united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Hitler -- What is the truth? https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=1194 |
Page 36 of 66 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Oct 07, 2018 2:28 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
That's right, Hitler's economic recovery for Germany was not based on creating weapons for a world conquest that Hitler is alleged to have envisioned.
Now there's a novel concept! No money is issued except for work done or goods produced! How alien to the debt-based capitalist system run by privately owned and for-profit central banks! No wonder they call the German national-socialist system "evil"... |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Oct 07, 2018 3:22 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
Under Hitler, Germany's living conditions for everyone were vastly improved. All of Germany knew it, too. That's why Hitler had nearly unanimous support in Germany. It wasn't because he was holding a gun to everyone's head and forcing them to follow his orders, as the Jews would have you believe. Speaking of what the Jews would have us believe, check out this description from a Jewish website called the Jewish Virtual Library:
How is it that a "crude, half-baked hotchpotch of primitive Social Darwinism, racial myth, anti-Semitism and lebensraum fantasy" can sell over 5 million copies and be translated into eleven languages before WW2 had even started? Could it be that Jews are falsely denigrating Hitler's work? Note Mein Kampf has been recently released in the Netherlands and is now a surprise best seller. This follows on the heels of Mein Kampf becoming a best seller in Germany last year. But Jewish sources say it is trash. I wonder whose judgment to trust here... |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Oct 10, 2018 7:51 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
Of course, we are taught just the opposite in our educational system and by our media outlets. There is a concerted and determined effort to maintain the propaganda from a war fought 75 years ago. The Holocaust Lie requires it. If the Holocaust™ happened, then Hitler had to have been the source. If it didn't happen, then why was it necessary to invent the horror story and paint Hitler as the world's most evil man, which somehow a nation of 70 million German people couldn't see right in front of their noses over a period of 12 years. We know now that it was necessary to invent the Holocaust™ so that the truly evil parties would appear to the the righteous ones, and the truly righteous parties would appear to be the evil ones. In effect, the sociopaths were accusing their opponents of their own malfeasance. The Allies were led by the sociopaths (Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt), while the Germans were led by the non-sociopaths (Hitler and crew). The consequences of this realization are epic. It changes everything you've been brainwashed to believe, because you realize it was indeed brainwashing, and not education, that you have been receiving all your life. And why would the world be this way? Because sociopaths are still running this world. Hitler wasn't feared by Germans. He was loved. Ever wonder why? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Oct 11, 2018 4:57 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
Mike King has put together a little debate between Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill here. I enjoyed reading it with an eye toward identifying which is the sociopath and which is not (if any). I have already been down this road many times, each time with deliberate study and research, so I can confirm that Mike King's arrangement is accurate with respect to each man's attitude. Churchill is the consummate warmonger, while Hitler wants peace but not if bullied. Naturally, no common ground can be found between a blustering tyrant and an independent sovereign.
Hitler doesn't want war among Europeans, while Churchill wants nothing but war with Germany. Churchill is being controlled by Jewish interests, while Hitler acts in the best interests of Germany first and Europe second. Plus we have a sociopath (Churchill) pitted against a non-sociopath (Hitler). Of course, the history books written by the victors paint it exactly the opposite. Is it really so difficult to see why they have done so? -- source Can you tell who is sociopathic and who is not? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Oct 11, 2018 5:44 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
Quite right. Those guilty nations would be Great Britain and the United States of America. The Allied bombing of Dresden and other German cities would also be in that same category of war crimes, yet no one was brought to justice or even charged for that unspeakable crime.
The horror is almost too sharp to bear. Hamburg victims where they died in the street. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri Oct 12, 2018 7:56 am ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Here we are talking about the bombing of Karlsruhe, Germany near the end of 1944. I've never heard about the bombing of this German city, but the absurdity of the story we are told here is obvious to me, but probably isn't obvious to most people. Read the account and see if you can spot the lies.
Karlsruhe had a population of around 180,000 in 1939. On December 4, 1944, we read that 989 bombers attacked the city, dropping probably many thousands of bombs (perhaps 20 bombs or more per plane?), yet we are told only 375 Germans died from the attack, slightly less than one third of a person per bomber sent on the mission. Are you kidding me?! Why bother terror bombing German civilians if this is the best you can do? It would appear that the Allied command is deliberately understating the massacre they inflicted in order to downplay their crimes against humanity. Each bomber with its full payload of bombs can't even kill one person on average? That's BS!
If you do the math, it allegedly took over 11,000 pounds of explosives to kill each German civilian, be it a woman, a child, or an elderly person. And this despite 80% of family homes being destroyed in a city of well over 100,000 people! Sure, that's not "complete" destruction, but it is getting pretty close.
So after all those explosives and incendiaries were dropped on Karlsruhe, the Allies could proudly boast that 1% (1,745 civilians) of the original population (around 180,000 people) had been exterminated at the cost of delivering over 20 million pounds of bombs. Absolutely ludicrous. They lied, and no one has bothered to correct the lies in the intervening 74 years. If they lied about this, what would they possibly tell the truth about? My answer — they didn't tell the truth about anything. "In war, truth is the first casualty." -- Aeschylus, Greek tragic dramatist (525 BC - 456 BC) The Bombing of Karlsruhe in WW2 and scenes from the aftermath (duration 7:10) |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri Oct 12, 2018 7:37 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
The retaliatory bombing reluctantly ordered by Hitler was not really mainstream German policy. Hitler's policy was to avoid targeting civilians and follow the existing conventions of wartime conduct which protected civilians. But when dealing with the sociopathic leaders of Britain (especially Churchill), Hitler had little choice but to eventually respond in a "tit for tat" manner to try to force a return to common sense into the minds of the British leaders. It didn't work, as those minds were too pathological to even understand "tit for tat", since it was not the British leaders who were bombed (Churchill typically fled to his country retreat each time London was attacked by the Germans). The lop-sided magnitude of the respective terror bombing programs of each side confirms that indiscriminate mass murder was not German policy, but was indeed British and American policy. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Oct 14, 2018 5:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? |
This man is sincere, reasonable, honest, direct, and genuine. He speaks the unvarnished truth. There is no pretense, no deception, no manipulation, no ego, no evil. You need only listen to his words to know it. But we aren't usually allowed to listen to his words. Instead we are told exactly what to think of this man, and what we are told is not the truth. Why is it so important that we not know the truth? Hitler in His Own Words - A Collection of Speeches with English Sub-titles (duration 47:51) You can be sure this video will eventually disappear. Already you are required to watch it on YouTube, so they can track how many watch it and how popular it becomes. Already you cannot easily share the video or leave comments about it, as you can with most other videos. It is taboo to learn what Hitler was really like. You are supposed to accept the official story without question, just like for the assassination of John F. Kennedy, or for the events of 9/11. They always do this, because they lie. Only it is worse for Hitler and the Holocaust, because they have passed laws in many countries making it illegal to investigate or question the official version of the story. They are very afraid that we will finally understand that they have been lying to us for a very long time. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:46 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
We are still being lied to after all this time! "Jet parts" do not include 65 tons of mercury! Mercury is not used in any fashion for jet aircraft. However, mercury was reported to be a critical component used by the Germans for their anti-gravity "flying saucers" that the Allied commanders have always kept secret from the public. All German high technology was actively (but quietly) pursued by the U.S. government after the war for their own power lust. Operation Paperclip was one of those programs. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Oct 14, 2018 5:49 pm ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
65 tons of mercury needed for the production of detonators? Being transported to Japan with other very high-tech material? Is that what we are supposed to believe?
So what's so important that the Allies pull out all the stops to intercept and destroy a U-boat transferring 1,800 barrels of mercury to Japan, supposedly to be used for detonators? This story also tells us that British military intelligence had access to all German encrypted communications, and that the Germans didn't know their most sensitive coded messages were being read by the enemy. There's more to this story than we are being told. The charade has been going on for 73 years now, so you know it has the highest priority among the ruling sociopaths. The public must not learn the truth about WW2 history, because if they do, the magnitude of the con-game being played on the world will be exposed, and the ruling sociopaths may lose their repressive control of humanity. U-864: video survey of stern section (duration 0:25)
It was so important to the Allies to stop that submarine that they were willing to use even untried and unproven tactics. For mercury? Hmm.... |
Page 36 of 66 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |