Hitler -- What is the truth?
Page 31 of 52

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Wed May 23, 2018 6:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

On one occcasion in 1937, Major Smith was summoned to Goering's coffee table after a large formal dinner in the Air Club. Goering was found to be in a talkative mood and wished to discuss his "führer". With moist eyes and a voice tinged with emotion, he turned to the attaché and said, "Smith, there are only three truly great characters in all history: Buddha, Jesus Christ, and Adolf Hitler." This remark reduced the military attaché to speechlessness. -- Berlin Alert: The Memoirs and Reports of Truman Smith, page 102

Goering was not a man who was easily impressed. He was an aviation hero of WW1 who commanded the famous Flying Circus after Manfred von Richthofen, the Bloody Red Baron, had been killed. Goering rubbed shoulders with all the great men of Germany. He was cultured and socially adept. He knew Hitler quite well, having worked closely with him for over a dozen years by 1937. Goering had already risked his life for the Nazi movement, having been severely wounded during the street march of the Munich Putsch of November 9, 1923. Goering was clearly not impressed by power and was not one to "kiss butt". This was demonstrated again during the Nuremberg Trials, where Goering mocked the tribunal process for its hypocrisy and disingenuous nature, even though his life hung in the balance. So for Goering to make such a statement in private conversation with Truman Smith, with no possible gain to be had, he must have been quite sincere and genuine. Even Truman Smith knew it, being reduced to speechlessness, making no attempt whatsoever to challenge the statement in any manner whatsoever.

Of course, given our brainwashing today, we would dismiss Goering as a lunatic and mock his statement as proof of his insanity. But this was not Smith's reaction then. He responded with reverent silence, having nothing to add to or subtract from Goering's observation. Smith himself had been duly impressed by Hitler when he had interviewed him 15 years earlier, and you can be sure that Smith had this in mind as he reflected silently on Goering's statement. Goering was not a man to spout nonsense. Like Hitler, Goering was straight-forward, honest, and genuine. Smith knew it, and we should all know it. It would help us recognize the ceaseless anti-Nazi propaganda we are still inundated with to this day.

Hitler and Goering

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Wed May 23, 2018 10:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

It was Göring who ordered Security Police chief Reinhard Heydrich to organize and coordinate a "total solution" to the "Jewish question." -- source

The implication is that Goering was responsible for the gassing of six million Jews. Ignoring the fact that Jews were not gassed in the concentration camps, despite all the Jewish hysteria to the contrary, the "Jewish question" from the German perspective was how to expel the Jews from Germany, with the "total solution" meaning expelling all of the Jews so that none could ever sabotage German infrastructure again (as they had with WW1, the Treaty of Versailles, and the devastating hyperinflation of 1922 - 1923).

The International Military Tribunal charged Göring on all four counts (crimes against peace, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and conspiracy to commit crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity). He was convicted and sentenced to death. -- source

Goering correctly pointed out to the crooked Military Tribunal that if he were guilty of these crimes, then so were all the Allied military commanders. Goering had done nothing more than serve his country militarily, just like Eisenhower, Patton, Montgomery, and many other Allied commanders. All had waged war. The Allied commanders had committed the bulk of any war crimes, with their premeditated program of terror bombing civilians in Germany and Japan, which was the huge elephant in the room, i.e. the real war crime. As we now know from the "second Pearl Harbor", Roosevelt and Churchill conspired to attack German civilians with chemical and biological weapons, a blatant war crime in that era, and one the Germans never employed despite their stockpile of advanced bioweapons and their desperate war situation. The Nazis were clearly committed to playing by the accepted rules of war, while the Allies were committed to circumventing the accepted rules of war.

But you will never get this truth from the Jewish-controlled "history" sites like the one providing the above quoted information. Instead, you will get the propaganda that they want you to believe, with the truth completely buried. Germans were no strangers to this phenomenon.

On the Jews and Their Lies is a 65,000-word antisemitic treatise written in 1543 by the German Reformation leader Martin Luther.

In the treatise, he argues that Jewish synagogues and schools be set on fire, their prayer books destroyed, rabbis forbidden to preach, homes burned, and property and money confiscated. They should be shown no mercy or kindness, afforded no legal protection, and "these poisonous envenomed worms" should be drafted into forced labor or expelled for all time. He also seems to advocate their murder, writing "[W]e are at fault in not slaying them".

...Luther describes Jews as a "base, whoring people, that is, no people of God, and their boast of lineage, circumcision, and law must be accounted as filth." Luther wrote that they are "full of the devil's feces ... which they wallow in like swine," and the synagogue is an "incorrigible whore and an evil slut". -- source

Hmm, it would seem Jews were a serious problem to the German people 400 years before WW2! Who knew? The Jews certainly keep quiet about it, while noisily (and falsely) condemning the German people as racists and genocidal murderers.

There's more to the history of the Jews than the Jews are telling us. It would appear that their nature is to lie continuously and without shame, and the information I am uncovering confirms this.


Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sun May 27, 2018 5:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

The Nuremberg Trials after WW2 are one of the most shameful miscarriages of justice of the 20th century.

I mean that most sincerely. Justice was never the goal at Nuremberg.

Julius Streicher was a non-combatant of the war who was hanged at Nuremberg along with high-ranking German military commanders. Streicher's only crime was that he published a popular magazine in Germany that was highly critical of the Jews. The fact that this was Streicher's only "crime" shows us all who was behind the Nuremberg Trials and why the proceedings were legal shams.

Like Rudolf Hoess (Commandant at Auschwitz), Julius Streicher was brutally tortured by the Allies during the "trials". Unlike Hoess, Streicher was tortured not to force him to sign a bogus confession, but to simply punish him for criticizing the Jews in print.

Streicher passed a note to his lawyer, Dr. Hans Marx, describing how Jews and Negroes had tortured him in his cell. A photograph backed up his charges, showing him standing naked with black and blue marks and a sign around his neck proclaiming, “Julius Streicher, King of the Jews.”

The note read:

“Two niggers undressed me and tore my shirt in two. I kept only my pants. Being handcuffed, I could not pull them up when they fell down. So now I was naked. Four days! On the fourth day, I was so cold that my body was numb. I couldn’t hear anything. Every 2 – 4 hours (even in the night!) Niggers came along under command of a White man and hammered at me. Cigarette burns on the nipples. Fingers gouged into eye-sockets. Eyebrows and chest hair pulled out. Genitals beaten with an oxwhip. Testicles very swollen. Spat at. “Mouth open” and was spat into. When I refused to open, my jaws were pried apart with a stick and my mouth spat into. Beaten with a whip – swollen, dark-blue whelps all over the body… Photographed naked! Jeered at wearing an old army greatcoat which they hung round me.”

When Her Marx protested the mistreatment of Streicher to the court, the inquisitors erupted with outrage. They immediately ordered that the motion be struck from the trial record as “highly improper.” Streicher twice brought up his being tortured and rather than ask for an investigation, the judges ordered his statements deleted from the record. They held him in contempt of court for even revealing the matter. -- source

That's right, telling the truth was considered a criminal act at the Nuremberg Trials! Streicher had also told the truth in his popular magazine, Der Sturmer, which the Jewish sociopathic leadership considered a criminal act, one that they would never forgive, for which they tortured him when he was helpless at Nuremberg.


Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Mon May 28, 2018 6:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

Scarcely had Major Vanaman taken over air activities of the office than he began to stress in his reports that Goering's Luftwaffe was not a long-range air force in the American sense, but rather an air arm, primarily designed to support the German ground forces. ... This fact revealed rather clearly one aspect of Hitler's policy: that his immediate foreign political ambitions lay close to Germany. -- Berlin Alert: The Memoirs and Reports of Truman Smith, page 120

In fact, Hitler's political ambitions were focused only on Germany and the German territory that had been stripped from the nation by the Treaty of Versailles. This was entirely proper and reasonable.

Hitler's military build-up was clearly for defensive purposes, not offensive purposes. American military intelligence was correctly and repeatedly advised of this fact by the Berlin Military Attaché office. Hitler absolutely had no ambitions to "conquer the world" as we have been brainwashed to believe. That assertion is nothing but post-war propaganda needed to vilify Hitler by the Jewish cabal.

Need more evidence of Hitler's real character? Here's some:

...Hitler's decision to seize Austria was taken at the spur of the moment. -- Berlin Alert: The Memoirs and Reports of Truman Smith, page 124

Of course, we are taught it was an unwanted, premeditated, hostile invasion. But was it?

There was no opposition in the air or on the ground. In fact, almost everywhere in Austria, except in Vienna, a warm welcome was accorded the invading German army. -- Berlin Alert: The Memoirs and Reports of Truman Smith, page 124

And we are supposed to believe that Hitler was a psychopathic madman bent on invading and occupying foreign lands for purposes of empire and tyranny. BS!

We were similarly fooled by the "invasion" propaganda associated with Czechoslovakia. And the "invasion"propaganda associated with Poland.

Are you starting to see the pattern of brainwashing?

Are these Austrians happy to be "invaded"?

Hitler Takes Austria
(duration 4:13)
Propaganda 101: The narrator demonstrates how to lie with the truth.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Fri Jun 01, 2018 9:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

According to Major Truman Smith, American Military Attaché in Berlin in 1938, the pivotal moment when American and German relations soured was November 9, 1938, commonly known as "Crystal Night".

"Crystal Night" is the name that's been given to the night of 9-10 November 1938. In almost all large German cities and some smaller ones that night, store windows of Jewish shops were broken, Jewish houses and apartments were destroyed, and synagogues were demolished and set on fire. Many Jews were arrested, some were beaten, and some were even killed. The "Reich Crystal Night" (Reichskristallnacht) was one of the most shameful events of National Socialist Germany. -- source

I have already written some about Crystal Night in the following three posts ( 1 2 3 ), but Truman Smith's perspective gives us some interesting new insight.

The anti-Semitic riots of November 9, 1938, constituted a turning point in German-American relations. The fierce American press attacks against Hitler and his Nazis for these government-provoked riots and the ensuing repressive measures against Jews shook the foundation upon which relations had been built between the attaché office and the (German) Air Ministry. -- Berlin Alert: The Memoirs and Reports of Truman Smith , page 149

The bias here is evident to me, because these were not "government-provoked" attacks. This is the critical mistake that was deliberately trumpeted in the Jewish-controlled American press to make the world believe this lie. "Hitler and his Nazis" were not the cause of Crystal Night. So who or what was?

In the wake of the Crystal Night, almost everyone wanted to know who the culprits were. Dr. Goebbels had to give an official explanation which was, in effect, that the German people had been so enraged by the murder of Ernst vom Rath that they wanted to punish the Jews and therefore started the pogrom. But Goebbels did not really believe this story himself. To several persons he expressed his suspicion that a secret organization must have instigated the entire affair. He simply could not believe that anything so well organized could have been a spontaneous popular outburst. -- source

A secret organization? How about a secret Jewish organization running a trademark false-flag attack that they then magnify in the Jewish-controlled press?

Well organized and widespread incidents began on the evening of 9 November. Groups of generally five or six young men, armed with bars and clubs, went down the streets smashing store windows. They were not Jew-hating SA men, enraged over the murder of a German diplomat. They operated too methodically to have been motivated by anger. They carried out their work without any apparent emotion. -- source

Almost a Mossad-style operation. "It's just business," as the sociopaths like to say. And who gets the blame? The "evil" Nazis!

I am convinced that neither the German government nor the leaders of the National Socialist Party instigated the Crystal Night. Ultimately it was not the Jews but the Germans who suffered most as a result of this event. Even persons sympathetic to National Socialism are still appalled when they think of the Crystal Night. Many are under the impression that murder and arson were quite common under National Socialism and that no Jew could be sure of his life or property. Nazi Germany was supposedly a country without any civil rights. The Crystal Night incident was indeed one of the darkest episodes of German history in the era of 1933 to 1945. But based on all of the available evidence, these demonstrations were neither thought up nor organized by German Party or government officials. In fact, they were completely suprised and shocked when they learned of the riot and destruction. The pogrom must have been thought up and organized by those who actually benefited from it and who wanted to create havoc in Germany.

Who could they have been? If we keep in mind the deep involve ment of the Jewish organization LICA in the murder of vom Rath, we may ask: Could the Jews themselves have hoped to benefit from a pogrom? In the aftermath of the Crystal Night, the world press became overwhelmingly sympathetic to the Jews, which is precisely what they wanted above all else. -- source

It looks like the world was fooled again in the classic "problem - reaction - solution" way that sociopaths often use. The Crystal Night Lie was another successful psy-op which would soon be followed in seven years by another masterful manipulation, the Holocaust Lie.


Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Fri Jun 01, 2018 9:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

Editorial Comment: While I don’t know the details of this story, I can report what I heard from many different sources – namely, that Kristallnacht was a false flag operation to brand Hitler as a “Jew Hater” for all the world to see. In other words, it was a calculated smear campaign to show the Germans up as brutes and the Jews as the eternal victims. The last thing Hitler needed in 1938 was this monumental public relations disaster - from which his regime, as a matter of record, never recovered. -- source

Crystal Night a false-flag operation perpetrated by the Jews themselves? Who would have guessed?

Grynspan supposedly acted alone in assassinating Vom Rath. But there are legitimate reasons for doubting it. Grynspan was poor and had no visible means of support. Yet Grynspan, a Polish Jew, was in contact in Paris with an organization, the LICRA, (“The League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism”) before he shot Von Rath. After he shot Vom Rath, it was “The League” which provided his lawyer, Morro Giaferri, free of charge.

Did the LICRA, a known Zionist organization, hire Herschel Grynspan to assassinate Vom Rath? A German lady, Ingrid Weckert, argues this thesis very convincingly in her book, “Flashpoint”. [Feuerzeichen in German] -- source

There's that "lone gunman" technique that sociopaths love to employ in their false-flag operations! You will remember that they also used it successfully with the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK.

-- source

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?


Marshal Edward Rydz-Smigly

And we were deceptively taught that Hitler started WW2! We were lied to!

The last hopes for starting the war to re-enslave Germany rested on the shoulders of one man, and one man only. His name was Edward Rydz-Smigly -- the criminal fool who started World War II. As is to be expected, his name is virtually unknown outside of Poland. It's high-time this dirty, rotten, ego-maniacal scoundrel gets the posthumous "credit" he so richly deserves. -- source

This is the other side of history that everyone needs to read. If you want to know how we've been fooled for such a long time, and how the scam is still reinforced to this day, 73 long years after WW2 ended, then you had better consider the evidence that you will read at the above link.

Did you ever see Hitler posing for a picture bedecked in medals like this Edward Rydz-Smigly? No you didn't, because Hitler wasn't a vain, selfish, demented poseur like this fool Edward Rydz-Smigly. Hitler was a modest man of integrity and intelligence, which is why a nation of 65 million Germans followed his lead to make their nation whole again, even when it meant confronting international Jewry and the whole western world that the Jews controlled.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Tue Jun 05, 2018 1:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

It's important to note that Marshal Edward Rydz-Smigly of Poland is NOT the man responsible for the start of WW2. He played an important role in the game, to be sure, but even he was just a pawn being manipulated behind the scenes by the real controllers of the world — the ruling sociopaths. The agents of the ruling sociopaths in Britain, France, and the United States were all working towards the same goal, according to the same game plan delivered to them by the ruling sociopaths. That goal was to start a war against Germany and the uncooperative Hitler in such a way that the war could be blamed on Germany and not Britain or France.

So the starting of WW2 was a classic false-flag psy-op. Who is it that specializes in false-flag operations of the most dramatic type, like the U.S.S. Liberty and 9/11? That's right — Jewish sociopaths. Hitler was well aware of the Jewish proclivity for deception and manipulation of the most devious kind, the kind we typically call "evil". That's why he and the German people wanted the evil Jews to leave Germany. It was impossible to separate the good Jews from the evil Jews, so the safest policy was to expel them all, and this was the policy the Germans were eventually reduced to.


Herschel Grynszpan, a German Jew of Polish refugee parents, assassinated the German diplomat Ernst vom Rath on 7 November 1938 in Paris. News of this act is what inflamed the violence against Jews in Germany the next day in what has become known as Crystal Night.

Note that Grynszpan when anglicized becomes Greenspan, as in Alan Greenspan, the Jew formerly in charge of the Federal Reserve.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

Another (David) Irving honesty, the one that destroyed him, was that after 10 years of research he could not find one document that provided evidence for the claim that Hitler personally conducted the holocaust or that he even knew about it. Irving did find and report documents that he made available in which Hitler issues orders prohibiting extermination of Jews. Being truthful does not make Irving a Hitler apologist.

Of course Hitler did not personally conduct the Holocaust or even know about it. Because there was no Holocaust. Jews invented it by twisting the truth around to fit their agenda of gaining power and control over the non-Jews. The wonder of it all is that the sociopathic Zionist Jewish leaders have fooled the world so completely for so long! Yes, they are clever, devious, intelligent con-artists whose psychological disease (sociopathy) makes them experts at their craft of deception and manipulation. They have even created laws in 17 countries making it illegal to question their Holocaust story! It's truly beyond belief the measure of control this tiny minority, less than 0.2% of the human population, has been able to exercise over the great masses of humanity.

The history of World War II is incorrect. It is written in a way that serves the interest of those who prevailed. It glorifies the victors and demonizes the vanquished. As the old adage goes, the victors write the history. In other words, the history is self-serving, not accurate. Irving’s histories are far more accurate than those written by court historians. Consequently, the court historians teamed up with Zionists to smear and demonize the best historian of our time.

That's how they have done it. That's how they have fooled us. Hitler was well aware of how the Jews operate, and that's why he wanted them to leave Germany. Hitler was right. The only way to restore Germany to health was to free it of the parasites that fed on it. The truth of the situation has been molded and shaped by those very same parasites to make them into the heroes and demonize the Germans. The injustice is of a magnitude that boggles the mind.


Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Tue Jun 26, 2018 4:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

Now this bomber (the German Horton XVIII jet-powered stealth bomber) was intended to deliver the atomic bomb to New York City and Washington D.C. in 1946. -- video below @ 22:26

Is it true, or is it propaganda?

That the Nazis could use a stealth jet bomber is very probable, and perhaps even one that could retaliate against the Americans who were indiscriminately bombing German cities, which was a blatant war crime against the Hague and Geneva conventions. Tit for tat is the only thing sociopaths like Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt would understand, and for Hitler to think of employing a tit for tat strategy is highly appropriate. These deceptive Allied leaders had long ago decided that they weren't following any rules of war, and Hitler knew it. The Katyn massacre showed Stalin's true face, while the illegal chemical weapons destined to be used on German civilians, sent by Churchill and Roosevelt to Bari, Italy (where the Germans successfully destroyed them 1 2 3 4 ) shows that these two leaders were no different than Stalin. All three were absolute monsters compared to Hitler, who always refused to use chemical weapons despite having stockpiles of them.

We've long been told the Americans were the first to develop the atomic bomb, and that the Germans never had any. Yet here is this conflicting story that Germany was developing a jet bomber "intended" to drop an atomic bomb on New York City or Washington D.C.

It sounds like outright fear-mongering to me, with the added useful purpose of justifying all Allied war crimes against Germany, since Germany "intended" to commit war crimes against the USA.

This is exactly how sociopaths (like the Allied leaders) would "play the game", and how non-sociopaths (Hitler) would be forced to respond (i.e. tit for tat).

The Futuristic Antigravity Technology that is Way Above Top Secret [FULL VIDEO]
(duration 1:30:48)

Page 31 of 52 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group