united-people.tk
https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/

Snow job
https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=845
Page 6 of 8

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sat Sep 12, 2015 9:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Snow job

Quote:
An FBI file dated September 24th, 2001, explained that “both the Newark and the New York Divisions conducted a through investigation which determined that none of the Israelis had any information or prior knowledge regarding the bombing of the World Trade Centers. Furthermore, Newark and New York determined that none of the Israelis were actively engaged in clandestine intelligence activities in the United States.” -- source

The FBI, protecting Americans and preserving national security!

Quote:
“Our Purpose Was To Document The Event”: Five Israelis – 2 Kurzberg brothers, Omer Marmari, Oded Ellner, and Yaron Shmuel. -- source

The Mossad, faithfully documenting their operations no matter where they may occur!



The Five Dancing Israelis - 9/11/2001 - Our Purpose Was To Document The Event

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sat Sep 12, 2015 9:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Snow job

A report on the 9/11 Pentagon "crash" that aired once but was quietly censored after that.

Oops.



Aired once and never aired again

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Snow job

Quote:
A 29-year-old clerical employee (John Friend) in the Escondido City Manager’s Office was forced out of his job this week after city officials learned he operates an anti-Semitic website and is active in a movement that blames Jews for the 9/11 terror attacks.

On his website, therealistreport.com, Friend posts stories that assert, among other things, that the Holocaust is a false and inaccurate interpretation of history made up by the Jewish-dominated media, and that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated by the Israel government to create the international war on terrorism. -- source

Anti-Semetic, eh? The Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, was involved in 9/11. They had undercover agents (the "five dancing Israelis") filming the events of 9/11 in real time in order to "document the event". Did they have undercover agents posing as art students working in the WTC towers prior to 9/11 as well?

Question everything, dismiss nothing.




THIS WILL SHOCK YOU TO YOUR CORE: 9/11 From Cheney to Mossad

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Snow job

David McGowan.

David McGowan got it right in one. The day after 9/11, the very next day, he wrote this article. When everyone else was falling for the psy-op, he was already seeing right through it.

I don't remember hearing of David McGowan before. There is one reference to him from Magamud in this post, which fittingly features Magamud dissecting Uncle Zook with the same accuracy that McGowan achieves dissecting 9/11. Uncle Zook has to be a psy-op, because I refuse to believe anyone could be that dumb. But I am mighty tempted to believe it.

McGowan also investigated the psy-ops of Laurel Canyon, and the psy-ops of serial killers. I never imagined that the victims of Satanic sacrifice, paedophilia rings, and any other unmentionable criminality could be murdered and then covered up by blaming the murders on a "serial killer" patsy. Once you understand how these ruling sociopaths work, however, it is exactly what they would think of to get away with murder.

Just like 9/11.

I think David McGowan was such a threat that he was very likely murdered with weaponized cancer. Like they did with Venezuela's Chavez.

Author:  UncleZook [ Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Snow job

David McGowan.

David McGowan got it right in one. The day after 9/11, the very next day, he wrote this article. When everyone else was falling for the psy-op, he was already seeing right through it.


It's a good article. An excellent article considering it was prnted the day after the 9/11/2001 attacks. I applaud McGowan.

Quote:
I don't remember hearing of David McGowan before. There is one reference to him from Magamud in this post, which fittingly features Magamud dissecting Uncle Zook with the same accuracy that McGowan achieves dissecting 9/11. Uncle Zook has to be a psy-op, because I refuse to believe anyone could be that dumb. But I am mighty tempted to believe it.


And here's Chico's fifth column credentials asserting themselves. Just a day or so ago I remarked about Magamud's regular use of "antiSemitic" to attack those who exposed the Zionist conspiracy in any significant degree, yours truly, to be specific. I've called Mags a tribal animal many times because his behavior has been to assist the mainstream narratives of the tribe of Zion. I also remarked that I had done more to expose the con coinage on this forum than even Chico claims to have done. Here's that post: viewtopic.php?p=19083#p19083

beginExcerpt
Quote:
It also explains anti-Semitism, which is not the evil the Jews claim. The idea that anti-Semitism is evil is completely wrong, upside down, inverted, and false. And everyone is too afraid to say it, to simply tell the truth, because if they do, the Jews have something planned for you -- brutal and total annihilation.


I've been pounding the drums against the con coinage "anti-Semitic" much more often and more forcefully than you have here on United. The archives hold it. And when I exposed Mags as a probable tribal allegiant, e.g. for using that term in his posts as a weapon against honest discourse, then you essentially supported him and attacked me. The archives hold your fifth column credentials in abundance, Sherlock.
end


Chico, now trapped in his relative support of Mags, the tribal animal, against Zook, the genuine truthseeker ... now is attempting to resurrect Mags, the tribal animal, because he is deeply associated with Mags throughout the history of this forum.

FTR, Mags couldn't dissect his way out of a wet paper bag. He's also a fellow co-religionist in the Cult of Sociopathy <-------- the bankrupt movement that seeks to explain the world's deeply corrupted state, and bankrupt precisely because it fails to displace the real causal agent: secretive organization. In the duty of protecting his co-religionist Magamud - and probable co-tribalist (after all, Chico's arguments are perched atop a fifth column and overall favor the tribal plan of FSD) - Chico drags in McGowan's good name, to use the latter as a shield to hide behind while he carries out his deceptions.

The timing of Mags resurrection coincides with the timing of my attack on Mags character (e.g. his usage of the con coinage "antiSemitic" to abuse discussion). By now, it should be apparent that this is no accident. The fifth columnists are a brotherhood of sorts, and their allegiances are figuratively consanguine.

Again, that was an excellent article by McGowan and he does dissect things with surgical understanding, especially given it was written on teh day after the attacks. To then compare such an expert analysis with Mags
unsupported ad hominem attacks against Zook ... well ... that's just Chico's brotherly love for Mags being public and indiscreet, and with purpose.

Quote:
McGowan also investigated the psy-ops of Laurel Canyon, and the psy-ops of serial killers. I never imagined that the victims of Satanic sacrifice, paedophilia rings, and any other unmentionable criminality could be murdered and then covered up by blaming the murders on a "serial killer" patsy. Once you understand how these ruling sociopaths work, however, it is exactly what they would think of to get away with murder.

Just like 9/11.

I think David McGowan was such a threat that he was very likely murdered with weaponized cancer. Like they did with Venezuela's Chavez.


McGowan appears to be genuine. I've already posted earlier wrt my researched opinion that Chavez was a pawn of the Rothschild brand, just like Castro is/was, e.g. to play the part of the regional bogeyman.

Chico attempts to associate McGowan with Chavez ... so that the latter can benefit from the merits of the former. Chico is just being Chico, e.g. mixing apples and oranges and selling them as fruit, which is like mixing cops and robbers and calling them both humans. Not untruthful, but beside the point.

Alas, genuine truthseekers display apples and sell them as apples ... display oranges and sell them as oranges.
Truthful and to the point.


Pax

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sat Jan 09, 2016 3:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Snow job

:lol: :lol: :lol: Oh, Zook, you are so funny! It is posts like this last one of yours that make me want to go with "dumb" over the hired "psy-op" agent. You really are beyond belief.

UncleZook wrote:
Chico, now trapped in his relative support of Mags, the tribal animal, against Zook, the genuine truthseeker ... now is attempting to resurrect Mags, the tribal animal, because he is deeply associated with Mags throughout the history of this forum.

Oh yes, I'm "trapped" by my "relative support" of Mags, and now I'm attempting to "resurrect" Mags due to my "association" with Mags, all to crucify the "genuine truthseeker"...

Do you even hear how ridiculous you are, Zook? Jesus complex, perhaps?

UncleZook wrote:
FTR, Mags couldn't dissect his way out of a wet paper bag. He's also a fellow co-religionist in the Cult of Sociopathy <-------- the bankrupt movement that seeks to explain the world's deeply corrupted state, and bankrupt precisely because it fails to displace the real causal agent: secretive organization. In the duty of protecting his co-religionist Magamud - and probable co-tribalist (after all, Chico's arguments are perched atop a fifth column and overall favor the tribal plan of FSD) - Chico drags in McGowan's good name, to use the latter as a shield to hide behind while he carries out his deceptions.

Oh yes, I have a "duty" to "protect" Mags by using "McGowan's good name" as a "shield"...

Are you for real, Zook? :face:

Secretive organization is a symptom of sociopathy, so it is not a causal agent. Sociopathy is. Normal people don't have a need for secretive organization, because they are not deceiving and manipulating others, so they have nothing to hide.

Yeah, I really am leaning away from "psy-op" towards "dumb" now regarding the "causal agent" of your idiotic posts.

UncleZook wrote:
The timing of Mags resurrection coincides with the timing of my attack on Mags character (e.g. his usage of the con coinage "antiSemitic" to abuse discussion). By now, it should be apparent that this is no accident. The fifth columnists are a brotherhood of sorts, and their allegiances are figuratively consanguine.

Indubitably! How could it NOT be? The fact that I wanted to know if anyone had talked about McGowan on this forum before had nothing to do with it! I typed his last name in the search bar, got one result, and then ended up reading the solitary post, which happened to be Mags railing against the Holy Truthseeker himself, our Lord and Savior, Uncle Zook! Synchronistically, I found Mag's analysis of you quite amusing, since I have been putting up with your very recent sanctimonious drivel over in the Hitler thread! So yeah, "consanguine" "fifth columnists", "brotherhood", and "allegiances" are surely the answer.

Good show, Zook!

UncleZook wrote:
Chico attempts to associate McGowan with Chavez ... so that the latter can benefit from the merits of the former.

Yes! Guilt, or benefit, by reason of association! Of course! It has to be!

You're definitely on a roll, Zook. This is Zook discernment at its best! I am wide-eyed and breathless at the amazement of it all. :shock:

Author:  UncleZook [ Sat Jan 09, 2016 2:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Snow job

Quote:
UncleZook wrote:
Quote:
FTR, Mags couldn't dissect his way out of a wet paper bag. He's also a fellow co-religionist in the Cult of Sociopathy <-------- the bankrupt movement that seeks to explain the world's deeply corrupted state, and bankrupt precisely because it fails to displace the real causal agent: secretive organization. In the duty of protecting his co-religionist Magamud - and probable co-tribalist (after all, Chico's arguments are perched atop a fifth column and overall favor the tribal plan of FSD) - Chico drags in McGowan's good name, to use the latter as a shield to hide behind while he carries out his deceptions.



Oh yes, I have a "duty" to "protect" Mags by using "McGowan's good name" as a "shield"...

Are you for real, Zook? :face:

Secretive organization is a symptom of sociopathy, so it is not a causal agent. Sociopathy is. Normal people don't have a need for secretive organization, because they are not deceiving and manipulating others, so they have nothing to hide.


The above illogical and idiotic paragraph illustrates Chico's grasp of the subject matter, which itself is softly scientific to begin with. Let's address the broken logic first.

Chico asserts that normal people don't have a need for secretive organization? What about The French Resistance? Wasn't that populated by normal people? To be sure, it was populated during abnormal times created when an enemy force, i.e. a sociopathic force, invaded an empathic space (from the perspective of the invaded). But then we have, during normal times, many instances of sociopaths in society invading empathic spaces thereby creating a need for secretive organization by those populating the empathic spaces, e.g. to deal with the invading sociopaths. Examples of empathic spaces that are consistently invaded by sociopaths (e.g. bad seeds) include home environments, workplace environments, consumer environments, playgrounds, etc.

So what is Chico really saying when he asserts that normal people don't have a need for secretive organization? Is he suggesting that the abused empath(s) must deal individually with their respective abusing sociopath (at all times) ... that they must not secretively organize against the abusing sociopath or risk becoming sociopaths themselves?

Or is he blowing more hot air into a giant balloon that hoists and maintains Noah's Ark a million cubits above the flood?


Pax

ps: If secretive organization is a symptom of sociopathy, as Chico claims, then The French Resistance (which was secretly organized) must be sociopathic ... or else secretive organization is a symptom of empathy as well, for no one can seriously argue that a people organizing to protect themselves against an invading force lack empathy. But then, if secretive organization is a symptom of both empathy and sociopathy, then it is not a symptom at all. It's just Chico's logic pretzel adding more twists unto itself.

ps2: How about the Unabomber ... Ted Kaczinsky (sp??) Did that sociopath secretly organize with anybody when he waged terror from afar? Where is this mythical symptom that Chico alludes to?

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sat Jan 09, 2016 9:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Snow job

UncleZook wrote:
What about The French Resistance?

War changes everything. It is insanity, brought to center stage by sociopaths. "All's fair in love in war", as they say, meaning normal conventions don't apply.

I had peace time in mind, and secret societies. Normal people tend not to have any interest in secret societies in time of peace. But sociopaths do.

UncleZook wrote:
ps2: How about the Unabomber ... Ted Kaczinsky (sp??)

There was very likely a secret society behind that whole thing, like the CIA. It has their modus operandi as a fingerprint, i.e. the "lone gunman" set up as a patsy to take the fall.


Your methodology of arguing here is quite deceitful, Zook. You pull out exceptional cases that you should know not to employ, but you are so focused on winning the game at any cost that you ignore your duplicity. Come to think of it, your methodology of arguing has long been steeped in deceit. That's why you were "busted" so many times that you have your own thread. It's true, I have been neglecting to continue listing your goof-ups in that thread (there are already so many of them). Your latest one regarding Hitler's art made me think of that the other day. But I'm dragging my feet, as the end of the alphabet is rapidly approaching. Then what will we do! :o

Author:  UncleZook [ Sun Jan 10, 2016 2:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Snow job

UncleZook wrote:
What about The French Resistance?

War changes everything. It is insanity, brought to center stage by sociopaths. "All's fair in love in war", as they say, meaning normal conventions don't apply.


No kidding. Which is why I alluded to abnormal times. Wartime is abnormal times. But it is not the only abnormal times. Peacetime contains its share of abnormal times. In war times, both normal and abnormal individuals (on either side) are thrown into the same spaces and are forced to unite in the name of patriotic duty. In peace times, both normal and abnormal individuals are thrown into the same spaces and the former are then forced to defend themselves from the latter.

Wartime houses conflict between internationals. Peacetime houses conflict between nationals. Conflict exists in both times and spaces, and is generally initiated by a sociopathic side against an empathic side. Antagonist offending protagonist, if you will. The battle between good and evil is eternal and transits through both wartime and peacetime.

Given this primary understanding, your attempt to confuse actual peacetime reality (with its plural small scale battles between good and evil) ... with political peacetime reality (with its singular large scale battle between good and evil, e.g. between offending nation and defending nation) ... is duly noted and tossed into the garburator.

Quote:
I had peace time in mind, and secret societies. Normal people tend not to have any interest in secret societies in time of peace. But sociopaths do.


You should reread my earlier post with comprehension this time. My argument is not about the many differences between war and peace; but the similarities they share. For all intents and purposes, peacetime is just the quintessential battle between good and evil being reduced in scale and increased in number.

Quote:
UncleZook wrote:
ps2: How about the Unabomber ... Ted Kaczinsky (sp??)

There was very likely a secret society behind that whole thing, like the CIA. It has their modus operandi as a fingerprint, i.e. the "lone gunman" set up as a patsy to take the fall.


That may be so. But lone gunmen are also known to have existed independently. Disgruntled with society, the sociopathic mindset is unpredictable in its independence and, too, in its allegiances. Indeed, many of the patsies that had been recruited in the long history of cloak and dagger, e.g. by organizations like the CIA, are individuals already primed for recruiting (e.g. by their own individual natures and circumstances).

Quote:
Your methodology of arguing here is quite deceitful, Zook. You pull out exceptional cases that you should know not to employ, but you are so focused on winning the game at any cost that you ignore your duplicity. Come to think of it, your methodology of arguing has long been steeped in deceit. That's why you were "busted" so many times that you have your own thread. It's true, I have been neglecting to continue listing your goof-ups in that thread (there are already so many of them). Your latest one regarding Hitler's art made me think of that the other day. But I'm dragging my feet, as the end of the alphabet is rapidly approaching. Then what will we do! :o


I'm focused on winning rational arguments, not arguments at all costs (like yourself). You are the deceitful one here, Chico, with your deliberate segueing into the differences between war and peace ... when I had clearly offered a specific similarity to be discussed, namely the abuse of personal space by an outside aggressor. In that, war and peace are the same.

To wit, The French Resistance of WW2 shares the same problem that empaths in the peacetime spaces - that I alluded to in my earlier post - had to deal with. Examples of peacetime spaces that are consistently invaded by sociopaths include home environments, workplace environments, consumer environments, playgrounds, etc. ... and these same spaces are consistently resisted by the empaths (often using the same tools available to them that The French Resistance had available during WW2, including secretive organization).

In short, secretive organization is not a symptom of sociopathy <---------- the baseless argument you were trying to advance.

Your attempt at designed misdirection is noted, for I don't think anyone of any notable intelligence can be stupid enough to confuse the subtle similarities between war and peace (which I was referencing) ... with the obvious differences between them (which I was not referencing).


Pax

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Mon Jan 11, 2016 4:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Snow job

UncleZook wrote:
In short, secretive organization is not a symptom of sociopathy <---------- the baseless argument you were trying to advance.

In short, you're an idiot (and a sociopath). Secrecy is indeed a recognized characteristic of sociopaths. This is not to say that secrecy is not practiced among normal people, because it is at times. Most sociopathic traits can be found in normal people, though at much reduced levels. Among sociopaths, however, they are greatly exaggerated. Secrecy is especially exaggerated for very good reasons tied to their unique psychology, mainly to hide the criminality sociopaths tend to practice that normal people find abhorrent and downright evil. You should not argue that because secrecy is practiced sometimes among normal people, it cannot be a symptom of sociopathy. To do so is disingenuous, duplicitous, dishonest, and deceptive. And, unfortunately, this is your basic argument. You try to obfuscate it with talk of the subtle similarities between war and peace ( :face: ), but this is just sleep-inducing banter. It is the enormous differences between war and peace that are universally recognized and worthy of analysis in the effort to avoid the evil of war and embrace the good of peace. Your arguments equating war with peace is just more sociopathic doublespeak ( "War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength." -- from George Orwell's 1984)

UncleZook wrote:
Your attempt at designed misdirection is noted, for I don't think anyone of any notable intelligence can be stupid enough to confuse the subtle similarities between war and peace (which I was referencing) ... with the obvious differences between them (which I was not referencing).

Accusing your opponents of your own malfeasance, Zookie? Who would have guessed...

Page 6 of 8 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/