Reply to topic  [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
The sneaky disarming of America 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The sneaky disarming of America
Quote:
Gun control advocates love to hate District of Columbia v. Heller, the 2008 case in which the Supreme Court recognized that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to arms. They may be protesting too much. Federal courts in the decade since have found many restrictions on the right to own and use weapons perfectly congruent with that decision. Heller merely says the government can't enforce laws that prevent (most) Americans from possessing commonly used weapons in their homes for self-defense.

Courts have found that Heller does not preclude laws that prohibit anyone younger than 21 from buying guns in retail stores; laws that bar people who committed a single nonviolent felony from ever owning a gun; laws that severely restrict the ability to carry a gun outside the home; laws that ban commonly owned magazines of a certain capacity; or laws that require handguns to incorporate untested, expensive, and unreliable "microstamping" technology. The Supreme Court so far has avoided taking up any of those questions. -- source

The Supreme Court avoids taking up those questions because they are obvious infringements on the right to bear arms. The hypocrisy of the Supreme Court would be clearly revealed if they had to consider upholding the Second Amendment, which is their sworn duty. So they avoid it and let lower courts violate the Constitution. The corruption of the legal system couldn't be much more evident. That Americans have become so complacent is a clear refutation of Franklin's comment:

Quote:
If there is a lesson in all of this it is that our Constitution is neither a self-actuating nor a self-correcting document. It requires the constant attention and devotion of all citizens. There is a story, often told, that upon exiting the Constitutional Convention Benjamin Franklin was approached by a group of citizens asking what sort of government the delegates had created. His answer was: "A republic, if you can keep it." The brevity of that response should not cause us to under-value its essential meaning: democratic republics are not merely founded upon the consent of the people, they are also absolutely dependent upon the active and informed involvement of the people for their continued good health. -- source

We failed to keep it. Sociopaths control it now.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Nov 09, 2019 6:03 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The sneaky disarming of America
Quote:
Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden is a tough guy. How do we know? 'Cause he talks real tough, that's how.

He also doesn't like guns very much. Doing his best Clint Eastwood impersonation, Biden told gun manufacturers that he is "coming for them."

To do what, Biden doesn't say. But whatever can a senile doddering old fool actually do to make those gun makers quake in their boots?

Maybe he'll throw his teeth at them. -- source

Gotta get them Americans disarmed!

Biden is such a sociopath. When he's not perving after young girls and their mothers, he's parroting whatever his controllers tell him to parrot. And gun removal is at the top of the list.

I saw a headline in today's newspaper that I picked up off the ground during my walk — "Gun violence leaves two injured". You never see "Knife violence leaves two injured" or "Fist violence leaves two injured". No, only guns are violent. Only guns are out of control. Never mind the people and their sociopathic values that are at the root of the violence. Just take the guns away, then the public will have no comparable defense to the guns the police and military will confront us with.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Feb 24, 2020 10:14 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The sneaky disarming of America
Quote:
In October former Florida Republican congressional candidate Laura Loomer slammed Republican party leadership for ignoring tech censorship of conservatives.

Loomer, perhaps the most censored woman in the world, won her primary while being banned from every major social media platform. Her campaign is also the only one banned from running ads on Facebook.

She has been kicked off Twitter, Facebook, Uber, Lyft, PayPal, GoFundMe, and other platforms for her fierce and controversial criticism of Islam.

Laura Loomer found out recently she was banned from owning a gun. Despite the fact that she faces constant death threats – she cannot own or possess a firearm for her own personal protection. Her 2nd Amendment right has been BANNED.

Laura writes: "While I have NEVER been convicted of a felony, domestic violence, and I’ve never been adjudicated mentally unfit by a judge, my name was placed in the Federal National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) and I have been prohibited from ever owning or even touching a firearm." -- source

This is a blatant violation of the 2nd Amendment by the U.S. government, demonstrating once again the criminal and treasonous nature of the government. When said government can violate the U.S. constitution with impunity, it is no longer legitimate.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Jan 22, 2021 9:58 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The sneaky disarming of America
Quote:
HR 127 would mandate that every gun owner apply for a federal gun license from the Department of Justice. The licenses would be issued in ‘may-issue’ fashion, giving the Attorney General complete discretion to ban anyone and everyone from owning guns.

The law would require firearms licensees to undergo a full psychological evaluation by a government-approved psychologist. Members of gun owners’ households would also be required to submit to mental health checks. -- source

Well would you look at that! The ruling sociopaths are trying to test the psychology of public, when it is the public that needs to test the psychology of the rulers!

I'm totally serious. Here's how the law should read:

Quote:
The law would require politicians to undergo a full psychological evaluation by a peer-approved psychologist. Members of the politicians’ households would also be required to submit to mental health checks.

It's our golden opportunity to apply equivalent laws onto our oppressors. If we succeed, we won't have any oppressors.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:02 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The sneaky disarming of America
Quote:
“All acts, law, orders, rules, and regulations of the United States Government, whether past, present, or future, that infringe on the people’s right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and Arkansas Constitution, Article 2, [Section] 5, are invalid in this state, shall not be recognized by this state, are specifically rejected by this state, and shall be considered null and void and of no effect in this state,” according to the text of the bill. -- source

At last! A state that opposes federal tyranny!

Bill and Hillary Clinton especially soiled the good name of Arkansas, but suddenly its reputation begins to recover! Go, Arkansas!

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Apr 04, 2021 4:08 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The sneaky disarming of America
Quote:
A federal judge has overturned California’s three-decade-old ban on assault weapons, ruling that it violates the constitutional right to bear arms. -- source

How is it possible that it takes 30 years to overturn an obviously unconstitutional law?

The miracle here is that a federal judge actually followed his solemn oath of office to support and defend the Constitution. The ruling is a no-brainer that any child could make, but a federal judge? I guess this one never took a trip to Epstein's island...

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Jun 06, 2021 3:14 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The sneaky disarming of America
Quote:
The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that “Where rights (liberty) secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no legislation which would abrogate (abolish) them.” (Miranda v Arizona) What’s that mean? Well, it means that in order to lawfully effect a Right/Liberty protected by our Constitution (nullify it, limit it, license it or restrict it) the powers that be (state or federal) are required to comply with the Constitution’s Article V Amendment process (amend the Constitution) before they expediently make an end-run around said Constitution. Merely ‘passing laws’, to take away (or “infringe” upon) your Right of self defense protected by the Second Amendment is unConstitutional.

Simply put, “Shall not be infringed” means that if they want to “infringe” by expanding the government’s (restricted) authority to nullify, limit, license or restrict that they don’t have, they must go through the Article V Amendment process in order to ‘acquire’ the lawful authority to legislate limits, licenses or to dictate or nullify your Rights.

Telling you they have the “authority” to by-pass the Constitution by passing some goofy law because ‘they’ voted on it is what’s known as acting under “the color of law.” The color of law is defined as the actions of an ‘official’, be it law enforcement or legislative, purported to be in the conduct of their official duties when, in fact, they have no lawful authority to actually ‘act’ or conduct themselves. An example would be a legislature passing laws effecting areas where they have no lawful authority to legislate. When they have no authority to pass such a law or ordinance (haven’t complied with the the lawful Amendment process) then the Supreme Court stated in Marbury vs Madison that: “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” -- source

This is the reality that the Supreme Court will not enforce, even though they swear loyalty to the Constitution. Their real loyalty is to the ruling sociopaths, who hold the power of life and death over them. Remember the murder of Justice Scalia? You can be sure the current Supreme Court Justices remember, and they won't be crossing the ruling sociopaths any time soon. No, instead they will be crossing the American public, who won't do a thing about it.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Jul 12, 2021 12:20 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The sneaky disarming of America
JP realizes he was wrong about gun control, mainly because of the COVID psy-op.




Why I Was WRONG About Guns!
(duration 16:30)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Feb 10, 2022 5:50 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The sneaky disarming of America
Quote:
The Grand Saline Independent School District, east of Dallas, started permitting the teachers to carry firearms in late February. Superintendent Micah Lewis told The New York Post, “Every time there was a school shooting, me and the board talked about it again. If some crazy came in here, could we minimize the damage by being armed?”

He added, “We’re educators. I hate that we have to do that, but again, you weigh it out. Do you take this student down if he’s mowing people down? It’s an easy answer. You take one to save many.” -- source

Allowing teachers in schools to be armed is long overdue. School shootings just wouldn't happen on a level playing field.

Government tyranny wouldn't happen either if all citizens carried weapons, concealed or open carry.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:00 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: The sneaky disarming of America
A few people see right through the deception and manipulation of the orchestrated madman shooting psy-ops (and here is the latest):



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue May 31, 2022 5:28 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.