Yes, its intolerance of a gatekeeper, shill, flamer, kook, and troll all rolled up into one!

Your hypocrisy is truly astounding, Zook. In the past, on this forum, when it was pointed out that you were the only member suspended by the high-consensus democracy unique to UP, you did everything in your power to discredit that process and make excuses for your shameful distinction. And now you claim to be "one of the great truthseekers of our generation", and that you are too "modest" to claim your title as the only UP member suspended by popular vote!

Don't you want to call me a "prevaricator" again?

Nope. In this case, any one of "liar", "spinner", "deceiver" ... is more to the point. Prevaricator is a givens, e.g. the default understanding of Chico and his pack dogs.

Fact is ... I was suspended on the wishes of the screech owl and her coterie of mimsicals ... you didn't have enough votes to suspend me otherwise. You know it, I know it, the warblers in the acacia shrubs know it.

IOW, the process was already discredited because it could not screen out sockpuppets and forum disruptors from the voting block. Moreover, my suspension became a badge of honor (if it had not already been that) - as opposed to your characterization of shameful distinction - at the exact moment you excommunicated the screech owl and her coadjutants.

Another triumph of the truths over the many innuendo posterizations at Innuendo Junction. Wot?

Pax

Kook is singing Daisy.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hchUl3QlJZE

King Richard at Nexus2012, aka Nexusnow, completely deleted several threads containing hundreds of members posts!

Care to comment on this UncleZook?

Andy is the most cool out of all of us. Deleting threads is like stealing property. Silencing speech, where is my pitch fork?

I too would like to see what Zook has to say about this. I don't recall Zook saying anything about Noxon's entire thread that was deleted at Universal Spectrum, so I suspect Zook is an advocate for censorship and other draconian control measures. It would be the official gatekeeping position, after all.

I must have missed it in the past, Chico .. but in recent months, I've noticed a strong moron element in your postings.

Listen closely and repeat after me ... a private club sets its own standards of censorship.

Universal has lower formal standards of speech - by design - and higher functional standards (inherited from the design). We believe that the subordination of form - as required - promotes function (as desired). IOW, the subordination of form - as required - delivers more freedom of speech than the reverse situation where formal freedoms of speech are celebrated even as functional freedoms are diminished.

To be sure, we can all be yahoos and force the ears off an elephant by yodeling all night and through the day about censorship ...

Censorship!
Censorship!
Censorship!

... but in the end, the litmus test for speech freedom is signal, not noise ... and a high signal to noise ratio can only be achieved - as demonstrated time and again - by curbing the formal freedoms of speech with measures that actually work ... not measures that claim all sorts of speech freedoms (formality) but have none of the claimed access (functionality).

Ideal gas behavior and laws versus real gas behavior and adjustments, as it were.

Of course, gatekeepers are not particularly interested in that which works ... in fact, that would be anathema in their job description, which is to destroy the quality of discussion wherever and whenever it is found (then blame it on the truthseekers in classic false flag attack mode).


Pax Veritas

ps: Universal Spectrum is not Congress ... nor is it bound by anybody's standards but its own. If you don't like this salient fact, focus on your own forum where the standards are high formally and lower than a limbo stick functionally.

ps2: Of course, the totalitarian mindset of the neoMarxist phagocyte is threatened by variance from the true and tried and socially engineered ... so I don't expect the moronic element in your recent posts to disappear any time soon.

ps3: If any of you clueless fukks want to tackle the serious aspects of issues like speech, liberty, the right of self-defense, fascism, socialism, etc. ... meet me at high noon on Skype and ye shall have some clues.

ZZZZZZZZZZZzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...

One man's signal is another man's noise, and vice versa. A censor sets himself up as the referee in determining the difference. If you cannot recognize the dangers of censorship, then you deserve the New World Order coming to your neighborhood. No surprise there, because you function as a gatekeeper for them.


Universal Spectrum is following the same deceptive path trod by Nexus and Avalon before it. It is certainly becoming a private club, much like the secret societies (Bilderbergers, Opus Dei, Freemasons, etc.) run by the ruling sociopaths that dominate us. Those private clubs also set their own standards, which include bribery, blackmail, terrorism, and murder.

Justifying censorship is just another step down that dark path. I am sorry to see you slipping to the Dark Side, Zook. Perhaps, like the fictional Darth Vader, you will realize your error before it is too late.

Well you've completely outdone yourself today UncleZook (whoever you are?) with the posting and re-posting of ZookShit!

In fact, if anything needed to be bounced today I think it should have been my above post asking you to comment on King Richard's most recent planar forum behavior.

In fact, UncleZook you not only ignored this, but you did you're up most to distract all attention away from it with massive heaps of "not so" Universal Spectrum BS and unrelated garbage from previous posts!

Lets face facts UncleZook, you didn't respond because you can't, hows it feel being in the corner of a room with a floor painted with you're own BS?

But don't let this deter you from returning to post here, there's nothing more entertaining than publicly exposing gate-keeping cockroach's like you.