Reply to topic  [ 648 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 ... 65  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Take a look at this Hitler film, which YouTube has not yet censored:




Hitler Returns To Germany From France (1940) | British Pathé
(duration 3:47)



Then check the comments on Youtube here.

You will see that in place of comments, we see "Comments are turned off".

That's right, the public may not comment on this film. Your freedom of speech is disallowed. Why? What is YouTube afraid of? Why won't they support free speech?

The answer, of course, is that the Jews (specifically the Jewish Anti-Defamation League) control freedom of speech at YouTube.

If Hitler was the world's most evil man, as the Jews want us to believe, don't you think the Germans in this film would have known it?


P.S. I watched four other old Pathé films about Hitler on YouTube, and all of them have disallowed comments.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Nov 26, 2019 3:24 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Here is a standard and current Allied propaganda piece that attempts to explain how Hitler lost the war. Note the title, designed to make it appear as if Hitler was deceiving and manipulating the German people. This is the standard approach used by the Jews and sociopaths in America and England, an approach which claims Hitler relentlessly "propagandized" his own people. In fact, Hitler told his people the real truth, while it was the British and the Americans that were relentlessly propagandizing their own people, which they continue to do to this very day, as evidenced by this video clip. You may think you are not being played, but you are, with largely simplistic explanations and mostly by a withholding of the real truth.

Needless to say, comments are allowed on YouTube for this YouTube video, which is in no danger of being censored, since it mostly supports the official version of history regarding Hitler and the Nazis. The Jewish ADL will allow it to remain on YouTube, since it aligns with and gives credence to the Jewish lies about Hitler and Germany.

From my perspective, with all the research I have done on the deceptive history of WW2, the film is such blatant propaganda that it is criminal. The truth is being deliberately twisted, misrepresented, and hidden. It is exactly what the western countries falsely accuse Hitler of having done to his own people. This is the sociopaths' classic tactic of accusing their opponents of their own malfeasance (propagandizing their own people), with the sociopaths being primarily Jewish.




How & Why Germans Bought Hitler's Pitch
(duration 24:18)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Nov 26, 2019 4:44 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
The real reason the Nazis "invaded" Europe, from German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop:

Quote:
Eighthly, documents in the possession of the German Government prove that the preparations made by Britain and France on Belgian and Netherlands territory for the attack on Germany had already reached an advanced stage. Thus, some considerable time ago all obstacles on the Franco-Belgian frontier which might have impeded the advance of the Anglo-French forces were secretly removed.

Airdromes in Belgium and Holland were inspected by British and French officers and improvements duly carried out. Means of transport were stationed in readiness on the frontier by Belgium and recently advanced staff and troop units of the British and French armies arrived in various places in Belgium and Holland.

These facts as well as additional reports which have become more frequent in the last few days, are undeniable proof that the Anglo-French attack on Germany is imminent and that this attack on the Ruhr (valley) will take place through Belgium and Holland.
......
If, despite this, Belgium and the Netherlands still persist in making a pretense of policy of independence and neutrality, this cannot, in the light of these indubitable facts, be regarded as anything but an attempt at deception as to the real intention of Belgian and Netherlands policy.

In view of this state of affairs, the German government can no longer doubt that Belgium and the Netherlands have determined not only to tolerate the impending Anglo-French stroke, but to support it in every direction, and that the agreements reached between the general staffs of the two countries and those of Britain and France can only serve this purpose.
....
In the struggle for life and death thrust upon the German people by Britain and France the German Government does not intend to await an attack by France and allow the war to be carried through Belgium and Holland into German soil. -- source

England and France, who had started WW2 by declaring war on Germany, were actively preparing to invade Germany in the spring of 1940. Germany watched them prepare. When it was clear that the invasion would undoubtedly occur, Germany decided the best defense was a preemptive strike.

Keep in mind that France had already half-heartedly invaded Germany in September of 1939, as a way of showing Poland that it was keeping its false promise of defending Poland should Germany attack Poland. France, England, and Poland had conspired to "make" Hitler attack Poland, so that England could blame the war on Germany. It was always the English ruling sociopaths that wanted a war against economic competitor Germany, which was thriving economically under Hitler while the western powers were struggling.

Yes, money was making the decisions, in the finest English/Jewish traditions. Hitler had kicked the Rothschilds out of Germany, and the Rothschilds controlling the City of London banking powerhouse (as well as the Rothschild banking cartel in France) were out for revenge. The Jews (Rothschild and company) do not forgive any opposition to their criminal activities.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:42 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
In government, look how Hitler burned down his own Reich stag building and blamed the communists in order to incite war. -- source

Only Hitler didn't do that. This is an example of the brainwashing and programming we have all received since birth about Hitler. It's all part of the comprehensive propaganda program to demonize Hitler as the world's most evil man by telling Big Lie after Big Lie about him, and repeating those lies over and over until everyone believes them. Astounding stuff, especially given that the person making this quoted statement does so in an article entitled "What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie?", and yet he cannot realize that what he is claiming as truth about Hitler burning the Reichstag is just another one of those lies.



Image



And Hitler never said that either. The above quote is also a lie, one that most people accept without question as coming from Hitler.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Dec 02, 2019 6:33 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
OK, now for some words that Hitler did write:

Quote:
Had they died for us, the soldiers of August and September, 1914? Was it for this that in the autumn of the same year the volunteer regiments marched after their old comrades? Was it for this that these boys of seventeen sank into the earth of Flanders? Was this the meaning of the sacrifice which the German mother made to the fatherland when with sore heart she let her best-loved boys march off, never to see them again?

Did all this happen only so that a gang of wretched criminals could lay hands on the fatherland? -- source

That "gang of wretched criminals" would be the Jewish sociopaths, in case you are unaware of the real history of WW1 Germany. There was a very valid reason why most Germans held a grudge against the Jews. They had literally betrayed the Fatherland.

This quote is also an example of Hitler's empathy for his fellow Germans, which a psychopath would be unlikely to author in a book like Mein Kampf. The evidence that Hitler was not a psychopath and madman, as Jews claim, is readily evident with just a minimum of effort. That evidence just grows and grows as you continue to research the censored information about Hitler. No one has ever been more falsely vilified than Hitler. The Jewish sociopaths have done such an outrageous reversal of the facts about Hitler that it is worth a special Academy Award.



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Dec 10, 2019 12:41 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
The latest in Hitler propaganda from The Guardian newspaper in London, England:

Quote:
Adolf Hitler's rabid antisemitism and virulent nationalism were not directly prompted by his experiences on the western front in the first world war, historical research suggests.

Unpublished letters and a diary written by veterans of Hitler's wartime regiment are among newly unearthed documents that challenge previous notions about how the conflict shaped the future dictator's views. -- source

Hitler's "rabid antisemitism" and "virulent nationalism"? Yes, Hitler recognized Germany's greatest enemies, and he was patriotic, but since when is that the mark of the Devil?

Quote:
They noticed that he did not indulge in their favourite pastimes – letter-writing or drinking – but was instead often seen reading a political book or painting, earning him the sobriquet the "painter" or the "artist". He was also viewed as particularly submissive to his superiors. -- source

That's right, Hitler was indeed an artist, a reader, an intellectual, and a serious individual not subject to getting drunk and cavorting with prostitutes during the war. So that makes him a demon and a madman, or so the Jewish mouthpieces like The Guardian would like you to believe.

After all these years (74 since WW2 ended), you have to wonder why the Jewish-owned mainstream media has to keep "suggesting" that Hitler was a madman psychopath. Is it because he was really the exact opposite, a very sane, compassionate hero of humanity? Was he the good guy of WW2, while Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt were actually the bad guys? That would mean the bad guys won the war. And who did Leon Degrelle, the Belgian politician who volunteered to fight Marxism in the German Waffen SS, and who rose through every rank from Private up to General — who did Leon Degrelle say won the war in an interview decades after the war concluded?

And he said it with absolute conviction: "The Jews."




Leon Degrelle - The Epic Story of the Waffen SS
(duration 1:21:58)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Dec 10, 2019 1:23 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Jewish lawyer Col. Murray C. Bernays played a major role in preparing the fraudulent Nuremberg Trials. Here was his take on the job he had to do:

Quote:
"There are a good many Nazi criminals who will get off if the roundups aren't conducted efficiently. But if we establish that the SS, for example, was a criminal organisation, and that membership in it is evidence per se of criminality, the Allies are going to get hold of a great many more criminals in one swoop. You know, a lot of people here at home don't realise that we are now the government of Germany in our zone and that no judicial system can exist other than one we approve. We are the law. If we wanted to, for instance, we could try Germans for crimes twenty, thirty, forty years old. We'll be too busy with the current crop of war criminals, though, to have much time to look into ancient wrongdoings." -- source, page 15


The Jewish perspective is that the SS was a criminal organization, and that being a member of the SS made you a criminal automatically. This is absurd and highly biased and discriminatory. You might as well say Judaism is a criminal organization, and that being a Jew makes you a criminal automatically.

The hypocrisy of the Jewish sociopaths is beyond belief.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:04 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Rudolf Hess was, like Adolf Hitler and Hermann Goering, a man of integrity. That's right, despite what we have all been taught by our illicit educational system, all three men were men of integrity. Stalin was not, Churchill was not, and Roosevelt was not. That distinction is important to make, because it was the western powers, under the direction and control of the Jewish sociopaths (like the Rothschilds), that deceived and manipulated us to believe the lies about Hitler and Nazi Germany. Current western leaders are vile and loathsome men in comparison to Hitler and his team. Interestingly, we are taught to believe the exact opposite. Ask yourself why that is. It's because the truth is being hidden. It's because our leaders are sociopaths. It's because our democracy is a con-game. It's because our news is fake. It's because our free press is not free. It's because capitalism is a control system, a prison for our minds. It's because we are slaves that have to be managed by our masters. It's because we live in a Matrix.

Rudolf Hess did not live in a Matrix. He refused, even at the risk of his life. There is no greater integrity than refusing to bow down to the Big Lie that nearly everyone else accepts obediently.



Image



When you know the truth about Rudolf Hess, you cannot help but have the highest respect for him. And Hess had the highest respect for Hitler, and he knew Hitler far better than any brainwashed scholar our illicit educational system produces today. So what does this tell us about Hitler? It tells us he was the real deal, a selfless leader with no equivalent in modern history. No wonder Hitler is demonized with such furor even today, 74 years after WW2 ended. Should the world realize what a good leader really looks like, all the sociopaths that lead us now would be snuffed out in little time, with only a “good riddance” associated with their departure.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Dec 13, 2019 8:41 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Like most of his comrades, Hess was drawn into the war in 1914 to fight for a free, strong and proud Germany. Now, in 1919, the 26-year-old had to witness the establishment in Bavaria of a "Soviet republic" headed by communists and Jews. In his eyes, military defeat had given way to national catastrophe. -- source

And it was a bonafide national catastrophe! It was also a global catastrophe, because the Jewish cabal was arranging all the dominoes to ensure that they fell in the direction of a second world war with an even greater death toll than "The War To End All Wars".

Quote:
My father (Rudolf Hess) became member number sixteen of the group (National Socialist Workers' Party) on July 1, 1920. From that time on he was slowly but steadily drawn to its leader. There were several reasons for his enthusiasm for Hitler. First, there were reasons of practical policy, which Hess formulated in these words in a letter written in 1921:

"The core of the matter is that Hitler is convinced that [national] resurrection is possible only if we can succeed in leading the great mass of people, in particular the workers, back to national awareness. But this is possible only in the context of reasonable, honest socialism." -- source

Despite what we have been falsely taught in America, Hitler did deliver "reasonable, honest socialism", exactly what Hess and the vast majority of Germans desired. The rest is forbidden history that you are not supposed to know, lest you realize your own enslavement.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Dec 14, 2019 4:40 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
The regulations under which the seven prisoners were held were so severe that even the French prison chaplain, Casalis, protested (in 1948) against their outrageous treatment. He went on to describe Spandau as a place of mental torture. In October 1952, after two years of protracted discussion between the custodial powers, the Soviets agreed to following so-called "special privileges": One visit of thirty minutes a month. One letter a week of no more than 1,300 words. Medical attention in the prison. And, in the event of death, interment of the ashes in the prison instead of scattering in the wind.

After the release of Albert Speer and Baldur von Schirach on October 1, 1966, Rudolf Hess was the only remaining inmate. For more than twenty years, my father was the sole prisoner in a prison designed for about six hundred.

After a further revision of regulations in the early 1970s, one member of the family was permitted to visit the prisoner for one hour once a month. The prisoner was now also permitted to receive four books each month. As before, visits, letters and books were strictly censored. No reference to the events of the 1933 to 1945 period was permitted. No mention of the Tribunal's sentence, or matters related to it, was permitted. Family visits were monitored by authorities of each of the four powers, as well as by at least two guards. No physical contact -- not even a handshake -- was permitted. The visits took place in a special "Visitor's Room," which had a partition with an open "window.' -- source

The Allies were the true monsters of WW2, and you can even see it here with the way they mentally and emotionally tortured Rudolf Hess, who had committed no crime! He had, in truth, been Hitler's secret peace envoy to England working to bring the war to an end with a peace settlement. Churchill and his Jewish sociopath cronies absolutely did not want peace, and for this reason they had to keep Hess locked up and quiet so that the truth would never get out to the general public. You see, the general public had been deceived and manipulated into believing that Hitler was a madman bent on world domination who did not want peace, and if they should learn how they had been royally fooled, the heads of British sociopaths might end up rolling down the streets of London.

It's a shame that sociopath heads never get the disqualification they deserve.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Dec 16, 2019 4:07 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 648 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 ... 65  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.