united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Hitler -- What is the truth? https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=1194 |
Page 24 of 66 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:26 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
After the war, Hitler's best friend August Kubizek was arrested and held by the Allies. Kubizek recounts in his book the way the interrogations usually went. What jumps out at me is how brainwashed the Allied interrogators already were against Hitler, believing he was so evil that any sane person would feel obligated to destroy Hitler to best serve humanity! Here is how Kubizek describes it:
We Americans have been taught that the Nazis were all about propaganda, and that was how they could bamboozle the German population into following their evil agenda. In fact, that is just Allied propaganda. In fact, it was the Allies that used pervasive propaganda to bamboozle the American population into following their evil agenda! |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Dec 24, 2017 5:14 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
There were no human gas chambers. That fact changes things dramatically. No six million exterminated Jews. No homicidal maniac named Hitler conspiring to exterminate Jews. And it reveals the most insidious collection of lies propagated by any group of people in the history of the planet! That Jews would invent this horrendous deception and propagate it for over 70 years, benefiting enormously at the expense of all other people, granting themselves privileged and untouchable status while they perpetrate crimes against humanity more evil than the ones they falsely pinned on Hitler, is almost unbelievable. No normal person could imagine such a scheme. But sociopaths could. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Dec 25, 2017 2:02 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
Hitler was financed by the western banksters. I used to believe this one, but it turns out it is just part of the incessant propaganda designed to discredit Hitler, who was the real deal! Hitler was the genuine "good guy" of the whole ugly global war, a war conceived, prepared, and steered by genuinely evil sociopaths in positions of great power and control. In fact, Hitler's goodness -- his solid principles, his moral and ethical sense, his unyielding concern for his people and nation, his selflessness, his sense of justice and equality, and his hard-won achievements derived from his genuine goodness -- is the very reason this horrible war was thrust upon the world. How evil is that?! How evil is it to snuff out 60 million lives and lay devastation to scores of nations in order to crush one good man? And then, to make matters worse, the evil ones fabricate all manner of lies to make everyone believe that this one good man is the epitome of evil! No, Hitler was not financed by the western banksters. Yes, they continued to invest in Germany even when Hitler was an up-coming politician, even when he became Fuhrer, even when he stopped the criminal Jewish Poles who were murdering German families. That's because businessmen have no ethics. The pursuit of profit is their only concern. They would invest in Germany no matter what its politics, as long as there were profits to be made. Hitler wasn't the reason they sent their money to Germany. Profits were.
Winston Churchill (left), puppet and obedient minion of the evil ruling sociopaths "In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies." -- Winston Churchill This is also how Churchill operated in peacetime. Sociopaths make no distinction. Truth is always the enemy for them. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Dec 25, 2017 3:03 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
Why is it so hard to get to the truth? Because the ruling sociopaths don't want us to know the truth. It would spoil their deceptions and manipulations that are used to control our minds. As I have long suspected, Hess was sent by Hitler to England to stop the war. Hitler didn't want war. He wanted to be left in peace so he could be free to improve Germany in great leaps and bounds, exactly as he had before the war was declared by England and France. All the malicious propaganda that Hitler was a homicidal maniac intent on conquering the world is utter nonsense. He was already a disgruntled veteran of the War to End all Wars, a decorated and reluctant war hero, a compassionate and dedicated artist, a national socialist focused on his people, a long-suffering ethical voice speaking for justice and equality for all Germans, a man for all seasons. Listen to Hitler tell it in his own words from 45:25 to 56:20 in "The Ultimate Red Pill". The Ultimate Red Pill (EstelleNation) February 14, 2019: This video scrubbed from the Internet. Private copy here. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Dec 25, 2017 11:48 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
Why must Churchill command that Hitler's peace terms be concealed for 100 years? Would it be because those peace terms were perfectly reasonable and just? Would it be because they would expose Churchill as the true warmonger, the real face of evil, the hidden psychopath behind the war? To this day, Churchill is painted as a great hero, while Hitler is the dastardly villain. Is this by deliberate design, i.e. propaganda? Who benefits? Perhaps the same people that benefited from the Holocaust Lie? Could it be the people we must never criticize, the Jews? Or can we just call them the organized sociopaths that hide behind a Jewish mask? The point is that Churchill was an evil man, being controlled by even more evil men, while Hitler was a good man acting independently according to his principles and values to truly serve his people. Although this is totally at odds with what we are taught, the signs of the cover-up are there to be seen, if only we bother to look. Churchill not only hid Hitler's peace terms from the British War Cabinet, he hid them from the entire population for at least one hundred years! Is this the behavior of a hero, or a sociopath? The answer is clear when you understand how a sociopath behaves. Sociopaths deceive and manipulate in the pursuit of power and control over others. And that's exactly what Churchill consistently did. The Real Winston Churchill by Historian David Irving (censored by YouTube from the quoted article) |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 3:20 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I was reminded of Zook's rationalizations concerning who financed Hitler, as if nothing gets started without someone putting up a bundle of money. Financing is often not necessary. I can point to my own business that I started in 1986 for zero dollars. I can point to this forum that I started in 2011 for zero dollars. Neither venture required any financing. Nobody financed Hitler either when he started being politically active after WW1 ended. He was an unknown but focused one-man act in the beginning. He worked hard for 12 grueling years on his vision before he ended up as Fuhrer ("Guide") of his nation. Nobody told him how to steer Germany; he knew from the beginning the direction he wanted. What triggered the flashback to Zook's cock-sure ravings was this paragraph that I just read:
How is it that know-it-all Zook can get things so wrong? It's because Zook parrots other authoritative voices. And get this -- that's something we all do! And that's how the mind control game is played. You just have to steer the authoritative voices that everyone else will parrot. It's rare that this technique does not work. It didn't work with David Irving or Vincent Reynouard. Real historians tend to ignore the squawking parrots and look for real evidence. This often takes them in a completely different direction from the authoritative voices. This often makes them renegades who are persecuted for their unconformist thinking. Adolf Hitler was one of those renegades, something Zook just can't accept. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Fri Dec 29, 2017 4:40 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Here's why getting to the truth about Adolf Hitler or the Holocaust is nearly impossible for the average Follower. It's a psychological characteristic of most human beings called confirmation bias:
Not only is this going on today, but it was going on 78 years ago during WW2. Our parents and grandparents were fed mountains of propaganda -- fake news -- about Hitler, the Nazis, the concentration camps, the Jews, and just about everything else that was happening in the war. It continued after the war with the circus trials like Nuremberg, the Eichmann trial, and all the "trials" in the press that crucified the opposition at every opportunity. There was simply no way the truth had any chance of being believed.
This is indeed why democracy in the U.S. is an illusion, nothing more than the continuing propaganda, i.e. "fake news", that has been our steady diet for over 200 years.
And that's what we have -- a tiny aristocracy, a huge mass of their suckers, and fascism. And it's all due to the ruling sociopaths using our trusting nature against us to "divide and rule". So why does the public automatically reject the evidence presented by the "Holocaust deniers", the "neo-Nazis", and the purveyors of "hate crimes"?
The first story, no matter how preposterous, that is planted in the public mind becomes the yardstick against which all other stories must compete. Only for most people, no competition is allowed. Their minds are closed. We saw this with the JFK assassination, 9/11, and a whole host of false-flag attacks during the last century that are still denigrated by the majority as "conspiracy theory". And so Hitler is the epitome of evil, six million Jews were gassed to death in Nazi concentration camps, and the Nuremberg Trials were fair and just. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Jan 01, 2018 2:32 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
David Irving made extraordinary efforts to interview the people who actually worked with Hitler. This was original research, something professional (i.e. bought and paid for) historians rarely do. So it should come as no surprise that what David Irving learned about Hitler from Hitler's regular associates was not what professional historians preach. The Germans who were in the best position to really know the real Hitler had an entirely different perspective.
Even David Irving had been brought up to believe that Hitler was the devil incarnate. Everything bad about WW2 was always blamed on Hitler.
How could that be? The obvious but uncomfortable answer is that the popular perspective of Hitler is wrong. It is propaganda. It is brainwashing. It is false. It is the Big Lie. David Irving's Revised Revisionism |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Jan 04, 2018 4:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? |
When you begin to see the evil that exists in the British royal family, an evil that has existed for a very long time, then you begin to understand how Churchill was able to freely exercise his sociopathy during the 20th century, most notably during WW2. When you also understand that the American government is just as evil, and has been since before Roosevelt orchestrated America into WW2 with the Pearl Harbor massacre, it is no mystery why transcripts of discussions between Roosevelt and Churchill that reveal the nature of their criminal conspiring have been sealed forever. When you understand that the Russian government under Stalin was equally as evil as both the British and American governments, even if we only consider the Katyn massacre, then the WW2 side known as the Allies takes on the unmistakable air of the Dark Side. For these forces of evil to overcome their natural resentment for each other and join together in opposition to a small but unified nation often called Nazi Germany, which they had completely defeated only 20 years earlier, suggests that the forces operating in Nazi Germany were the forces of good. After all, what other force can cause the evil in the world to come together and cooperate in the annihilation of the one force that it cannot tolerate? Hitler was the Fuhrer (literally, the Guide) who was the engine behind those forces of good that the forces of evil so hated. It is why Hitler has been falsely painted as exactly the opposite of what he truly was. If the forces of evil portray someone as the devil incarnate, what does that tell you? You know they lie, and they lie big. If they tell you that war is peace, shouldn't you be suspicious and perhaps even entertain the notion that war is the opposite of peace? |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Jan 07, 2018 6:53 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
What utter BS from Frederic Spotts, the brainwashed author suffering from cognitive dissonance. The "racial idea" that Hitler was following as the basis of life was "Germany and Germans first", not so different from the campaign Donald Trump used ("America first") to win the presidency of the U.S. against all odds. This "racial" perspective is clearly more about philosophy than race per se. Jumping from that "racial idea" to "racial genocide" is totally unwarranted and just emphasizes the degree of Spotts' brainwashing. Hitler never condoned racial genocide, never practiced it, and never ordered it! The Jewish Holocaust was a massive lie, a frame-up, and a psychological manipulation of the entire world for the benefit of one special interest group ("God's Chosen People"). Racial genocide was never a "supreme goal" of Hitler's. Neither was "the establishment of a state in which the arts were supreme." The arts were to be better supported in Hitler's Germany, yes, but they were not to reign supreme. It was German well-being and quality of life that was to be supreme. Spotts is a disingenuous researcher, one who has little regard for the truth. I initially wanted to start this post by claiming "Spotts is either an idiot or a Jew", but then I realized he might be both. I don't know what his connection is to the Jewish mindset, but I do know that his biased perspective is idiotic. The real racial genocide of the second World War was the killing of Germans, not Jews. And guess who was the driving force behind that genocide, that organized the major powers of the world into destroying the German people for the second time within 25 years. It was the Jews. |
Page 24 of 66 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |