When a liar can say yes, no, maybe it makes it hard for people to identify the liar. A politician does not have a stance. And if they are asked to reason their stand they filler buster. This bureaucracy mixed with a technocracy is something to behold. Couple this with the education system and the overall redirection from reality through a child life and one wonders why we are in this state. Its all acting. It's all make believe. Oh thats right. It's a Con game.

And that's what sociopaths do. It's not the ordinary sociopaths we are talking about, it's the "best of the best", or more accurately, "the most skilled of the worst". Only the most devious, manipulative, deceptive, conniving, shameless, and uncaring human predators make it into the top positions of power and control. They are the con-artists that fool the entire world, and they are doing it now.

They are so good at it, that they have bloodlines and we have rebuilt the Pharaohs for them again and again. Can it not be plainer for people to see?

Jeff Monson: US a police state, George Orwell's 1984 happening before us

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j518I5oK ... r_embedded

Transparency in government? That is a complete oxymoron nowadays. The only information the government freely disseminates is propaganda.

Jake Brewer is most likely a gatekeeper. But then, that was your point.

Keiser Report: Ponzi Lottery

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFCkG9UJ ... e=youtu.be

You gotta love how the British are so polite. "Remarkably similar" is an understatement. The global banking system is absolutely a crime racket, with its headquarters in the City of London. What a laugh, claiming "the British banking system is remarkably similar to an organized crime racket."

Obama to support Internet wiretapping program



United States President Barack Obama is likely to endorse a Federal Bureau of Investigation effort that would ensure all Internet companies in the US provide a way for the government to conduct undetected, backdoor surveillance.

The FBI has been considering solutions to their so-called “Going Dark” problem as intricate methods of encryption and advances in technology have made it increasingly difficult for the federal government and law enforcement to gain access to online communications conducted in the shadows of the Web. Should the latest efforts of the FBI move forward, though, Internet companies that act as any conduit for correspondence of any kind would be heavily fined if they don’t include in their infrastructure a way for the government to eavesdrop on that dialogue in real time.

At a press conference in Washington, DC in March, FBI general counsel Andrew Weissmann said the Department of Justice was determined to have the means to wiretap any online communication by 2014 and called it “a huge priority for the FBI.” Further developments last month revealed that the FBI was considering a fine-based model under which Internet companies would be forced to comply or risk being penalized beyond repair.

Source

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution states:


This is the supreme law of the land. Any law passed by Congress that is not in alignment with the Constitution is null and void, meaning it is not a law at all.


Any president or government official that pursues unreasonable searches and seizures of "papers and effects" (like email, letters, phone calls, Internet usage, etc.) is in violation of both the Fourth Amendment and their solemn oath of office to support and defend the Constitution, which would qualify them as a traitor to the United States of America and a domestic enemy of the state, meaning a terrorist.

Obama is exactly that. Being president does not place him above the law. He should be immediately arrested as a traitor and terrorist with the same conviction and zeal used to arrest CIA patsies after orchestrated false-flag events (see the Boston Marathon bombing thread).