Hitler -- What is the truth?
Page 30 of 52

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

Reading Goebbels' 1934 speech makes me realize how the Jewish concept of propaganda, used to deceive and manipulate, differs so radically from the German concept of propaganda, used to educate and enlighten. Jewish propaganda was thus used to demonize German propaganda! All this time, I had no idea how and why this was going on, and is still going on even to this day, nearly 73 years after WW2 ended!

The concept of propaganda has undergone a fundamental transformation, particularly as the result of political practice in Germany. Throughout the world today, people are beginning to see that a modern state, whether democratic or authoritarian, cannot withstand the subterranean forces of anarchy and chaos without propaganda. It is not only a matter of doing the right thing; the people must understand that the right thing is the right thing. Propaganda includes everything that helps the people to realize this.

This is propaganda in the service of good, not evil. The "subterranean forces of anarchy and chaos" mentioned here are the usual methods of the secretive ruling sociopaths, such as "divide and conquer" and "problem, reaction, solution".

Political propaganda in principle is active and revolutionary. It is aimed at the broad masses. It speaks the language of the people because it wants to be understood by the people. Its task is the highest creative art of putting sometimes complicated events and facts in a way simple enough to be understood by the man on the street. Its foundation is that there is nothing the people cannot understand, but rather things must be put in a way that they can understand. It is a question of making it clear to him by using the proper approach, evidence, and language.

Propaganda used in this way is a tool to simplify complexity and still illuminate the truth with clarity.

If propaganda is to succeed, it must know what it wants. It must keep a clear and firm goal in mind, and seek the appropriate means and methods to reach that goal. Propaganda as such is neither good nor evil. Its moral value is determined by the goals it seeks.

Propaganda with moral value! This is the so contrary to Jewish propaganda, whose goal is to deceive and manipulate the masses to serve the selfish interests of the sociopathic controllers.

Propaganda can be pro or con. In neither case does it have to be negative. The only thing that is important is whether or not its words are true and genuine expressions of a people’s values.

Just like Hitler, Goebbels understood that the values of the German people are what determined the purity of the Aryan race. It was about values, not eugenics.

Each situation brings new challenges. And each task requires the support of the people, which can only be gained by untiring propaganda that brings the broad masses knowledge and clarity.

Knowledge and clarity! As I started off saying, propaganda to Goebbels and Hitler was to educate and enlighten. That's how the National Socialists came to power with almost unanimous support of the German people, and that's how the Nazis (National Socialists) kept their unanimous support throughout the war years, in spite of the horrific terror bombing of the German civilian population at the hands of the murderous British and American war criminals. In fact, it is highly likely that the Germans clearly understood the criminal nature of the British and American leadership, thanks to the honest German propaganda that educated and enlightened them to the real truth of their difficult situation.


Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war. They are the incarnation of that destructive force that in these terrible years has guided the enemy war leadership in a fight against all that we see as noble, beautiful, and worth keeping. For that reason alone the Jews hate us. They despise our culture and learning, which they perceive as towering over their nomadic worldview. They fear our economic and social standards, which leave no room for their parasitic drives. They are the enemy of our domestic order, which has excluded their anarchistic tendencies. Germany is the first nation in the world that is entirely free of the Jews.

And that is exactly why the Jewish-directed Allied leadership (Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin) was so focused on the utter destruction of Germany and the German people.

And how prophetic Goebbels' vision was, as the world slowly slides into that "dull and primitive state", led by the eternal darkness of the Jewish leadership's psychological disorder.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sat Apr 28, 2018 12:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

As we’ve come to appreciate with each passing year, World War Two was the most evil manifestation in human history. No other conflict even comes close in matching that war for its vast and unspeakable crimes. Mass murder of surrendering soldiers, mass starvation of helpless civilians, mass rape of women and children, assembly-line style torture in the tens of thousands, uprooting and expulsion of millions to certain death, the deliberate destruction of ancient cultures--these atrocities and many more add annually to World War Two’s menu of beastly war crimes.

Also, with each passing year, it becomes clearer and clearer that virtually all the major crimes of the Second World War were committed by the Allied powers. -- source

It seems I've been the lone voice stating this, but not any more! I am so pleased to see someone else coming to the same conclusion as me. The Allies were the bad guys in WW2, which means the Nazis were the good guys! The general population has been thoroughly brainwashed to believe the exact opposite, even to the point of making heroes out of psychopaths Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt. For much of my life, I was among the duped, but that is no longer the case. I now understand how and why I was brainwashed. It's amazingly liberating, almost as if the truth actually does set you free.

One of those major war crimes is the deliberate targeting of enemy civilians, to either be blown apart by powerful bombs or burned alive in fiery "holocausts". It is no coincidence that the Jewish sociopaths accused the Germans of the Holocaust after the war when it was by their orders that German and Japanese cities were reduced to rubble and burnt cinders. The real Holocaust was thus perpetrated by the Jewish sociopaths that directed the Allied war leadership, and like sociopaths everywhere, they then accused their opponents of their own malfeasance!

Since the raid occurred near midnight, most people were long in bed, thus ensuring a slow reaction. Also, the sheer number of firebombs—nearly half a million—and the great breadth of the targeted area—sixteen square miles-- insured that Tokyo's already archaic fire-fighting ability would be hopelessly inadequate to deal with such a blaze.

When the flames finally subsided the following morning, the relatively few survivors could quickly see that much of the Japanese capital had been burned from the face of the earth. In this raid on Tokyo alone, in one night, an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 people, mostly women and children, were, as General LeMay announced proudly, “scorched and baked and boiled to death.” Only the incineration of Dresden, Germany one month earlier, with an estimated death toll of 250,000-400,000, was greater.

“Congratulations,” wrote General Henry “Hap” Arnold to LeMay after hearing the news. “This mission shows your crews have got the guts for anything.” -- source

What kind of people lack the empathy to revel in the mass murder of innocent civilians, mostly women and children, and even publicly proclaim their satisfaction at having accomplished the deed?

Only sociopaths.

Tokyo, March 1945. Operation Meetinghouse. The real Holocaust that they never show you, directed by Jewish sociopaths.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sun May 06, 2018 4:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

Who financed Hitler?

We all have heard the conspiracy theory propaganda spread in the alternate media, that the Wall Street bankers financed Hitler (Uncle Zook parroted this religiously in this very forum). This claim makes no sense, as the Jews control the financial world, and they had declared global economic war on Hitler and Germany in 1933. Are they really going to finance their true enemy that they are trying to destroy economically?

Hitler, on the other hand, is dependent on the financial support of his own party members. -- Berlin Alert: The Memoirs and Reports of Truman Smith, page 49

This is from the notebook of American Captain Truman Smith, Assistant Military Attaché in Berlin, in his intelligence notes for November 15, 1922. Hitler started his political movement in 1919, not long after WW1 ended in November 1918, and probably following the signing of the hated Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919. So it would appear that Hitler was not a political play financed by the Jewish bankers of Wall Street or any other financial center.

Hitler was already espousing the "Jewish problem" at that point, as he was well aware of the Jewish orchestration of the unfair terms imposed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles.

Kress felt that Hitler was not as radical as his speeches made him out. Nevertheless he was anti-Semitic in what Kress termed "a healthy sense"; i.e. he wanted to keep Jews out of all government offices. -- Berlin Alert: The Memoirs and Reports of Truman Smith, page 53

Kress is General Kress von Kressenstein, artillery commander of the German Seventh Division. Truman Smith was briefed by him on November 16, 1922. Hitler intuitively understands that Jewish sociopaths in positions of power and control are crippling Germany, and one necessary cure is to prevent them from holding public office. Is it logical that Jewish sociopaths in the banking system would choose to finance such an "anti-Semite"?

In the November 25, 1922 report from the Military Attaché Office in Berlin to the Division of Military Intelligence in Washington DC, we read the following:

Until a short time ago, the activities of the (National Socialist) party were confined very largely to the city of Munich. This was explained by Hitler's chief of staff as due to the condition of party finances. In recent months, he stated, large sums of money have been received anonymously. A well-informed Jewish newspaperman stated that Director Hugenberg of Krupps has recently donated 40 million marks to the National Socialists.

So it would appear that the Nazi party had such meager finances that they could not expand beyond Munich, but that their fortunes were beginning to turn. Was this "well-informed Jewish newspaperman" reporting the truth, or was he inventing "fear porn" to alarm fellow Jews of the rise of the anti-Jewish Nazis? 40 million marks seems like an enormous sum, but keep in mind that hyperinflation was ravaging Germany at the time, and the exchange rate in November 1922 was around 5000 marks per dollar. So 40 million marks at that time was equal to 8000 U.S. dollars, which was still a respectable sum in 1922. For comparison, only about 6% of the American population (the well-to-do) were required to file income tax in 1922, and the average yearly income reported was $3143.

If the Krupps donation is a true fact, it is still apparently coming from German supporters of the National Socialist party, like the Krupps business concern.

In the Nazi era, Krupp was much more cautious than most people think, notes Grütter. Though Krupp did cooperate with the Nazis, he kept half of his manufacturing facilities focused on non-military goods. The indictment and conviction after World War II for cooperating with Hitler and using forced labor was certainly justified. But what is more mystifying is that other business magnates who did the same were not indicted. This too is a reflection of the "Krupp legend," which always seemed to swing between glorification and vilification. -- source

-- source

Wrong! International Jewry brought death and destruction to Germany, not Hitler.
This is Jewish-directed propaganda, the way they twist history to their advantage.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Mon May 14, 2018 6:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

It occurs to me, after the prior post about the hyperinflation ravaging Germany in 1922 and 1923, that a brief lesson of that economic disaster would be helpful to understand the events that shaped Hitler and his fellow Germans.

The hyperinflation of the German currency in 1922 and 1923 devastated what remained of the German middle class following WW1. All savings disappeared as money became worthless. It's hard to imagine how a nation can survive such turmoil, but the bitter experience is surely never forgotten.


Why did it happen?

Hyperinflation probably happened because the Weimar government printed banknotes to pay reparations and - after the 1923 French invasion - the Ruhr strikers. Because these banknotes were not matched by Germany's production, their value fell. -- source

This is the usual official narrative. What is unsaid is that Jews had probably orchestrated all the events feeding the hyperinflation. Jews were the negotiators at the Treaty of Versailles that saddled Germany with impossible reparations. Jews were the bankers and money men directing the printing of paper money. Money matters were their specialty, and Germans were well aware of this. Resentment of the Jews was inevitable as Germany was being drained of its economic life after WW1. The causes of WW1 itself had been seen in Germany as a Jewish plot originating from Theodor Herzl and the First Zionist Congress in 1897. So there was a long history of pointing at Jews as the source of Germany's orchestrated decline, to the point that anti-Jewish political parties were forming in Germany completely independently of Hitler's National Socialist party.

In the summer of 1920, however, a small political group known as the German Social Party was organized in North Germany by the agitator Richard Kunze, which at once developed a violent anti-Semitism. Soon afterward other small parties preaching patriotism for labor, and anti-Semitism, formed in Hanover, Saxony, and other provinces. -- Berlin Alert: The Memoirs and Reports of Truman Smith, page 72

Anti-Semitism in Germany did not originate with Hitler. It was a natural reaction to Jewish parasitic feeding on the German nation that was codified in the universally hated (by Germans) Treaty of Versailles. After having their financial life destroyed due to hyperinflation, Germans were understandably organizing against the Jewish forces that had directed their demise through the usual sociopathic methods of clandestine deceit and manipulation. This public sentiment would be successfully incorporated into the National Socialist party and help Hitler in his long 20-year struggle to restore Germany to health.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Mon May 14, 2018 8:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

Truman Smith wrote:
In the meantime, in North Germany, the small anti-Semitic factions had been struggling along without gaining much ground. But their poison had become firmly lodged in the political stronghold of Prussian agrarianism, the German Nationalist Party. In the winter of 1922-23, three of the most radical of their deputies, Wulle, Graefe, and Henning, left the party and set about organizing the scattered groups in North Germany into the Racial Freedom Party, the "Völkischer", the name now used. -- Berlin Alert: The Memoirs and Reports of Truman Smith, page 73

Author Truman Smith is decidedly pro-Semitic, based on his description of anti-Semitic factions "struggling along without gaining much ground" and his choice of the word "poison". Anti-Semitic parties were constantly gaining ground, as they were a new phenomenon in Germany that had just started from zero in post-WW1 Germany. I've noticed Smith's bias earlier in the book, and I made a mental note of it as it clearly colors his reports back to the U.S. military command.

Note that all of this anti-Jewish political organizing in Germany is spontaneously arising independently of what Hitler is doing in Munich with his young political organization.

Truman Smith wrote:
In the summer of 1923, the North German Racialists and the Munich National Socialists joined forces, Hitler being unanimously accepted as leader. -- Berlin Alert: The Memoirs and Reports of Truman Smith, page 73

These anti-Jewish factions are not "struggling along without gaining much ground" as Truman Smith suggests. They are growing and consolidating. They are an accurate reflection of the German people's sentiments of that time period. We have been falsely taught that Hitler was the source of Jewish "discrimination", but the truth is that it was a natural reaction of the German people to the sabotage of German interests by the international Jewish cabal.


German political cartoon from 1930. Translation: The year is over. The fight goes on!

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Tue May 15, 2018 7:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

Author Truman Smith is decidedly pro-Semitic...

And anti-Hitler, at least in his writings after the war. His writings about Hitler before Hitler became a household word are decidedly different. This contrast is quite telling of how our opinions are shaped by brainwashing and the herd mentality as demonstrated by the Asch experiment.

An example of Truman Smith conforming to the post-war brainwashing regarding Hitler can be seen here:

Hitler's success now went rapidly to his head. In the choice of his personal advisers, he had previously shown his ignorance of human character. This fault, coupled with an amazing lack of comprehension of the value of playing for time and further strengthening his hand, led directly to the most ludicrous of all revolts, the beer cellar putsch of November 8. -- Berlin Alert: The Memoirs and Reports of Truman Smith, page 73

There was nothing ludicrous about the beer cellar putsch, nor did Hitler's success go rapidly to his head. His choice of personal advisers was quite sound, and he was quite skilled at judging human character. Truman Smith's comment about Hitler's "amazing lack of comprehension of the value of playing for time and further strengthening his hand" is itself ludicrous, given Hitler's 12 years of determined work to become a political leader in Germany, as well as Hilter's brilliant strategy of invading France long after France declared war on Germany and long after France had tried its own premature invasion of Germany. Truman Smith is simply verifying the Asch experiment by conforming to the prevalent opinion of Hitler instilled in the American public by Allied propaganda. Frederic Spotts, author of Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, does the same thing in his book, almost as if it is required if you expect to have your book published and subsequently reviewed in a positive light. This is the incredible power of controlling the media, a power which the Jewish sociopaths undeniably possess today. Note that a similar situation of strong Jewish control of the media existed in Germany in the 1920s as Hitler was trying to build up the National Socialist party. To his credit, Hitler successfully battled and overcame this Jewish media leviathan during his long political struggle, and it may be that his "ludicrous beer cellar putsch" played a critical role in that success. After all, Hitler was imprisoned for that revolt, and it was during that prison time that he wrote Mein Kampf, which reached so many Germans. Hitler's notoriety resulting from the putsch and imprisonment surely helped get his book published and into the hands of the German people.


Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Fri May 18, 2018 6:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

Who financed Hitler?

Let's see what Frederic Spotts has to say:

The funds at Hitler's personal disposal were enormous, though impossible fully to calculate since the surviving documentation is incomplete. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 81

The Germans documented things better than anyone in the world. If surviving documentation is incomplete, it's because the documentation was either destroyed by the massive, indiscriminate criminal bombing of Germany that the Allies did, or the Allies captured the documentation and don't want the information released.

Most significant were royalties from Mein Kampf. With nearly every German family owning a copy, these amounted to roughly 1.5 to 2 million marks annually during the Third Reich years. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 81

Mein Kampf was published in 1925, after the devastating hyperinflation of the German currency (1921 to 1923). The exchange rate of marks to dollars was stable from 1925 to 1933 at about 4.2 marks per dollar. The equivalent dollar amount of Hitler's book royalties would be between $350,000 and $475,000 per year. That was a lot of money back then, the equivalent of an annual income of 25 to 35 million dollars today!

According to Spotts, what did Hitler do with all this money? Did he spend it on a lavish lifestyle of women, luxury, and leisure? Well, no, actually. Hitler was apparently the opposite of a self-indulgent rich man.

Hitler earmarked these monies for museums, foundations and construction projects in favoured cities -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 81

Note the feeble attempt to introduce some selfishness into this generosity of Hitler by specifying "favoured cities". Hitler's favored cities were German and Austrian cities like Linz, Munich, and Berlin, among many others. Hitler was focused on improving Germany for Germans. Any American president who would use his own personal wealth to improve the United States for ordinary Americans would simply be unimaginable, as no American president has ever shown any such inclination. Let that sink in for a moment when comparing the greatness of Hitler to such "heroes" as Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin.

Jewish-controlled Hollywood loved mocking Hitler in 1940. Wonder why....
Was Charlie Chaplin Jewish? Hmm...

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Fri May 18, 2018 9:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

Who financed Hitler?

Frederic Spotts continues on Hitler's finances:

Another source was the so-called Cultural Fund, which he (Hitler) instituted in 1937. This was largely financed by a scheme — dreamed up by Heinrich Hoffman and the Postal Minister Wilhelm Ohnesorge — to pay Hitler a royalty on every stamp with his picture on it. This wheeze raised no less than 75 million marks over the years. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 81

Scheme? Wheeze? Spotts tries hard to turn this financing of Hitler by the German people into some kind of con-artistry, but it is in fact a solid and legitimate means of voluntarily supporting the Fuhrer. No one was forcing Germans to buy stamps with Hitler's picture on it, and there were surely other stamps to choose from.

If 2 million marks a year in Mein Kampf royalties was a lot of money, the postage stamp royalty bringing in some 10 million marks a year is even more astounding. Does it sound like Hitler needed Wall Street banksters or anyone else to fund his hopes for Germany? He had nearly the entire German nation behind him, and he was not holding a gun to their heads as is often claimed. But wait, there's more...

The Cultural Fund also received sizable transfers arranged by Goebbels from the film industry and a variety of other sources. It was this income that Hitler drew on to bestow his benefactions to artists, to make his own art purchases and to contribute to his building projects. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 81

Note that Hitler's "own art purchases" were usually not for his own use, but were typically for the Munich Art Museum that was created by Hitler to allow all German people, regardless of financial means, the opportunity to appreciate fine art. So once again, Spotts tries to paint Hitler with the "selfish" brush, but the truth does not support his efforts.

As a related and typical example of the rabid vilification of Hitler and all he did to bring art to the German people, check out this article. The usual overkill of propaganda and programming against Hitler and the Nazis is on display, shaping our minds with brutal efficiency.

Munich Art Museum (literally "House of German Art"), one of Hitler's "building projects".
The color postcard shows how the roof was built to admit light for the exhibit halls,
and how the building was located adjacent to the famous Englischer Garten. -- source

The Haus der Deutschen Kunst was officially opened by Adolf Hitler on 18 July 1937, with the opening
of the first Greater German Art Exhibition. Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, and others inspect ceremonial troops
uniformed as Bavarian infantry, during the grand opening ceremony.

In his speech for the opening of the museum, Hitler dedicated the building to the art of the German people.
Munich Gauleiter Adolf Wagner looked on from the side.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sun May 20, 2018 8:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

The support of the German people for Hitler was almost unanimous. There is a reason for this, and it was because Hitler's support for the German people was genuine. There was simply no doubt in Germany that Hitler always had the best interests of the German people in mind with everything he did. Hitler continuously demonstrated it naturally and effortlessly, precisely because it was genuine.


Hitler could not walk around so vulnerable among the masses of German people if he did not have their love and support. The Jewish propaganda that Hitler obtained this support by using German propaganda is deceptive and manipulative, as Jewish propaganda always is. German propaganda was entirely different, with its aim being to educate and enlighten. This difference in the meaning and purpose of propaganda reflects the underlying difference of the respective psychologies involved. Jewish psychology is sociopathic, while German psychology is one of practicality in service of the common good. The difference boils down to empathy. Jews pursue practicality in service of their selfish good. This is always the critical difference between sociopaths and normal people. It's all about empathy. Hitler had it in abundance. The Haavara Agreement to help Jews leave Germany with their wealth intact is a perfect example of Hitler's empathy towards others. He would not treat the enemies of the German state any differently than how he would want to be treated if he were in their shoes. The same cannot be said for the Jewish sociopathic leaders. They also provided a perfect example of their total lack of empathy towards others — the Holocaust Lie. They shamelessly and falsely claimed that Hitler ordered 6 million Jews gassed to death, without any regard whatsoever for how this lie would impact the entire world. To this day, those Jewish sociopaths brutally persecute any who would seek to expose their Holocaust Lie.

It is also no surprise that the Jewish sociopathic leaders would accuse Hitler of their own malfeasance — they publicly accused him in all the media they controlled of being a psychopathic madman and the epitome of evil. In essence, they publicly exposed themselves.

Author:  Chicodoodoo [ Sun May 20, 2018 8:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?

Yet we are still, to this day, 74 years after the war, treated to outrageous Jewish propaganda with headlines like this:

The truth about the Hitler Youth: Nazis were shocked by sex mania at the Nuremberg Rally
that left nine hundred teenage girls pregnant and later hanged children to quell revolts

  • All children over ten had to join Hitler Youth and the League of German Girls
  • Some 900 teenagers fell pregnant during the 1936 Nuremberg Rally
  • Doctors were ordered to administer abortions to great shame of the Nazi Party
  • Revealed in exhibition organised by the Nazi Documentation Centre in Cologne
  • Exhibition also documents revolts and dissenters within Nazi youth clubs

Girls from Nazi-occupied Austria cheer for Hitler during at the Nuremberg Rally in 1938.
A new exhibition in Germany is shedding light on their lives and reveals that 900 teenage girls
became pregnant at the event.
-- source

Hitler and the Nazis are continuously vilified and demonized in the Jewish-controlled media with twisted and made-up "facts" designed to elicit shock and disgust in the gullible readers. And the brainwashing still works!

Hmm, I wonder if some of God's Chosen People are responsible for the above "new exhibition in Germany" informing us of these shocking new "facts"...

Let's check into this Nazi Documentation Centre in Cologne, where they claim this new exhibition originates:

Since its founding, research projects have been key to the work of the NS Documentation Center. The subjects of those projects include, among others, Jewish history, collecting contemporary witness statements and interviews, forced labor, the police, young people, including subjects such as “Child Evacuations to the Countryside” and “non-conformist youth,” the press, clubs and organizations, the persecution of the Sinti and Roma, and Nazi military justice. Among the large, ongoing research undertakings are the history of the Holocaust, opposition and resistance, the Gestapo, the Nazi system of Gauleiter, architecture and urban planning, Cologne’s public health policies under the Nazis and the Hitler Youth movement. -- source

Yep, same people behind all the slick and expensive Holocaust museums — the Jews. Who would have guessed?

Page 30 of 52 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group