Reply to topic  [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 52  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
What justification is there for Hitler being called "the world's most evil man"?

The big one is that he allegedly gassed 6 million Jews to death. We now know this is completely false. Hitler didn't have anyone gassed to death in the concentration camps, Jews or non-Jews.

Another justification is that Hitler is responsible for starting WW2. We now know this is completely false. Jewish interests orchestrated world events to create the war and place the blame on Germany. They did the same thing with WW1. International Jewry publicly declared global economic war on Germany in 1933, so there is no denying their malicious intent towards the Germans.

All of the secondary research I have done, as well as the primary research others have done (like David Irving and Vincent Reynouard) indicates that Hitler was not an evil man at all, but was quite the opposite, meaning he was a very good man. But could there still be evil in Hitler that is being overlooked?

How about "The Night of the Long Knives"?

We should start with the Jewish version of this event, which will be the one published in the mainstream media, and also be the last to be censored.

Quote:
By 1934, Adolf Hitler appeared to have complete control over Germany but, like most dictators, he constantly feared that he might be ousted by others who wanted his power. To protect himself from a possible coup, Hitler used the tactic of "divide and rule" and encouraged other leaders, including Hermann Goering, Joseph Goebbels, Heinrich Himmler, and Ernst Röhm, to compete with each other for senior positions. -- source

Already I am seeing the signs of sociopaths accusing their opponent of their own malfeasance.

  • Dictators are always bad.
  • Hitler is paranoid about maintaining total control.
  • Hitler's exclusive goal is power over others.
  • Hitler uses "divide and rule" tactics.
  • Distrust, competition, and hierarchy are the foundation of Hitler's power.

In other words, the mindset of sociopaths is being overlaid onto Hitler. My suspicions are on high alert whenever I see this happening.

Quote:
On June 29, 1934, Hitler, accompanied by the Schutzstaffel (SS), arrived at Wiesse, where he personally arrested Ernst Röhm. During the next 24 hours, 200 other senior SA officers were arrested on the way to Wiesse. Many were shot as soon as they were captured...

The purge of the SA was kept secret until it was announced by Adolf Hitler on July 13. It was during this speech that Hitler gave the purge its name: Night of the Long Knives (a phrase from a popular Nazi song). Hitler claimed that 61 had been executed while 13 had been shot resisting arrest and three had committed suicide. Others have argued that as many as 400 people were killed during the purge. In his speech, Hitler explained why he had not relied on the courts to deal with the conspirators: "In this hour I was responsible for the fate of the German people, and thereby I become the supreme judge of the German people. I gave the order to shoot the ringleaders in this treason." -- source

Were Hitler's actions justified? Was there evil intent behind Hitler's actions, or was evil really being purged to benefit the German people, as Hitler claimed?

Was Hitler lying, or was he being truthful?

I don't know yet, as I am just beginning to look into this event. I do know Hitler tended to be honest and sincere, so it will be interesting to see if this is not the case here. I also know that the Jewish version of history tends to be dishonest and insincere. It will be interesting to see if Jewish history is as deceptive as usual.

I'd say I'm in for another adventure in truth-seeking.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:48 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
From the outset of the war (WW1), he enjoyed a sexual relationship with fellow dispatch-runner, Ernst Schmidt which lasted almost six years. The relationship was not exclusive, however, and Hitler is believed to have had “sexual relations with a senior officer”. US intelligence later discovered that Hitler was never promoted during WW1 because of his “sexual orientation” and that he was arrested in Munich in 1919 for “pederasty and theft”. Indeed, former Nazi, Otto Strasser said that when Hitler became Nazi Party leader in 1921, “his personal bodyguards and chauffeurs were almost exclusively homosexual”. Two of these bodyguards, Ulrich Graf and Christian Weber, were expected to satisfy their boss’s needs whenever necessary.

Then, in 1924, when Hitler was jailed for treason in Landsberg Castle, he began a love relationship with Rudolf Hess, who was nicknamed “Fraulein Anna” and “Black Emma” by other Nazis. Their sexual relationship endured for many years until Hess, who was prone to hysterics became an embarrassment to the Nazi leader. -- source

As I recall, Hitler went into the army as a private and came out as a corporal. So much for "Hitler was never promoted during WW1 because of his sexual orientation".

So if they lied about that, can we trust any of the speculation about Hitler's sex life, presented without any corroborating evidence whatsoever? If Hitler is so homosexual, how do you explain young Hitler's obsession with Stephanie, and his marriage to Eva Braun? Obama is a homosexual, and he's married to a tranny, so was Eva a tranny too?
:face:


Image
Eva Braun au naturel (source)


Oh, yeah, she's a tranny all right...

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Feb 19, 2018 3:07 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Just writing a book about Hitler will get you labeled as an apologist for "the world's most evil man". I have seen Frederic Spotts be accused of exactly that, but the opposite is actually the case. Spotts is an apologist for the official story that falsely labels Hitler as "the world's most evil man". Spotts and his book very much reinforce the mind control program we have all been subjected to which shapes our mistaken beliefs about Hitler.

Quote:
He (Hitler) made over a hundred thousand men stand motionless and at the snap of his fingers had them turn, march, sing, shout or raise their arms in the party salute as though a choreographer or stage director. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 54

Oh, what a nasty dictator! How evil to stage a military parade! They do this at the nearby Air Force Academy and at military academies all over the world quite regularly, though they typically can't orchestrate quite so many men. Kim Jong-un did this recently in North Korea, and U.S. president Donald Trump was impressed enough to suggest that Americans should do an even bigger show of military precision! Good God, evil dictators are all around us!

Quote:
What in another country would have been a terse government announcement explaining away, with decent embarrassment, its violation of a major international obligation, was turned into a brazen celebration. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 55

Here Spotts is speaking of Hitler's March 16, 1934 decree declaring the Versailles Treaty limits on German armaments as null and void. We already know that the Versailles Treaty was broken by all the other major signatories, while Germany had adhered to it far longer than anyone else. So with his typical bias, Spotts subtly condemns Hitler but conveniently ignores all the other Allied leaders who never had any intention of following the treaty, which was designed by the Jewish sociopaths to plunder Germany anyway. Hitler essentially told the Jewish sociopaths that the plundering of Germany was over. I'm sure you can see why Germany would celebrate, and why the Jewish sociopaths would see this as a truly evil act.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:30 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
More important still, his pageantry and rites provided the populace, now deprived of debate and elections, with a stronger sense of political participation than ever before. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 56

As if debates and elections constitute political participation...

We have plenty of debates and elections in the USA, yet people in the know don't have any desire to participate because the political process is fake. It's rigged, contrived, orchestrated, controlled, manipulative, and deliberately deceptive.

It was the same in Germany before Hitler came to power, which by way was accomplished via 12 long years of debate and elections. Hitler spoke of the failed democratic system that preceded him that was mostly an illusion allowing a small minority of Jewish sociopaths to control Germany. The populace agreed and opted for a dramatic change with Hitler in charge. The result was a dramatic improvement in German life with near unanimous participation by the German people. And it was not a "sense" of participation on the part of Germans, it was the real thing. Instead of participating in meaningless debates and elections, Germans participated in making their nation strong and healthy again, with envious results.



Image
Germans participating in the political process under Hitler -- a united people

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:35 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:05 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
To secure his position further he also made himself supreme military commander by requiring a formal oath of allegiance from the top military leaders and, in ceremonies repeated throughout Germany the next day, from every member of the German armed forces. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 55

That didn't sound like Hitler to me, who was selfless in his devotion to the German people. He's going to require an oath of loyalty to his private person? That would surprise me. Is author Frederic Spotts spinning the truth again? That wouldn't surprise me, so it's time to seek the real truth.

Here is the oath before Hitler's appointment as Chancellor and after, so that we can see the change that was made. There is no indication that Hitler was responsible for this change, nor is there any allegiance to Hitler required.

Quote:
I swear loyalty to the Reich's constitution and pledge, that I as a courageous soldier always want to protect the German Reich and its legal institutions, (and) be obedient to the Reichspräsident and to my superiors. -- source
Quote:
I swear by God this holy oath, that I want to ever loyally and sincerely serve my people and fatherland and be prepared as a brave and obedient soldier to risk my life for this oath at any time. -- source


Finally, here is the oath that was implemented after President Hindenburg dies in August 1934 and Hitler becomes Fuhrer:
Quote:
I swear by God this holy oath, that I want to offer unconditional obedience to the Führer of the German Reich and people, Adolf Hitler, the commander-in-chief of the Wehrmacht, and be prepared as a brave soldier to risk my life for this oath at any time. -- source

There is indeed a personal allegiance to Adolf Hitler in the new oath! But is Hitler responsible for this change, as Frederic Spotts claims in his deceptive book? Surprise, surprise ... the answer appears to be NO.

Quote:
In the same year, after Hindenburg's death on August 2, as part of his "self-Gleichschaltung" strategy, Blomberg personally ordered all soldiers in the army and all sailors in the Navy to pledge the Reichswehreid (oath of allegiance) not to People and Fatherland, but to the new Führer Adolf Hitler, which is thought to have limited later opposition to Hitler. The oath was the initiative of Blomberg and that of the Ministeramt chief General Walther von Reichenau, the entire military took an oath of personal loyalty to Hitler, who was most surprised at the offer; the popular view that Hitler imposed the oath on the military is incorrect.[32] -- source

Frederic Spotts is not much of an academic scholar or historian when he pulls stunts like this. He's a lackey propagandist for the usual suspects who want Hitler smeared and discredited, who need him to be "the world's most evil man" in order to support their Holocaust scam.




Wehrmacht swear 'Oath of Loyalty' to Hitler (good footage)
(duration 1:21)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:09 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
No wonder people don't want the truth. The truth is painful. It hurts.

But the truth will set you free.



Image


I was hurting from reading this, but I knew it was true, and I knew it was necessary to feel the pain.

There is great evil in the world, dividing us and ruling over us. Do we want to be free of it? Do we really? How badly do we want it?

Hitler's life work, his passion, was to set humanity free. Hitler was crushed by the evil he opposed, the same evil that rules over us today. No wonder that evil demonizes Hitler with such stubbornness and vigor. Its survival depends on doing so.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:21 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Image

Rudolf Hess was a very learned man, an intellectual even. If he was impressed by Hitler's reasoning, then you can be sure there was something to it. Hitler was no idiot, no madman, and no demented psychopath. Hess was a man of extremely good character, and he would never have associated himself with Hitler or have served him with distinction and loyalty if Hitler had been of dubious character.

Quote:
Joseph Goebbels described Hess as "the most decent, quiet, friendly, clever, reserved... he is a kind fellow." Joachim C. Fest (The Face of the Third Reich) argued that many Germans thought he was an "honest man" and "the conscience of the Party". -- source

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:20 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Dictator BAD, democracy GOOD. That's our brainwashing. But like all brainwashing done by sociopaths, it's a twisting of the truth. Let me show you why.

In the hands of sociopaths, both are BAD. In the hands of people with empathy, both are GOOD. It is not the mechanism of government that matters. It is the psychology of those operating the mechanism.

When sociopaths are our leaders, they use a strategy known as "divide and conquer". In such an environment, democracy is hopelessly crippled and easily manipulated. Democracy requires consensus, and the greater the consensus, the better it works. At its worst, where a simple majority decides, democracy is effectively one vote removed from perfect disagreement, from a 50 - 50 split in consensus. In the hands of sociopaths practicing a "divide and conquer" strategy, democracy then becomes an effective and easy-to-use tool for controlling the masses. This is exactly what we have in the USA today, and have had for over a century.

A dictator with empathy and genuine concern for his people can implement beneficial changes far faster and more efficiently than any democracy, especially a democracy that is being manipulated by ruling sociopaths. That is why Hitler's dictatorship was so constructive for Germany in the 1930s. In just a few years under Hitler, from 1933 to 1936, Germany reinvented itself, transforming from the trash heap of Europe into the envy of the world. In a world run by sociopaths practicing a divide and conquer strategy, such a transformation could only happen with a benevolent dictatorship.

For further clarification, watch this excellent video (censored from YouTube).

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:29 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 9926
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Now Frederic Spotts is arguing that Hitler's National Socialism was nothing but empty pagentry bedazzling stupid Germans.

Quote:
Ultimately the purpose of these spectacles was to fill a void at the center of National Socialism. Nazi ideology was, in Karl Deitrich Bracher's words, essentially 'an eclectic conglomeration of ideas and ways of thinking, concepts and hopes, emotions of various origins that was welded together only through the manipulation of a radical political movement at a time of crisis.' In other words, unlike Marxism, it offered little that was concrete enough to get hold of. What Hitler provided was ritual in place of belief, or ritual as belief. Ritual inculcates obedience. It involves loyalty rather than conviction, blind faith rather than reasoned understanding. -- Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, page 61

Spotts might as well be describing the Jewish religion, or the American presidential elections. His arguments are nothing but empty pageantry themselves bedazzling his stupid readers. Spotts is beyond belief, essentially accusing his opponent (Hitler) of his own malfeasance.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:55 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 519 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 ... 52  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.