Reply to topic  [ 648 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 65  Next
Hitler -- What is the truth? 
Author Message
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Image
Postcard of Hitler's mountain home, the Berghof.


Hitler's mountain home that I posted about here was bombed by the British RAF on April 25, 1945. The relatively modest home that was featured in the November 1938 Homes & Gardens magazine was reduced to rubble by the aerial bombardment.


Image
The ruins of Hitler's mountain home, the Berghof.


Reducing everything to rubble was standard Allied procedure. Whereas previous European wars had typically been clashes between military forces in open, rural battlefields, now civilians and civilian living spaces were deliberately targeted for indiscriminate aerial bombardment, in flagrant violation of the standard rules of war. Some examples of this follow:


Image
Saint Lo, France


Image
Unidentified Italian town


Image
Heilbronn, Germany


Image
Yokohama, Japan


Image
Hiroshima, Japan. See this comparison to Tokyo destruction.


The bombing of civilian population centers by the American and British military was ramped up to a staggering scale in the last years of the war, so much so that the German population in Berlin was literally forced underground in order to survive.


Image
Berlin in 1945, mostly burned from incendiary bombs. Click on the picture for greater detail.



Image
An American B-17 "Flying Fortress" delivering random destruction.


What is the underlying lesson here? The leadership of humanity is a cooperating club of sociopaths! The leadership of the Allies (Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt) was a visible band of sociopaths supported by a vast and invisible cartel of even more dangerous sociopaths, the moneyed Jewish banksters! The morally insane essentially run the world, and the result is the mass destruction of a large portion of humanity.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:55 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Hitler's Secret Book is his forthright and chilling blueprint for world conquest and domination.

This is the quick description of the book from the back cover jacket. Like nearly everything we've been told about Hitler, it appears to be a clever lie designed to discredit and dismiss the man. From the first two chapters alone, it is clear to me that Hitler is thoughtfully analyzing the needs of his own nation in terms of the needs that all nations share, specifically the problem of a growing population and limited natural resources. This is the very same problem that my esteemed physics professor Albert A. Bartlett ( 1 2 3 4 5 ) lectured on to significant public acclaim. Hitler is, among many things, a deep-thinking intellectual on par with the best teachers our universities can offer. This is hardly consistent with the evil psychopathic monster the sociopaths would have us believe Hitler to be. That is an important clue to recognizing their con.

The vileness of the lies we have been taught about Hitler indicates to me the mind of the sociopath at work. Sociopaths have constructed this deception for a selfish reason that benefits them, once again highlighting the lack of empathy that is inherent in their psychology. This is a consistent theme of their agenda to demonize Hitler.

Let me give you an example. When Hitler talks about race, we have been told he is comparing the Aryan and Jewish gene pools. This is dead wrong. Hitler is talking about the psychological differences between peoples, and the resulting differences in principles that are derived from these psychological differences!

Adolf Hitler wrote:
This is also the reason for the fierce hatred of the typical capitalistically inclined Jews against an organization in which money is not identical with position, dignity, to say nothing of honor, but rather with achievement; and in which the honor of belonging among people of a certain accomplishment is more greatly appreciated than the possession of property and riches. -- Hitler's Secret Book, page 16

The word "Jews" in this quote could be replaced with the label of any group of people that values an artificial hierarchical tool used primarily for maintaining power and control over others perceived as inferior. In other words, "Jews" could be properly replaced in this quote with "sociopaths" and have an even more accurate meaning. This is not to imply that all Jews are sociopaths or that all sociopaths are Jews, as this is certainly not the case! An oversimplified argument of this type is exactly what generates the charge of "anti-Semite" from sociopaths that are Jews and Jews that are sociopaths. This is precisely how sociopaths deceive and manipulate us when they accuse their opponents of their own malfeasance.

No, Hitler is clearly talking about ethical and moral principles when he talks about race. His opponents, organized sociopaths which include a deviant faction of the Jews (like Netanyahu, Ben-Gurion, Peres, and other Israeli sociopaths), twist this around and paint it as talking about differences of ethnicity, culture, and religion. This is the con that is designed to make us see Hitler as an evil man, when in fact it is a deception designed to invert his true nature and manipulate us in a direction pre-determined by the con-artists.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Mar 25, 2017 5:37 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
If I were to use the word race in the same manner as Hitler uses it, I would be calling sociopaths a race of people. To qualify as a member of this race, a person would only have to exhibit a distinct collection of characteristics, like a general lack of empathy, dishonesty, shallow emotions, disingenuousness, a reliance upon deception and manipulation, a desire for hierarchy, a superiority complex, a philosophy that everything is just a game to win, heavy use of secrecy, a strong attraction to power and control over others (the desire to dominate), etc.

For sure, the word race has genetic components. It is well recognized that there is a strong genetic influence on individual psychology, just as there is on many other human characteristics. It's not hard to notice that the children of sociopaths tend to also be sociopathic. And the characteristics of sociopaths can be magnified and exaggerated through selective reproductive pressures, like inbreeding (in this case, marrying within your psychological group).

It is very clear to me now that when Hitler talks about the Aryan race or the Jewish race, he is not talking about the characteristics of their facial features, or their religious beliefs, or their cultural uniqueness. He is talking about their group behaviors, their fundamental philosophies, and their guiding principles. In a word, Hitler is talking about their psychology.

However, it is also clear to me now that sociopaths have deliberately twisted the understanding of the word race as used by Hitler to paint him as "racist", "anti-Semitic", and anti-human. The deception involved in doing this is incredibly vile.

Personally, I have long ago rejected using the word race in application to human variation. My perspective is that there is only one race when it comes to people, and that is the human race. That there are physical types, cultural types, religious types, and psychological types is certain, but there is no doubt that all are human. I have asked the question Are sociopaths human? to encourage others to examine the incredible harm sociopathy is capable of when left unchecked and unmanaged. It is much like asking "Are criminals human?" to examine the incredible harm criminality is capable of when left unchecked and unmanaged. Fortunately, the human race has not left criminality unchecked and unmanaged. We have an entire legal system that attempts to address the problem. But unfortunately, humanity has left sociopathy unchecked and unmanaged, and it is crippling us.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:27 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Adolf Hitler wrote:
... nothing is easier to replace than a loss of weapons, and every organisational form can again be created or renewed. What is irreplaceable is the spoiled blood of a Folk, the destroyed inner value.

For the source of a Folk's whole power does not lie in its possession of weapons or in the organisation of its army, but in its inner value which is represented through its racial significance, that is, the racial value of a Folk as such, through the existence of the highest individual personality values, as well as through its healthy attitude toward the idea of self preservation. -- Hitler's Secret Book, page 17

Once again it is quite clear that when Hitler speaks of "blood" or "race", he is talking about "values". It is not a race issue at all along the lines of what people tend to think of as race. It is an issue of psychology and the values and principles derived from that psychology.

It is so easy for the Jews (specifically those that are sociopaths) to fool us all by a simple twisting of Hitler's meaning. They even fool their fellow Jews who are not sociopaths. Very few of the fooled will make the effort to examine the original sources to discover the truth. Certainly the Followers, the bulk of humanity, the 80%, will not do it. They are quite satisfied to accept the deception as truth without the slightest inquiry. It would only be the Independents, the 9%, who might question the "facts". Of those, maybe only 1 in 10 would be industrious enough and courageous enough to speak out and brave the condemnation of the fooled masses. That means we only have less than 1% of humanity who can awaken us to the deception! That fact demonstrates the enormous value of people like Vincent Reynouard, Robert Faurisson, Ernst Zundel, Germar Rudolf, David Irving, and yes, Adolf Hitler. The very people the fooled masses mistakenly condemn and persecute are the ones trying hardest to save them! Isn't that also the story of Jesus? Can we not see the great advantage the deceivers have over the saviors? This is why evil triumphs over good far too often. Most of humanity are sheep, and the organized sociopaths herd us with practiced manipulation.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Mar 27, 2017 6:28 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Adolf Hitler wrote:
... the State has become a purely formal mechanism which appears to them (the leaders) as an aim in itself, which must not in the least coincide with the interests of a specific Folk. Folk and State have become two different concepts. It will be the task of the National Socialist Movement to bring about a fundamental change here. -- Hitler's Secret Book, page 20

Hitler is correctly pointing out that the People and the Government have become two different things entirely. That situation is perfectly clear in the United States today. While the theater of democracy is acted out every four years in the U.S., the American people have no real influence over their own collective household. The same situation existed in Germany after WWI. Hitler achieved something that is rarely seen in a world led by sociopaths -- he united his people. But he united them behind their common interest, the common interest of the people, something sociopaths never do. Sociopaths deceive and manipulate people to unite behind their common interest, meaning the common interest of the sociopaths. Whereas sociopaths hold themselves separate from the people, feeling themselves to be superior in all respects, Hitler held himself as one of the people, and he was genuine in this belief and acted accordingly. In effect, the State almost always degenerates into the House of Sociopaths, while the Folk, or People, are tricked into greater and greater degrees of misery and servitude.

The dream of Hitler was a united people. He actually achieved it in a way so spectacular, so unexpected, and so dangerous (to the ruling sociopaths), that the sociopathic leaders of the most dominant nations in the world felt obliged to cooperate at an uncomfortable level in order to crush this menacing threat to their world order of tyranny. I picture Stalin, Roosevelt, and Churchill -- three classic sociopaths -- squirming in their chairs and biting their tongues in the supreme effort to appear cooperative among "equals" (HA!) in pursuit of the total demise of Hitler and his blasphemous dream.



Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Mar 28, 2017 6:10 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Reading Hitler's Secret Book, I am coming to realize that Hitler was truly a man of remarkable vision. He sees the problems of Germany. He sees the problems of the monarchy. He sees the problems of democracy. He even sees the problems of seeing the problems.

Adolf Hitler wrote:
Under the conditions of that time, there was no prospect at hand of making one's way to a responsible position in the leadership of the German Government against the will of the democrats or against the will of His Majesty The Kaiser, and thereby being able to change the course of foreign policy. Further, this led to the fact that German foreign policy could be contested exclusively on paper, which consequently launched a criticism that necessarily took on the characteristic features of journalism, the longer it continued. The consequence of this, however, was that increasingly less value was placed on positive proposals, in view of the lack of any possibility of their realisation, whereas the purely critical consideration of foreign policy occasioned the innumerable objections that one could adduce in all their fullness, all the more so because it was hoped that thereby one could overthrow the bad regime responsible. To be sure this was not achieved by the critics of that time. It was not the regime of that time which was overthrown, but the German Reich and consequently the German Folk. What they had foretold for decades had now come to pass. We cannot think of these men without a deep compassion, men condemned by fate to foresee a collapse for twenty years, and who now, having not been heeded and hence in no position to be of help, had to live to see their Folk's most tragic catastrophe. -- Hitler's Secret Book, page 22

We have the same kind of critics in our time, who foresee the collapse, who employ the media to spread their observations, who are not heeded, and who are in no position to be of help. You know their names, people like Gerald Celente, Alan Watt, Bill Still, Alex Jones, Max Kaiser, Jordan Maxwell, and many others. Maybe even Chicodoodoo.

Hitler saw what they saw, but he understood that democracy and the monarchy did not have the ability to effect the changes Germany needed. Hitler knew that only individual leadership with the highest principles serving the common interest of the people could succeed. Slowly but steadily over more than a decade, through persistence, hard work, and good fortune, Hitler put himself in that position where he could effect the necessary change. And the results for Germany, from 1933 to 1939, were spectacular. Germany was transformed from the wretch of Europe into the envy of Europe. German men transformed from beggars to master craftsmen. German women transformed from sexual objects to sacred mothers. The entire country united with Hitler to march towards a nourishing and thriving future. Hitler's magic so scared the ruling sociopaths of that era that they conspired in every manner possible to sabotage his agenda. And they easily succeeded through masterful deception and manipulation, turning the gullible Followers of the world into hateful soldiers whose focus was the destruction of Hitler and Germany. For while the good that humanity is capable of must struggle mightily to be born, the evil that sociopaths can conjure up is almost infinitely scalable with far less effort.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Thu Mar 30, 2017 6:44 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Quote:
Misch also confirmed that Rudolf Hess did not have Hitler's permission to go to the UK to negotiate terms of surrender.

'He saw how the news was given to Hitler by Hess's adjutant, Karl-Heinz Pintsch as Hess had arranged,' said Mr Mace.

'Hitler was outraged, tirelessly repeating to himself: 'Why did he do this to me?' Anyone who had knowledge of Hess' flight to Britain was arrested and sent to Sachsenhausen concentration camp.

'There can be no doubt, therefore, that Hess did not have Hitler's permission to go to the UK.'
-- source

Sorry, but I don't buy this story at all.

Hess was the #2 man in the Nazi party, and Hitler's most loyal follower. I have seen no evidence that Hess would act independently of and in opposition to Hitler's vision, a vision which he understood better than anyone besides Hitler himself. Nor does it make any sense that Hitler would arrest and send to Sachsenhausen (the concentration camp for political prisoners near Berlin) "anyone who had knowledge of Hess' flight to Britain." That's absurd. Hitler is not going to waste valuable soldiers who simply had knowledge of Hess' use of an airplane. First, Hess was the #2 man in the hierarchy, so obeying his orders would be expected. Second, if Hitler wanted to punish German soldiers, he would send them to the front where they could fight, rather than stick them in a political prison. After all, Hitler wasn't a madman, though they want us to believe he was, which is why they create such ridiculous stories. Third, if Hess did desert Hitler, don't you think the British military propagandists would have made a big deal out of it? Instead, they threw Hess in prison and kept him in near solitary confinement for the next 42 years, and then probably murdered him to be absolutely sure he would never talk. And finally, if Hitler wanted to "surrender", he would simply announce it himself, not send his most trusted man into the jaws of the enemy.

No, this story stinks of more propaganda designed to reinforce the force-fed story of madman Hitler, killer of 6 million Jews, monster of history, epitome of evil, and the devil incarnate himself.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Apr 01, 2017 7:45 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
What is a Nazi?

An evil monster, as we have all been taught? A killer of Jews, as we have all been brainwashed? A psychopathic destroyer of nations, as we have all been programmed to believe?

Of course not. We have been deceived. Let Adolf Hitler tell you what a Nazi is:

Adolf Hitler wrote:
I am a German nationalist. This means that I proclaim my nationality. My whole thought and action belongs to it. I am a socialist. I see no class and no social estate before me, but that community of the Folk, made up of people who are linked by blood, united by a language, and subject to a same general fate. I love this Folk and hate only its majority of the moment, because I view the latter to be just as little representative of the greatness of my Folk as it is of its happiness. -- Hitler's Secret Book, page 26

Everything Hitler did, he did for the best interests of Germany. He was the ultimate representative of the German people, because he was a true and genuine representative. The United States has 535 representatives, and guess how many of those are true and genuine? How many of those do not serve particular social estates, special classes, or as we call it, "special interests"? How many of those love the common people and hate the majority leadership that works contrary to the real public interest?

Unlike our representatives in the United States, Hitler's words are direct and honest. He is not about deceiving and manipulating. He is not about selfish enrichment. He is not about pursuing power and control over others. He is about serving his people to the best of his ability. That is why the German people loved him. That is why they continually chose him to lead. They were always fighting for their freedom and liberty against an outside sociopathic collective determined to crush them into absolute submission. That sociopathic collective had already crushed them with World War I, and upon seeing the Phoenix rise again, was planning to crush them again with World War II. Hitler opposed them, and he was absolutely right to do so. All good people must oppose the evil that sociopaths have planned for us. Hitler did, and for that, the sociopaths must forever convince us to curse his existence.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:38 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Adolf Hitler wrote:
Folks living on an impossible soil surface fundamentally will tend to enlarge their territory, consequently their living space, at least as long as they are under healthy leadership. This process, originally grounded only in the concern over sustenance, appeared so beneficent in its felicitous solution that it gradually attained the fame of success. This means that the enlargement of space, at first grounded in pure expediencies, became in the course of mankind's development a heroic deed, which then also took place even when the original preconditions or inducements were lacking. Later, the attempt to adapt the living space to increased population turned into unmotivated wars of conquest, which in their very lack of motivation contained the germ of the subsequent reaction. Pacifism is the answer to it. Pacifism has existed in the world ever since there have been wars whose meaning no longer lay in the conquest of territory for a Folk's sustenance. Since then it has been war's eternal companion. It will again disappear as soon as war ceases to be an instrument of booty hungry or power hungry individuals or nations, and as soon as it again becomes the ultimate weapon with which a Folk fights for is daily bread. -- Hitler's Secret Book, page 28

Those who wish to vilify Hitler have interpreted his words in the manner that best suits their agenda. This is easily done, since Hitler tends to take the position of a neutral observer.

In the quote above, is Hitler talking about conquest or world domination? The word conquest is in there, as is war, booty, power, weapon, and territory. But what is his message? What is he really communicating? Is he for or against conquest and war? Is he for or against pacifism?

I can plainly see that Hitler is in favor of "conquest" (meaning territorial expansion) only when it is absolutely necessary for survival, i.e. to feed the nation's people. When it is encouraged for any other reason, Hitler recognizes that pacifism from the people is the correct response. Hitler is clearly viewing things from the perspective of the people.

Most nations that opposed Germany in both world wars were constantly guilty of conquest for "booty", and not for survival by any stretch of the imagination. That includes England, France, Russia, and the United States. Those very countries (or rather Jewish sociopaths pretending to represent those countries) had taken away a significant portion of German land as punishment for participating in World War I (see chart below). A bit hypocritical, no? So Hitler is speaking in the context of having to feed more people with less land in a fractured nation surrounded by booty-seeking hostiles. And yet his tone is quite neutral and could be easily mistaken for the attitude of any reasonable nation analyzing its own prospects for survival.


Image

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Sun Apr 02, 2017 8:19 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11843
Reply with quote
Post Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Image



You must believe that the man pictured at the podium giving a speech is the Devil himself. You must believe that all the men sitting behind him are demented servants of evil. You must believe that the massive audience cheering his words are degenerate sub-humans of no inherent value. You must believe that the giant symbol on the wall is a blasphemy that cannot be tolerated. You must believe this without question or commentary, for if you speak out publicly in disagreement, you will suffer imprisonment in 16 European countries and one solitary Middle Eastern country (Israel). You must believe all this or you are anti-Semitic and automatically guilty of heinous hate crimes against the Jews.

WTF ? !

Where did this insanity come from?


Oh.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Mon Apr 03, 2017 11:16 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 648 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 65  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.