united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Insiders tell no tales https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=830 |
Page 2 of 2 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Dec 09, 2015 9:06 pm ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Insiders tell no tales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No single puzzle piece is. Yet every piece contributes to the picture.
Mind control. Programming. Brainwashing. I agree, that's how it's done.
Pursuing information, gaining knowledge, and searching for truth are not the gatekeeper's priority. The gatekeeper's priority is to impede that, to sabotage that, to prevent that. Can you not recognize the reflection of the gatekeeper in your own post? Must I point out again how you accuse your opponent of your own malfeasance? Really, Zook, you need to change your tune. I've mentioned many times that sociopaths cannot change their behaviors. They always expose themselves, and they can't help but do so. It is my secret hope that you will prove me wrong by being the exception, by seeing the light, by changing your ways, by rebuilding yourself. Very foolish of me, I know. It's like being in a relationship and thinking you can change your partner. It rarely happens, and yet, to some extent, it always happens. You have changed me somewhat; you have some responsibility for my growth. And I have changed you somewhat, though I am often challenged to see any trace of that change. But you've come back to engage again. That may be a hint of the change in you that I am hoping to see. Or it could just be the usual sociopathic traits of never quitting the game, of stubborn selfishness, of arrogant refusal to concede, of pursuing power and control over another. Or it might be some of both. We should be the change we wish to see in the world. Falsely accusing Sonnenfeld of being a gatekeeper, or falsely accusing me, doesn't seem like it will lead to the change I wish to see in the world. Does it really lead to the change you wish to see in the world? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri Jul 15, 2016 5:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Insiders tell no tales |
If the U.S. government really pursued justice, it would indict and prosecute Hillary Clinton for a myriad of crimes against humanity. Instead, it doggedly hounds one simple FEMA videographer who filmed evidence of U.S. government complicity in the attacks on 9/11. Mighty strange, eh? Even hypocritical. It feels like the actions of organized sociopaths to me. Kurt Sonnenfeld The Man Behind the Camera 9 11 Witness |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sat Jul 15, 2017 8:20 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Insiders tell no tales | ||||||||||||||||||
They do, but the stories are always swept under the rug. That's how enormous the conspiracy of 9/11 is. And it is internal, an inherent part of our criminal government. I'm quoting the entire article here, as this is more than sufficient testimony to launch a citizen-led investigation and criminal trial of the entire U.S. government. This kind of revelation has happened more than once already, and nothing was done, because the story was kept from the vast majority of the population. The mainstream media never mentions this stuff, as they are in on the conspiracy. The government never launches a legitimate investigation, as they are in on the conspiracy. The intelligence agencies never give us this vital information, as they are in on the conspiracy, too. Who is not in on the conspiracy? Us, the public, the citizens who supposedly run this country, the people who are being murdered by "our" government, the suckers who have been played by the most vile sociopaths humanity can produce. We are fooled into making those sociopaths our leaders, and events like 9/11 are the harvest we reap. Why don't we revolt? Because we are mind-controlled ( 1 2 3 4 5 )
|
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Jul 16, 2017 5:34 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Insiders tell no tales | ||||||||||||||||||
Snopes comes to the rescue once again to save us from "fake news", like the above deathbed confession of CIA agent Malcom Howard.
Snopes has already been shown ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ) to be a controlled opposition site designed to dismiss anything that might challenge the official lies we are constantly fed by the sociopathic state. While it accuses others of being fake news, it is itself fake news. Can you spot the evidence for this hypocrisy?
The Popular Mechanics article (click the "debunked" link) is also a well known fake news attempt to support the official 9/11 lie. Snopes points to another controlled opposition site to give its fake news apparent credibility. It's all a complicated web of propaganda, twisted truth, outright lies, and suppressed information -- all designed to control our thoughts. |
Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |