Reply to topic  [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
UncleZook 

UncleZook should be suspended.
Yes 63%  63%  [ 5 ]
No 38%  38%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 8

UncleZook 
Author Message

Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 5:40 pm
Posts: 2156
Reply with quote
Post Re: UncleZook
UncleZook wrote:
Easy, two different contextual usages of the word "staff".

The first instance was alluding to the entire staff minus Richard. I said the rest of the staff, e.g. the staff without Richard. The implication being that, with Richard, we would have the entire staff, or simply, the staff.

In the second instance, the proper parsing is that no one was acting as another's personal staff, e.g. secretary and the sort.

English is your first language and my second ... so how come I have the premier understandings and you have the premature ones?

Pax

You're correct it is, which is why I'm able to see the BS in this post! :lol:

You wrote: The rest of the staff gave an ultimatum to Richard the week before. (assuming that when you wrote "staff" that you meant "staff")

Then wrote: no one was anyone's staff at Nexus. (assuming that when you wrote "staff" that you meant "staff")

I searched hard to find an explanation of your "contextual usages", alas all I was able to dig up was this from your favorite source of information "Wikipedia", which however mentions nothing about the "contextual usages" that you describe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context_%28language_use%29

Could you please give another example of how these "contextual usages" as you described can be used in the English language?

_________________
Think twice before you speak, especially if you intend to say what you think.

QRK: QifUSqn6ygXK61pEkm2g4iBY9ZcLw4g4su
FCK: FettxKyQVhsSURZt1XQxUTypwxEeBbTgUQ

Please visit http://forum.qrk.cc/ for all things Crypto!


Tue Mar 12, 2013 5:52 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm
Posts: 1400
Reply with quote
Post Re: UncleZook
Andy tries to intimate something here:
Quote:
Quote:
UncleZook wrote:
Well generally, that's the way it works, idiot. Chico wanted to set up a 3-way chat ... so I was forced to add you onto my contacts list.


Again, you lying sack of shit UncleZook, you're the one who called for a Skype group chat and it was me that sent you the contact request!


Are you daft? That's precisely what I indicated. Chico wanted to set up a 3-way chat. You sent me a contact request. And I was then forced to add you onto my contacts list.

Nice try at trying to intimate that I had been lying. In fact, this is your modus operandi ever since I've known, Andy. You twist the given facts ... and then scream into the ether that I had been lying about this or the other thing.

You've yet to produce evidence of me lying about anything. The worst I've ever done was misremember a fact here and there ... no big deal ... after all, my brain is on the glide side of the half-century. It skips a bit every now and then. When you reach 50 in another forty years from now, you'll start skipping, too. But even there, whenever I'm apprised of an error on my part, I correct it and seal the deal with a gift-wrapped mea culpa. I realize that it irks you and Chico when I do offer mea culpas when required ... but hey ... that's the honest thing to do. But you became dishonest not long after you were born, Andy .. .which is why you took the shenanigan fork on the road of life. So be it.

:jest:


Pax

_________________
Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.


Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:34 pm
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11875
Reply with quote
Post Re: UncleZook
UncleZook wrote:
Chico wanted to set up a 3-way chat ...
Andywight wrote:
UncleZook, you're the one who called for a Skype group chat...

It's easy to see how the misunderstandings swell out of control. You are both right.

A number of months ago, I suggested to Zook during a Skype call that we should include Andy. Zook was hesitant at that time, as he and Andy were often at odds on the forum (though Zook and I were, too). I tried a few times to encourage the idea, but there was no enthusiasm for it, so I dropped it.

Some time later, when things were getting more heated on the forum, Zook saw the need to take the conflict to a new arena and began calling for a recorded four-way conversation (to include Magamud). I was still fine with the idea, though it was fairly clear that Zook was now in "payback" mode and expected the calls to provide him with the opportunity to crush his opponents into atomic sized particles. That opportunity to crush his opponents had also existed on the forum, and had not materialized, so I didn't see the advantage to Zook, but I could understand it from an emotional point of view. For this new effort, unrelated problems popped up that stymied our efforts to schedule such a call, so it never quite materialized.

Now we are at the point where we are all liars, though no one is really lying. It reminds me very much of the story I recommended before in this post, about some blind men describing an elephant.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:39 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 10:33 pm
Posts: 4156
Reply with quote
Post Re: UncleZook
Zook is redirecting you guys to follow R rated skype chats? Missed invites? Zook has slandered more people on this board then a foul mouthed comic. Andy's entire reputation is in shambles because of a missed invite or not? WTF is this Bullshite drama? Zook slanders people because he thinks hes smarter then everyone else? He knows the 5th column? The guy cant figure out what the foundations of liberty are, much less how to apply them. Hes rude, arrogant, obfuscates because hes a narcissistic sociopath playing some hokey pokey comic book in his head. Dont let this guy fool you.

Andy and Chico got banned from Nexus because they questioned its integrity. Zook tried to cover it up like a weasel trying to bury its gold. Universal Spectrum is a private club and Zook is saying this is transparency and liberty? Hes trying to project sheeple ignorance if you post Chavez, wikileaks etc.. They have nothing good to say exposing American Imperialism? What the fuck is this guys problem? Is it infancy trauma? Schizophrenia? Self esteem issues? Narcissism? Sociopathy?

Is there nothing better to do then play this guys obvious games? Ban this bitch to kingdom come....

What say you?

_________________
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.


Tue Mar 12, 2013 5:14 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 10:33 pm
Posts: 4156
Reply with quote
Post Re: UncleZook
Quote:
I agree, but unfortunately United-people is not like the other forums out there, so we will have to vote the idiot out democratically.

There are 4 or 5 people here who post content. A majority vote should ban this prick. Reset the count and make a vote!


What say you?

_________________
Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.


Tue Mar 12, 2013 5:42 pm
Profile

Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 5:40 pm
Posts: 2156
Reply with quote
Post Re: UncleZook
magamud wrote:

There are 4 or 5 people here who post content. A majority vote should ban this prick. Reset the count and make a vote!


What say you?

Agreed, lets reset the count.

_________________
Think twice before you speak, especially if you intend to say what you think.

QRK: QifUSqn6ygXK61pEkm2g4iBY9ZcLw4g4su
FCK: FettxKyQVhsSURZt1XQxUTypwxEeBbTgUQ

Please visit http://forum.qrk.cc/ for all things Crypto!


Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:50 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 5:11 pm
Posts: 1400
Reply with quote
Post Re: UncleZook
andywight wrote:
magamud wrote:

There are 4 or 5 people here who post content. A majority vote should ban this prick. Reset the count and make a vote!

What say you?

Agreed, lets reset the count.



Oh, goody ... we get a do-over!!

Always valuable to have Plan B on the backburner, just in case Plan A fizzles. Wot?


Pax

ps: Let me know when the reset will be done ... we need to ban that prick before he punctures any more happy balloons ... we're already done to our last half-dozen. How many did we start out with ... do you remember, guys? No matter. We just need to get rid of him first; we can always buy more happy balloons.

:jest:

_________________
Flight that sends into the clouds brings wings to rest upon the boughs. Then further down to the liquid lawn, to serve as sentries for the gliding swan. Curve, a perfect turning of the line between here and Heaven, with extensions into infinitum.


Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:59 am
Profile
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 6:06 pm
Posts: 11875
Reply with quote
Post Re: UncleZook
magamud wrote:
Zook has slandered more people on this board then a foul mouthed comic.

Is there nothing better to do then play this guys obvious games? Ban this bitch to kingdom come.... What say you?

I say your post is a good one, and full of valid observations.

Based on the old polling rules, which are posted here, we need at least 75% consensus and a minimum of 10 votes to suspend Zook for a week. I don't think we have 10 members paying attention.

However, based on the newer rules implemented to resist GW-style wrecking crews, we have four members with voting privileges based on seniority and number of posts -- Chico, Andy, Mags, and Zook. A 75% majority, meaning three out of four, is sufficient to suspend a forum member. Conceivably, it is possible to suspend any member, including any one of us, with a 3 to 1 vote.

I was under the mistaken impression that we needed 80% consensus, but that was a result of needing 8 out of 10 votes using the old polling rules to reach a 75% consensus! I apologize for my mistake which caused me to believe our hands were tied, when in fact they are not.

I will put together a poll for the four voting members to decide if Zook should be suspended. For a second suspension, the term is one week.

_________________
It's not that we can't handle the truth. It's that they can't handle us if we know the truth.


Wed Mar 13, 2013 6:18 am
Profile

Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 5:40 pm
Posts: 2156
Reply with quote
Post Re: UncleZook
I managed to finally to coax UncleZook into some real-time debate, and yes you have my permission to post these logs, in fact let my simplify things and just post them for you!

Quote:
[3/11/2013 9:08:22 PM] andywight: (rofl)
[3/11/2013 9:59:25 PM] andywight: This is just too easy! \o/
[3/11/2013 10:00:13 PM] andywight: (rofl)
[3/11/2013 10:01:51 PM | Edited 10:02:12 PM] andywight: I think you need to get a girlfriend and quit the forums for a while UncleShill!
[3/11/2013 10:52:25 PM] andywight: My four year old is more intellectually challenging than you UncleShill (rofl)
[3/11/2013 10:53:22 PM] Zookie Monster: I can believe you are intellectually challenged by 4-year-olds (sun)(beer)
[3/11/2013 10:53:55 PM] Zookie Monster: care for a recorded skype .. or just too chickenshit?
[3/11/2013 10:55:07 PM] andywight: sure, next time you guys over at US do your Pub Chat count me in!
[3/11/2013 10:55:24 PM | Edited 10:55:55 PM] Zookie Monster: nope .. here ... one on one .. they don't like the smell of sulphur over there ;)
[3/11/2013 10:56:42 PM] Zookie Monster: ... or do you need Chico to hold your hand?
[3/11/2013 10:57:51 PM] andywight: Sorry, but you changed the game by running your mouth last week over at US!

You guys over at US frightened of me? (rofl)
[3/11/2013 10:58:14 PM | Edited 10:58:32 PM] Zookie Monster: another excuse ... what is this now ... the fourth time running?
[3/11/2013 10:58:16 PM] Zookie Monster: LOL
[3/11/2013 11:00:31 PM] andywight: The game has changed! You and Viagrayaya need to man up and allow me to debate you at US!
[3/11/2013 11:01:12 PM | Edited 11:01:27 PM] Zookie Monster: I already told you, sulphur is not permitted over at teh Pub ...
[3/11/2013 11:01:25 PM] andywight: coward!
[3/11/2013 11:02:35 PM | Edited 11:23:13 PM] Zookie Monster: Coward?? I'm offering to disassemble you molecule by molecule ... here and now ... what can be cowardly about that? (rofl)
[3/11/2013 11:02:42 PM] andywight: that's the price you muppet fucks now have to pay for running your mouths!!!
[3/11/2013 11:03:25 PM] andywight: \o/
[3/11/2013 11:05:58 PM] andywight: I've allready posted an acceptance for a US Pub Skype chat at UP, the balls in your court now!
[3/11/2013 11:06:19 PM | Edited 11:07:22 PM] Zookie Monster: listen up, I'm not interested in your fanatsy with sex dolls ... you probably have Kermit and Miss Piggy fucking froggy style somewhere in that coconut shell of yours that doubles as a thought factory ... are you going to man up and debate me here ... NOW ... are are you going to do another Usain Bolt? (rofl)
[3/11/2013 11:07:14 PM] andywight: Boy, mags is so right about you, you really do have issues don't you?
[3/11/2013 11:08:02 PM] Zookie Monster: no issues .. just a wicked accelerated sense of humor LOL
[3/11/2013 11:09:04 PM] Zookie Monster: Chico's back online
[3/11/2013 11:09:15 PM] Zookie Monster: .. he can hold your hand now
[3/11/2013 11:09:21 PM] Zookie Monster: so no more excuses
[3/11/2013 11:09:36 PM] Zookie Monster: tell me when you're ready (beer)
[3/11/2013 11:09:43 PM] andywight: As I said earlier, you need to get a girlfriend and quit the forums for a while

Your really out of league here!
[3/11/2013 11:10:42 PM] Zookie Monster: No shit sherlock ... these minor leagues are a drag ....
[3/11/2013 11:11:23 PM] *** Call from Zookie Monster ***
[3/11/2013 11:11:34 PM] Zookie Monster: busy picking your nose?
[3/11/2013 11:12:16 PM] andywight: Balls in your court now, try and get out of that without looking like a cowardly retard!
[3/11/2013 11:13:09 PM | Edited 11:13:20 PM] Zookie Monster: I know that you being a Stasi stooge, you will archive this message ... so I'm asking you again ... are you ready to confront me in realtime ?
[3/11/2013 11:13:59 PM | Edited 11:15:19 PM] Zookie Monster: I will ring you once more ... then be forced to conclude that you're a yellar fellar with a St. Bernard bark and a chihuahua bite, e.g. if you refuse the invite
[3/11/2013 11:15:23 PM] *** Call from Zookie Monster ***
[3/11/2013 11:15:28 PM] Zookie Monster: (sun)
[3/11/2013 11:15:44 PM] Zookie Monster: you dropped the chalupa, Andy LOL
[3/11/2013 11:16:26 PM] andywight: I've explained my terms, the balls in your court now :)
[3/11/2013 11:17:21 PM] Zookie Monster: ok .. I won't push it further .. .i can smell the fear .. .and i am compassionate. Cheers Andy. take care of yourself and have a good life. I sincerely mean that. (beer)
[3/11/2013 11:20:09 PM] andywight: Go fuck yourself, and I sincerely mean that! :)
[3/11/2013 11:20:39 PM] Zookie Monster: you don't mind if I post this exchange on the forum will you .. .thought not ... thanx for the permission. ;)
[3/11/2013 11:22:57 PM | Edited 11:23:39 PM] andywight: Getting permission from the second party has never stopped you posting private communications before, why start now?
[3/11/2013 11:24:20 PM | Edited 11:26:08 PM] Zookie Monster: I'll take that as a yes?
[3/11/2013 11:26:57 PM] Zookie Monster: Andy, you really do need to give me permission ... I won't post it if you'd rather not.
[3/11/2013 11:27:20 PM] Zookie Monster: Oh, Andy ...
[3/11/2013 11:28:10 PM | Edited 11:28:16 PM] Zookie Monster: well, at least allow me to post it in Chico's window ... I need a witness to your ongoing refusal to debate me in realtime.
[3/11/2013 11:30:10 PM] andywight: I didn't give you permision the post my United-people pm's, but you did it anyway!

What doe's that say about your integrity UncleShill?
[3/11/2013 11:33:07 PM | Edited 11:33:25 PM] Zookie Monster: You gave me permission for that first one, the really toxic PM you sent me ... after that, I didn't need your permission because a proactive tamper doesn't have the same rights of privacy as a regular member. Next question, please (coffee)
[3/11/2013 11:34:04 PM | Edited 11:36:33 PM] Zookie Monster: Btw, I'm only asking permission now because of my penchant for compassion; and because i don't relish in the knowledge that I had pummeled you on the forum with that exposee (that was witnessed by Chico). ;)
[3/11/2013 11:36:47 PM] andywight: interesting perspective


UncleZook has since removed his contact details from my Skype account, so I guess he doesn't what that group chat after all! :lol:

_________________
Think twice before you speak, especially if you intend to say what you think.

QRK: QifUSqn6ygXK61pEkm2g4iBY9ZcLw4g4su
FCK: FettxKyQVhsSURZt1XQxUTypwxEeBbTgUQ

Please visit http://forum.qrk.cc/ for all things Crypto!


Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:18 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.