Reply to topic  [ 648 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 ... 65  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
There is no way that anyone can believe that Hitler was a psychopathic madman if only they were to read his speeches! This is an exceptional man, a true leader driven by empathy for his people, of which, he realizes, he is but one of them. He did not want war. He did not want to dominate other nations. He did not want to rule the world.

No, Hitler wanted to give other nations an example of what was possible when sociopaths did not rule over them. Germany was that example.

National Socialism does not harbour the slightest aggressive intent towards any European nation. On the contrary, we are convinced that each European nation ought to live its own life, the life which has been marked out for it and regulated and determined by its own traditions and its historical and economic necessities. This the nations will have to do unless Europe, as the general product of an immortal civilisation, is to go to pieces and disappear. Inasmuch as we have put this conviction into practice as far as the German people are concerned, we believe that we have given a useful example to the other European States.

This speech was the opening address by Hitler at the Seventh National Socialist Congress in Nuremberg on September 11, 1935.

How many of you were taught the contents of this astounding speech in school? Or anywhere else? This was the real Hitler, while the boogie man you were taught was Hitler is nothing but an astoundingly BIG Jewish lie.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Oct 27, 2019 4:13 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Staff Sergeant Kurt Hummel, Military Post Number L 31 605 Lg Pa. Paris, to his local group

Northern Russia, 12 August 1941

Bolshevist conditions are indescribable. I had never imagined that such misery was possible. People here know nothing about electric lights, radio, newspapers and the like. One can't call what they live in houses. There are only shanties with rotten straw roofs. Huge neglected fields lay around. We haven't yet found even a small shop. This is what people call the Soviet paradise. I wish the few outsiders who still remain in Germany could be shipped here. There is misery wherever one looks. One has to see it to realize how beautiful Germany is. -- source

This is a German soldier writing about the conditions he observed to exist in Russia as the Nazis were "invading", a defensive move to pre-empt the invasion of Germany Stalin had quietly prepared. Unlike Hitler, Stalin really was a psychopathic madman, and Russia was not thriving under his demented rule. The German soldiers are shocked to see such poverty, and they can't help but marvel at the beauty of the German nation that they are willingly defending. They know that Hitler and the Nazi party was fully responsible for nursing Germany back to health after it had been driven into poverty by the insane conditions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles which ended WW1. Every German knew how great Hitler was for having saved Germany from the Jewish cabal that had imposed those insane conditions. Stalin's propaganda machine describing the glorious living conditions in Russia were cruel lies, while Goebbles' propaganda machine was all about the truth. This is an important distinction to understand, because to Goebbels and Hitler, propaganda was meant to educate and enlighten, whereas to sociopaths and the Jewish Zionist leaders, propaganda was meant to deceive and manipulate. Even today, in the western world, we still define propaganda as the Jewish sociopaths do. The German concept of propaganda is foreign to us, because we have been propagandized incessantly by the Zionist cabal ever since Nazi Germany was destroyed. The Holocaust Lie is a prime example, and Zionist Jews are still working hard to force that falsehood on everyone under penalty of law! But we all know the truth needs no legal protection. Holocaust denial is truth, no matter how hard the Jews attempt to criminalize it.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Nov 07, 2019 4:10 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Hitler and Nationalist Socialist Germany (Nazi stands for National Socialist German Workers’ Party) are the most demonized entities in history. Any person who finds any good in Hitler or Germany is instantly demonized. The person becomes an outcast regardless of the facts. Irving is very much aware of this. Every time his factual account of Hitler starts to display a person too much different from the demonized image, Irving throws in some negative language about Hitler. -- source

Not even the great David Irving can stand up to the propaganda might of the Zionist Jews. They wield the "Big Lie" (the Holocaust narrative) as the most fearsome weapon humanity has ever faced. Like all clever sociopaths, they use our empathy against us as they cry crocodile tears and claim to be the eternal victims, all while crushing their enemies with understated hate and loathing.

The reason the truth about Hitler is so hard to find is because the Jews want it that way.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:02 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
In Chapter VII of Mein Kampf Vol. 1 (1925), Hitler writes about the betrayal of Germany with the armistice that ended WW1, the "stab in the back" that so many Germans realized had been delivered to Germany by the German Jews. Hitler was in the hospital in November of 1918 suffering from blindness induced by a chemical gas attack at the front. He could only hear about the events unfolding, as he couldn't see to read about them. This is why Germans disliked the Jews, because Jews orchestrated the political defeat of Germany in WW1, when militarily it was not defeated at all.

I have underlined Hitler's references to the Jews, as he often assumes everyone knows who he is talking about. Certainly Germans at that time knew precisely who was responsible, but generations of today are totally brainwashed to believe Jews are helpless victims instead of master manipulators.

And so it had all been in vain. In vain all the sacrifices and privations; in vain the hunger and thirst of months which were often endless; in vain the hours in which, with mortal fear clutching at our hearts, we nevertheless did our duty; and in vain the death of two millions who died. Would not the graves of all the hundreds of thousands open, the graves of those who with faith in the fatherland had marched forth never to return? Would they not open and send the silent mud- and blood-covered heroes back as spirits of vengeance to the homeland which had cheated them with such mockery of the highest sacrifice which a man can make to his people in this world?

Had they died for us, the soldiers of August and September, 1914? Was it for this that in the autumn of the same year the volunteer regiments marched after their old comrades? Was it for this that these boys of seventeen sank into the earth of Flanders? Was this the meaning of the sacrifice which the German mother made to the fatherland when with sore heart she let her best-loved boys march off, never to see them again?

Did all this happen only so that a gang of wretched criminals could lay hands on the fatherland?

Was it for this that the German soldier had stood host in the sun's heat-and in snowstorms, hungry, thirsty, and freezing, weary from sleepless nights and endless marches? Was it for this that he had lain in the hell of the drumfire and in the fever of gas attacks without wavering, always thoughtful of his one duty to preserve the fatherland from the enemy peril?

Verily these heroes deserved a headstone: 'Thou Wanderer who comest to Germany, tell those at home that we lie here, true to the fatherland and obedient to duty.'

And what about those at home-?

And yet, was it only our own sacrifice that we had to weigh in the balance? Was the Germany of the past less precious? Was there no obligation toward our own history? Were we still worthy to relate the glory of the past to ourselves? And how could this deed be justified to future generations?

Miserable and degenerate criminals!

The more I tried to achieve clarity on the monstrous event in this hour, the more the shame of indignation and disgrace burned my brow. What was all the pain in my eyes compared to this misery?

There followed terrible days and even worse nights-I knew that all was lost. Only fools, liars, and criminals could hope in the mercy of the enemy. In these nights hatred grew in me, hatred for those responsible for this deed.

In the days that followed, my own fate became known to me.

I could not help but laugh at the thought of my own future which only a short time before had given me such bitter concern. Was it not ridiculous to expect to build houses on such ground? At last it became clear to me that what had happened was what I had so often feared but had never been able to believe with my emotions.

Kaiser William II was the first German Emperor to hold out a conciliatory hand to the leaders of Marxism, without suspecting that scoundrels have no honor. While they still held the imperial hand in theirs, their other hand was reaching for the dagger.

There is no making pacts with Jews; there can only be the hard: either-or.

I, for my part, decided to go into politics.

The Jews had succeeded in defeating Germany politically with WW1, and it was on this political battlefield that Hitler realized Germans would have to defeat the Jews if any victory was even possible. Hitler dedicated the next 15 years of his life towards the creation of a political force that could do this very feat. It was no cake walk, but the endless years of effort and turmoil finally led to success. A liberated and thriving Germany was to emerge in three short years of Hitler becoming chancellor.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:36 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Hitler came to power in Germany slowly and quite improbably. It was all done legitimately within the rules of the existing German political system, which was politically complex and convoluted, as well as volatile. The position of Chancellor, which Hitler attained in on January 30, 1933, was an appointed position determined by the President of Germany. Hitler was still subordinate to the President. No one knew that President Hindenburg would die 18 months after Hitler's appointment to Chancellor, not even Hitler.

Quote:
Although Hitler would not become the Führer until Hindenburg’s death on August 2, 1934, the downfall of the German republic had officially begun.

Over the course of the next 19 months (Jan. 1933 to Aug. 1934), a variety of events would drastically increase Hitler’s power over the German government and the German military. It would only be a matter of time before Adolf Hitler attempted to assert his power over the entire continent of Europe. -- source

What propaganda! Hitler had no plans to "assert his power over the entire continent of Europe". His focus was always on the German nation, which had been torn asunder by the Jews that negotiated the end of WW1. The "downfall of the German republic" was actually a good thing, as it was a republic in appearance only. The President could dissolve the Reichstag (the representative Congress) whenever he decided, so Germany was already close to a dictatorship. And under Hitler's guidance, what the west loves to vilify as a "dictatorship", Germany thrived to an extent never seen under any republic or democracy. The proof was in the pudding, and there is really no arguing with results. Germany flourished under Hitler's leadership, because Hitler's leadership was focused on Germany thriving. All dictatorships are not bad, just as all republics are not good. Hitler's "dictatorship" was extremely good for Germany, better than anything else that nation had ever known.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:37 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Wally wrote:
The author ignorantly said:

“The Holocaust is placed before the Armenian Genocide, even though the latter preceded the former by two decades and was a model for Hitler, who admired Turkey’s brutality.”

– What a load of nonsense by someone looking to cash in like Jews have cashed in after manufacturing their utterly impossible “holocaust” narrative.

– There was no alleged 6,000,000 & gas chambers, hence Hitler could not have modeled anything. It’s laughable.

Quite right, it is laughable, if only you know the truth!

Here it is easy to see how the Jewish sociopaths added their spin to history, when they created the propaganda that the Armenian Genocide "was a model for Hitler, who admired Turkey’s brutality.” This is utter BS, as Hitler did not admire brutality. If he wanted to be brutal, he could have used chemical and biological weapons, but he did not. He could have wiped out the British and French armies at Dunkirk, but he did not. He could have destroyed the great cities of Europe, like Paris, but he did not. He could have indiscriminately carpet-bombed civilians like the British and Americans did, but he did not. He would never have made peace offerings over and over to the Allies to end the war. He would never have allowed his right-hand man, Rudolf Hess, to fly alone to England to negotiate peace with England and end the war.

Really, it is laughable to see how poorly the Jewish sociopaths lie to deceive and manipulate the public, and yet they have succeeded brilliantly in fooling nearly everyone. The public believes Hitler was brutal, when it is far easier to believe Churchill was brutal, or Roosevelt, who did try to use chemical weapons, who did destroy the great cities of Europe, who did run real death camps for surrendered German soldiers, and who categorically refused all peace offerings. Who even employed atomic weapons on defenseless civilian populations during the war? It wasn't Hitler, and he had that option, though we are brainwashed to believe he didn't.

The level of deception we operate under in the world today is truly unbelievable.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Nov 18, 2019 7:04 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Claus Hant is a German author who has spent 15 years researching Hitler’s younger days and he believes the events of one day in the Nazi leader’s life changed the course of history.

On October 14, 1918, at Werwicq in Belgium, Lance Corporal Hitler and his comrades fell victim to a gas attack.

“Hitler remained at the hospital for a month and may have been treated with hypnosis, which was the usual treatment at that time for war neurotics, although it seems unlikely that hypnosis could provoke such a profound and permanent change in a person’s being as was the case with Hitler. Equally, he may have undergone electric shock therapy.”

It arguably makes no difference whether Hitler’s psychological metamorphosis was triggered the front line, the effect of poison gas (most probably mustard gas), a near-death experience or a combination of these factors.

“His racism, his anti-Semitism, his opposition to democracy and his exaggerated love for Germany as had his violent temper, the certainty that divine Providence was on his side,” says Hant. -- source

This is pure BS. I have underlined the speculation so that you can see the manipulation. There was no "psychological metamorphosis" in Hitler due to his injury. Yes, the experiences of Hitler's life influenced his development, but no more than it influenced all the other men who fought in WW1. Hitler's basic psychological makeup was not transformed due to his gas attack injuries. His psychology before and after the injury is remarkably consistent and stable. He was not racist at all, but did recognize the danger of sociopaths. He was not anti-Semitic, but did recognize the danger posed by Marxists, Communist Bolsheviks, and self-serving sociopaths, many of which were indeed Jewish. His opposition to "democracy" was that it didn't work because it was rigged and directed by the ruling sociopaths, which is still the case today. He did not have a violent temper, which all the people who worked closely with him confirm. His "certainty that divine Providence was on his side" was merely his conviction that he was observing the ugly reality of the world accurately, that evil people (sociopaths) were sucking the life force out of Germany like parasites.

Claus Hant is not going were the evidence takes him, rather he is looking for evidence that supports his starting assumption, which is a faulty premise to begin with that Hitler is a psychopathic madman. Yes, everyone has been brainwashed to believe this, so Hant feels he is on such solid ground that he has no reason to question his starting point. This is the easy path to take, and the path that the sociopathic system will reward rather than punish. But it is still pure BS.

Young Hitler: A Non-Fiction Novel, by Claus Hant. It's a novel, a fictional story based on twisted and speculative history! Calling it "non-fiction" is just plain wrong. Using it as evidence for Hitler's alleged evil psychology is just plain fantasy.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:45 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Hitler was filmed with a tremor in his left hand in 1945 near the fall of Germany. We can only speculate on the root cause of this tremor and on what Hitler's true state of health was. If Hitler did live out the remainder of his life in South America as some suggest, it may not have been Parkinson's disease as suggested in the video below.

Trying to discover the truth about Hitler is a truly daunting challenge.




This Video Exposes Hitler's Secret Illness
(duration 2:57)

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:23 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
I have noted many times the false quotes attributed to Hitler and other Nazi leaders, and I have even noted bogus translations of German into English in the subtitles of some films of Hitler's speeches. But today I discovered even more treachery from "the usual suspects", as Mike King likes to call the Jews.

In the 1940 German film "The Eternal Jew", at the 1:02:45 mark, there is an excerpt from a speech Hitler gave on January 30, 1939 at the Reichstag. There are English subtitles, and this is what they say:

Quote:
There is plenty of living space in the world, but the notion that the Jewish people were chosen by God to live off the productivity of other peoples will finally have to go. Jews will just have to get used to the idea of performing some respectable constructive activity as other people do, or sooner or later they'll face trouble they never dreamed of.

Yep, that sounds exactly like Hitler — direct, honest, simple, and clear. Now compare that translation from the 1940s film to the current on-line translation I found on the Internet:

Quote:
The world has sufficient settlement space, but it must finally be broken with the opinion that the Jewish people are destined by God to be, in a certain percentage, benefactors of the body and of the productive work of other peoples. Judaism will have to adapt to solid building activity as other peoples do, or it will sooner or later succumb to a crisis of unimaginable proportions. -- source

WTF?! Hitler would never say something so confused and muddled! Quiet! Jews at work...

However, the next sentence was hardly changed, so that the Jews could label it as a "THREAT TO KILL JEWS":

From the 1940s film: "Should the international finance Jews inside and outside of Europe push people into another world war, the result will not be a victory of Jewry, but the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe."

From the Internet: "If international financial Jewry in and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the peoples once again into a world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevization of the earth and thus the victory of Judaism, but annihilation the Jewish race in Europe."

Well, yes, the Jews did spiff it up a bit to make it seem like Hitler is actively threatening to "annihilate" the Jews, so that they can pin their false Holocaust story on him, but that's just the usual deception and manipulation of the Jewish sociopaths that we have come to expect. They are master con-artists, so of course they will be doctoring the text of Hitler's speeches published on the Internet.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Nov 24, 2019 4:55 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
The absurd logic of the Holocaust can therefore be whittled down to one word: space. Hitler believed there wasn't enough. And so genocide was justified. Hitler's obsession with physical space also helps explain why the Nazis decided to speed up the process of killing Jews in Occupied Poland: with gas chambers - rather than guns - in purpose-built death camps. -- source

This is the idiotic claptrap that the public is still being fed in books today published by the Jewish-controlled media. "And so genocide was justified." Absolute BS. I can hardly believe people are so dumb that they believe this stuff. But they do, because it's the only side of the story they are allowed to hear. All other dissenting voices are censored. The truth is not allowed to appear in any respectable form, while the lies are. It's sickening to witness.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Nov 25, 2019 7:44 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 648 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 ... 65  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.