united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Hitler -- What is the truth? https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=1194 |
Page 33 of 65 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Aug 02, 2018 2:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? |
Eva Braun with Adolf Hitler 370. (photo credit: Jerusalem Post Archives) -- source Why do these two seem to be sporting the Jewish hook nose? I would never have guessed that this was a picture of Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun. Not only do the noses look doctored, but neither resembles the famous non-Jewish couple. Compare the noses of the real Eva and the real Hitler to the subjects above. Are we being conned by the Jews again? Adolf Hitler -- source Eva Braun -- source |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Aug 08, 2018 9:58 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
The horrific crime of fire-bombing German and Japanese civilian populations in the crowded cities during WW2 ranks as the greatest crime against humanity of the 20th century. It is telling to observe how this crime was "spun" to the propagandized public of the time. Here is the justification for indiscriminately murdering civilians in Dresden.
So yeah, kill 'em, kill 'em all! We have the perfect justification — enemy troops were raised there! So wipe out everyone. Dresden Bombed To Atoms: World War II (1945) | British Pathé (duration 1:32)
Dresden before the bombing On the night of February 13, 1945, Dresden's cultural reputation couldn't save it from the moral insanity of the sociopaths leading the Allied powers. Dresden was swollen with civilian refugees pushed back by the Russian advance into Germany, pushing its normal population from 600,000 to over a million. German troops were fighting the Russians at the front and were hardly to be found in the city. Primarily only women, children, and the elderly were to be found in the city. Churchill and Roosevelt knew this and knowingly elected to massacre the civilians concentrated in the cities rather than bomb German fighting positions at the front. It was an often repeated act of pure evil, a deliberate agenda to terror bomb the civilian population against all international law and war conventions. The Allies were essentially criminal terrorists. The result was horrific, worse than if an atomic bomb had been dropped on the city. Dresden after the bombing Note that the official history today (written by the victors) understates casualties of the Dresden bombing to 2.5% of the population in the city at that time (about 25,000 killed). The casualty count released by the Germans, who were actually there counting the dead, was closer to 50% of the population in the city at that time (500,000 killed). Look at the above picture of Dresden after the bombing and see if you can determine who is telling the truth. Is it more likely that 97% of the population survived the bombing, or 50%? Hitler was careful to preserve the beauty of Paris in his taking of France. He made sure the city was undamaged. No German bombs ever rained down on Paris. Hitler was a moral man who respected the conventional rules of war and never broke them unless his enemies broke them first, and repeatedly. The same cannot be said for the sociopaths Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Aug 09, 2018 3:29 am ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This gem came up in my research on the justification for the Dresden massacre:
If God can do it, then so can we! So what would God do? Why, he would kill 'em all! How does one rationalize murder? I think it is important to note that sociopaths do exactly this. Note also that the God of the Old Testament displays an obvious sociopathic mindset. If the God that religious leaders invent behaves much like a sociopath, it becomes easier for religious leaders who are sociopaths to justify their own behavior. After all, they are simply behaving like the God of their holy book, the God that they invented in their own image.
And this is the way non-sociopaths must respond when faced with an enemy of sociopathic persuasion — tit for tat. Game theory has taught us that it is the only winning strategy when playing against cheaters, liars, con-artists, and those who will stoop to any measures to win (i.e. sociopaths). Hitler himself stated in a speech that he had no choice but to retaliate against the repeated English bombings of German cities at a time when Nazis were not bombing English civilians. And it is known (from David Irving's research) that Churchill deliberately had German civilians bombed in an attempt to goad Hitler into retaliatory bombing, so that Churchill could strengthen his war-monger policy. So evidently Hitler and Goebbels understood the correct way for non-sociopaths to play the game, while Churchill and Roosevelt understood the correct way for sociopaths to play the game. That pretty much tells you who the sociopaths were. Hitler was frank, while Churchill was deceptive. See the difference?
In other words, it is just when we do it, and unjust when our enemies do it. Got hypocrisy? Sociopaths do, and plenty of it. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Aug 09, 2018 4:53 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
The Führer did not start the war. Sociopaths in England, France, and Poland quietly orchestrated it behind the scenes so that Hitler would be the patsy who would be blamed for the war. It was a set-up, which is precisely the way sociopaths operate.
Yes, it's called cognitive dissonance, which is the discomfort that results from holding many conflicting beliefs at the same time. When you believe such falsehoods as Hitler started the war, Hitler was a madman and psychopath, Hitler ordered 6 million Jews gassed to death, Hitler always lied to his people, Hitler wanted to conquer the world, and a litany of similar BS, you are guaranteed to suffer from cognitive dissonance. It does not mesh with Churchill being the great hero of England, Churchill secretly refusing every peace offer Hitler made, Churchill who ensures Rudolf Hess will never be heard, Churchill who pushes for chemical and biological warfare against German civilians, and Churchill who finally settles for massive terror bombing against German civilians. Under such conflicting belief systems, cognitive dissonance is inevitable, which is why most people, including the author of this paper (Charles S. Maier, Professor of History at Harvard University), become the hapless victims of the malaise, always trying to avoid the inescapable discomfort by choosing to ignore the whole thing. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Aug 09, 2018 8:16 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The amount of BS we accept and believe is literally off the charts!
So it looks like the "brainwashed-about-Hitler-and-the-Nazis" Mr. Perkins contributed to this nonsense!
First it's a Communist plot, then a Nazi plot. That Charled Perkins sure has an active imagination, eh?
And there is what is happening — it's the parroting network in action! So much of what we believe about Hitler and the Nazis comes from war propaganda that is amplified to the level of widely accepted truth by the parroting network. I suspect that 99% or more of what we believe about Hitler and the Nazis originated in this way. How about you? Been parroting lately? We all do it, you know. It can't be helped, but it should be recognized. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Aug 12, 2018 7:43 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
What is the real story behind the flight of Rudolf Hess to England?
There are lots of problems with the above reasoning. Hitler never wanted a war with England, and it was England that declared war on Germany. Who was attacking who was a moot point at that time, as the war was in progress with attacks back and forth from both sides. Hitler did indeed want peace with England, but doing "nothing at all" would not attain that peace, not with the sociopathic Churchill leading the English effort from London. Hitler had already tried doing "nothing at all" right from the start of the war in September of 1939 (with respect to England), but nothing Hitler tried would deter Churchill from total war. Churchill was beholden to the Jewish powers for his position as prime minister, and his orders from those very same Jewish powers demanded total war against Germany. Churchill was fine with that anyway, as he had always been a cold, calculating war-monger, which was quite consistent with his psychology as a sociopath. Still, I am curious to see where Sylvain Laforest goes with his analysis of the Hess flight to England. What conclusion has his research and reasoning led him to? Clearly, the official story is nonsense. What is the truth? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Aug 12, 2018 6:03 pm ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
Back to the bombing of Dresden, an Allied war crime of massive proportions. The horror was unbelievable. Even the Allied bombing crews above the city sensed it.
Of course, they couldn't imagine the reality on the ground the following morning.
Even people in the air raid shelters couldn't survive the Dresden firestorm! So tell me again how only 25 thousand were killed, or about 2.5% of the city population that night! The Germans claimed 500 thousand died, or about 50% of the city population that night. I believe the Germans, not the lying victors. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sat Aug 18, 2018 8:02 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
The firestorm created in Dresden by the Allied bombing has been described by survivors, but few readers have any idea of the horror being described. Here is a video showing a mild version of what Dresden experienced. It shows a tornado of fire that formed in California just from open areas burning. Imagine what is possible in a fuel-rich, densely packed European city that is burning everywhere all at once.
This description is no exaggeration. For 97% of Dresden's population to have survived this holocaust, as our current history propagandists claim, is an utter impossibility. Over ninety percent of the city center was destroyed. -- source |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Aug 21, 2018 4:29 am ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hitler and the German military are always being painted as aggressive "invaders" by the Jewish-controlled media, which includes our history books. It was the "invasion" of Poland that was used by the British as the excuse to be the first nation to declare war on Germany in September of 1939. Hitler was set up for that one by the wily British diplomats manipulating the Polish leaders with false promises of aid in the event of conflict. Conflict was exactly what Britain wanted to provoke so that Germany could be falsely blamed for the war. That plan worked. The British repeated it with Norway and Denmark, cutting off Germany's supply of iron ore, forcing Hitler to "invade" to re-establish trade for this precious commodity used to make steel.
Churchill, the war-mongering schemer, is repeating the strategy that allowed Hitler to be painted as the brutal invader of Poland, the "innocent" country that was just minding its own business. Never mind that Poland was genociding Germans living on formerly German land stolen after WW1, as well as actively preparing its own invasion of Germany!
This is a full-blown sociopath deceiving and manipulating with the practiced ease that other people employ in breathing. Churchill's plan, which is really the plan of his employers (the Jewish cabal), is to assassinate the character of the Germans as "evil invaders" and thereby rally the support of other nations to oppose the German people and their "madman" leader.
Fake news is obviously nothing new. Just look at those misleading headlines and articles! It is masterful propaganda. Imagine you are an ordinary citizen on April 9, 1940, and the mainstream media is your only source of news. Based on the information you are reading, what would be your impression of Hitler and the German military? How would you feel about jolly old England, so gallantly offering to aid the "oppressed" countries, when you didn't even know that Churchill orchestrated the whole thing? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? |
Here is more evidence that Churchill was a lying sociopath intent on deceiving and manipulating the masses in his successful attempt to obtain as much power and control as possible for such a loathsome man. The video at that link has been banned from all social media sites, so the only home it has left is the author's personal website. There's no telling how much longer it will be before his personal website is censored. That is the direction we are all being herded towards, where freedom of speech is verboten. Few people realize the gravity of our current situation concerning the explosion of blatant censorship. They are taking away our freedoms. They wish to gradually enslave us. This is exactly what Hitler fought against, which is why world Jewry conspired to fool other nations into crushing Germany via WW2. It is the same issue (freedom) against the same enemy (Jewish sociopaths). History repeats. You cannot remember what you have never been taught. |
Page 33 of 65 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |