Reply to topic  [ 514 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 ... 52  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9814
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
I love the way Vincent Reynouard uses original source materials to make his case, especially the testimony of German officers from the Nuremberg Trials. The German officers are caught telling the truth, and the prosecutors are caught leading the witnesses toward the unjust result they desire. It is so contrived and biased, the exact opposite of what a legal trial should be!

The video here by Vincent Reynouard is another masterpiece in truth-seeking. All of the Nuremberg testimony is in English and can be clearly read on-screen. While Vincent's narrative is in French, the English testimony speaks for itself. A jury of ordinary "peers" would never have convicted the German officers of any crime, which is why Nuremberg was a "military tribunal" and not a legal court of justice. Indeed, it was a military tribunal that created its own set of unfair rules right from the start that would assure it of the outcome desired before the "evidence" was even examined.




Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:40 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9814
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”

Faurisson wrote that 38 years ago. It is just as true today as when he wrote it. The entire world is still suffering from the incredible Jewish deception known as the Holocaust™.

We have indeed been swindled, just as Hitler, the Nazis, and the German nation have been swindled.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Dec 30, 2018 1:34 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9814
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Image
Reichstag fire, Berlin, February 27, 1933



The Reichstag fire is widely believed to have been a false-flag operation by the Nazis to catapult Hitler into power. This is the "history" that I also believed, having read it from numerous sources. Unfortunately, this version of history is just parroted propaganda that is totally inaccurate. And guess who was the source of this now widely believed propaganda?

Communist Jews.

Quote:
That led to the generally accepted theory that the National Socialists themselves torched the building. This version has been generally accepted. It appears in most textbooks and many reputable historians repeat it. According to A.J.P. Taylor in History Today, "I myself accepted it unquestioningly, without looking at the evidence."

But someone did look at the evidence: A retired civil servant-and anti-Nazi named Fritz Tobias. He began his project, it is reported, with the idea of settling once and for all the fact that the Nazis had been responsible for the fire. But that's not what he discovered. The results of his investigation were serialized in the German weekly Der Spiegel in 1950.

Here's the story as detailed by Tobias. -- source

Besides author Fritz Tobias, we also have the account of Sefton Delmer, who no doubt learned his later trade in shameless propaganda from the events he witnessed that grew up around the Reichstag fire.

Quote:
Sefton Delmer: The Reichstag Fire

I saw the Reichstag fire not only from the outside, but the inside – in all senses of the word. And as a result I formed a view of its origin very different from the legend accepted by historians.

The news that the Reichstag was burning came to me from one of the many petrol station attendants to whom I had given my card with a request to ring me if anything noteworthy happened nearby. There were no taxis to be seen, and I had already put my car in the garage a quarter of a mile away. So I ran, ran and ran the whole mile and a half from my office to the Reichstag.


I got there at a quarter to ten – just forty minutes after the first alarm had been given. Already there were quite a few people standing around, watching the flames funnelling up through the great glass dome in a pillar of fire and smoke. Every minutes fresh trains of fire engines were arriving, their bells clanging as they raced through the streets.

[...]

Author in chief – of the 'Hitler, Göring and Goebbels did it' fiction – was Willy Münzenberg, the propaganda genius of the German Communist Party. He had managed to escape the German police roundup on February 28th and to flee to Paris. Willy, a dynamic little fellow full of charm and imagination, whom I was later to meet frequently in Paris, soon set up a workshop in the student quarter on the left bank. Then, with the help of a small team of collaborators he proceeded to fake up a number of stories all going to show that the Reichstag fire was a Nazi conspiracy. Every little bit of fact that came the way of the team was seized, twisted and embellished to make up the 'dossier' which was promptly published in two 'Brown Books'.

The recipe by which they worked was simple enough. For instance when Walter Gempp, the Berlin Fire chief who had personally directed the operations in the burning Reichstag, was dismissed because he had accepted extensive bribes from a fire extinguisher concern, Willy Münzenberg and his merry men immediately turned him into a brave anti-Nazi martyr. Gempp, they said, had been got rid of because he knew too much about the fire's Nazi origin, and because he had complained publicly that he had been hindered by the Nazis in his fire fighting. He had complained, they alleged, that when his firemen got into the Reichstag they found at least twenty Stormtroopers already there. A brilliant invention. I can vouch myself, that when I went round the burning building, we met only police officers, no Stormtroopers. But it was universally accepted as the truth.

On May 8th, 1933, Ernst Oberfohren, the deputy chief of the nationalist Party and a bitter opponent of his leader Hugenberg's alliance with Hitler, committed suicide out of chagrin over the way things were going in Germany. Münzenberg at once faked up a secret document which, he alleged, Oberfohren had left behind telling the inside history of the fire. It too proved wonderfully effective. My colleague of the Manchester Guardian fell for the fake and sent a long dispatch, citing it as proof of the Nazis' guilt.

My editor immediately wanted to know why I had not done the same. So I pointed out that apart from other improbabilities contained in the alleged Oberfohren document, I was particularly doubtful concerning the validity of one of the ten points it put forward as proof of the Nazi guilt. This 'point' was not in the Manchester Guardian version. But it was contained in the copy of the document I had seen.

"I think you will agree that it rather undermines the credibility of Herr Oberfohren's alleged revelations – if indeed he was their author. Listen to this!" And then I read him the passage.

"Hitler's constant companion and friend, the English journalist Delmer," it said, "telegraphed full details of the fire to his newspaper before it was discovered, and the name of [the young Dutch Communist Marinus] van der Lubbe as being the culprit."

The Editor agreed that perhaps we had not been scooped after all.

Münzenberg and his team freely seasoned their inventions with Nazi names to give them the stamp of authenticity. Heines, the Stormtroop leader, they said had led a posse of his men into the Reichstag, through the subterranean passage connecting it with Göring's palace. There they had then poured petrol over the benches in the assembly hall. The story was believed all the world over. The fact that Heines was four hundred miles away at Gleiwitz in Silesia, when this was supposed to be happening, did not detract from it at all.

The Münzenberg team declared that the protocol drawn up by Commissary Heisig and Commissary Zirpins during their interrogation of van der Lubbe and signed by him had been destroyed because in it van der Lubbe said that he had not laid the fire in the debating chamber. 'Someone else' he was alleged to have said, 'must have done that.' He had only set fires in the restaurant and the corridors. In fact the protocol was never destroyed. It still exists today and extracts from it were recently published. In it – as I have already stated – van der Lubbe states that he was responsible for all the fires in the building and had no helpers. And he continued to protest his sole responsibility for the fire at the trial – right up to the last.

When the Nazis tried to contradict the 'Brown Book's' accusations they were too late. The world, shocked by their appalling crimes against the Jews and horrified by the lawlessness of the Stormtroops, was only too ready to believe that the fire was their work.

The legend first sponsored by Münzenberg grew and grew. After the collapse of Hitler, it became standard practice for former Nazi highups to alibi themselves with some new piece of 'evidence' proving that the Nazis fired the Reichstag. But in almost all instances they merely elaborated some point in Willy Münzenberg's ingenious myth.

Even today, when the 'Hitler, Göring and Goebbels did it' legend has been thoroughly exploded as a result of the meticulous and painstaking historical investigation done by the German writer Fritz Tobias,** I fear it will still live on among the historical lumber filling the minds of most people.

But not, I hope, the minds of those who read this book. -- Sefton Delmer, Trail Sinister pp. 185-200, Martin Secker & Warburg, London 1961.


** Der Reichstagsbrand, 1933. Fritz Tobias. Der Spiegel. Hamburg, 1959.

(Sefton Delmer's Account of the Burning of the Reichstag)

-- source

Sefton Delmer became the most prolific purveyor of lies (via propaganda) for the British during WW2 ( 1 2 3 ). But at the time of the Reichstag fire (February 27, 1933), he was seven years out from becoming the head of British anti-Nazi war propaganda in 1940. In 1933, Sefton Delmer was simply observing the masters of that craft, the conniving Jews, as they spun their imaginative tales to deceive and manipulate the public with incredible success. Later, during the war, Sefton Delmer would demonstrate how well he had learned from the Jewish shysters, by becoming one.

The bottom line — to this day the general public still believes the false story that the Nazis secretly set fire to the Reichstag as a false-flag attack to blame on the Communists, many of whom were Jewish Marxists. In fact, it was the Communist Jewish sociopaths who twisted the tale of the fire so completely around that they got away with falsely placing the blame on their mortal enemies the Nazis! And they've made it stick in the public mind for nearly 86 years, even though the true information has been available for 59 of those 86 years!

When it comes to fooling the public, no one does it better than the Jewish sociopaths.





The Reichstag Fire: A Nazi 'False Flag' Operation?
(duration 49:40)

January 21, 2020: Wouldn't you know the Jews would erase the video from the Internet!
They don't want anyone to know the truth...

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Feb 08, 2019 8:56 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9814
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
As Michio Kaku and Daniel Axelrod documented in their excellent book To Win a Nuclear War, and as Daniel Ellsberg more recently documented covering a later period in his book The Doomsday Machine, the US has repeatedly come close to launching, and has even more often threatened to launch a nuclear war. It has also at staggering cost for years sought to develop advanced offensive and defensive weapons that would enable it to launch such a war while suffering “only acceptable losses” of Americans (at one point that number was considered to be 20 million men, women and children). Only the inability to assure that retaliatory losses would not be greater has prevented those criminal attacks, which, with combined deaths well in excess of 100 million, would have made Hitler’s crimes look minor in comparison. -- source

And what crimes were those, pray tell?

Did he goad Japan into a "sneak attack" on the USA? No, Franklin D. Roosevelt did that. Did he reject over twenty peace proposals that could have ended WW2? No, Churchill did that. Did he order the execution of over 20,000 Polish military and police officers, each killed with a bullet to the back of the head? No, Stalin did that. Did he order his own soldiers be machine-gunned if they chose to retreat from battle? No, Stalin did that. Did he fire-bomb civilian cities, indiscriminately killing hundreds of thousands of women, children, and the elderly? No, Churchill and Roosevelt did that. Did he drop atomic bombs on defenseless cities? No, Truman did that.

When it comes to history, we police ourselves. In other words, we reinforce our own brainwashing. Hitler did not commit any crimes, yet we are still today brow-beaten to believe Hitler gassed 6 million Jews, when he didn't gas any. At the same time, we are constantly being told what great heroes Roosevelt and Churchill were. It's a massive deception, and we always fall for it.

Now that's a pretty good trick. Whoever is doing this is no amateur.

Got sociopaths?



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Feb 18, 2019 2:34 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9814
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Evil people and their lackeys absolutely despised Lyn (Lyndon Larouche) because he actually stood for hope and change and gained global recognition and prominence for his fight to save man from oligarchical oppression in all it's forms. He was at one time coined the most dangerous man in America because he wouldn't sell out. -- source

Adolf Hitler was the same way, the most dangerous man in Europe because he wouldn't sell out. He actually stood for hope and change and gained global recognition and prominence for his fight to save man from oligarchical oppression.

Good men are always painted by the sociopaths, who control the press, as bad men. Don't believe them. They are liars. They are deceivers. They are con-artists. They are evil.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Feb 18, 2019 7:02 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9814
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Looking at the transcripts taken by the Jewish-controlled Allied stooges at the Nuremberg Tribunal proceedings, it is obvious that the goal was to make the false accusations against the German Nazis "stick" by hook or by crook. Goering was their big prize, and they were determined to rail-road him straight to the gallows. The prosecution was focused on asking leading questions to uncover any "crime" that it could latch onto. The Nuremberg Tribunal was not a court of justice, but an outright witch hunt disguised as a court of justice. It was, in essence, criminal. Once again, it reveals who the real criminals of WW2 were — the Allies. More specifically, it was primarily the Jews, and more specifically yet, it was the sociopaths.

Read this transcript of the dialogue between the prosecutor and Goering. Goering tells the truth, recounting his legitimate role in the German government, specifically around the Reichstag fire on February 27, 1933. The prosecutor is fishing for supporting evidence of alleged crimes, of which there is none. The implied accusation is that Goering was behind the burning of the Reichstag, which allegedly was a deliberate false-flag attack to help Hitler consolidate power.

If I remember correctly I believe Goring ran into the still burning Reichstag trying to save documents and artwork and almost died from smoke inhalation and had to be drug out by SS soldiers. A rather strange thing for a man to do If he was In fact responsible for the fire.

Of course, that was not even mentioned at Nuremberg. But is it true? Did Goering risk his life trying to save documents and artwork from the burning building? I can't find any information on this. If it is true, the Jewish-controlled media would certainly omit it from circulation, as appears to be the case.

Quote:
"That accusation that I had set fire to the Reichstag came from a certain foreign press. That could not bother me because it was not consistent with the facts. I had no reason or motive for setting fire to the Reichstag." -- Hermann Göring (source)

A "certain foreign press"? As in a Jewish/Marxist/Communist foreign press?

Quote:
Then came the Reichstag fire. Hitler immediately blamed the communists. Hindenburg proclaimed a state of emergency and issued decrees suspending freedom of speech and assembly. Thanks to the "Red scare," the National Socialists and their allies, the German Nationalists, won a bare majority in the general election of March 5.

Shortly thereafter, first the Communist Party, and then all other parties except the National Socialist, were made illegal. The burning of the Reichstag was the spark that set the country ablaze. If, then, the fire was what catapulted Hitler to power, is it not reasonable to assume that the National Socialists had a hand in it? That was the consensus of propaganda in the United States, France and Great Britain.

Yes, we are buried in propaganda here, alleging that Hitler and the Nazis were behind the Reichstag fire. Who benefits from this propaganda? Cui bono?



Image
Damage from the Reichstag fire

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Feb 20, 2019 6:24 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9814
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
In 1919 and 1920, Hitler spoke against the orchestrated division of north and south Germany being fomented by the Marxist/Communist Jews. "Divide and conquer" was the strategy of these sociopaths. Hitler's strategy was "united and liberate".

I believe that never in my life did I undertake a more unpopular task than I did when I took my stand against the anti-Prussian incitement. During the Soviet regime in Munich great public meetings were held at which hatred against the rest of Germany, but particularly against Prussia, was roused up to such a pitch that a North German would have risked his life in attending one of those meetings. These meetings often ended in wild shouts: "Away from Prussia", "Down with the Prussians", "War against Prussia", and so on. This feeling was openly expressed in the Reichstag by a particularly brilliant defender of Bavarian sovereign rights when he said: "Rather die as a Bavarian than rot as a Prussian".

One should have attended some of the meetings held at that time in order to understand what it meant for one when, for the first time and surrounded by only a handful of friends, I raised my voice against this folly at a meeting held in the Munich Löwenbräu Keller. Some of my War comrades stood by me then. And it is easy to imagine how we felt when that raging crowd, which had lost all control of its reason, roared at us and threatened to kill us. During the time that we were fighting for the country the same crowd were for the most part safely ensconced in the rear positions or were peacefully circulating at home as deserters and shirkers. It is true that that scene turned out to be of advantage to me. My small band of comrades felt for the first time absolutely united with me and readily swore to stick by me through life and death.

Hitler was a great man, probably the greatest man of the 20th century. But he has been vilified and slandered by his enemies to the point where the public is convinced Hitler is the world's most evil man.

This is proof of the Jewish sociopaths being masters of deception. They convince the whole world to believe the exact opposite of the truth.

Impressive.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:41 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9814
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
How many of you have read the Nazi party platform, created by Hitler in February 1920?

I just read it myself for the first time. It would appear that someone doesn't want us to know what the Nazi party was really all about.

Now who could that be, and why?

Because my source for this is a public blog that can be "disappeared" by powerful interest groups, I will print the whole thing in anticipation of the likely censorship.

Quote:
Something they do not even teach you;

Party Program of NAtional SoZIalist German Workers' Party

The Party Program of the NSDAP was proclaimed on the 24 February 1920 by Adolf Hitler at the first large Party gathering in Munich and since that day has remained unaltered and was the Party’s official program throughout the Nazi regime. The national socialist philosophy is summarized in following 25 points:

1. We demand the unification of all Germans in the Greater Germany on the basis of the right of self-determination of peoples.

2. We demand equality of rights for the German people in respect to the other nations; abrogation of the peace treaties of Versailles and St. Germain.

3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the sustenance of our people, and colonization for our surplus population. (Since during that period some countries had colonies for their excess population like England and France had settled their people in Australia, New Zealand, Sought Africa, Canada and USA. You speak English because you have been colonized by England)

4. Only a member of the race can be a citizen. A member of the race can only be one who is of German blood, without consideration of creed.(Consequently no Jew [Zionist] may be citizen of nation, This was done as aims of Zionists are different from the aims of Society and Nation where they live)

5. Whoever has no citizenship is to be live in Germany only as a guest, and must be under the authority of legislation for foreigners. ( the same rules as those for Mexicans in USA)

6. The right to determine matters concerning administration and law belongs only to the citizen. Therefore we demand that every public office, of any sort whatsoever, whether in the Reich, the county or municipality, be filled only by citizens.

We oppose the corrupting parliamentary custom of filling posts merely in accordance with party considerations, and without reference to character or abilities.

7. We demand that the State shall make it its primary duty to provide a livelihood for its citizens. If it should prove impossible to feed the entire population, foreign nationals (non-citizens) must be deported from the Reich. (same rules as for Mexicans)

8. All non-German immigration must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who entered Germany after 2 August 1914 shall be required to leave the Reich . (same rule as for illegal immigrants in US)

9. All citizens must have equal rights and Duties.

10. It must be the first duty of every citizen to perform physical or mental work. The activities of the individual must not clash with the general interest, but must proceed within the framework of the community and be for the general good of the whole for the benefit of all.

Consequently we demand:

11. The abolition of incomes unearned by work. (primarily aimed at ending usury)

12. In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore we demand the total confiscation of all war profits. (mainly aimed at Bankers and those who earn from war Industries)

13. We demand the nationalization of all (previous) associated industries (trusts). (Industries must work and produce to fulfill needs of nation and society not solely for their own profits)

14. We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries. (To prevent rich becoming richer at cost of Nation and Society)

15. We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.

16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a healthy middle class, the immediate communalizing of big department stores, and their lease at a cheap rate to small traders, and that the utmost consideration shall be shown to all small traders in the placing of State and municipal orders.

17. We demand a land reform suitable to our national requirements, the passing of a law for the expropriation of land for communal purposes without compensation; the abolition of ground rent, and the prohibition of all speculation in land. *

18. We demand the ruthless prosecution of those whose activities are injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, profiteers, and so forth etc., to be punished with death, without consideration of creed or race.

19. We demand that Roman Law, which serves a materialistic world order, be replaced by a German common law.

20. The State must consider a thorough reconstruction of our national system of education (with the aim of opening up to every able and hard-working German the possibility of higher education and of thus obtaining advancement). The curricula of all educational establishments must be brought into line with the requirements of practical life. The aim of the school must be to give the pupil, beginning with the first sign of intelligence, a grasp of the nation of the State (through the study of civic affairs). We demand the education of gifted children of poor parents, whatever their class or occupation, at the expense of the State.

21. The State must ensure that the nation's health standards are raised by protecting mothers and infants, by prohibiting child labor, by promoting physical strength through legislation providing for compulsory gymnastics and sports, and by the extensive support of clubs engaged in the physical training of youth.

22. We demand abolition of the mercenary troops and formation of a national army.

23. We demand legal opposition to known lies and their promulgation through the press. In order to enable the provision of a German press, we demand, that: Non-Germans are forbidden by law any financial interest in German publications, or any influence on them, and as punishment for violations the closing of such a publication as well as the immediate expulsion from the Reich of the non-German concerned. Publications which are counter to the general good are to be forbidden. We demand legal prosecution of artistic and literary forms which exert a destructive influence on our national life, and the closure of organizations opposing the above made demands.

24. We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the Germanic race.

The Party, as such, stands for positive Christianity, but does not commit itself to any particular denomination. It combats the materialistic spirit within and without us, and is convinced that our nation can achieve permanent health only from within on the basis of the principle: The common interest before self-interest.

25. For the execution of all of this we demand the formation of a strong central power in the Reich. Unconditional authority of the central parliament over the whole Reich and its organizations in general. The forming of state and profession chambers for the execution of the laws made by the Reich within the various states of the confederation.

The leaders of the Party promise to work ruthlessly -- if need be to sacrifice their very lives -- to execute the points set forth into action and achievements without consideration.

Adolf Hitler proclaimed the following explanation for this program on the 13 April 1928:

* Explanation:

Regarding the false interpretations of Point 17 of the program of the NSDAP on the part of our opponents, the following definition is necessary:
"Since the NSDAP stands on the platform of private ownership it happens that the passage" gratuitous expropriation concerns only the creation of legal opportunities to expropriate if necessary, land which has been illegally acquired or is not administered from the view-point of the national welfare. This is directed primarily against the land-speculation companies.

I wish my country, the United States of America, had such noble principles and direction. But alas, it does not. The American (Jewish) political parties are corrupt and criminal, the polar opposite of the nation Hitler was able to forge from the chaos and destitution of Jewish parasitism.

What an amazing man. The more I learn, the more I am impressed.



Image
Adolf Hitler, early 1930s

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Feb 21, 2019 7:29 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9814
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Both sides respected each other and their prisoners. There were none of the atrocities which made the war in Eastern Europe especially terrible. -- video below @ 19:50

Though the below video (from Reader's Digest and the BBC) is a propaganda piece for the gullible public, clues of the deception and manipulation are visible, if you know what to question.

The fact that there were no atrocities from German troops in Africa under Rommel was not the exception for the German military, it was the norm. The Germans were a noble people who respected themselves as much as they respected their opponents. This is an important clue that alleged German atrocities in eastern Europe were largely Allied propaganda, just as Allied atrocities against German civilians were largely covered up and trivialized by the Allied press. The bogus stories of the Holocaust are not believable when you understand the character of the German nation. Germans did not gas people. Hitler repeatedly forbade the use of chemical and biological weapons against enemy soldiers, while Churchill and Roosevelt actively conspired to use them on German civilians. How then can we believe the unrelenting propaganda of the Allies while dismissing the truth-telling of the Germans as typical Nazi propaganda? Aren't we being deceived and manipulated?

Darn right!




What Really Happened to Rommel (Secrets That Won WWII) - [1998 | VHS | 60FPS]
(duration 52:54)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:27 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9814
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry commented:

“Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.” -- source

The Capitalist world was Jewish controlled. The Communist world was Jewish controlled. The Bankers were Jewish controlled.

Hitler was not Jewish controlled. In fact, he opposed Jewish control. He took action against Jewish control. And that is precisely why Jewish control was determined to crush both Hitler in particular and the Germans in general.

Hitler and the Germans had good reason to oppose Jewish control. It was not racial or religious discrimination. It was self-preservation in the face of parasitic infestation.

Quote:
What causes hyper-inflation is uncontrolled speculation. When speculation is coupled with debt (owed to private banking cartels) the result is disaster. On the other hand, when a government issues currency in carefully measured ways, it causes supply and demand to increase together, leaving prices unaffected. Hence there is no inflation, no debt, no unemployment, and no need for income taxes.

Naturally this terrifies the bankers, since it eliminates their powers. It also terrifies Jews, since their control of banking allows them to buy the media, the government, and everything else. -- source

Quite right. This is what has happened in the United States. The Jews (or sociopaths) have bought the media, the government, and everything else. The Jews, less than 3% of the American population, control the media, the government, the central banks, the financial system, the educational system, the judicial system, and the energy sector. Our inflation, which is officially understated, is caused by carefully managed speculation. This creates steady and tolerable inflation while avoiding rapid and shocking hyperinflation. This allows the parasites to feed on the host for a long time, instead of causing the host to weaken too fast and die, depriving the parasites of their own survival.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Feb 24, 2019 7:31 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 514 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 ... 52  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.