View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 11:20 am
Hitler -- What is the truth?
Author |
Message |
Chicodoodoo
Site Admin
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm Posts: 11866
|
Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Sylvain LaForest thinks the U.S. money men funded Hitler to bring about the demise of the Rothschild-controlled City of London so that the American empire could replace the British empire. Oy vey, has he got it wrong! LaForest completely ignores the elephant in the room — the Jewish juggernaut. Both Churchill and Roosevelt were controlled by the Jewish cabal. Stalin was part of the Jewish cabal. Only Hitler was the odd-man out, the only one acting independently of the Jews and actively removing their power and control from the German nation. It is absurd to imagine that Jewish-controlled America was trying to undermine Jewish-controlled Britain by manipulating non-Jewish-controlled Germany! No, Jewish sociopaths and their minions were running the show, and they were surely united in their efforts to annihilate their greatest enemy in modern history, Hitler and the Nazi party. The Jewish declaration of economic war on Germany in 1933 was the precursor to the behind-the-scenes intrigue that led to England declaring war on Germany in September of 1939. So LaForest's speculation, and all we get from him is speculation, just isn't on solid ground. That's too bad, as I was hoping for some new, relevant information about the Hess mystery. It still looks most probable that Hess was on a secret peace-seeking mission for Hitler that Churchill was determined to cover up, just like he covered up all of Hitler's peace proposals, and just like he covered up the chemical weapons he and Roosevelt sent to Bari, Italy for use against German civilians ( 1 2 3 ). Churchill was a monster, while Hitler was not, and that truth can never be allowed to leak out to the public, as it would undermine the whole false history of WW2 that we are force-fed even to this day. Please remember that for the Germans, propaganda was accurate information intended to enlighten and inform. For the Jews, propaganda is false information designed to deceive and manipulate. It is important to understand this difference of definition, and to understand the underlying psychology from which it springs. The Jewish leaders were sociopaths, while the German leaders were not. Their respective use of propaganda reflects their underlying psychology. What the western world calls Nazi propaganda was far more truthful than anything the Allied forces put out as "fact". The Katyn massacre is a typical example. The Nazis reported this atrocity to the world, but the Allies completely dismissed it publicly as "Nazi propaganda", when in fact the Nazis were being totally honest with their information. Russia denied its responsibility for the war crime, and the Allies even accused the Nazis of being responsible! It wasn't until 1989 that Gorbachev admitted Stalin had ordered the killings.
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
|
Sun Aug 26, 2018 12:37 am |
|
|
Chicodoodoo
Site Admin
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm Posts: 11866
|
Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
-- sourceDid Hitler really say that? I tend to doubt it. The quote comes from Hitler's Table Talks, also published as Hitler's Secret Conversations. We have already seen how unreliable quotes attributed to Hitler are. They are often outright fabrications. Quotes allegedly by Hitler sourced back to these books would be in the latter category.
|
|
|
|
Quote:
LORD DACRE of Glanton, the historian who as Hugh Trevor-Roper wrongly authenticated the “Hitler Diaries”, has died aged 89 at a hospice in Oxford. He had cancer. His reputation as an expert on modern history was damaged after the diaries affair in 1983. The Sunday Times and the German magazine Stern published extracts from what were said to be 60 volumes of Hitler’s personal diaries that had been found in East Germany. They turned out to be a hoax. He was a prolific historian who wrote several books on the Third Reich, including The Last Days of Hitler and Hitler’s Table Talk. -- source
|
|
|
|
|
There is so much deceit involved with understanding the real Hitler that you have to wonder why. It looks to me like it is due to the false portrait of Hitler we are expected to believe, which is built upon Allied wartime propaganda.
|
|
|
|
Quote:
After the war, these notes were acquired by a French con-man, Genoud, who, other than this, fabricated Hitler saying things that were easily shown to be categorically false, and admitted as much when confronted. When Trevor-Roper went to translate these he signed a contract which allowed only access to the French versions of the pages as translated by the con-man Genoud. Trevor-Roper kept this agreement secret and claimed they were from the German versions. But, translations errors and the contracts (found after he died) reveal this to be completely false, and he agreed to something that a serious scholar should never have ever agreed to. Trevor-Roper claimed in his foreword that he used the German Bormann-Vermerke. This is a lie. A lie he would have known was a lie because it was in his contract that he was to use the French version and the translators were never given access the original German pages in Genoud's possession. In the time since, the German versions have been released in German and a quick translation and comparison finds that a lot of the quotes that certain people harp on are completely fictitious. Most of the glaring problems come between the German -> French translations by the con-man. The French versions say the same thing, whereas the German versions say something different. -- source
|
|
|
|
|
Who can you believe? Where is the truth? Why is it so hard to find? Are we being lied to about Hitler? As we have seen over and over again, almost everything we have been taught to believe about Hitler is indeed a lie.
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
|
Sun Aug 26, 2018 2:08 am |
|
|
Chicodoodoo
Site Admin
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm Posts: 11866
|
Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
This is the quote beneath Adolf Hitler's picture on Wikiquote. I just came across it today, and as soon as I read it, I thought, "I would bet money that quote is fraudulent." According to Wikiquote, this quote is from Hitler and Nazism (1961) by Louis Leo Snyder, p. 66. So who is Louis Leo Snyder, and where did he get this quote? Hmm, Snyder sounds like a purveyor of Jewish propaganda against Hitler and the Nazis. It says he is "an authority on the rise and fall of Nazi Germany and the author of more than 60 books..." That's quite the book mill. It sounds like someone was cashing in on the public's fascination with Hitler and the Nazis. Could he be Jewish? So he's a student in Germany in 1931, and two years later, the same year Hitler becomes Fuhrer, Snyder is living in New York City, a stronghold of American Jews! But is he Jewish or a Jewish apologist? Interestingly, there is nothing I can find about this prolific author's religious background or religious persuasion. And the quote from his book? Is it fraudulent? That I could find!
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Hermann Rauschning's The Voice of Destruction, later republished as Conversations with Hitler, seems to be the source for the first half of this quote. ( Rauschning is not a trustworthy source. If you find that the source for a quote attributed to Hitler is Rauschning, that already invalidates it, but what we get in Capra's film ( Why We Fight) is even worse than that.)
|
|
|
|
|
Wait a minute! Haven't I already posted about Rauschning before? Why, yes! ( 1 2 ) So a respected historical scholar and prolific WW2 author named Louis Leo Snyder is just parroting wartime propaganda that is completely false? Who knew? Another fraudulent Hitler quote uncovered, one that is prominently displayed at Wikiquote as the truth! For shame...
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
|
Sun Aug 26, 2018 4:09 am |
|
|
Chicodoodoo
Site Admin
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm Posts: 11866
|
Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
It is startling when I see people waking up to the truth, as well as seeing the push-back from the Jewish-controlled media which opposes such lucidity.
|
|
|
|
Quote:
The Nordic Resistance Movement (NRM) held a rally in Stockholm on Saturday, facing off counter-protesters, who decried its members as neo-Nazis. Members of the NRM do not like being described as neo-Nazis, branding those who call them so “brainwashed,” but at the same time do not hide their fondness for the policies of National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP), better known as the Nazi Party of Adolf Hitler. But Lindberg went even further, and didn’t shy away from praising Hitler personally and on camera. Calling the Nazi leader “a very very good person for German people,” he claimed that Hitler “freed Germany from the globalists and the bankers, that have a grip over Sweden today.” “He did what was necessary to secure his people’s freedom,” Lindberg went on. “We’re National Socialists, as Hitler was and we do whatever it takes to take our nation back.” Germany’s infamous Fuhrer is surrounded with “a million lies,” which many “not so [well-thinking]” people do believe, Lindberg claimed. Other extremely controversial statements of the NRM leader included branding the Holocaust “probably the biggest lie in history,” as well as a bizarre claim that “Jews declared war on Germany.” -- source
|
|
|
|
|
Bizarre claim? These Nordic people are spot-on in their understanding of history. There are indeed "a million lies" that we have been taught as "fact" concerning Hitler, and I have been exposing those lies in this thread for nearly five years now. And now I learn there is a new political party in Sweden that is on-board with my investigations. The truth is leaking out. I know that my investigations had nothing to do with these Swedes waking up, because almost no one reads my posts, so I take no credit for their awakening. I am happy to see it nonetheless. Everyone should know the truth, because the truth will indeed set us free, just like the lies keep us enslaved. -- source
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
|
Tue Aug 28, 2018 3:55 am |
|
|
Chicodoodoo
Site Admin
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm Posts: 11866
|
Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
They lied to us about Hitler and the Nazis. Once you realize that, you have to investigate who lied, and why they lied. It was the Jewish sociopathic leaders and their puppets (like Churchill and Roosevelt). They lied to hide their crimes and their prior lies. They lied to hide the truth. -- source
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
|
Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:06 am |
|
|
Chicodoodoo
Site Admin
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm Posts: 11866
|
Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
What happened the day after the city of Dresden was bombed and burned into ruins, in one of the worst war crimes of World War II? The Americans returned to murder the survivors and rescue workers helping them.
|
|
|
|
Quote:
“[P]anic broke out,” said fifteen-year-old Gerhard Kuhnemund. “Women and children were massacred with cannon and bombs. It was mass murder…. While we literally clawed ourselves into the grass, I personally saw at least five American fighter-bombers, which from an altitude of approximately 120–150 metres opened fire with their cannon on the masses of civilians. My companion . . . was killed beside me in this attack. There was a hole in his back the size of a palm.” Near the park, zoo-keeper Otto Sailer-Jackson watched in stunned disbelief as one American pilot mowed down people running in the street. “He attacked several times, flying very low, firing from cannon and machine-guns into the refugees. Then he flew low over the Zoo and made several firing runs at anything he could see that was still alive. In this way our last giraffe met her death. Many stags and other animals which we had managed to save, became the victims of this hero.” Although the raid lasted only ten minutes, the Americans returned the next day, and the next, and the next, seemingly determined that not a single living thing should survive in Dresden. “There seemed to be no end to the horror,” said Eva Beyer. -- source
|
|
|
|
|
Is it any wonder that Hitler and the Nazis had to be vilified and demonized, so that Allied war crimes could be completely overlooked and ignored? A charred body of a woman in the air-raid shelter – Dresden, February 1945. -- source
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
|
Wed Aug 29, 2018 9:05 pm |
|
|
Chicodoodoo
Site Admin
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm Posts: 11866
|
Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Hitler's men were not sociopaths. They were feeling, empathetic, compassionate Germans who mourned all the victims of the war. They didn't want war. It was forced upon them by their heartless enemy, the Jewish cabal and their diseased leaders, who were indeed sociopaths. Goebbels was a man of honor, much like his Fuhrer, and Goebbels too had to be vilified and demonized by the Allied propaganda machine, the Allied media, and later by the Allied history books. ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ) No, Hitler's men were not sociopaths. But the enemy forces that sought to destroy them at any cost, including global war, were directed by sociopaths, and Jewish sociopaths at that. When former Waffen SS General Leon DeGrelle stated with conviction that the real winners of the war were the Jews, he wasn't joking. "I am convinced — it's obvious, without a doubt in the universe — that those who won the war were the Jews." -- Leon Degrelle @ 1:30 in this videoThe losers of the war were the ordinary German civilians in the crowded cities that the Allies fire-bombed into oblivion without any warning, like the hundreds of thousands of Dresden victims. The villainy is unprecedented.
|
|
|
|
Quote:
As more facts and information from neutral Swiss and Swedish sources began to arrive, however, many throughout the world were horrified. For the first time in the war, those in England, America and elsewhere learned what Germans had known for three years—the Allies were engaged in “deliberate terror-bombing.” Most outrage, high and low, was directed at Arthur Harris, Chief of Bomber Command. “[W]e were told at the briefing that there were many thousands of Panzer troops in the streets [of Dresden], either going to or coming back from the Russian Front,” one angry RAF crewman later explained. “My personal feeling is, that if we’d been told the truth at the briefing, some of us wouldn’t have gone.” Once known affectionately by many of his men as “Bomber” Harris, after Dresden the air marshal earned a new nickname—“Butcher.” “Butcher Harris didn’t give a damn how many men he lost as long as he was pounding the shit out of German civilians,” growled one British airman. Meanwhile, the man directly responsible for the Dresden massacre began to publicly distance himself from both Harris and terror bombing. Winston Churchill: "It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts, should be reviewed. The destruction of Dresden remains a serious query against the conduct of Allied bombing. . . . I feel the need for more precise concentration upon military objectives … rather than on mere acts of terror and wanton destruction." -- source
|
|
|
|
|
Churchill backtracks like the hypocritical sociopath he is, throwing Butcher Harris under the bus to save his own fat ass. How typical of the monster known as Winston Churchill, the real butcher of Dresden. Hitler is an innocent choir boy next to the vile Churchill. Fake hero (smiling) versus real hero (serious). -- source
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
|
Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:41 pm |
|
|
Chicodoodoo
Site Admin
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm Posts: 11866
|
Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
The horror of Dresden was repeated on many German cities. Repeated war crimes is what finally won the war for the Allies and their Jewish controllers. This is the way sociopaths "win the game", using any underhanded way imaginable — rules, ethics, and morals be damned! If only there were justice in the world. Churchill would have been assassinated, and Hitler's peace offers would have been accepted by England and France. Stalin would have been overthrown by the German military, Russia would have been freed from Jewish control, and Jews would have been relegated to Israel, where Palestinians would police them and keep them in check. Roosevelt's foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor would have been revealed and he would have been quickly impeached. All of his Jewish advisers would have been exposed and prosecuted. America would never have dropped atomic bombs on Japan and would have been forced to negotiate a proper peace with Japan to avoid prosecution for crimes against humanity (including crimes against its own people). Sociopaths would not dominate our world with Jews properly corralled and Germany setting the example for other nations to follow. If only there were justice in this world, Dresden and many other German cities would never have been destroyed, and millions of German civilians would not have died so horribly. The Eisenhower death camps for surrendering German soldiers would never have operated, saving over a million lives. The gulags in Russia would have never existed, saving millions more. The Holocaust Lie would have never survived, and the real history of WW2 would be in the history books today. All the wars pursued by the USA since 1945 would likely never have happened, saving millions more. Everything would be different, and surely much better for the bulk of humanity.
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
|
Thu Aug 30, 2018 8:08 am |
|
|
Chicodoodoo
Site Admin
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm Posts: 11866
|
Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Here is an example of how the propaganda about the Dresden death toll can convince people to dismiss the truth. This is a comment from a reviewer of the book Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi German, 1944-1947 by Thomas Goodrich. The reviewer is inclined to dismiss the historical accuracy of the book based on a comparison to "most other accounts of the events it describes". In other words, one person recounting a truthful description of events cannot be believed if ten other people parrot the official propaganda line. This leads the reviewer to wrongly state that "the Nazi government is the worst possible source for historical accuracy". Author David Irving would disagree, as his widely acclaimed book on Dresden, Apocalypse 1945: The Destruction of Dresden, is based on the opposite perspective that the German people, including the Nazi government, who actually experienced the Dresden apocalypse would be the best possible source for historical accuracy! Irving also recognizes the German habit of documenting everything with efficient accuracy, given the enormous quantity of Nazi war records and documents he has studied as the basis for all of his books. But for the reviewer, Dresden's Chief of Police who actually participated in Dresden's recovery and burial of the bodies in 1945 becomes a highly dubious source, while the Dresden Historical Committee study some 65 years later, mired in the powerful political pressures of the false Jewish narrative of the Holocaust, is granted the title of best possible source for historical accuracy! The insanity of our world is truly remarkable.
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
|
Fri Aug 31, 2018 5:35 pm |
|
|
Chicodoodoo
Site Admin
Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm Posts: 11866
|
Re: Hitler -- What is the truth?
Pforzheim was another terror-bombing, holocaust attack on German civilians 10 days after the similar Dresden attack. There's a whole lot of parroting going on, it would seem. The point here is that the official "old" propaganda concedes that over 31% of the city's population likely died in the bombing attack on Pforzheim, while the "new" propaganda places Dresden deaths at only 4% (25,000 deaths out of a normal population of 600,000) at most! This clearly exposes the desire of the WW2 victors (the Jews, according to Leon Degrelle) to further rewrite history in order to distort the true magnitude of the evil they visited upon the world. In examining the photos of the destruction of Dresden, I still find it highly feasible that 1 in 2 people failed to survive the series of bombings the city suffered. Half the people in the city could easily have died, especially given the use of phosphorus incendiary bombs (now illegal due to their inhumane effects) to burn the combustibles that the explosive bombs had rendered accessible in the old and compact city during the first of the attacks on the night of February 13, 1945. The follow-up attack the next day targeting the rescue workers and dazed survivors in the streets just ensures a high kill percentage of the city's population. The 4% figure implied from the 2010 Dresden Historical Commission report is totally ludicrous. This is how they fool us. This is how they mind control us. And this is who they are. Terror-Bombing of Pforzheim: Phosphorus Incendiary Bombs against Civilians -- source
_________________ It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.
|
Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:02 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|