united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Hitler -- What is the truth? https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=1194 |
Page 40 of 65 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? |
I love the way Vincent Reynouard uses original source materials to make his case, especially the testimony of German officers from the Nuremberg Trials. The German officers are caught telling the truth, and the prosecutors are caught leading the witnesses toward the unjust result they desire. It is so contrived and biased, the exact opposite of what a legal trial should be! The video here by Vincent Reynouard is another masterpiece in truth-seeking. All of the Nuremberg testimony is in English and can be clearly read on-screen. While Vincent's narrative is in French, the English testimony speaks for itself. A jury of ordinary "peers" would never have convicted the German officers of any crime, which is why Nuremberg was a "military tribunal" and not a legal court of justice. Indeed, it was a military tribunal that created its own set of unfair rules right from the start that would assure it of the outcome desired before the "evidence" was even examined. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Dec 30, 2018 1:34 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
Faurisson wrote that 38 years ago. It is just as true today as when he wrote it. The entire world is still suffering from the incredible Jewish deception known as the Holocaust™. We have indeed been swindled, just as Hitler, the Nazis, and the German nation have been swindled. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri Feb 08, 2019 8:56 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
Reichstag fire, Berlin, February 27, 1933 The Reichstag fire is widely believed to have been a false-flag operation by the Nazis to catapult Hitler into power. This is the "history" that I also believed, having read it from numerous sources. Unfortunately, this version of history is just parroted propaganda that is totally inaccurate. And guess who was the source of this now widely believed propaganda? Communist Jews.
Besides author Fritz Tobias, we also have the account of Sefton Delmer, who no doubt learned his later trade in shameless propaganda from the events he witnessed that grew up around the Reichstag fire.
Sefton Delmer became the most prolific purveyor of lies (via propaganda) for the British during WW2 ( 1 2 3 ). But at the time of the Reichstag fire (February 27, 1933), he was seven years out from becoming the head of British anti-Nazi war propaganda in 1940. In 1933, Sefton Delmer was simply observing the masters of that craft, the conniving Jews, as they spun their imaginative tales to deceive and manipulate the public with incredible success. Later, during the war, Sefton Delmer would demonstrate how well he had learned from the Jewish shysters, by becoming one. The bottom line — to this day the general public still believes the false story that the Nazis secretly set fire to the Reichstag as a false-flag attack to blame on the Communists, many of whom were Jewish Marxists. In fact, it was the Communist Jewish sociopaths who twisted the tale of the fire so completely around that they got away with falsely placing the blame on their mortal enemies the Nazis! And they've made it stick in the public mind for nearly 86 years, even though the true information has been available for 59 of those 86 years! When it comes to fooling the public, no one does it better than the Jewish sociopaths. The Reichstag Fire: A Nazi 'False Flag' Operation? (duration 49:40) January 21, 2020: Wouldn't you know the Jews would erase the video from the Internet! They don't want anyone to know the truth... |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Feb 18, 2019 2:34 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
And what crimes were those, pray tell? Did he goad Japan into a "sneak attack" on the USA? No, Franklin D. Roosevelt did that. Did he reject over twenty peace proposals that could have ended WW2? No, Churchill did that. Did he order the execution of over 20,000 Polish military and police officers, each killed with a bullet to the back of the head? No, Stalin did that. Did he order his own soldiers be machine-gunned if they chose to retreat from battle? No, Stalin did that. Did he fire-bomb civilian cities, indiscriminately killing hundreds of thousands of women, children, and the elderly? No, Churchill and Roosevelt did that. Did he drop atomic bombs on defenseless cities? No, Truman did that. When it comes to history, we police ourselves. In other words, we reinforce our own brainwashing. Hitler did not commit any crimes, yet we are still today brow-beaten to believe Hitler gassed 6 million Jews, when he didn't gas any. At the same time, we are constantly being told what great heroes Roosevelt and Churchill were. It's a massive deception, and we always fall for it. Now that's a pretty good trick. Whoever is doing this is no amateur. Got sociopaths? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:02 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
Adolf Hitler was the same way, the most dangerous man in Europe because he wouldn't sell out. He actually stood for hope and change and gained global recognition and prominence for his fight to save man from oligarchical oppression. Good men are always painted by the sociopaths, who control the press, as bad men. Don't believe them. They are liars. They are deceivers. They are con-artists. They are evil. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Feb 20, 2019 6:24 pm ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Looking at the transcripts taken by the Jewish-controlled Allied stooges at the Nuremberg Tribunal proceedings, it is obvious that the goal was to make the false accusations against the German Nazis "stick" by hook or by crook. Goering was their big prize, and they were determined to rail-road him straight to the gallows. The prosecution was focused on asking leading questions to uncover any "crime" that it could latch onto. The Nuremberg Tribunal was not a court of justice, but an outright witch hunt disguised as a court of justice. It was, in essence, criminal. Once again, it reveals who the real criminals of WW2 were — the Allies. More specifically, it was primarily the Jews, and more specifically yet, it was the sociopaths. Read this transcript of the dialogue between the prosecutor and Goering. Goering tells the truth, recounting his legitimate role in the German government, specifically around the Reichstag fire on February 27, 1933. The prosecutor is fishing for supporting evidence of alleged crimes, of which there is none. The implied accusation is that Goering was behind the burning of the Reichstag, which allegedly was a deliberate false-flag attack to help Hitler consolidate power.
Of course, that was not even mentioned at Nuremberg. But is it true? Did Goering risk his life trying to save documents and artwork from the burning building? I can't find any information on this. If it is true, the Jewish-controlled media would certainly omit it from circulation, as appears to be the case.
A "certain foreign press"? As in a Jewish/Marxist/Communist foreign press?
Yes, we are buried in propaganda here, alleging that Hitler and the Nazis were behind the Reichstag fire. Who benefits from this propaganda? Cui bono? Damage from the Reichstag fire |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:41 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
In 1919 and 1920, Hitler spoke against the orchestrated division of north and south Germany being fomented by the Marxist/Communist Jews. "Divide and conquer" was the strategy of these sociopaths. Hitler's strategy was "united and liberate".
Hitler was a great man, probably the greatest man of the 20th century. But he has been vilified and slandered by his enemies to the point where the public is convinced Hitler is the world's most evil man. This is proof of the Jewish sociopaths being masters of deception. They convince the whole world to believe the exact opposite of the truth. Impressive. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Feb 21, 2019 7:29 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
How many of you have read the Nazi party platform, created by Hitler in February 1920? I just read it myself for the first time. It would appear that someone doesn't want us to know what the Nazi party was really all about. Now who could that be, and why? Because my source for this is a public blog that can be "disappeared" by powerful interest groups, I will print the whole thing in anticipation of the likely censorship.
I wish my country, the United States of America, had such noble principles and direction. But alas, it does not. The American (Jewish) political parties are corrupt and criminal, the polar opposite of the nation Hitler was able to forge from the chaos and destitution of Jewish parasitism. What an amazing man. The more I learn, the more I am impressed. Adolf Hitler, early 1930s |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:27 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
Though the below video (from Reader's Digest and the BBC) is a propaganda piece for the gullible public, clues of the deception and manipulation are visible, if you know what to question. The fact that there were no atrocities from German troops in Africa under Rommel was not the exception for the German military, it was the norm. The Germans were a noble people who respected themselves as much as they respected their opponents. This is an important clue that alleged German atrocities in eastern Europe were largely Allied propaganda, just as Allied atrocities against German civilians were largely covered up and trivialized by the Allied press. The bogus stories of the Holocaust are not believable when you understand the character of the German nation. Germans did not gas people. Hitler repeatedly forbade the use of chemical and biological weapons against enemy soldiers, while Churchill and Roosevelt actively conspired to use them on German civilians. How then can we believe the unrelenting propaganda of the Allies while dismissing the truth-telling of the Germans as typical Nazi propaganda? Aren't we being deceived and manipulated? Darn right! What Really Happened to Rommel (Secrets That Won WWII) - [1998 | VHS | 60FPS] (duration 52:54) |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Feb 24, 2019 7:31 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
The Capitalist world was Jewish controlled. The Communist world was Jewish controlled. The Bankers were Jewish controlled. Hitler was not Jewish controlled. In fact, he opposed Jewish control. He took action against Jewish control. And that is precisely why Jewish control was determined to crush both Hitler in particular and the Germans in general. Hitler and the Germans had good reason to oppose Jewish control. It was not racial or religious discrimination. It was self-preservation in the face of parasitic infestation.
Quite right. This is what has happened in the United States. The Jews (or sociopaths) have bought the media, the government, and everything else. The Jews, less than 3% of the American population, control the media, the government, the central banks, the financial system, the educational system, the judicial system, and the energy sector. Our inflation, which is officially understated, is caused by carefully managed speculation. This creates steady and tolerable inflation while avoiding rapid and shocking hyperinflation. This allows the parasites to feed on the host for a long time, instead of causing the host to weaken too fast and die, depriving the parasites of their own survival. |
Page 40 of 65 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |