Reply to topic  [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 52  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Adolf Hitler wrote:
"Not that the English people as a whole are responsible for this (WW2). Here are a few men whose stubborn hatred and insanity have sabotaged every attempt at reaching an understanding. They are supported by the international enemy of the world whom we all know: International Jewry." -- The Ultimate Red Pill at 16:35

The morally insane are better identified as the organized sociopaths, rather than International Jewry, but Hitler was as close as anyone of his era at identifying the source of evil in the world. The organized sociopaths do consist of Jews far in excess of the Jewish proportion of the human population. Jews make up less than one quarter of 1% of humanity, yet the percentage of Jews in key positions of the Trump administration far exceeds 10%. Sociopaths make up less than 2% of humanity, yet the percentage of sociopaths in key positions of the Trump administration far exceeds 20%. This alignment is not by accident, as the Jews are a sociopathic group. So if Hitler could have said "International Sociopathy" instead of "International Jewry", he would have been more accurate, but not by much.

Adolf Hitler wrote:
Although a number of these men, such as Martin Bormann, Dr. Goebbels, etc., together with their wives, have joined me of their own free will and did not wish to leave the capital of the Reich under any circumstances, but were willing to perish with me here, I must nevertheless ask them to obey my request, and in this case set the interests of the nation above their own feelings. By their work and loyalty as comrades they will be just as close to me after death, as I hope that my spirit will linger among them and always go with them. Let them be hard, but never unjust, above all let them never allow fear to influence their actions, and set the honour of the nation above everything in the world. Finally, let them be conscious of the fact that our task, that of continuing the building of a National Socialist State, represents the work of the coming centuries, which places every single person under an obligation always to serve the common interest and to subordinate his own advantage to this end. I demand of all Germans, all National Socialists, men, women, and all the men of the Armed Forces, that they be faithful and obedient unto death to the new government and its President.

Above all I charge the leaders of the nation and those under them to scrupulous observance of the laws of race and to merciless opposition to the universal poisoner of all peoples, international Jewry.

Given in Berlin, this 29th day of April 1945. 4:00 A.M.

ADOLF HITLER

-- Adolf Hitler's final testament (source)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Feb 26, 2018 7:33 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Hitler was nothing if not honest. This is one of the most striking things you discover when you uncover the real truth about Hitler. He was genuine, sincere, and straight as an arrow. He was like that as a teenager, as a lowly soldier in WW1, as a neophyte politician, as the Fuhrer rebuilding his nation, as a leader defending his country, and as a defeated man preparing to end his own life. It is easy to see why his people loved him, followed him, and fought for him. It was because he loved them, wanted the best for them, and gave everything he had for them. A leader like that is rare. Most non-sociopaths can never attain such influence, especially in a world dominated by sociopaths, but Hitler did it by a sheer determination derived from his empathy and love for others.

And the victors of WW2 painted him as a psychopath by blaming a fictitious Holocaust on him. They had no shame in doing this, because they were truly evil.

Adolf Hitler wrote:
More than thirty years have now passed since I in 1914 made my modest contribution as a volunteer in the First World War that was forced upon the Reich.

In these three decades I have been actuated solely by love and loyalty to my people in all my thoughts, acts, and life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions, which have ever confronted mortal man. I have spent my time, my working strength, and my health in these three decades.

It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish descent or worked for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the control and limitation of armaments, which posterity will not for all time be able to disregard for the responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be laid on me. I have further never wished that after the first fatal world war a second against England, or even against America, should break out. Centuries will pass away, but out of the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred against those finally responsible whom we have to thank for everything, international Jewry and its helpers, will grow.

Three days before the outbreak of the German-Polish war I again proposed to the British ambassador in Berlin a solution to the German-Polish problem—similar to that in the case of the Saar district, under international control. This offer also cannot be denied. It was only rejected because the leading circles in English politics wanted the war, partly on account of the business hoped for and partly under influence of propaganda organized by international Jewry.

-- Adolf Hitler's final testament (source)

Hitler knew who the true enemy of humanity was. He knew who were the lying deceivers, the shameless manipulators, the false friends, the clever chameleons, and the selfish parasites. He tried to free Germany from their clutches, and he succeeded for a while, until their dishonesty overpowered the resources Germany could muster for its defense. Evil triumphed and Germany was crushed. Most of humanity doesn't even realize that the deception of that triumph is still going on, just as strong today as it was then. Maybe even much stronger.


Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:16 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Linked to this was Hitler's own near deification. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 61

Here comes Spotts the parrot, echoing the official propaganda about Hitler the megalomaniac. Spotts has to do this, if he wants his book published by the Jewish-controlled book industry. He has to do it if he wants positive book reviews by the Jewish-controlled mainstream media. If he wants to earn money from his book and be "successful", he has to "play the game" according to their rules. The result is that all truth is lost and Spotts is just another con-artist.

Quote:
His belief in his own near divinity — the notion of being the instrument of providence, as he repeatedly put it — increased as his political and diplomatic successes multiplied. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 61

Many religious men believe they are an instrument of providence without being accused of thinking themselves as gods. Spotts is just spouting utter BS. Hitler never considered himself a god or a divine person. Far from it. Hitler was basically a humble man with strong principles founded in empathy.

Quote:
And, in fact, Hitler had at that time begun to order the centre of dozens of German cities to be reconstructed to create mammoth meeting places — in Berlin a space for a million people — to celebrate his appearances -- that is, to worship him. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 61

Spotts is a sick man to make arguments like this. Hitler was all about unifying Germans, not to worship one man, but to make Germany function again as a sovereign and free nation. Spotts is just twisting things around to align with the official propaganda. He should be ashamed, but he won't be, because he received his 30 pieces of silver.



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Feb 26, 2018 7:20 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Nearly 7 years into Hitler's reign, at a time when Europe was still at peace and Jews were living well and prospering in Hitler's Germany (it's true!), Hitler's logical, thoughtful and truthful attempt to avert disaster fell on deaf ears. Neither the French nor the British even attempted to refute Hitler's claims. Instead, just like modern day 'court historians,' they simply ignored the irrefutable points which Hitler expressed; and then babbled on about "the rights of Poland."

By now, the warmongering pressures on French President Daladier and British Prime Minister Chamberlain were too much to hold back. Thus emboldened, the militaristic and ultra-nationalist government of Poland allowed ultra-Nationalists and Jewish Bolshevik Partisans to escalate their border provocations of Germany; culminating with the September 1st German counter-attack against Poland, followed by the liberation of the Corridor and Danzig.

Britain and France declared war on Germany, yet did not lift a finger to help Poland. Having been played for 'chumps.' Poland was soon discarded by the Allies as Stalin's Soviet Union then invaded Poland from the east. While continuing to ignore Hitler's pleas for peace, the Allies will spend the next eight months plotting Scandinavian-based maneuvers and deploying a massive mechanized fighting force in northern France, in anticipation of invading Germany via "neutral" Belgium and Holland, sometime in the Spring of 1940. -- source

The real history of the causes behind WW2 are so different from what we are taught. The real history is covered up, hidden, and suppressed. We're taught that Hitler, the world's most evil man, bent on world conquest and domination, was on a psychopathic mission to overrun all of Europe and enslave everyone. How anyone falls for this is a study of propaganda and mind control. Hitler would have made no peace offers if the official history was valid, instead of the dozens of peace offers he actually made, including the one to French President Daladier that is described in the article quoted above. Just from this one plea for peace, it is clear that Hitler is lucid, reasonable, and compassionate, with no desire for conquest, domination, or hostilities. How can anyone believe the utter nonsense we are taught?

We believe it because we trust our authorities. Big mistake. Our authorities are nearly always sociopaths, and sociopaths lie.



Image
Hitler restores Danzig to Germany in September 1939, and Danzig celebrates

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Mar 05, 2018 9:44 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
An old Luftwaffe veteran told me there are two main worldviews: nationalism and internationalism. The latter won WWII. The internationalists want to destroy ALL nations and races! They want one big mongrelized mass, which is easier to control and exploit. (Of course, the Jewish masters do not want to lose their own ethnic identity). "Nationalists" and "racists" put their own folk first, but are not motivated by hatred against others. Alliances against our shared foe are logical. Furthermore, since the well-being of the folk has priority, wars for the financial gain of a tiny plutocracy and colonialism are rejected. "World empires" destroy folks, conqueror and conquered alike, in the long-term. And always collapse one day. The U.S. world empire today is merely a tool for the same international plutocracy that is trying to exterminate all races and nations, most noticeably in Europe and the USA, through massive non-White immigration and miscegenation. The real "hatemongers" are the same people who accuse us of "hate", simply because we want to save our own race and nation. -- Gerhard Lauck (source)

The Nazi (National Socialist) perspective hasn't changed much over the years. Hitler would have agreed with Gerhard Lauck. It was indeed nationalism versus internationalism. Hitler defied the Jewish sociopaths steering the world towards internationalism under their control. Hitler did what was best for his nation, rather than doing what was best for the Jewish sociopaths in their pursuit of internationalism. This is why the Jewish sociopaths, the ruling elite, the international banksters, or whatever label you wish to use to identify the global controllers, had to crush Hitler and thoroughly demonize him. This was also one of the primary purposes of the Holocaust Lie.

Quote:
The first politician to tour the country by air during an election campaign, Hitler issued an endless stream of slogans to win potential supporters over. He would make Germany great again. He would give Germans work once more. He would put Germany first. He would revive the nation’s rusting industries, laid to waste by the economic depression. He would crush the alien ideologies—­socialism, liberalism, communism—­that were undermining the nation’s will to survive and destroying its core values. -- source

Propaganda alert! Hitler did not issue "an endless stream of slogans". He issued limited and focused dialogue aimed at restoring Germany to health. And unlike all the American "fake" leaders since JFK, Hitler made good on his promises. He turned Germany around, taking it from poverty to powerhouse. Germany thrived, Germans were happy, and foreigners looked on with envy. By contrast, America has deteriorated, Americans are unhappy, and foreigners look at America with disgust and hate.

So much of the truth about Hitler is twisted around to paint him unfavorably. Even today, 73 years after WW2 ended, there are daily references to Hitler or Nazis in the media. This has to be very important brainwashing that must be reinforced on a regular basis for it to show up every day so long after the events took place. And who benefits? Jews. Who controls the media? Jews. Is that a coincidence? No.



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:06 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Heinz Weichardt (1915-2011) was a German Jew who fled to the US in 1938. In spite of this, he felt Nazi Germany was misrepresented in the West.

Heinz Weichardt's 28-page booklet, 'Under Two Flags' is so much at variance with conventional accounts of pre-WWII Germany as to elicit instant 'cognitive dissonance' in the reader.

Even Weichardt took until 1995 to set-pen-to-paper in this unique memoir of a German Jew. He says: "The complete lack of veracity in reporting anything about Germany and the outbreak of the war became obvious to me shortly after I arrived in this country [the USA] and my conviction that a colossal fraud was imposed on the American people by the Jewish-controlled media has been reinforced ever since". -- source

"Conventional accounts" are lies. So of course when the truth is heard for the first time, cognitive dissonance is practically guaranteed.

Everything we've been taught about Hitler and the Nazis is propaganda, specifically Jewish propaganda. Here's a Jew who lived it and is not afraid to tell the truth. Shall we just dismiss him as a "self-hating Jew", as Jewish sociopaths would advise? I think not.

I have always regretted that I was not permitted to serve Germany in its time of great need and feel absolutely no resentment because of Hitler's racial policies. To the contrary, I am convinced that the Nuremberg Laws of 1935 were an absolute necessity and if they could be enforced throughout that part of the world which still considers itself white they would prevent a coming disaster of unimaginable dimensions. Only a highly disciplined, racially and culturally homogeneous nation, like Hitler's Germany, could have achieved the unprecedented recovery from nearly total destruction and loss of practically all resources and one-third of her territory to her sadistically vengeful, victorious assassins. The systematic effort to convert the world into a racial cesspool will lead to a condition which was predicted by Hitler seventy years ago in his fundamental work, Mein Kampf. These are his words: "If ever the Jew succeeds in conquering the people of this world by means of his Marxist ideology, his crowning achievement will be the dance of death of humanity. The planet will then move through space without a human being, like millions of years ago."

It's important to understand "the Nuremberg Laws of 1935", which are not to be confused with the Nuremberg Trials of 1946.

Quote:
The laws — so-called because Hitler ordered their passage in Nuremberg during the Nazi Party’s 1935 rally — consisted of three separate pieces of legislation that were rubber-stamped by the Reichstag in an atmosphere of fascist pomp. The Reich Flag Law replaced the colors of the Weimar Republic with the swastika. The Reich Citizenship Law established a distinction between “citizens of the Reich,” who were entitled to full political and civil rights, and “subjects” who were excluded from those rights. The third statute, known as the Blood Law, legislated the subordinated status of Jews by prohibiting marriage or sexual relations between Jews and German citizens, the hiring by Jews of German citizens under the age of 45 as servants, and flying the German flag by Jews. -- source

Even the description of these laws is framed in pro-Jewish/anti-Nazi bias and propaganda, which I have underlined in the above quote.

Now, knowing what the Nuremberg Laws of 1935 were, we can better understand the significance of Weichardt's statement: "I am convinced that the Nuremberg Laws of 1935 were an absolute necessity and if they could be enforced throughout that part of the world which still considers itself white they would prevent a coming disaster of unimaginable dimensions."

A Jew who was actually subject to the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, which to his regret prevented him from serving in the German army (!), is defending those very laws as absolutely necessary and even advocating their reintroduction into today's world!

:o :shock:

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Mar 16, 2018 10:40 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
The sinister reality was that Hitler made the dramatic arts a technique of mental manipulation and mind control. By merging into the mass, the individual felt he had gained his sense of identity. In the party rallies the German people symbolically enacted their willingness to be used by Hitler at his will. In his well-known aphorism, Walter Benjamin observed that fascism aestheticized politics. In fact, Hitler's fascism anaesthetized politics. The rallies were a microcosm of Hitler's ideal world: a people reduced to unthinking automatons subject to the control not of the state, not even of the party, but to him personally — and that unto death. Never before was there a clearer example of aesthetics used to promote enslavement and heroic death. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 69

This pretty much sums up Frederic Spotts' purpose in writing the book. His goal is to clandestinely reinforce the brainwashing we have all received regarding Hitler, who has been falsely painted as the world's most evil man. But it is all just insidious propaganda. If Hitler had a hand in the closing ceremonies of the 2018 Winter Olympics, a recording of which I just watched last week, Spotts would point at those ceremonies and make the exact same arguments. The sinister reality is that Spotts and the Jewish Shoah industry supporting him are using the book as a technique of mental manipulation and mind control. By merging into the mass of hoax believers, the reader feels he has gained his sense of identity. In the book reviews, the readers symbolically enact their willingness to be used by Spotts and his shadowy support team at their will. In his well-known aphorism, Walter Benjamin observed that fascism aestheticized politics. In fact, Spotts' fascism anesthetizes critical thinking. The book reviews are a microcosm of the Jewish sociopaths' ideal world: a people reduced to unthinking automatons subject to the control not of the state, not even of the party, but to them personally — and that unto death. Never before was there a clearer example of aesthetics used to promote enslavement and heroic death.

I don't know if I can keep reading this insidious book, because it reminds me so much of watching television, which has become nothing but an instrument of mental manipulation and mind control, promoting enslavement and heroic death. Those Jewish sociopaths controlling the media are clever little bastards, aren't they...


Image
This man, attempting to design a beautiful new world free of sociopathic control, is,
according to the ruling sociopaths, the world's most evil man. Look at his lifeless face.
Can you see how evil he is?

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Mar 19, 2018 6:06 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Hitler had produced one of the most potent and sinister symbols of the 20th century - a flag more powerful than the hammer and sickle, or stars and stripes, or any national flag. It was an early form of pop art, something you could get fast - recognize in a split second - and iconic. It was evil, but 18 years as a painter had led to a masterpiece of graphic art.

The cognitive dissonance so visible with Frederic Spotts is also visible in his reviewers. It is the natural consequence of our brainwashing, which is all about false narratives. Hitler creates one of the most iconic and captivating graphics in history, the Nazi flag, and Roger Clark immediately concludes "it was evil". How is it that the brainwashed cannot see their malaise and self-correct? Because they don't question everything. Because they dismiss anything that runs counter to their belief systems.

Clark concludes "it was evil" because his premise already supposed the conclusion, i.e. the flag was "one of the most potent and sinister symbols of the 20th century". There was nothing sinister about it. It was "a masterpiece of graphic art", remember, Clark? The 60 million Germans who rallied around that flag during Hitler's time as Fuhrer didn't see anything sinister in it. They saw it as a symbol of the strong principles Hitler represented, meaning the liberation of the German people from the crushing tyranny of the ruling Jewish sociopaths who had imposed the Treaty of Versailles on them.

The reader reviews praising Spotts' book are a wonderful study into the efficacy of the mind control we all operate under. Like an alcoholic, we can't begin to break our addiction until we fully realize that we have a drinking problem. Well, friends, we have a brainwashing problem. We have all been brainwashed. Now get out there and study how they do it and who is doing it. Only then can we find the cure.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Mar 19, 2018 9:15 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
T. Bachman wrote:
Spotts does a good job of underscoring another aspect of all this by calling attention to the seeming homoeroticism in Hitler's taste, particularly as it expresses itself toward the human being: at bottom (pun intended), Hitler preferred, aesthetically, buff blond males with blue eyes, i.e., "Nordic" types. The Jews, in addition to being greedy, "Bolsheviks", destroyers of art/culture/life, etc., just...looked "wrong". And so in this sense, in Hitler's mind, ridding the proper-looking race of these improper-looking portions of it was as obviously a necessary decision as would be getting rid of a "wrong" piece of furniture cluttering up an otherwise beautiful living room. (Spotts even includes a contemporary German cartoon caricaturing the physical features of a "typical" Jew).

Are you kidding me!? This is what I have to look forward to in Spotts' book, the "homoeroticism in Hitler's taste", just because he supports the artistic image of the idealized German man? Or how about getting rid of Jews because they are like the "'wrong' piece of furniture cluttering up an otherwise beautiful living room"? If Spotts goes down these paths, then there can be no doubt of the Jewish agenda in his "work", and of Spotts' own outrageous bias.



Image



Image

"Homoeroticism" my ass! :lol:

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Mar 19, 2018 9:47 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9928
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
This technique (the false-flag attack) was used by the Nazis at Glieweitz, Germany where they dressed up like Polish Soldiers and attacked a German radio station and used it as an excuse to invade Poland and start WWII.

It was also used by the Nazis to burn down the Reichstag and blame it on the Russians and institute gun control and other anti-terror measures such as the Nazi Enabling Act. -- source

And to think, for much of my life, I used to believe this crap! I remember when I first read about the Glieweitz incident, six or seven years ago. I was outraged at the evil plot that Hitler and the Nazis had hatched to provide an excuse to attack poor, defenseless Poland! Yep, I swallowed that story hook, line, and sinker. How embarrassing now to reveal my gullibility. Of course, back then, I completely believed in the reality of the Holocaust, the psychopathic evil that was Hitler, and the brutal fascism of the Nazis. But now I know it was all propaganda, a twisting of the truth to make people believe a complete illusion!

But affidavits like the one signed by Alfred Naujocks, in which he claimed, without any corroboration, that he participated in a German undercover operation to attack the Gleiwitz radio station on the very night that Hitler ordered the invasion of Poland, and blame it on the Poles in order to “justify” Germany's “crime against peace”—this was admitted by the court (at Nuremberg) with no questions or discussion. Naujocks did not appear in person, only his affidavit was put in evidence; there was no opportunity for cross-examination of the witness by the defense.

In such a way did the “evidence” accumulate to find Germany's National Socialist government guilty of “Crimes Against Peace.”

So that's the source of the so-called Gleiwitz false-flag attack! It was another deliberate Nuremberg miscarriage of justice!

Further study of the files brought Jackson to doubt that a fair trial would support, in any way, the finding of Germany’s exclusive responsibility. On the contrary, he said:

“The Germans will certainly accuse our three European allies to have pursued a policy that has enforced the war. I say this because the seized documents from the German Foreign Office, which I have seen, all come to the same conclusion: “We have no escape, we must fight, we are surrounded, we are strangled.” How would a judge react if this is found in the trial? I think he would say: “Before I condemn anyone as the aggressor, he ought to describe his motives.”

And that would be catastrophic, Jackson continued, because

“… if this trial leads to a discussion of the political and economic causes of the war, this may cause infinite damage, both in Europe I do not know well, and in America that I know fairly well.”

As a servant of the U.S. Government and U.S. war policy, Jackson came up with the only solution: to ban any discussion on the causes of the war before the Nuremberg tribunal. In other words, not to have a fair trial.

So the Nuremberg Trials were rigged from the start. We've already seen lots of evidence in this thread supporting this notion, and now this. What a scam!

So how did Hitler make use of this Gleiwitz false-flag attack?

In his speech to the nation on Sept. 1, 1939, Adolf Hitler did not mention, except indirectly, this so-important Gliewitz “false flag” that was supposedly ordered by him to justify his invasion order, but instead spoke at length about the ongoing provocations over the past four months by the Poles. He pointed out that since 1919-1920, 100,000 ethnic Germans who were Polish citizens had been forced to flee their homes in Poland.

He had only this to say about what occurred during the previous night:

"These proposals for mediation have failed because in the meanwhile there, first of all, came as an answer the sudden Polish general mobilization (Aug. 30), followed by more Polish atrocities. These were again repeated last night (Aug. 31). Recently in one night there were as many as twenty-one frontier incidents: last night there were fourteen, of which three were quite serious. I have, therefore, resolved to speak to Poland in the same language that Poland for months past has used toward us. This attitude on the part of the Reich will not change."

Further on in his speech, Hitler said

"This night for the first time Polish regular soldiers fired on our territory. Since 5:45 A.M. we have been returning the fire, and from now on bombs will be met by bombs."

Fire coming across the border from Polish regular soldiers does not mean a raid on a radio station by irregulars. The raid on the Gleiwitz station and the customs house in Hohenlinde must be included in the “three which were quite serious.” But is that how a leader makes use of a “false flag” event that he ordered, intending to use as a pretext? No.

The words “Gleiwitz” or “radio station” never came up in the speech, nor afterward from Hitler. So much for it being a German “false flag” from the German perspective!




Image
Gleiwitz radio station, scene of a false false-flag attack!
(Totally invented by the Nuremberg Tribunal, just like Auschwitz Commandant Höss' "confession".)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Mar 20, 2018 5:05 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 52  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.