The mainstream news media is scripted to downplay the risk of radiation exposure from the Fukushima disaster. They even stoop to ridiculous claims that cosmic radiation is more dangerous to our health than Fukushima.

Guess who else is also on the same scripted page?


UncleZook, have you no shame?!

That's a rhetorical question, as we all know sociopaths have no shame.

Zook continues his tactic of deceptive arguments. Humans evolved with cosmic radiation, and the level of cosmic radiation we are exposed to is fairly constant and very infrequent, so it represents no danger. The UV radiation that we are exposed to is non-ionizing radiation, completely different from what Fukushima delivers. Non-ionizing radiation typically has less than 33 eV of energy. Cs-137 from Fukushima is ionizing radiation with an energy rating of 660,000 eV. That's at least 20,000 times more energetic than non-ionizing radiation like UV light!

Unlike Cs-137, depleted uranium (U-238) is only slightly radioactive, decaying very slowly. That's why its half-life is so long (4,400,000,000 years), compared to Cs-137's 30 year half-life. Depleted uranium emits alpha particle radiation, the equivalent of a helium nucleus, which is relatively large and heavy and can't even penetrate human skin. That is why depleted uranium is only dangerous when it gets inside the body through consumption or breathing. Cs-137, on the other hand, emits beta particles, the equivalent of an electron, which is 8,000 smaller than an alpha particle. It does penetrate the skin and can go deep into your body, depending on its proximity and energy. Cs-137 is orders of magnitude more dangerous to human health than depleted uranium, and UV light doesn't even register on this scale. So Zook's dismissal of the danger from Cs-137 radiation is highly deceptive, even malevolent.

So not only is the mainstream media acting as a gatekeeper, delivering deceptive disinformation to the public, but so is UncleZook.

Shame on you, Zook. But I'm glad you keep doing it, because it provides us with a great learning tool that helps us recognize the behavioral characteristics of the sociopath.

You should be exposed for this deception as well. I've spent many days skiing under Colorado blue skies at 8 to 10 thousand feet, and I can tell you that without sunscreen, your exposed skin gets cooked. I've seen skin blister with second degree sunburn, and I even had a friend go blind for 24 hours when he chose to skip wearing sunglasses, in pursuit of a more even facial tan. He got a blistered lobster face as well, besides going temporarily blind. Colorado has one of the highest rates of skin cancer in the nation, and you can get sunburned with only 30 minutes of exposure here. I can tell you from long experience that sunscreen can protect your skin, and that's no fearmongering.

So even though UV light is low energy, non-ionizing radiation, it can still impact your health. And when it comes to the danger, it isn't even in the same ballpark as depleted uranium, which itself doesn't play in the same league as Cs-137.

So you're just deceiving people in order to manipulate them into thinking like you, Zook. And you surely remember what type of person behaves like that, right? Yep, sociopaths.

For another example of how sociopaths deceive others to get them to think like they do, watch this film on the Ruby Ridge incident. The authorities spin their lies via the mainstream media to justify their criminal actions, and they get away scot-free with murdering a boy and a woman. Then watch the sheriff proudly show off photos of all the celebrities he got to meet as a result of his notoriety, and listen to him state he sleeps just fine with the way things played out. No regret, no shame, no responsibility. Can you spot the sociopaths? It's not easy, but it is easier when you know what to look for.



The Ruby Ridge Massacre

Strontium-90, worse than Cs-137?! Radioactive strontium is readily incorporated into your body chemistry, the worst thing that can happen, because then the exposure to radioactivity is constant, intimate, and unavoidable.


People don't realize that nuclear "accidents" like Fukushima put out a witches' brew of harmful or deadly radioactive elements. Nobody even talks about the plutonium, once considered the most lethal substance known to man. There are 20 different isotopes of plutonium alone, with Pu-239 and Pu-240 being among the most deadly.


So one millionth of a gram of radioactive plutonium is already over the permissible life-time burden for a human being.

I also noticed this in the Los Alamos article:


That sounds reassuring, but it is misleading. Normal background radiation readings here in Colorado, at a mile above sea level up against the mountains, are consistently around 0.19 microsieverts, according to my radiation detector. If you convert the "insignificant compared to background radiation dose" 0.00006 sieverts to microsieverts, you get 60 microsieverts! That is 300 times higher than background radiation! I don't call that "insignificant", not by a long shot. Thanks for testing hundreds of nuclear weapons in the air (1945 - 1963), you sick sociopathic bastards!


For comparison, the Hiroshima bomb was .015 Megatons, so that's the equivalent of 36,333 Hiroshima bombs exploded in the air, every one of them creating new radioactive elements for us to absorb from eating, drinking, breathing, or just standing still.

Many of those "baffling" die-offs have been reported right here in this thread. One I didn't bother to post recently, because there have been so many other examples that everyone seems to ignore, was this one:



Massive Die-Off: Bazillions of Tiny Crabs Cover California Beach In 'Sea of Red'


Eh, who cares about tiny red crabs dying en masse? We're still partying, so everything is hunky dory!

And that's exactly how they want us to react.


Wrong. We didn't "allow" ourselves to be ruled by "a ruthless, psychopathic gang of parasites". We were tricked into it. Those parasites fooled us. Not only that, but they took active steps to dumb us down, poison our minds and bodies, censor the reality of our situation, and distract us from seeing the magnitude and scope of their deceptions.

We're not "allowing" the sociopaths to destroy us. They are doing it as cunningly and quietly as they can. It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.

Radiation? What radiation?


Baffling.

It's all so baffling!

We are not helpless. There is very little we can do, so let's do it! We don't have to do much to have an impact, but we do have to do something to change the path that humanity is on, which is one of mass extinction. Burying our heads in the sand, ignoring the problems, and subscribing to the prevalent philosophy that "ignorance is bliss" just gives the ruling sociopaths a free hand at killing us off. We need to expose them and their plans! Talk about it, communicate, share! A meme is a powerful force that can change entire societies. The meme we need to spread is that a minority of psychological deviants is leading the vast majority to ruin. Our survival rests in identifying these crafty predators and disqualifying them from positions of power and control over others. Memes succeed when they are simple and catchy, when they "go viral". Any of us can help that happen by doing our small part. So you see, you are not helpless. Your voice counts, and what you say can be very important. Speak up, even when your audience gets angry. Ignorance is killing us all. Even the angry person wants to survive. He just doesn't realize that you are working in his best interests.

The list of "baffling" die-offs just won't quit.


Every one of those creatures listed has a link back to the source articles in the quoted document. Note also that all die-offs have occurred since 2011. Fukushima started pumping out poisonous radiation on March 11, 2011 and has done so continuously ever since. As far as anyone can tell, it won't stop releasing radiation and radioactive particles for many generations, if such a thing as generations continues to exist. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that humanity's die-off is coming soon. After all, all living things on this planet are connected.

Thus, any reader of this forum should be forewarned of the strong pro-truth bias of the posts here!

I can't believe what I'm reading. Do we need to be chastised for delving into the obvious dangers of the greatest threat to human survival ever constructed by humanity? Is our desire to live in optimal health and harmony with other life on this planet to be discredited as "a clear agenda" and an "anti-nuclear bias"? Must we now confess to an "anti-vacuum bias" because we all desire to live in a breathable atmosphere?

Was this book review written with a nod to the ruling sociopaths?