Two posts that illuminate Mags' hypocrisy and gameplaying. I can't rebut there in the suspension threads, not being a chosen one ... so I'll use Mr. ULY's thread here to highlight Mags gameplaying.
More than two months had passed before the Suspension Poll-Andwight thread was reactivated with renewed interest by Mags, our self-purported paragon of speech virtues:
viewtopic.php?p=17053#p17053
beginExcerpt
Re: Suspension poll - andywight
Postby magamud » Thu May 29, 2014 5:22 pm
I would like to vote in favor of Andywights first official banning.
Since we have identified Andy as a sociopath, I submit he is disqualified from any position of power and loses his vote earned.
Can we reset the vote?
end
... then ... a mere three days after the reactivation, Mags posts the following:
viewtopic.php?p=17177#p17177
beginExcerpt
Re: Suspension poll - andywight
Postby magamud » Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:00 am
I relinquish my vote and concede control of the board to Chic.
end
It's quite disgusting, really. He doesn't even have the guts to pull the trigger, himself. Mags wants Chico to do the dirty work of banning those that Mags deems unfit for this forum ... so that Chico gets the fallout later ... while Mags gets what he wants. In the best case, Cupid is too dense to notice that the tail is wagging the dog.
Pax
ps: And now we find that Chico is using Screech Owl as a precedent to ban Andy for two days.
ps2: "What's that, Chico? Yours is the most accommodating free speech forum on the internet??
ps3: ... erm ... yeah, ok ... let's have another round of beer for our little green buddies from the big saucer in the parking lot ... and two rounds of green beer for the two little men of United People. Worsh down that humble pie.
