the Bengal famine in India which killed millions from starvation during WW2. The International Churchill Society defends Churchill, as one would expect, but I see duped people defending their "hero". Churchill was a genocidal leader. Sociopaths in leadership positions almost always are. While normal people are always trying to dream up reasons for the strange behaviors of their sociopathic leaders, it is a futile exercise. Sociopaths have entirely different reasons for their actions that are markedly devoid of empathy, compassion, sympathy, responsibility, and integrity. They act just like like sociopaths and use deception to hide their true motivations. Churchill's written history of WW2 is demonstrably full of lies to make him look good. Yep, sociopaths do that. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:10 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hero or Traitor? | ||||||||||||||||||
Synchronicity! I love it when it happens! And it just happened while listening to David Irving at about 1:45:00 in this video: David Irving - The Biggest Lie (duration 1:53:51) A question is asked of David Irving about new information revealing that Churchill's mother was Jewish. Irving says Churchill probably wasn't cognizant of it because he never mentioned it! That is just David Irving failing to understand how secretive sociopaths are about their private histories! I'm sure Churchill never mentioned it because he knew he had to hide it, given the extent to which he was financially indebted to the Jewish cabal. Jews completely owned Churchill, and this was a big secret that the deceived and manipulated (hoodwinked) public could never know. So somehow David Irving brushes off Churchill's Jewish mother as not particularly interesting. But...
So the "authorized" Churchill biographer Martin Gilbert is a Jew! But then why should that be interesting when Churchill's Jewish mother is not? Irving goes on to explain how Churchill's stately lifestyle, which he could not afford, was paid for by wealthy Jews for the 10 years preceding the start of WW2. Suddenly, his mother being Jewish is not to be dismissed, as it appears the Jewish cabal has had its claws into Churchill since he was born. But the sychronicity comes from my prior post, where I mention Churchill being defended by the International Churchill Society. And who do they get to defend their man Churchill? Martin Gilbert! The very same Martin Gilbert who Irving identifies as the authorized Churchill biographer who doesn't want the goyim to know he's a Jew, defending Churchill, a puppet of the Jewish cabal, who happens to have a Jewish mother! What authority "authorized" Martin Gilbert as the official Churchill biographer? Well, who owns the publishing houses that authors rely on? The Jews. God's Chosen People. The Authorities. Our Masters.
Oh yes, you can trust Sir Martin Gilbert and his searching. No conflict of interest there! No bias either! Jews stick to their lies with the boldness and audacity of a sociopath. Coincidence? I think not. Another revered Martin, but not a Jew, and not so biased. He saw sociopaths. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Sep 02, 2018 1:49 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hero or Traitor? | |||||||||
Sounds like a classic sociopath to me! It makes me wonder why it is so hard for most Americans to see the true nature of the men that lead them. But I don't wonder for long. When 80% of the population are Followers, it is pretty self-explanatory. John McCain is not pictured, but might as well be. |
Page 3 of 5 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |