Reply to topic  [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 ... 52  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Image
Eva Braun with Adolf Hitler 370. (photo credit: Jerusalem Post Archives) -- source


Why do these two seem to be sporting the Jewish hook nose?

I would never have guessed that this was a picture of Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun. Not only do the noses look doctored, but neither resembles the famous non-Jewish couple.

Compare the noses of the real Eva and the real Hitler to the subjects above. Are we being conned by the Jews again?



Image
Adolf Hitler -- source



Image
Eva Braun -- source

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Aug 02, 2018 2:32 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
The horrific crime of fire-bombing German and Japanese civilian populations in the crowded cities during WW2 ranks as the greatest crime against humanity of the 20th century. It is telling to observe how this crime was "spun" to the propagandized public of the time. Here is the justification for indiscriminately murdering civilians in Dresden.

Quote:
It (Dresden) was being used to pump German troops into counter-attacks against the Russian army, not many miles to the east. -- @ 0:10 in the video below

So yeah, kill 'em, kill 'em all! We have the perfect justification — enemy troops were raised there! So wipe out everyone.




Dresden Bombed To Atoms: World War II (1945) | British Pathé
(duration 1:32)


Quote:
Dresden was truly one of the world’s great cultural treasures. Known as the “Florence on the Elbe,” the ancient showcase in the heart of Saxony was a virtual time-capsule of Gothic architecture and medieval culture. At every turn on every narrow, cobbled street of the old town was an ornate palace, a museum, an art gallery, or a towering, centuries-old cathedral. Like Paris, Rome and Venice, Dresden was both beautiful, romantic and enduring. For decades, the city had been one of the “must stops” for continental travelers, especially those from Britain and America.

Welcome as it was, the fact that a city the size of Dresden had survived when all else was destroyed, mystified some residents and troubled others. Since only two tiny daylight raids had occurred during five years of war, many assumed Dresden’s salvation was due to its reputation as an “art city”; that as a priceless, irreplaceable gem of Western culture even “terror-bombers” lacked hatred sufficient to efface such beauty. Others surmised that since Dresden had almost no heavy industry—and what little it did have had no bearing on the war—the enemy simply did not deem the city a viable target. When skeptics pointed out that many other beautiful German towns with little or no industry had been systematically obliterated, rumors invented new reasons for Dresden’s miraculous survival. -- source




Image
Dresden before the bombing



On the night of February 13, 1945, Dresden's cultural reputation couldn't save it from the moral insanity of the sociopaths leading the Allied powers. Dresden was swollen with civilian refugees pushed back by the Russian advance into Germany, pushing its normal population from 600,000 to over a million. German troops were fighting the Russians at the front and were hardly to be found in the city. Primarily only women, children, and the elderly were to be found in the city. Churchill and Roosevelt knew this and knowingly elected to massacre the civilians concentrated in the cities rather than bomb German fighting positions at the front. It was an often repeated act of pure evil, a deliberate agenda to terror bomb the civilian population against all international law and war conventions. The Allies were essentially criminal terrorists. The result was horrific, worse than if an atomic bomb had been dropped on the city.



Image
Dresden after the bombing



Note that the official history today (written by the victors) understates casualties of the Dresden bombing to 2.5% of the population in the city at that time (about 25,000 killed). The casualty count released by the Germans, who were actually there counting the dead, was closer to 50% of the population in the city at that time (500,000 killed). Look at the above picture of Dresden after the bombing and see if you can determine who is telling the truth. Is it more likely that 97% of the population survived the bombing, or 50%?

Hitler was careful to preserve the beauty of Paris in his taking of France. He made sure the city was undamaged. No German bombs ever rained down on Paris. Hitler was a moral man who respected the conventional rules of war and never broke them unless his enemies broke them first, and repeatedly. The same cannot be said for the sociopaths Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Aug 08, 2018 9:58 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
This gem came up in my research on the justification for the Dresden massacre:

Quote:
In targeting Sodom and Gomorrah for incendiary attacks, even God was willing to allow innocent victims. -- source

If God can do it, then so can we! So what would God do? Why, he would kill 'em all!

How does one rationalize murder? I think it is important to note that sociopaths do exactly this.

Note also that the God of the Old Testament displays an obvious sociopathic mindset. If the God that religious leaders invent behaves much like a sociopath, it becomes easier for religious leaders who are sociopaths to justify their own behavior. After all, they are simply behaving like the God of their holy book, the God that they invented in their own image.

Quote:
Only Hitler and Goebbels were frank enough to declare that the V-1 and V-2 attacks in the latter stages of the war were indeed designed to wreak terror, hence their V designation for “Vergeltung,” meaning reprisal or retaliation. -- source

And this is the way non-sociopaths must respond when faced with an enemy of sociopathic persuasion — tit for tat. Game theory has taught us that it is the only winning strategy when playing against cheaters, liars, con-artists, and those who will stoop to any measures to win (i.e. sociopaths). Hitler himself stated in a speech that he had no choice but to retaliate against the repeated English bombings of German cities at a time when Nazis were not bombing English civilians. And it is known (from David Irving's research) that Churchill deliberately had German civilians bombed in an attempt to goad Hitler into retaliatory bombing, so that Churchill could strengthen his war-monger policy.

So evidently Hitler and Goebbels understood the correct way for non-sociopaths to play the game, while Churchill and Roosevelt understood the correct way for sociopaths to play the game. That pretty much tells you who the sociopaths were. Hitler was frank, while Churchill was deceptive. See the difference?

Quote:
Allied victory was a worthy end that justified the very means condemned when used in the service of an Axis victory — an unworthy end. -- source

In other words, it is just when we do it, and unjust when our enemies do it. Got hypocrisy? Sociopaths do, and plenty of it.



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Aug 09, 2018 3:29 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
... evil regimes hold their own citizens hostage and are as responsible for the death of “innocents” as are those who seek to defeat them. The Germans started the war, or their Führer did. Well, this sounds good, but it doesn’t diminish the complicity of the bombers. -- source

The Führer did not start the war. Sociopaths in England, France, and Poland quietly orchestrated it behind the scenes so that Hitler would be the patsy who would be blamed for the war. It was a set-up, which is precisely the way sociopaths operate.

Quote:
As good liberals, we might plausibly argue that our statesmen and pilots could have killed fewer babies or non-combatants, and probably that is where most of us are left after reading his book. Yet at the end I am nevertheless forced to confront inconsistencies and beliefs that I would rather avoid. -- source

Yes, it's called cognitive dissonance, which is the discomfort that results from holding many conflicting beliefs at the same time. When you believe such falsehoods as Hitler started the war, Hitler was a madman and psychopath, Hitler ordered 6 million Jews gassed to death, Hitler always lied to his people, Hitler wanted to conquer the world, and a litany of similar BS, you are guaranteed to suffer from cognitive dissonance. It does not mesh with Churchill being the great hero of England, Churchill secretly refusing every peace offer Hitler made, Churchill who ensures Rudolf Hess will never be heard, Churchill who pushes for chemical and biological warfare against German civilians, and Churchill who finally settles for massive terror bombing against German civilians. Under such conflicting belief systems, cognitive dissonance is inevitable, which is why most people, including the author of this paper (Charles S. Maier, Professor of History at Harvard University), become the hapless victims of the malaise, always trying to avoid the inescapable discomfort by choosing to ignore the whole thing.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Aug 09, 2018 4:53 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Fluoridation of public drinking water began in 1939 when the Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA) – the largest producer of aluminum in the world – and DOW – the largest chemical company in the world – decided to open manufacturing plants in Nazi Germany.

Many manufacturers made this move at the start of WWII in order to take advantage of the old Cabalistic expression, “War is business, and business is good!”.

The Nazis began using fluoride in the water to sedate the general population and make them more docile and malleable to the control of Hitler’s Third Reich. -- source

The amount of BS we accept and believe is literally off the charts!

Quote:
Conspiracy theories are always interesting because there is usually a kernel of truth in them. One of the most pervasive theories behind fluoride is about the Nazis and mind control during WWII. Many people have propagated this myth, among them Charles E. Perkins, a chemist from Milwaukee who wrote a pamphlet in 1954 titled “The Truth about Water Fluoridation.” -- source

So it looks like the "brainwashed-about-Hitler-and-the-Nazis" Mr. Perkins contributed to this nonsense!

Quote:
In 1952, American fluoridation opponent Charles Perkins published The Truth about Water Fluoridation, a 44 page treatise on the evils of water fluoridation. In this book he makes the claim, with no supporting evidence, that, “Mass medication, involving fluoridation of public water systems, has long been known as an important technique of the Communist philosophy of mass control,” and that it “was taken to England by the English-born Russian Communist Kreminoff in 1935.” When later asked for clarification and documentation on this claim, Perkins responded with a letter in 1954 that simply added a new layer of complexity. According to Perkins fluoridation was not just a Communist plot, but had actually found its genesis in Nazi Germany,

“When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to communize the world.” -- source

First it's a Communist plot, then a Nazi plot. That Charled Perkins sure has an active imagination, eh?

Quote:
In his 1987 address to the Victorian Legislative council Mr. Dickinson cited claims made by Perkins,

“At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government sent Charles Elliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast [IG] Farben1 chemical plants in Germany. While there, he was told by German chemists of a scheme which had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General Staff…This scheme was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water. In this scheme, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place”

This statement is a good example of how Perkins’ unsupported claims get uncritically parroted by fluoridation opponents. -- source

And there is what is happening — it's the parroting network in action! So much of what we believe about Hitler and the Nazis comes from war propaganda that is amplified to the level of widely accepted truth by the parroting network. I suspect that 99% or more of what we believe about Hitler and the Nazis originated in this way.

How about you? Been parroting lately? We all do it, you know. It can't be helped, but it should be recognized.



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Aug 09, 2018 8:16 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
What is the real story behind the flight of Rudolf Hess to England?

If any of the aforementioned theories held any truth, Hess would have never suffered amnesia since they all bear their good share of political correctness and the British government would have no reason to keep the Hess files secret. Any of these versions could have been released to the public, since they became over time different explanations of the Hess journey in our history books. But the roots of most theories hold no logical ground and don’t even make sense, since it was Germany that was attacking England and not the other way around. Therefore, if Hess was really looking for a truce, he only needed to talk to Hitler. And if Adolf himself wanted peace with England, he just had to do nothing at all.

There are lots of problems with the above reasoning. Hitler never wanted a war with England, and it was England that declared war on Germany. Who was attacking who was a moot point at that time, as the war was in progress with attacks back and forth from both sides. Hitler did indeed want peace with England, but doing "nothing at all" would not attain that peace, not with the sociopathic Churchill leading the English effort from London. Hitler had already tried doing "nothing at all" right from the start of the war in September of 1939 (with respect to England), but nothing Hitler tried would deter Churchill from total war. Churchill was beholden to the Jewish powers for his position as prime minister, and his orders from those very same Jewish powers demanded total war against Germany. Churchill was fine with that anyway, as he had always been a cold, calculating war-monger, which was quite consistent with his psychology as a sociopath.

Still, I am curious to see where Sylvain Laforest goes with his analysis of the Hess flight to England. What conclusion has his research and reasoning led him to? Clearly, the official story is nonsense. What is the truth?

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Aug 12, 2018 7:43 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Back to the bombing of Dresden, an Allied war crime of massive proportions. The horror was unbelievable. Even the Allied bombing crews above the city sensed it.

Quote:
After half an hour or so, the bombers broke off the attack and banked for home. Equipped with a movie camera, a single aircraft remained to record the drama:

There was a sea of fire covering in my estimation some 40 square miles. The heat striking up from the furnace below could be felt in my cockpit. The sky was vivid in hues of scarlet and white, and the light inside the aircraft was that of an eerie autumn sunset. We were so aghast at the awesome blaze that although alone over the city we flew around in a stand-off position for many minutes before turning for home, quite subdued by our imagination of the horror that must be below. We could still see the glare of the holocaust thirty minutes after leaving.

It was on that dark return flight home, when crewmen had a chance to ponder, that some first came to realize that the war had gone “a step too far.”

“[F]or the first time in many operations,” a Jewish pilot confessed, “I felt sorry for the population below.”

“I was sickened,” echoed a comrade simply. -- source

Of course, they couldn't imagine the reality on the ground the following morning.

Quote:
What were at first mistaken to be thousands of burnt, blackened logs scattered about the streets were soon found to be charred corpses, each reduced to roughly three feet. “All the way across the city,” said a horrified rescuer, “we could see [these] victims lying face down, literally glued to the tarmac, which had softened and melted in the enormous heat.”

“The thin and elderly victims took longer to catch fire than the fat or young ones,” observed another witness.

Horribly, many frantic relatives were compelled to examine countless such bodies in hopes of identifying loved ones. “I can still see my mother,” remembered eleven-year-old Erika Simon, “bending down and turning over dead children, or bits of dead children, for she was still desperately searching for my little brother.”

“One shape I will never forget,” a rescue worker recalled, “was the remains of what had apparently been a mother and child. They had shriveled and charred into one piece, and had been stuck rigidly to the asphalt. They had just been prised up. The child must have been underneath the mother, because you could still clearly see its shape, with its mother’s arms clasped around it.” -- source




Image


Even people in the air raid shelters couldn't survive the Dresden firestorm! So tell me again how only 25 thousand were killed, or about 2.5% of the city population that night! The Germans claimed 500 thousand died, or about 50% of the city population that night. I believe the Germans, not the lying victors.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Aug 12, 2018 6:03 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
The firestorm created in Dresden by the Allied bombing has been described by survivors, but few readers have any idea of the horror being described. Here is a video showing a mild version of what Dresden experienced. It shows a tornado of fire that formed in California just from open areas burning. Imagine what is possible in a fuel-rich, densely packed European city that is burning everywhere all at once.

Quote:
Here, in the heart of old Dresden, temperatures reached upwards of 3,000 degrees. Metal roofs, copper cupolas, glass, even sandstone, liquefied in the furious heat and poured down like lava. A hurricane of smoke, flame and dust roared toward the vortex from all directions as the cold air beyond Dresden was drawn in by the fire ball. Many disoriented victims, especially the thousands of refugees, took wrong turns on strange streets and were swept like feathers into the furnace. -- source

This description is no exaggeration. For 97% of Dresden's population to have survived this holocaust, as our current history propagandists claim, is an utter impossibility.



Image
Over ninety percent of the city center was destroyed.
-- source

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Aug 18, 2018 8:02 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Hitler and the German military are always being painted as aggressive "invaders" by the Jewish-controlled media, which includes our history books. It was the "invasion" of Poland that was used by the British as the excuse to be the first nation to declare war on Germany in September of 1939. Hitler was set up for that one by the wily British diplomats manipulating the Polish leaders with false promises of aid in the event of conflict. Conflict was exactly what Britain wanted to provoke so that Germany could be falsely blamed for the war. That plan worked. The British repeated it with Norway and Denmark, cutting off Germany's supply of iron ore, forcing Hitler to "invade" to re-establish trade for this precious commodity used to make steel.

The only way in which the desired train of events can, perhaps, be set in motion is by the practical step of stopping the Narvik ore. This causes little injury to Norway and Sweden and is the minimum violation of their neutrality. It is not comparable to an act of invasion of their soil. Nevertheless, as this paper shows, it may bring about a violent German reaction. If this reaction takes the form of the invasion of southern Norway and southern Sweden, then alone will the offence be given to those countries, which will make them take up arms in self-defence, and this will be the moment when they will look to us for aid and be willing to open to us the passage to the northern orefields.

Churchill, the war-mongering schemer, is repeating the strategy that allowed Hitler to be painted as the brutal invader of Poland, the "innocent" country that was just minding its own business. Never mind that Poland was genociding Germans living on formerly German land stolen after WW1, as well as actively preparing its own invasion of Germany!

Meanwhile, at once make preparation secretly for the winter force to occupy the ironfield. Await German reaction on the south coasts of Norway and Sweden. Should this take the form of invasion and the Swedes and Norwegians be forced on to our side, then offer the fullest support in our power.

This is a full-blown sociopath deceiving and manipulating with the practiced ease that other people employ in breathing. Churchill's plan, which is really the plan of his employers (the Jewish cabal), is to assassinate the character of the Germans as "evil invaders" and thereby rally the support of other nations to oppose the German people and their "madman" leader.

Quote:
As planned, Churchill's Scandinavian scheme draws Germany into invading (to protect its iron ore shipments and preserve the neutrality of the Scandinavian countries). But notice the anti-German spin from the Fake News of the day -- which makes no mention of Churchill's plot. -- source

Fake news is obviously nothing new. Just look at those misleading headlines and articles! It is masterful propaganda.

Imagine you are an ordinary citizen on April 9, 1940, and the mainstream media is your only source of news. Based on the information you are reading, what would be your impression of Hitler and the German military? How would you feel about jolly old England, so gallantly offering to aid the "oppressed" countries, when you didn't even know that Churchill orchestrated the whole thing?




Image

Image

Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Aug 21, 2018 4:29 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Here is more evidence that Churchill was a lying sociopath intent on deceiving and manipulating the masses in his successful attempt to obtain as much power and control as possible for such a loathsome man.

The video at that link has been banned from all social media sites, so the only home it has left is the author's personal website. There's no telling how much longer it will be before his personal website is censored. That is the direction we are all being herded towards, where freedom of speech is verboten. Few people realize the gravity of our current situation concerning the explosion of blatant censorship. They are taking away our freedoms. They wish to gradually enslave us. This is exactly what Hitler fought against, which is why world Jewry conspired to fool other nations into crushing Germany via WW2. It is the same issue (freedom) against the same enemy (Jewish sociopaths).

History repeats.



Image
You cannot remember what you have never been taught.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:32 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 ... 52  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.