united-people.tk https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/ |
|
Hitler -- What is the truth? https://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=1194 |
Page 23 of 65 |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:45 pm ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
What does the propaganda maligning Hitler and Nazi Germany look like today? Here is a classic example: What Happened to The Man Who Refused to Salute Hitler? Nobody had to salute Hitler. It was a choice. The wonder is not that one man refused to salute, but that everyone else did so of their own volition. Hitler had near-unanimous support among his people because he was genuine, caring, honest, and wise. There was no Gestapo waiting to pounce on anyone that didn't salute Hitler. That simply wasn't a Gestapo function, nor did Hitler need that kind of help. Even the Jewish stronghold Wikipedia notes that this fantasy story is potentially a fantasy.
So, is this the real story of the man with crossed arms? Or was he feeling sick and had the chills, crossing his arms to feel warmer? Or did he just have a stomach ache? Are his crossed arms an act of defiance against Hitler, or is it something entirely more innocent? Can you see how totally convincing propaganda can be conjured up out of nothing to deceive and manipulate a gullible public? I will bet the rest of the August Landmesser story is twisted truth, just like the "refusing to salute" explanation assigned to this photo. The claim is the the Nazis were the undisputed masters of propaganda, but I think that's just organized sociopaths accusing their opponents of their own malfeasance. The truth is that the Germans were far too honest and down-to-earth to rely on propaganda to effect change, when the truth was what they craved and could do a better job, as Hitler had amply demonstrated to the entire nation from 1933 to 1939. I think it is becoming clearer and clearer that we won WW2 not because of our unwavering conviction to do what is right and just, but because of our naive gullibility and foolishness to swallow the con-artistry of our own master propagandists. We were duped. We were deceived and manipulated by the skilled sociopaths who ran our country, and it is still going on today. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? |
Or do you think this is propaganda? Adolf Hitler: The Man They Call the Devil In case of YouTube censorship, another copy is here. Real film of a real man saying real words (accurately translated) expressing real ideals and real goals in front of a real mass of really appreciative Germans. Hitler's message was always honest, genuine, compassionate, and selfless. He was his people's tireless advocate. He always placed their best interests first. He transformed Germany from a destitute, broken wasteland into a proud, vigorous, strong, unified nation. That was his crime in the eyes of the ruling sociopaths, who wanted him utterly crushed and discredited, even if they had to orchestrate another global war to accomplish it and sacrifice the innocent lives of 60 million people. You want your devil? Look to the ones who would do such evil. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Dec 05, 2017 1:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? |
Why were we never accurately shown what Hitler said to his nation? Why could we not hear his message for ourselves? Why were we simply fed lies that vilified one of the greatest men of the 20th century? Why were we taught to hate this one man and the nation he led? Why has the name Hitler been falsely associated with the word "evil" in the minds of the masses? Why must historical revisionists be imprisoned for overturning the deliberate propaganda that was presented as unquestionable history? Why have laws been passed to criminalize the pursuit of truth? Why the deception? Why the brainwashing? Why is this still going on 72 years after WW2 ended? Why is it so important that we do not know the truth? Adolf Hitler, the man against time. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Thu Dec 07, 2017 3:28 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
To understand why Hitler was vilified with the totally false story of the Holocaust, meaning the gassing of 6 million innocent Jewish civilians, which never happened, you have to know about the real atrocities committed by the Allies during WW2, because this is what the Holocaust was meant to hide. We've already looked at the terror fire-bombing of German cities (like Dresden) full of civilians, the Katyn massacre committed by the Russians, and the deliberate killing of over a million German soldiers who surrendered to the Americans rather than the Russians at the end of the war in the hopes of more humane treatment, which they did not receive. These were all undeniable war crimes, and in fact the Germans were tried and found guilty at Nuremberg for the Katyn massacres, when the real perpetrators were the Russians following Stalin's orders. Not surprisingly, there are other Allied atrocities that are still suppressed to this day. I didn't even know about this one:
World War 2 - British Massacre Confessions Of Bleiburg In case of YouTube censorship, another copy is here. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Sun Dec 10, 2017 1:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? |
The truth about Hitler is starting to leak out without being censored. The general public is still completely brainwashed to think of Hitler as the most evil man that ever lived, but the truth is almost the polar opposite. So while the bulk of the public cannot willingly change their programmed mindset, the ranks of those who can continues to grow. At some point in time, a tipping point will be reached where the once-dismissed truth will be embraced as obvious, and the "most evil man" propaganda will be ridiculed and universally rejected. Even the brow-beaten Germans, the most heavily indoctrinated with the "most evil man" belief system, are starting to wake up to the deception, as this video shows. Adolf Hitler's - Economic Reform of Germany In case of YouTube censorship, another copy is located here. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Mon Dec 11, 2017 6:55 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
Black St. Louis, MO pastor Ray Hagins pulls no punches when defending Hitler:
Thai Royal Prince ML Rungguna Kitiyakara posted the following comments on his Facebook page:
Not everyone has been fooled by the malicious propaganda about Adolf Hitler, perhaps the greatest leader of the 20th century. Once you discover that no people were gassed in German concentration camps, and you realize who is behind the BIG LIE that six million Jews were gassed to death there, you suddenly understand where the real evil lies -- not in Hitler's actions, but in the actions of his most ardent accusers. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:32 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
The Germans were far more advanced technologically than we've ever been told. The rumor is that Hitler had the first atomic bomb long before the United States, but unlike U.S. sociopathic leaders, Hitler refused to use such weapons of mass destruction. In fact, the blitzkreig was a tactic Hitler deliberately selected to minimize death and destruction. Hitler also had horrific biological and chemical weapons that he also refused to employ. Not much of a sociopath, I would say. Yet he is painted by the Jewish sociopaths and their puppets (like Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt) as a psychopathic madman. I don't think so.
Yes, an unbelievably inconsistent position! Unless Hitler never gave a directive to use Zyklon B and other poisonous gases to kill millions of concentration camp prisoners. And he didn't give such a directive, no directive has ever been found, and no poisonous gases were used to kill any concentration camp prisoners. That lie comes from the wily Jews, not from the honest Hitler. The claims of William Tompkins ( 1 2 ) are not so unbelievable once you consider that Hitler was speaking the truth to his German Ninth Army officers, as quoted above. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:23 am ] | ||||||||||||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | ||||||||||||||||||
Speaking of Nazi atomic bombs and Luigi Romersa (mentioned in the prior post):
What kind of new weapon? An atomic bomb!
Hitler had the weapons, but refused to employ them. He wasn't trying to "conquer the world". He was defending Germany against Britain and France in the beginning, and later defending Germany and all of Europe against the Russian-Jewish Bolsheviks. He said so himself many times. Here is one from 1941: Adolf Hitler Speech About the History & Defense of Europe - English Subtitles Deutsch |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:49 am ] | |||||||||
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? | |||||||||
Just so you know what kind of sociopaths Churchill and Roosevelt were:
Remember, Hitler vetoed every suggestion that the Germans use chemical or biological weapons against their enemies. Hitler was a moral man. The same cannot be said for Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt. |
Author: | Chicodoodoo [ Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hitler -- What is the truth? |
Of special interest to me is Frederic Spotts' efforts in his book Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics to discredit August Kubizek's book Adolf Hitler - mein Jugendfreund (still available to read online free here). Kubizek and Hitler were best friends in their later teenage years growing up in Linz, Austria. Kubizek's book is the only source of information we have describing the young Hitler, which makes it very important. I read Kubizek's book with the express purpose of finding the identifying markers of a sociopath in the young Hitler. If Hitler were truly the psychopathic madman that we are taught, then the traits of a sociopath would have surely been evident in his teenage years. To my surprise, I not only found no evidence of sociopathy in the young Hitler, I found just the opposite -- evidence for above-normal levels of caring, compassion, and empathy ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 ). Kubizek's book was thus pivotal in changing my programmed attitude towards Hitler. In another recent surprise, I find that Spotts spends several pages in the Preface of his book (section entitled Sources) trying to discredit Kubizek's book. He condemns anyone that puts any faith in Kubizek's work and compares it to other fraudulent books like the Hitler Diaries. His reasons seem shallow and unconvincing, and I wonder why discrediting Kubizek is so important. The answer is that if Kubizek's portrayal of Hitler is accurate, it completely undermines the "world's most evil man" image of Hitler we have all been taught. Spotts ends up admitting in that section that he uses Kubizek as a source, but it's clear he does so only when it fits his purpose. In other words, he cherry-picks from Kubizek only what he agrees with, rather than take an unbiased approach. Once again we see cognitive dissonance behind Spotts' analysis of Hitler. Spotts never knew Hitler, while Kubizek grew up with Hitler. Who do you think is more likely to describe the real Hitler? Who is the more credible author? |
Page 23 of 65 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |