united-people.tk
https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/

Russian Times
https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=962
Page 1 of 12

Author:  magamud [ Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Russian Times

Russian Times
Kim Dotcom wants to encrypt half of the internet to end government surveillance
http://rt.com/usa/news/kim-dotcom-interview-mega-673/

Quote:
In an in-depth interview, Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom discusses the investigation against his now-defunct file-storage site, his possible extradition to the US, the future of Internet freedoms and his latest project Mega with RT’s Andrew Blake.


Freedom through encryption? Has it come to this? :(

Author:  UncleZook [ Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Russian Times

The commerce of sex should be banned worldwide as a first step in overthrowing the power pyramid. Sex should be entirely free and consensual, not the property of pimps and prostitutes and the government revenue services. Sorry, the righteous mind can have no pity for the merchants of sex ... nor the open mind can so pity. The commerce of sex is not an issue related to the freedom of the mind to think and exercise speech ... although the ideological subversion agenda would have you believe it is crucial to this end.

This Kim Dotcom (Shmitz) character made his money on filesharing porn, with anticipated consequences of destroying culture(s) and reducing human activity to instant gratification and basic instincts. A trip back to the cave is what this pseudo-libertarian wants, for that maximizes his bottom line.

In addition, ideological subversion through pornography ... represents a whole section of legs (of the bankster centipede).

Ergo, Kim Dotcom is party to the vast corruptions on the venerable blue and green.

Pax

ps: Sex should be free and freely available. By contrast, one of the biggest blights on freedom (liberty) is the commerce of sex.

ps2: Until we address that fact, the merchants of penis will see the vagina as a commodity, not the rightful property of the woman that owns it.

ps3: Freedom of body meets the slavery of mind at the commerce junction.

Author:  andywight [ Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Russian Times

UncleZook wrote:


Sex should be entirely free and consensual

:lol: You have my sympathy's UncleZook, it must be difficult being a middle aged man still living with his mother, who I doubt has ever had "free and consensual sex" with anyone! :lol:

UncleZook wrote:


This Kim Dotcom (Shmitz) character made his money on filesharing porn

Do you have any evidence of these accusations?


Author:  UncleZook [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Russian Times

You're always fantasizing about mothers and sons, Andy.

Do you suffer from Oedipus complex?

Pax

ps: Your wife must be proud of the boy she married. Question begs ... couldn't she make it with a real man that she she settled for riff raff with Oedipal preoccupations?

ps2: Your friend is derailing yet another thread, Chico ... are you going to play Nero's fiddle yet again.

Author:  andywight [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Russian Times

UncleZook wrote:
You're always fantasizing about mothers and sons, Andy.

Do you suffer from Oedipus complex?

Pax

ps: Your wife must be proud of the boy she married. Question begs ... couldn't she make it with a real man that she she settled for riff raff with Oedipal preoccupations?

Again, where's your evidence on Kim Dotcom? :D

Author:  andywight [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Russian Times

UncleZook wrote:

ps2: Your friend is derailing yet another thread, Chico ... are you going to play Nero's fiddle yet again.

Exactly how am I "derailing yet another thread" by asking you for evidence UncleShill?

Author:  magamud [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Russian Times

Quote:
Your friend is derailing yet another thread,

He is not derailing the thread Zook.

And you seem to be accusing Kim Dot like the US. And like the US they have not provided any proof of racketeering.
Care to comment on any of the good points he brought up in the interview?

Perhaps you should start a thread on prostitution?

Author:  andywight [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Russian Times

Surely a genuine truth seeker like yourself UncleZook wouldn't make such damning accusations about an individual without being in possession of evidence to back them up!

I see your still online... why are you unable to do this, whats taking you so long? Wot!

Author:  UncleZook [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Russian Times

magamud wrote:
Quote:
Your friend is derailing yet another thread,

He is not derailing the thread Zook.


Sure he is. You have a blind spot. Either that, or you don't care whether your mother is dragged into all kinds of salacious innuendo on a riff raff's whim. Certainly, you don't care if mine is. By infusing innuendo into the mix, riff raff rutabaga is derailing the thread that you created.

Quote:
And you seem to be accusing Kim Dot like the US. And like the US they have not provided any proof of racketeering.
Care to comment on any of the good points he brought up in the interview?

Perhaps you should start a thread on prostitution?


Not like the US.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megaupload

beginExcerpt

Company and services

The company's registered office is in Room 1204, on the 12th floor of the Shanghai Industrial Investment Building in Wan Chai, Hong Kong.[10][11]

The company web services included: (a) Megaupload.com, a one-click hosting service; (b) Megapix.com, an image hosting; (c) Megavideo.com and Megalive.com, video hosting services; (d) Megabox.com, a music hosting service; and (e) Cum.com, hosting for pornographic content (formerly Megaporn, Megarotic and Sexuploader). Other services included Megaclick, Megafund, Megakey and Megapay, all of which were advertisement and financial services. Two additional services, Megabackup and Megamovie, were in development before their closure.[12]

end


Racketeering?? Not my point of contention.

Porn peddler?? My point of contention and ... hell ya!

I don't have to be siding with the US to know what ideological subversion is ... or who is promoting it. Sometimes the truths create strange affiliations. As usual, you're a buck short on the conclusions and a buck long on the innuendo.

Pax

ps: None of you Unit Peepian clowns are sophisticated enough to see the patterns behind the obvious ... which is why you tramp on the truths with frightening regularity. If that makes me elitist, so be it.

ps2: Kim Dotcom fits the profile of a bankster empire moral eunuch fitted for the task of piracy and bottom-line profiteering. He is just another amoral drip from the putative corporate faucet that seeks the maximization of profit and the minimization of obstacles to that profit.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Russian Times

UncleZook wrote:
ps2: Your friend is derailing yet another thread, Chico ... are you going to play Nero's fiddle yet again.

If you think I'm chomping at the bit to censor anyone, you are sadly mistaken.

Magamud started a thread about a plan to encrypt half the Internet as a defense against pervasive government surveillance. This plan is coming from the founder of Megaupload, a foreign company that the U.S. government illegally raided and shut down last year. The first response to this subject came from you:

UncleZook wrote:
Sex should be entirely free and consensual

And you have the gall to ask me to censor someone for derailing a thread?

You should know my history when it comes to fighting censorship and defending free speech. Perhaps you've forgotten that I was banned from Avalon for highlighting the censorship Bill Ryan practiced there, and similarly silenced at Nexus for criticizing the tyranny of King Richard. Nor did Atticus appreciate my exposure of his psychological deviancy on his forum, with the usual result. So if you think I am inclined to censor anyone for something as trivial as "derailing a thread", you would be operating under a mistaken impression. I started this forum so that there would be neither censorship nor dictator here. I have no desire to deviate from that course.

I respectfully suggest that you examine where your strong impulses to lynch forum members come from. You have been so well programmed in the practice of persecuting others in the service of the elitists (Bill Ryan, Richard, etc.) that it has become almost a Pavlovian response for you. Please, show a little empathy and put yourself in others' shoes, if that is possible. Do not do to others what you would not want done to yourself. All members can bring value to this forum, including you. No member behaves flawlessly here, including me. So let's not be so insistent to "hang 'em high".

Page 1 of 12 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/